AI requires consistent energy afforded by nuclear power

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 34

  • @russellk.bonney8534
    @russellk.bonney8534 22 години тому +6

    So does general industry require electromechanically generated stable, three phase high Q frequency stabilised power. You cannot get that from renewables or batteries alone. Period.

    • @ricky6864
      @ricky6864 19 годин тому +1

      @russellk.bonney8534 this is way above the intelligence levels of the karens and corrupt politicians..

  • @HappeningKorea
    @HappeningKorea 20 годин тому +2

    Ensuring a stable energy supply is crucial for technological advancement. 🚀 The intersection of AI and energy policy is fascinating!

  • @HappeningKorea
    @HappeningKorea 20 годин тому +2

    This highlights the growing energy demands of AI technology! 🔋

  • @L0b0ts
    @L0b0ts 22 години тому +1

    Don't cook with gas, don't drive a normal car, but unlimited energy for AI.

  • @JacobElliott-r4n
    @JacobElliott-r4n 21 годину тому +1

    Oh well if ai needs nuclear then I change my vote to labor

    • @phyju
      @phyju 11 годин тому +1

      When you have flavour of the month Trump and Libs here they think they can do anything. Voldemort says nuclear in AUSTRALIA is good for us as you know the straws are being clutched. Thank God young people are smart and see through BS. Imagine a place where there is no nuclear which is a Chernobyl in waiting and then building stations. We have the most sun of anywhere on earth yet they come up with some stupid excuses it won't work. Liberals and Sky News can jump.

  • @ChrisM-fz6xx
    @ChrisM-fz6xx 21 годину тому +1

    Your United States has 95 active full size Nuclear Reactors that produce 16 % of American Electricity , Professor . The US has 30% of all the Nuclear Reactors on Earth , professor .The Last Nuclear Power Station built in the US in Georgia took 18 years to build and cost $ 45 Billion US , $ 65 Billion Australian , professor .Dutton claims that 7 Nuclear Reactors will supply 35% of Australian Electricity , professor . But you and I know that's a load of bullshit , don't we , professor . Australia would need at least 50 Reactors to produce 35% of Australian electricity , wouldn't we , professor .That would cost Australian Taxpayers 3. 25 Trillion Australian Pesos wouldn't it , professor .Quite sufficient to Bankrupt Australia , professor .

  • @Aucklandinsummer
    @Aucklandinsummer 22 години тому +7

    One more reason NOT TO HAVE NUCLEAR POWER

    • @leonharrison800
      @leonharrison800 22 години тому +4

      Yes. No AI and no Nuclear!!!😡😡🔥🔥

    • @vivrowe2763
      @vivrowe2763 22 години тому +2

      They think it's for them, they have no idea what is going on.

  • @Poorlineforeva
    @Poorlineforeva 22 години тому +2

    Let me guess - he's a professor in home economics or agricultural science? That's usually the way with sky "experts"

  • @womp6338
    @womp6338 19 годин тому +1

    GOD BLESS THE JEWISH PEOPLE! THE GODS CHOSEN PEOPLE!!!!

  • @pelicancountrysinger
    @pelicancountrysinger 21 годину тому +1

    ai has been around for decades without nuclear power

  • @simongross3122
    @simongross3122 22 години тому

    How much AI are we going to host in Australia anyway?

    • @vivrowe2763
      @vivrowe2763 22 години тому +1

      Heaps that is the only reason they want nuclear, it's not for the people in case you think it is.

  • @coal_man
    @coal_man 22 години тому

    AI needs coal power.

    • @vivrowe2763
      @vivrowe2763 22 години тому +1

      @@coal_man Well they need both actually too bad about the people.

    • @leonharrison800
      @leonharrison800 22 години тому

      @@coal_man
      Renewables matter. Nothing else.

    • @Berserker978
      @Berserker978 22 години тому

      ​@@leonharrison800
      To meet Australia's climate targets, the country needs to build 40 wind turbines each month until 2030. This would amount to around 3,840 turbines over the next eight years.
      Australia also needs to install more than 22,000 solar panels each day, or 60 million by 2030. A study found that Australia needs nearly three terawatts of wind and solar power to meet its goal of a net zero economy by 2030.

    • @Poorlineforeva
      @Poorlineforeva 22 години тому

      Says absolutely nobody

  • @Jason_g_kennedy
    @Jason_g_kennedy 22 години тому +1

    We should be creating more hydro dams and increasing national water supplies. Population keeps growing, and critical infrastructure is lacking very badly. Then clean coal, coal hypercritical anti coal nuts, more than trippled mining for solar, batteries, and wind turbines production. lithium ponds are so toxic, but don't worry about strip mining third world forests.

    • @Poorlineforeva
      @Poorlineforeva 22 години тому +1

      Strip mining forests? For wood presumably

    • @Jason_g_kennedy
      @Jason_g_kennedy 21 годину тому

      @Poorlineforeva colboat Congo, DW News. All is well known, and going on in every third world country. So you can play the righteous.
      ua-cam.com/video/OvKnn8BRRI8/v-deo.htmlsi=k3pdjbrMph9jI_gi

  • @wilbur1884
    @wilbur1884 22 години тому

    ALBO'S GONNA BAYE GOWWIN INDA LAYBOUR🤰OVA DISS NUCLEAR CONTRIVERSAYE LITTRILAYE EVERYDAYE UNTIL DUTTONI'STA GETS VOTED IN. ALBO'S A GREENAYE CLIMAYTE LIBBAYE.

  • @countyorga764
    @countyorga764 20 годин тому +2

    Any type of intelligence would be an improvement for sky ‘news’ viewers 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂.

    • @ZELJKO472
      @ZELJKO472 19 годин тому

      Do you have an IQ monitor do you? How would you know exactly? I know plenty of very unproductive people working for govt watching the ABC

    • @countyorga764
      @countyorga764 5 годин тому

      @@ZELJKO472 Do you, do you😂. Thanks for reacting 👏 .