How come China caught up to US' 6th gen fighter development?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @likeforsure
    @likeforsure 13 днів тому +255

    Chinese 6th gen has zero stealth. I can see it in the video right here. Unlike the US sixth gen, which is so stealth even the US military themselves can't see it. US is clearly unbeatable.

    • @MrSpiritmonger
      @MrSpiritmonger 12 днів тому +32

      US NGAD exists in a PowerPoint concept art.

    • @kingwing3203
      @kingwing3203 12 днів тому +14

      不存在当然看不见

    • @mdhossain4316
      @mdhossain4316 12 днів тому +12

      Haha CIA bots 😁😁......Coping Mechanism in Americans are unbelievable 😂😂

    • @yiquny
      @yiquny 12 днів тому +16

      @@kingwing3203 他说反话呢,being sarcastic

    • @tluangasailo3663
      @tluangasailo3663 12 днів тому +5

      The existence of a classified program doesn’t depend on whether someone has seen it or not.

  • @ShibalotonSeattle
    @ShibalotonSeattle 14 днів тому +58

    China stole the NGAD, literally. They stole and flew it over to Chengdu.
    That can also explain why the project is on hold, cause the plane is in China right now and Pentagon cannot get it back.

    • @arghost9798
      @arghost9798 14 днів тому +4

      Did USA defense contractors is really that Sh*t in keeping their project data to make China always stole that technology?
      Or are they too corrupt that's Chinese is easily bribe them to give their weapon blueprints?

    • @TheDaysOfGlory
      @TheDaysOfGlory 14 днів тому

      That thing is huge. More like china stole the stealth bomber info thinking it was a fighter.
      Regardless, “Fox one.”

    • @拳打香港黄尸渣脚踏台
      @拳打香港黄尸渣脚踏台 14 днів тому +7

      美国人都像你一样聪明就好了❤

    • @oot007
      @oot007 14 днів тому +2

      🇺🇸🐍🤡💅😭😨🚽

    • @frankmerriwell8339
      @frankmerriwell8339 14 днів тому +8

      Most sane explanation

  • @brucechow1588
    @brucechow1588 14 днів тому +60

    NGAD is so stealth that nobody can see it. China's 6th gen fighter jets are not so stealth because everyone can see it from below😂

    • @matthorrocks6517
      @matthorrocks6517 2 дні тому

      After all the 5th Gen and 6th gen get destroyed they won't bother to make these dumb ass things anymore.

  • @lijackson-x6r
    @lijackson-x6r 15 днів тому +476

    After the J 36 test flight, A Pentagon spokesman said: The United States is a peaceful country and has no intention of engaging in an arms race with the People's Liberation Army.

    • @demcomp
      @demcomp 15 днів тому +124

      @@lijackson-x6r in other words, they don't consider it a credible threat

    • @小郑中午
      @小郑中午 15 днів тому +76

      突然说话都那么温柔了呵呵呵

    • @ILoveFishMilk
      @ILoveFishMilk 15 днів тому +131

      @@demcomp cope

    • @lijackson-x6r
      @lijackson-x6r 15 днів тому +39

      @@demcomp Peace exists in the balance of power. Threat comes when the power is imbalance. It is better to stay the race.🤪

    • @wenbo595
      @wenbo595 15 днів тому +28

      ​@@demcompis that why they woke up pentagon at 5aam and caused traffic?

  • @izak5356
    @izak5356 15 днів тому +77

    All the gremlins in this comment section explain a lot of why we're in the current situation we're in globally. Literally "my dad could beat up your dad" but with countries that have nuclear weapons. Blind nationalism, devoid of any useful analysis or objective framing.

    • @reggiep75
      @reggiep75 15 днів тому +10

      Unfortunately that's how they educate some kids in school and their country wasting near $1trn is seen as a good investment... but only for the Military Industry Complex!!!

    • @DPoner
      @DPoner 15 днів тому +5

      “Blind nationalism”
      Pick a side or get out of the way

    • @ruifenghuang1029
      @ruifenghuang1029 14 днів тому

      Huh? That's because the average person don't have access to information for "useful/objective analysis", it's all guess work at most.

    • @Bruhngus420
      @Bruhngus420 14 днів тому +15

      ​@@DPoneryou are exhibit A of what this guys talking about

    • @persistentwind
      @persistentwind 14 днів тому

      @ruifenghuang1029 no... one nation is significantly lacking in education on southeast Asian affairs and history. So that way, the people remain uneducated.

  • @aligator2150
    @aligator2150 15 днів тому +89

    Ahead? My man, you are comparing an already flying plane to a paper concept...

    • @neon.kalash3115
      @neon.kalash3115 15 днів тому +12

      They both have flying aircraft. Neither are production. Neither have concrete designa.

    • @你看个锤子你看
      @你看个锤子你看 15 днів тому +30

      @@neon.kalash3115 There is no evidence that a finished NGAD exists... Four years after its "first flight", there is not a single photo or video.😢

    • @Fold-103
      @Fold-103 15 днів тому +12

      Yeah cause it’s classified

    • @ColinJ88
      @ColinJ88 15 днів тому +2

      @@Fold-103 Exactly. 👍🏻

    • @tluangasailo3663
      @tluangasailo3663 14 днів тому +3

      you dont see the picture of ur brain doesnt its a paper concept

  • @charliehigglons7490
    @charliehigglons7490 14 днів тому +47

    You can't compare it to NGAD because NGAD doesn't exist.

    • @tluangasailo3663
      @tluangasailo3663 13 днів тому

      @@charliehigglons7490 yea coz someone said so?

    • @accountantthe3394
      @accountantthe3394 12 днів тому

      ​@@tluangasailo3663Because no one has seen it yet?

    • @tluangasailo3663
      @tluangasailo3663 12 днів тому +1

      @@accountantthe3394 its not supposed to be seen by public, its called classified.

    • @accountantthe3394
      @accountantthe3394 12 днів тому

      @@tluangasailo3663 How convenient...

    • @tluangasailo3663
      @tluangasailo3663 12 днів тому

      @@accountantthe3394 yea, The existence of a classified program doesn’t depend on whether someone has seen it or not.

  • @leipamies1816
    @leipamies1816 15 днів тому +80

    To be honest we as the civilians don’t know actual shit about how high tech these things are and how long these projects are ahead that we think

    • @Joker-yw9hl
      @Joker-yw9hl 15 днів тому +6

      This guy gets it

    • @saldownik
      @saldownik 15 днів тому +5

      no, most non-civilians are equally uninformed

    • @kimlau4285
      @kimlau4285 15 днів тому +2

      @leipamies1816 nah we will be informed if we watch more binkov videos

    • @4DCResinSmoker
      @4DCResinSmoker 15 днів тому

      Speak for yourself only as there as many with prior service / Avionics.

    • @melvinmelvin8577
      @melvinmelvin8577 15 днів тому +3

      When u know shapes and radar u will know if this shape will work. But they had to steal tech to make a 4+ gen so I bet this not a 6

  • @yaoyaoxie-g7v
    @yaoyaoxie-g7v 11 днів тому +14

    美国的同志们不要害怕,中国哪有美国先进,所谓的6代战斗机其实都是j10的改版而已

    • @ftacvd-r5m
      @ftacvd-r5m 11 днів тому +2

      战忽局同志辛苦了:)

    • @Philip_zh
      @Philip_zh 10 днів тому +1

      其实就只是个模型,用硬纸板做的

    • @monkemode8128
      @monkemode8128 10 днів тому

      Tell me more​@@ftacvd-r5m

  • @thejeffinvade
    @thejeffinvade 14 днів тому +11

    Your analysis is the most objective I saw on UA-cam. All the pictures and posts are from official sources or reputable outlets citing actual words of government/industry officials. Less speculation and more facts, I really appreciate your honesty.

  • @Failedartstudent
    @Failedartstudent 15 днів тому +361

    The idea that China only produces cheap knockoffs is foolish. Because China has the capability to build a space station, it is not surprising that it would build such a high-performance fighter jet.

    • @demcomp
      @demcomp 15 днів тому +52

      Except it's a paper tiger

    • @mattvic4617
      @mattvic4617 15 днів тому +31

      Completely unrelated things and something other countries have done decades before China, but sure

    • @clearheaded5696
      @clearheaded5696 15 днів тому +56

      ​​@@demcompPaper tiger vs drug addict aging bald chicken 🐔 , who do you think will win?

    • @Rumpelstiltskin-s8e
      @Rumpelstiltskin-s8e 15 днів тому +17

      Quick question
      When was the last time in history China had a navy and air force?
      Thanks

    • @ryanwalters6184
      @ryanwalters6184 15 днів тому +20

      ​​​​​@@clearheaded5696 have you ever fought a drug addict chicken?
      Who wants to play Russian roulette with a drug addict chicken?😮
      The gamecocks are actually the mascot of the South Carolina flagship University. You must not know the history of the fighting gamecocks. Those gamecocks took on the British Empire during British empires prime and beat them with volunteers. 😂

  • @lawdelber3593
    @lawdelber3593 13 днів тому +23

    好吧,我要开始坦白啦。这么说吧,作为一名中国人,我可以保证,我的朋友们,中国根本就没有什么所谓的六代机,那不过是ai合成的影片!美国技术永远是这个星球排名第一的国家,中国只是发展中国家。所以大家不要担心,中国人只关心自己的事,只关心今天是否比昨天有进步,只心今年是否比去年更好。所以说中国只是发展中国家,因为没有比一直发展更有意思的事情拉。peace。

    • @KevinZJR
      @KevinZJR 13 днів тому +5

      战忽局已经解散了。。。兄弟

    • @DaedalusAI
      @DaedalusAI 13 днів тому

      从36数字就看的出来这个只是5.5啊,没主动防御,没狗斗ai,速度和过载也没超出三四代范围。就是个对标大航程无尾翼五代。

    • @User1717ww
      @User1717ww 13 днів тому +1

      yes as another Chinese all the amerikkkans are right, nothing to worry about! Chinese can only copy so they will only ever be behind you...just keep doing what you are doing!

    • @cywg9188
      @cywg9188 12 днів тому

      @@DaedalusAI 少說 ”看出“ ;你根本就不是這類人

  • @Rayleonard13
    @Rayleonard13 10 днів тому +18

    Builds and flys a single tailess plane
    "Clearly they have caught up in engine, missile and all other military aviation related technology"

    • @btkt6464
      @btkt6464 7 днів тому +2

      there are two Chinese 6th gens in the work btw,
      also u wanna talk about missiles? u sure u dont wanna do some facts check before that?

  • @Lsw7oz
    @Lsw7oz 7 днів тому +12

    As a Chinese, I confirm this new jet is made of tofu, so no worries. BTW, we are building another fighter jet which is made of garlic. Yall should pay attention to the garlic one, no jokes bro... 😁

    • @user-kl3bo7mg9x
      @user-kl3bo7mg9x 5 днів тому

      别说了,他们真的信啊😂。唉。我们在美国的,天天跟这帮虫蛭,到底怎么搞好帝国主义 😂

    • @gulanhem9495
      @gulanhem9495 3 дні тому

      "Made in China" lol

  • @grid-panda
    @grid-panda 14 днів тому +18

    There is no doubt that as long as NGAD's Powerpoint presentation is updated frequently enough, it will always be ahead of the Chinese.

  • @georgejesson1944
    @georgejesson1944 4 дні тому +5

    These are only the ones that are allowed to be shown in the light, fear the ones still in the dark

  • @zenden9
    @zenden9 14 днів тому +40

    I am American, I really want USAF to fly a 6th gen fighter and not with all the empty bragging and self comfort comments from US fans.

    • @persistentwind
      @persistentwind 14 днів тому +2

      Already have... but they aren't dummies, ain't no one gonna see it, even when it's taking down J20s like your mom.

    • @Jaymachine
      @Jaymachine 14 днів тому +1

      Naw keep it secret- they steal everything because they have no imagination of their own.

    • @ColinJ88
      @ColinJ88 14 днів тому +4

      Sure you’re American.

    • @zenden9
      @zenden9 14 днів тому +4

      @ColinJ88 you sounds like a bot.

    • @ColinJ88
      @ColinJ88 14 днів тому +4

      @@zenden9 If i was, i would still be taller.

  • @KrazeDiamond
    @KrazeDiamond 14 днів тому +35

    Why are people still talking about NGAD? The plan has been scrapped, the US does NOT have a 6th Gen fighter.

    • @MardukTheSunGodInsideMe
      @MardukTheSunGodInsideMe 13 днів тому +1

      Go eat a Chinese hot pot meal and wake up in a western hospital.

    • @DaniMagnes
      @DaniMagnes 13 днів тому +17

      @@MardukTheSunGodInsideMe when you cant refute the facts you must attack the fact giver. Whats the matter, you butt hurt. That is what happens when you can't handle the truth.

    • @kren4449
      @kren4449 13 днів тому +1

      I'd bet they have some top secret officially doesn't exist program at least looking into 6th gen fighters even if they claim they don't. Would fit pretty well in how the us operates

    • @KrazeDiamond
      @KrazeDiamond 13 днів тому +3

      @@kren4449 The only "Black Programs" the US has are regime change and assassination plots and Bio-weapons labs; they don't have some kinda Hollywood miracle weapon. Stop watching movies.

    • @kinwai27271
      @kinwai27271 13 днів тому

      @@MardukTheSunGodInsideMe and seeing Chinese doctors using Chinese-made equipments. 🤭

  • @astroch
    @astroch 14 днів тому +38

    The chinese are so good copying that they copied a plane from the future!

    • @Terminalsanity
      @Terminalsanity 14 днів тому

      Not really no it looks like the F117 without a tail.

    • @inoculateinoculate9486
      @inoculateinoculate9486 14 днів тому

      This is just 3 low quality Chinese jet engines with an NGAD bodykit wrapped around it. Nothing was demonstrated here besides an ability to make an airplane fly in circles, which we already knew China could do.

    • @zenden9
      @zenden9 14 днів тому +1

      @@inoculateinoculate9486 and USAF can't even make a cheap copy fly. Are u insulting USAF even more?

    • @MardukTheSunGodInsideMe
      @MardukTheSunGodInsideMe 13 днів тому

      CCP bot propaganda.

    • @zenden9
      @zenden9 13 днів тому

      @@MardukTheSunGodInsideMe what he say is correct. So who is bot? You?

  • @akakakakakak3084
    @akakakakakak3084 14 днів тому +67

    No worry, US has Tom Cruise and Hollywood.

    • @GL-my3me
      @GL-my3me 14 днів тому +16

      Holluwood is on a big bushfire recently, not sure if Hollywood still works, but USA can ask India for help. India N.O 1 in this universe.

    • @chadly19
      @chadly19 14 днів тому

      @@GL-my3meat what? Call center scams?

    • @chadly19
      @chadly19 14 днів тому +1

      We also have a functional military lol

    • @bixudiwon6363
      @bixudiwon6363 14 днів тому +3

      Now I know why the blueprints for Moon walking can't be found because there was a fire in Hollywood.

    • @chadly19
      @chadly19 14 днів тому

      @ ^ paid Chinese shill

  • @Bonesashes-g1u
    @Bonesashes-g1u 15 днів тому +59

    要怎么领先一个尚未存在的飞机确实是一个十分困难的问题

    • @bin.s.s.
      @bin.s.s. 15 днів тому

      对方是一个全世界都没人看得见的 stealth fighter,完全靠瞎子摸象才能开动。

    • @barryneild379
      @barryneild379 14 днів тому +1

      *Eastern Europeans are pro - US (like Ukrainians), thus: "we don't know much about this jet, we don't have any data at all, we just have a few videos, therefore they are 4 - 5 years behind of the jet from the US (that never flew)"*

  • @iupring
    @iupring 14 днів тому +28

    It is more realistic to compare the fires in the United States and the earthquakes in China these days. Sorry, the United States does not have the sixth-generation aircraft yet.

    • @moist_ointment
      @moist_ointment 14 днів тому +4

      "Sorry, the United States does not have the sixth-generation aircraft yet."
      ....Nobody does. That's literally the point of the video

    • @白也-m4c
      @白也-m4c 14 днів тому +1

      像那些没有编号的测试涂装色的飞机,我每天抬头就能看见,我已经见怪不怪了,中国官方从没报道过什么6代机,在国内也就是抖音平台在转发,不知道你们外边每个媒体都炒作的意图是什么,笑死了。。。。。。人家自己都没报, 反而你们自己闹麻了。

  • @shenmisheshou7002
    @shenmisheshou7002 3 дні тому +7

    The answer is pretty simple. 4 Million STEM graduates in China mean that China is producing far more engineers and scientist than the US. (The US produces about 750 thousand including masters degrees). When you have a lot of smart engineers, you get good products.

    • @ryanvanderwel2301
      @ryanvanderwel2301 3 дні тому +2

      Interesting. I have an uncle who was an executive engineer for Boeing for 10+ years. He has ~1,300 direct and indirect reports. He said that no matter where you go, the top 1% of engineering students are AMAZING. The next 2% are excellent almost everywhere.
      The difference is in the next 70% of engineering graduates. The difference between the US and Europe, and the rest of the world, especially the developing world is night and day. the bottom 25%-30% is bad everywhere. The median engineering graduate from America, Grermany, or France is miles ahead of the median engineer from Indonesia, India, or China. They tried to hire outside of the country for economic reasons, but they couldn't justify it for business reasons.
      So, with 4,000,000 STEM grads, that would mean they produce 40,000 exceptional graduates, and another 80,000 graduates that are excellent. The rest are not very solid.
      Meanwhile the US produces ~550,000 graduates. However, of that cohort, there are ~300,000 that are solid, and 5,500 that are exceptional.
      So, according to his math, the gap isn't really that big.
      However, Justin Bronk in his latest video said that China has been pouring around 21,000 PHD level scientists into their aviation sector, so that gap should be closing quickly/already be closed. When the US only has ~1,000 PHD level guys, it does mean that this is a problem for US supremacy.

    • @goprojoe7449
      @goprojoe7449 2 дні тому

      @@ryanvanderwel2301 There is ubiquitous corruption outside of western civilization in which you can buy your grades and ultimately your degree. Having lived all over the world, it's truly unimaginable to the untraveled westerner just how backwards the rest of the world is (with the exception of east asians, but not including chinese).

    • @ThePozilla
      @ThePozilla 2 дні тому +1

      Ahem. All chinese technological progress is stolen from the west. They needed 20 years to reproduce Lyulka jet engines :))

    • @NanoGi-lt5fc
      @NanoGi-lt5fc 2 дні тому

      ​@@ThePozilla agreed 💯 I am from India here education institute are bad that's why thousands of people goes to usa for higher studies

    • @iamscoutstfu
      @iamscoutstfu 2 години тому

      That is not how that works lol.

  • @mettaworldpeace9836
    @mettaworldpeace9836 14 днів тому +71

    US NGAD is so stealth that it is nowhere to be found.

    • @luckycat4753
      @luckycat4753 14 днів тому +1

      made in china🤭

    • @zenden9
      @zenden9 14 днів тому

      @@luckycat4753 You mean NGAD is made in China?

    • @HailAzathoth
      @HailAzathoth 14 днів тому +3

      Just like the SR71, B2, and F117 lmao. You say it as a joke but you're actually correct

    • @analien5251
      @analien5251 14 днів тому +1

      unlike russia or china, its nowhere to be found but has probably been flown multiple times and all the sightings of it have probably been let off as another silly UFO sighting that nobody believes lol

    • @Loubie2005
      @Loubie2005 14 днів тому +4

      @@HailAzathoththose are old and don’t work anymore lol

  • @joshgulrud
    @joshgulrud 6 днів тому +12

    How come? Maybe because China makes lots of STEM students, and we sell derivatives and drive Ubers.

    • @PaxMagna
      @PaxMagna 5 днів тому +3

      What a dumbass comment. The US military is the LARGEST EMPLOYER of Americans period. Chinese youth do not join the military because they want to but because of the help the money can give their families. American youth who join WANT to fight and serve their country. If a war happens china will be destroyed and any idea of Chinese technological superiority is Chinese propaganda ment to scare the US public. regardless of current politics, America is the most militarily dominant country in the world and that will not change. Keep taking America for granted if that’s the case leave and go to china yourself no need for ungrateful citizens.

    • @waldo8158
      @waldo8158 5 днів тому

      Yeah I remember that prodigy kid who graduated with a PhD in engineering at age 14, and at age 30 he lives with his parents and has no job.

    • @user-kl3bo7mg9x
      @user-kl3bo7mg9x 5 днів тому

      @@PaxMagnamaga: I would die for my country! But I won’t learn math for it.

    • @user-kl3bo7mg9x
      @user-kl3bo7mg9x 5 днів тому +1

      @@PaxMagnaand how dumb it is to say Chinese students won’t go to army😂. Check how many new students in Tsinghua University is military-oriented, meaning that they must serve in the army for years after graduate. That’s tsinghua! You have no idea how many Chinese would choose it at any price

    • @user-kl3bo7mg9x
      @user-kl3bo7mg9x 5 днів тому

      @@waldo8158use 1 example to represent the whole class?

  • @ShibalotonSeattle
    @ShibalotonSeattle 15 днів тому +22

    NGAD is so stealthy, Nobody can even see it on the visible spectrum.

    • @Bruce3949
      @Bruce3949 15 днів тому +1

      Do you understand the word secrecy? How long did it take before U.S even let people see the B-21?

    • @majesticflyingbrick
      @majesticflyingbrick 15 днів тому +1

      @@Bruce3949 China has already constructed the death star. I do not need to provide evidence because I understand the word secrecy.

    • @WestoidBreaker
      @WestoidBreaker 14 днів тому

      ​@@Bruce3949the U.S , with it's military complex and it's techno pride have proven to showcase their latest prototype prior to production in it's history. You can't prove me wrong

    • @WestoidBreaker
      @WestoidBreaker 14 днів тому

      NGAD= Non Germinated American Dream

    • @你看个锤子你看
      @你看个锤子你看 14 днів тому

      @@Bruce3949 The B21 will hold a press conference in 2022, even though it just made its first flight last year...😂

  • @addypc7996
    @addypc7996 5 днів тому +4

    Doesn’t matter, for Americans anything that can fly always count as copy them anyway

  • @僧唐-f3u
    @僧唐-f3u 5 днів тому +11

    底特律的汽车工人 直到工厂倒闭前都坚信,没有人比底特律更懂造车!

  • @cywan8195
    @cywan8195 14 днів тому +35

    The American aviation industry needs to recruit more Indian CEOs, engineers, and workers. India is currently developing the seventh generation fighter jet ahead of the whole world!

    • @oot007
      @oot007 14 днів тому +6

      🐍🤡

    • @TheKkpop1
      @TheKkpop1 14 днів тому +3

      Thank you Indian for Making Boeing Great Again.

    • @ZeitwandelVibes
      @ZeitwandelVibes 14 днів тому +3

      Mehg Ahmeriga grete ahgen 🇺🇸🇮🇳🇮🇱 saaaar

    • @oot007
      @oot007 14 днів тому

      @@TheKkpop1 🤣

    • @mingliu-f4q
      @mingliu-f4q 14 днів тому +3

      我是中国人,恭喜美国,恭喜印度。😆

  • @siphoramashiya531
    @siphoramashiya531 14 днів тому +25

    This show never disappoints...China flew a tailless prototype jet and they never said its a 6th gen jet...US never flew such a jet. Yet the host says China is behind by 4/5 yrs in this tech. (You come to that conclusion by comparing some research paper of a future US jet with a a Chinese prototype...we must believe that this is an analysis of some sort...hai maan)

    • @JayzsMr
      @JayzsMr 14 днів тому +3

      this channel used to be better in the past

    • @LordEmperorHyperion
      @LordEmperorHyperion 14 днів тому +8

      I think Binkov here is Coping really hard seeing China is leaps and bounds ahead of the US really rattle him a bit too hard.

    • @mashedpotato8976
      @mashedpotato8976 14 днів тому +1

      man, what you expect, this channel is MAGA!!!!

    • @inoculateinoculate9486
      @inoculateinoculate9486 14 днів тому

      China's engines suck. They're really poor. Not even Russia wants to buy Chinese engines or jets, and they are willing to buy equipment from North Korea. Binkov was EXTREMELY generous to suggest China is anything less than 30 years behind. They have never battle tested a single fighter jet, and no major military on earth wants their jets. Binkov did another video about this, look up "Why is nobody buying Chinese fighter jets."

    • @AmericanAdvancement
      @AmericanAdvancement 13 днів тому

      Tell me you didn’t finish watching the video without telling me you didn’t finish the video.
      He said that China could be anywhere from 1-3 years behind to 1-3 years ahead of America. We just don’t know because we don’t have all of the information. China may very well be ahead, but unless the US releases information and images of the design flown in 2020 and 2023 we will not know for sure.

  • @picandvideo
    @picandvideo 10 днів тому +6

    Chinese philosophy of building planes takes different path from Western including Russia. Most tests could be done through China advanced wind tunnel.

  • @tcxm333
    @tcxm333 12 днів тому +14

    各位来自美国朋友不要恐惧,这不是真正的第6代战机,这只是 J10 的改进版

    • @hellolyc4658
      @hellolyc4658 12 днів тому +4

      无时不刻都有战忽局

    • @BangLittle-ry4ng
      @BangLittle-ry4ng 12 днів тому +2

      局座深感欣慰

    • @IblameBlame
      @IblameBlame 10 днів тому

      Nah, it's just an improved version of a copy of the Orville brothers Flyer I.

  • @timothygamble374
    @timothygamble374 13 днів тому +14

    I way how i see it is that the technology gap between China and US is rapidly shrinking. It's not so much about who's leading right now but eventually at this pace there's not much else to say. Just saying if I'm going to buy my next car it'll likely to be a chinese EV.

    • @bc-cu4on
      @bc-cu4on 13 днів тому +1

      Enjoy your battery fire.

    • @seabedsand
      @seabedsand 13 днів тому

      @bc-cu4on Forest fires

  • @cwlmall
    @cwlmall 14 днів тому +8

    China is so good in copying that they are now able to copy the future design of US NGAD!

    • @adam68756
      @adam68756 14 днів тому +4

      China dug a hole in the ground
      USA media: OMG, they copied our vagina

  • @tan-thefearlessjuggernaut7437
    @tan-thefearlessjuggernaut7437 7 днів тому +3

    When comparing, it is recommended to compare specific configurations and performance details, rather than simply summarizing one with better performance. This is unprofessional and imprecise

  • @mrdebris1217
    @mrdebris1217 12 днів тому +7

    The X 32 was so ugly the Chinese and Russians would have been unable to fight any more because of laughing.

    • @accountantthe3394
      @accountantthe3394 12 днів тому

      That's the reason why they didn't copy it

    • @TheSwegBucket
      @TheSwegBucket 11 днів тому

      Maybe if they picked that option the chinese wouldn't want to copy because of how ugly it is lol.

    • @thomgizziz
      @thomgizziz 9 днів тому

      You clearly don't understand why x planes exist...

  • @maxbgi70
    @maxbgi70 10 днів тому +6

    Its simple… the Han, Tang and Ming Dynasties are back as one! Bring back zhongguos glory! 😂

  • @tomazznidarko8700
    @tomazznidarko8700 14 днів тому +27

    It's an interesting fact, that are a lot of simulations of how US and Chinese are fighting in front of China coast, but none in front of US coast. Isn't it strange? Who is here an aggressor and who defend itself?

    • @daleb5967
      @daleb5967 14 днів тому +2

      Defending the people of Taiwan? How is this even a question?
      Taiwan is yours? How far back you wanna go?
      China belonged to Mongolia. How bout somebody arm Mongolia so they can invade China? Not funny anyone?
      See how that works?

    • @ColdCicada
      @ColdCicada 14 днів тому +4

      @@daleb5967 Taiwan's current constitution states that Taiwan belongs to China. Do you want to violate the current constitution of Taiwan?

    • @Jaymachine
      @Jaymachine 14 днів тому +2

      @@ColdCicadahey Ill agree with you on that one. Usa has no business in Taiwan, we need to take back the asml machines and technology we developed and stop using Asia for manufacturing.

    • @FloofyMinari
      @FloofyMinari 14 днів тому +2

      ​@@ColdCicada
      No it does not. The ROC constitution states no such thing.

    • @daleb5967
      @daleb5967 14 днів тому

      ​@@ColdCicadathey hoped to reinstate.

  • @dragonmares59110
    @dragonmares59110 15 днів тому +19

    what should also be scaring people is europe absolute inability to produce any fighters (or even tanks or any military related stuff in quantity) now

    • @demcomp
      @demcomp 15 днів тому

      @@dragonmares59110 they're not using slave labor, and they're not a communist state, nor are they in a war time economy.
      Look during wwii, who won the war pretty much single handedly? The USA.
      It's called a Wartime Economy. We're not at war.

    • @VeteranExpat
      @VeteranExpat 15 днів тому +4

      A French Rafael can take on and defeat 3 of these at once.

    • @HTV-2_Hypersonic_Glide_Vehicle
      @HTV-2_Hypersonic_Glide_Vehicle 15 днів тому +7

      ​@@VeteranExpat no it can't.
      China and the United States both have Jets that can't be picked up on their radar, and have missiles that have a long enough range that would eliminate those fighter jets without any trouble. In terms of dog fighting, yeah you might be right, but dog fighting isn't as prevalent when you have long range missiles and stealth aircraft as priority.

    • @eldrago19
      @eldrago19 15 днів тому

      Europe has produced a perfectly reasonable number of Typhoons. Europe does not need a world leading military, it just needs (and has) a significantly bigger military than Russia.

    • @YSKWatch
      @YSKWatch 15 днів тому

      europe was very good producing 4th gen jet fighter, after that: no more, just some ppt and nice 3d model.

  • @siphoramashiya531
    @siphoramashiya531 14 днів тому +20

    This show analysis:-
    China: I flew a tailless prototype jet fighter...did you see?...i might be ahead of you in this tech.
    US&this Show😢: no ways you're ahead...see my research paper on a future jet fighter plane... it's better than yours.

    • @inoculateinoculate9486
      @inoculateinoculate9486 14 днів тому

      That's not what happened. China is desperate for outside investment and for the world to think their military is powerful, so they took 3 of their shit engines and put them inside an empty shell shaped like the American NGAD. Then they flew it around in lazy circles for the press, made sure to send out millions of bots to promote it on the internet. The US has F35 flying stealth sorties over Iran, and also has F22, F15EX, F16, F117, B2, B21, Etc, etc, etc. The US suffers from choosing which fork to use for the feast, there are too many, and China suffers from having plastic forks that are unreliable and not tested on actual food.

  • @ColinJ88
    @ColinJ88 15 днів тому +7

    English has left the comment section.

  • @jg3000
    @jg3000 15 днів тому +40

    I've only seen cartoons of NGAD. So yes.

    • @ericsortzi5669
      @ericsortzi5669 14 днів тому +1

      NGAD flew years ago at this point. The US just doesn't parade their stuff around in public.

    • @你看个锤子你看
      @你看个锤子你看 14 днів тому +2

      @@ericsortzi5669lol, After four years of flying, there is not even a single photo? Or is the flight test only done at Area 51? Nowadays, people have smartphones and can easily take photos of airplanes in the sky.😂😂😂

    • @WestoidBreaker
      @WestoidBreaker 14 днів тому +2

      @@jg3000 US could should photo of UFO but not NGAD kek

    • @anotherbacklog
      @anotherbacklog 14 днів тому +3

      The NGAD is just so stealthy that you can’t even see it.

    • @ericsortzi5669
      @ericsortzi5669 14 днів тому

      @@你看个锤子你看 The B-21 has been flying for over 3 years but it's only been seen publically this last year. So... Yeah. The US doesn't parade its new stuff out where everyone can bounce radars off it and measure the returns. Just saying.

  • @yoingen
    @yoingen 4 дні тому +11

    The comments from Americans in the comment section made me think for a moment that this was an Indian comment section.

  • @briantuk3000
    @briantuk3000 15 днів тому +5

    first, not even in the US they agree on what "6th generation" is, second this model of flying wing was discovered muchn earlier in the US, third is easy to take any demonstration or experimental aircraft and name it "X generation whatever", there are multiple of these, then are each a new generation?

    • @mrspeigle1
      @mrspeigle1 15 днів тому +2

      Agreed. I see a plane that Flys, wich is meaningless when the missles, radar,software and supporting systems are all more important than a airframe with no data.

  • @henreator
    @henreator 13 днів тому +18

    So many salts in the comments 😂

  • @wenbo595
    @wenbo595 15 днів тому +15

    Pentagon december 26th: print money mow
    😂😂😂

    • @geraltofrivia9167
      @geraltofrivia9167 15 днів тому +3

      nice flag 😂

    • @wenbo595
      @wenbo595 15 днів тому

      ​@@geraltofrivia9167 yes good flag

    • @bobbysuazjFhvcfgh
      @bobbysuazjFhvcfgh 15 днів тому

      @@wenbo595 people saw light gradually getting turned on at night that day at the pentagon 🤣🤣🤣

  • @ediss821
    @ediss821 13 днів тому +4

    Of course, while NGAD still on Paper, J36 and J50 have been flown.

  • @ronsmith3523
    @ronsmith3523 12 днів тому +10

    As of right now, the US has as many 6th gen fighters as india and Nigeria😂

    • @jwolf4948
      @jwolf4948 12 днів тому +1

      which is ironically the same as EVERY OTHER NATION. No one has publicly stated they have created and flown a 6th generation fighter. Even China stated that the 2 aircraft flown were early designs and that they aren't in production. Going by that standard, are you going to ignore the NGAD prototype that took flight in 2020? stop commenting troll.

    • @TheSwegBucket
      @TheSwegBucket 11 днів тому

      "As many 6th gen fighters we are aware of"***** Fixed that for you

    • @thomgizziz
      @thomgizziz 9 днів тому

      then the same goes for china... those planes aren't in production, they are prototypes at best, just like the US has.

  • @Nero-Caesar
    @Nero-Caesar 15 днів тому +12

    The Chinese military has really come a long way very fast over the last decade. I'm glad I'm around to see all of these amazing achievements. And I'm thankful for your coverage.

  • @christophezecheru5440
    @christophezecheru5440 14 днів тому +20

    I heard that US 6th generation planes can down balloons, kites and blimps. Impressive!

  • @GK-zu8zs
    @GK-zu8zs 15 днів тому +47

    This isn't a prototype. It's serial number J360011 means it's the 11th craft built and is probably entering serial production soon

    • @notthatgerry
      @notthatgerry 15 днів тому +8

      As if you couldn't just paint whatever you want in the frame. It's called deception. You can paint a 0011, but what does that means, is to anyone but the manufacturer to guess...

    • @月影CHR
      @月影CHR 15 днів тому +13

      @@notthatgerry Well,i rather to believe Xiaomi Su7,rather than garbage Tasla

    • @lijackson-x6r
      @lijackson-x6r 15 днів тому +5

      After the J 36 test flight, A Pentagon spokesman said: The United States is a peaceful country and has no intention of engaging in an arms race with the People's Liberation Army.

    • @殇夜-q2l
      @殇夜-q2l 15 днів тому +2

      @@lijackson-x6r Just like the Soviet Union's rhetoric during the Cold War, we all know the final outcome

    • @SifisoMoabj
      @SifisoMoabj 15 днів тому +2

      @@殇夜-q2l well, China is forcing the US to become peaceful lmao.

  • @johnroberts9922
    @johnroberts9922 15 днів тому +4

    I would imagine that the reason our Air Force decided to delay NGAD is that solid state lasers with a power output approaching 1 megawatt are not near yet available. There is no more frightening a weapon at 35,000 feet, with the extremely low air pressure and humidity, than a 1 megawatt laser. It will reach out and touch you at 150 miles.

    • @thomaswakefield6889
      @thomaswakefield6889 15 днів тому +1

      lmao the US has been using lasers on aircraft ever since Ronald Reagan issued the Star Wars initiative in the early 80s

    • @subasthapa4839
      @subasthapa4839 15 днів тому

      ​@@thomaswakefield6889he seems newbie

    • @johnroberts9922
      @johnroberts9922 15 днів тому

      @@thomaswakefield6889 That monstrous chemical laser was fitted on a converted passenger aircraft. What the USAF is waiting for is one that can be fitted on a F-35's air frame. Don't be foolish.

    • @johnroberts9922
      @johnroberts9922 15 днів тому +1

      @@subasthapa4839 Really? My comment was precise, thoughtful, and informed you of the difference between operating lasers at sea level versus 35,000 feet up. You learned something.

    • @jaytea1591
      @jaytea1591 15 днів тому

      US has far better. USAF has alien tech, which it used to bring down MH370.

  • @岑君影
    @岑君影 14 днів тому +17

    我是中國人,我澄清一下那根本就是一些CG和航模飛行視頻,中國馬上就要崩潰了,怎麼可能吹口氣就造出來美國都沒有的六代機?中國有很多航模玩家,他們總是以假亂真,這種飛機佈局不需要飛行控制系統就能飛的很穩,所以航模玩家選擇這個🎉🎉🎉

    • @Curbing2018
      @Curbing2018 14 днів тому +1

      你应该加个狗头,以防被误伤。😂

    • @chinabattlehawk
      @chinabattlehawk 14 днів тому

      @@Curbing2018 根本不需要加,这是具有自动敌我识别的等级。

    • @curtiswong7280
      @curtiswong7280 14 днів тому

      你这样用的繁体,应该是台湾而香港人吧?你特别时候都觉得自己不是”中國人“,你现在来用这些的身份来弄自己好像在中国居民一样,真好笑

  • @shenmisheshou7002
    @shenmisheshou7002 5 днів тому +4

    NGAD is dead, and the answer to the question is that the US has let the F-35 and the B-21 soak up the pentagon budget for aircraft for the next 15 years. We can't afford the NGAD. meanwhile, China has been pushing ahead with more advanced designs. The F-35 is so expesive to buy and operate that it will only be allowed to fly about 185 hours a year (average per airframe) and will have to remain in service until 2085. It is a fantasy to think that the F-35 will be relevant in 2050, much less for 60 years. The F-35 program has been a financial disaster.

    • @mikewazowski7024
      @mikewazowski7024 4 дні тому

      ”We” bro you even have a chinese username😭

    • @gulanhem9495
      @gulanhem9495 3 дні тому

      The US is superior. China is weak and nobody fears China.

    • @shenmisheshou7002
      @shenmisheshou7002 3 дні тому +1

      @@mikewazowski7024 You know, I was in the US Marines for 8 years. You can't tell anything about someone from their UA-cam user name. To even point out the name I use makes me believe that you are probably a bigot or white nationalist. Are you? I mean it would be hard to tell by your name, but it is about what you said. Are you a bigot or white supremacist? Is that why you wanted to make fun of my user name? I have little respect for people that just want to attack and humiliate others, but when they direct something towards me that I don't like, then I guarantee that I can sink to that same level. So, which do you consider yourself to be, bro?

  • @HyperpigGaming
    @HyperpigGaming 14 днів тому +12

    Well i got to tell you there are picture on line the code for the jet is 360011. That's why it's called J36 and 011 means it the 11th jet. 😊😊😊

  • @el4369
    @el4369 14 днів тому +2

    It was supposed that there were 3 designs. However, the third one was spotted this week, but it turned out to be another design by SY, which was not expected. So now people don't know how many designs there are. Possibly all five control surfaces (AMT, SSD, Calmshells, DRUS, DLEF) are all included for testing.

  • @alexfish477
    @alexfish477 15 днів тому +6

    Between the underestimates and the overestimates I feel like I have a good idea about what to think about this aircraft somewhere in the middle. It is a significant development and shows a great growth in capabilities. However, whatever makes something "6 gen" is just not something we can see from these images. It's all speculation. You'd be wrong to write this aircraft off, but it does not mean that weatern air superiority is over. Every aircraft China puts in the sky should be considered a real threat, even if it's a simple J-7.

    • @demcomp
      @demcomp 15 днів тому +1

      @@alexfish477 slave labor. Imagine what the US could accomplish with slavery.. wait....

    • @alexfish477
      @alexfish477 15 днів тому +7

      @demcomp Although I can't say anything for certain. I can be reasonably sure the Chinese are not using slave labor for high end aircraft development and manufacturing. These are very complex systems that require skilled professionals. I don't have to imagine what the US could do with slave labor because there are historic examples of exactly that.

    • @demcomp
      @demcomp 15 днів тому

      @alexfish477 keep telling yourself that mate.

    • @alexfish477
      @alexfish477 15 днів тому +4

      @@demcomp With such certainty you must have a good source. Would you be able to provide one?

    • @demcomp
      @demcomp 15 днів тому

      @alexfish477 prove they don't. I don't have to prove they use slave labor, it's actually common knowledge.. You're the one now making wild claims they don't. Prove it.

  • @ABC456-t8v
    @ABC456-t8v 14 днів тому +11

    American NGAD are so super stealthy that nobody, including the American pilots saw themselves. That's why they have to use publication and word of mouth that it flew years ago to win this one down

    • @frostwing9046
      @frostwing9046 14 днів тому +1

      That's nothing. Indian Airforce stealth systems are so super stealthy that they have shot down their own craft by mistake 😅

  • @Jonasbarbury
    @Jonasbarbury 15 днів тому +9

    So are we talking true 6th gen or just a flying promo piece?

    • @davidz7858
      @davidz7858 15 днів тому +2

      I believe you and others made similar comments when J-20 first was showed on 2014.

    • @KC_Smooth
      @KC_Smooth 15 днів тому +1

      Seeing as 6th Gen is an American term, I’d say it’s a tech demonstrator piece for them… It’s still very impressive.

  • @luoeain2026
    @luoeain2026 8 днів тому +5

    How could u catch up to things that not even exist? Sounds like CN knows more about USAF's NGAD than USAF itself

    • @cameronspence4977
      @cameronspence4977 7 днів тому

      Yeah, you're right.The US AF is definitely equal to a bunch of ytube commenters.

  • @pajeetkumar1645
    @pajeetkumar1645 15 днів тому +20

    (Aggressive head wobble intensity: 9/10)
    "Arrey saar, please yaar, where is the respect? You talking about next-generation jets, and you *not mentioning India*? Shame-shame, saar! We are *very ancient civilization,* okay? When rest of world was living in mud huts, eating raw banana, we were *flying vimanas* and doing air traffic control from the Himalayas only! Learn your history first, saar, before making these big-big claims!"

  • @xavi239
    @xavi239 15 днів тому +14

    China has been poaching the best engineers for the past 20 years now and we all act surprised that they can build this

    • @TuanTran-h5f
      @TuanTran-h5f 15 днів тому +5

      Poaching all the Chinese engineers that would have went to the US. Your engineers are all aspiring UA-camrs

    • @demcomp
      @demcomp 15 днів тому

      @@xavi239 slave labor built this

    • @xavi239
      @xavi239 15 днів тому

      @ what do you mean some of the engineers that china pouches where French American ect that worked on owns country aircraft

    • @wenbo595
      @wenbo595 15 днів тому

      Some Ukrainian and Russians

    • @wenbo595
      @wenbo595 15 днів тому

      But USA also poaches Chinese engineers. Just look at silicon valley. 40% asians

  • @zix_zix_zix
    @zix_zix_zix 15 днів тому +36

    China’s 6th gen programme is BY DEFINITION ahead of US NGAD, given that China has displayed two aircraft flying over a public area and the US has so far presenetd no evidence whatsoever about their programme's progress. What's more impressive (if not shocking) though, is the fact that China pursues a large number of separate development projects concurrently, showing rapid progress everywhere (aircraft carriers, landing helicopter docks, H-20 stealth bomber, J-35 fighter, 6th gen fighter jets etc etc)...

    • @Mistshock
      @Mistshock 15 днів тому +9

      ​@@Rägardedthat's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. If you have a weapon, you reveal and document its existence whilst keeping its capabilities secret to a degree, not keep the whole weapon secret - that's not how deterrence works.
      If you have nuclear weapons, they do absolutely nothing to deter a strike I'd you keep it secret.

    • @jimmiekarlsson4458
      @jimmiekarlsson4458 15 днів тому +4

      USA dont have to flex with stuff lol, China is a paper tiger, thats WHY they have to show these airplanes to the public.,

    • @zix_zix_zix
      @zix_zix_zix 15 днів тому +1

      @@Rägarded I don't think that the US Government is so secretive anymore. The B-21 aircraft was unveiled at a 2 December 2022 public ceremony at Northrop Grumman's production facilities! Since then, however, we've seen no evidence on its progress, other than an announcement made by Northrop, about the flght-testing of three B-21s. Also, all the military development projects, I mentioned, include multiple elements of research and development!

    • @giganigga9624
      @giganigga9624 15 днів тому

      The f-35 was flyimg 10 years before they revealed it. The 6th gen US jet had its first flight in 2018. The US dont want to show what they have because china will use the same blueprint and copy and try to counter it. The less we reveal, the less time china has to spend money and copy our planes

    • @lake-j5n
      @lake-j5n 15 днів тому +9

      ​@jimmikarlsson4458 😂😂😂joke,usa is 🤡

  • @mxl4345
    @mxl4345 15 днів тому +10

    Whether it’s a 5th-gen, 6th-gen, fighter, bomber, or a hybrid, the distinction may not matter as much. This represents a new paradigm: a long-range, stealthy hunter designed to render traditional dogfighting obsolete. It operates seamlessly with drones and other platforms to track and engage both air and ground targets with precision.

    • @thomaswakefield6889
      @thomaswakefield6889 15 днів тому +1

      not by the Chinese let's not forget that none of China's aircraft are capable of aerial refueling and their drones are not long range capable

    • @topgamez9498
      @topgamez9498 15 днів тому +1

      @@thomaswakefield6889 no need for those features when taiwan is right next to the mainland

    • @Lai-peter
      @Lai-peter 14 днів тому +5

      ​@thomaswakefield6889 lol, J10, J15, J16, J20 all showed air refuelling capabilities. J35 will be too. Have you been living in a cave without knowing the real world?

    • @mingliu-f4q
      @mingliu-f4q 14 днів тому

      @@thomaswakefield6889
      中国最新研制出出来的MD22高超音速临近空间飞行器,可以以7马赫的速度在6万米高空直接飞到洛杉矶。

    • @thiccchungo1041
      @thiccchungo1041 14 днів тому

      You literally just described the F-35 😭😭😭

  • @ZacharyJClark
    @ZacharyJClark 15 днів тому +11

    China does not have a 6th Gen aircraft.
    The US would prove it... but to do so would show how far behind they really are.

    • @ManAssome
      @ManAssome 15 днів тому

      The US is far ahead of China, you know why? Becuz their citizens watch Huawk Tuaah girl videos every time before going to bed, and that makes american IQ unbeatable! Just look at the person they voted in to the office as president, who plans to annex Canada and Greenland to build a bigger empire, that’s pure genius.

    • @raidenshougun9663
      @raidenshougun9663 15 днів тому +10

      Ah yes, the armchair general

    • @ZacharyJClark
      @ZacharyJClark 15 днів тому +1

      Ah yes, someone who hasn't seen these planes in action.

    • @raidenshougun9663
      @raidenshougun9663 15 днів тому +8

      @@ZacharyJClark wowowow, you got me there bud... Calm down, you silly sigma boy

    • @ManAssome
      @ManAssome 15 днів тому

      @@ZacharyJClark You have seen 6th gen fighter jets in action??? Dayuuum

  • @johnnymars9782
    @johnnymars9782 15 днів тому +26

    The NGAD is nothing but powerpoints at this moment. The video has 0 meaning.

    • @destroyeris3k
      @destroyeris3k 15 днів тому +4

      Lol sure buddy

    • @peterpanini96
      @peterpanini96 15 днів тому +7

      Yeah... npowerpoint... 😂😂😂 thats why usa is afraid of china and retreating from Taiwan and neighboring countries im sorry to destroy the American morale but your 3mpire is crumbling and even tramp starting world War 3 won't fix it.

    • @Smokedouttasian
      @Smokedouttasian 15 днів тому +6

      @@destroyeris3k considering Russia is nothing more then a paper tiger, it is not far fetched that China is the same

    • @leoschmain
      @leoschmain 15 днів тому +1

      ever heard of opsec?

    • @laudsrealm188
      @laudsrealm188 15 днів тому +5

      Except it already flew in 2021 but push on troll

  • @BoatLoadsofDope
    @BoatLoadsofDope 3 дні тому +8

    China has really sped up development of well... Everything, was in Chengdu a couple of years ago. We have nothing, nothing in the west that remotely compares to that place, and it's only 1 of the modernized cities China has. Didn't want to believe it, but we are falling behind.
    Not too strange considering what we spend our energy on here in the west, bickering amongst each other.

    • @shenmisheshou7002
      @shenmisheshou7002 3 дні тому +2

      Sadly, I agree. China has a lot of economic problems though, but China is in ascendency, and the US is in decline.

    • @asw654
      @asw654 День тому

      @@shenmisheshou7002 US is ascending in copium.
      Look at the advanced copium we have in these comments. The level of ingenuity and persistence is unmatched.

    • @shenmisheshou7002
      @shenmisheshou7002 День тому

      @ Yes, the denial is pervasive. Now I am not saying that China can match the US military today, but at the rate they are going, they will be at parity in maybe 8-10 years.

    • @FabioCapela
      @FabioCapela 18 годин тому

      Isn't China's largest shipyard an industrial complex that covers a whole island roughly the size of Manhattan?
      The Chinese industrial capacity is crazy.

  • @TheKifster
    @TheKifster 14 днів тому +2

    I swear you are delaying the "..and remember..." bit at the end to make it even more iconic!

  • @ajs4287
    @ajs4287 15 днів тому +22

    Usa cannot even build civilian planes that won't fall out of the sky. Cant even bring our own astronauts home from space without russian space uber

    • @fd35g3
      @fd35g3 15 днів тому

      Well, dinosaurs rule our country, so they don't really look up much.
      And they used a SpaceX (I hate elon) capsule second time after Boeing obviously failed. It was going to be used originally but there were manufacturing delays with the Falcon 9.
      But for real, Boeing fell into the toilet when they were sold off years ago. It's just aluminum, duct tape, a few wood screws, some various chants and prayers and they call it an airplane.

    • @ColinJ88
      @ColinJ88 14 днів тому +2

      China flys those US civilian planes. 😂

  • @Lancaster604
    @Lancaster604 15 днів тому +9

    The US kept fantasizing about a Pearl Harbor when most of the conflicts involves the US going across the planet to someone's front lawn.

  • @whokilledmax
    @whokilledmax 14 днів тому +11

    China got the best wind tunnels and the strongest computing power, there is no surprise to make these achievements.

    • @maewae936
      @maewae936 14 днів тому

      People like you are the true definition of "WOKE" my friend.

  • @Subhumanoid_
    @Subhumanoid_ 12 днів тому +2

    _"This new fighter seems to be very large, very fast, can carry a LOT of missiles, and because of its low wing loading must be super-maneuverable"_
    Where oh where have I heard that before?

    • @DAloyalking
      @DAloyalking 12 днів тому

      "bu- but my country makes the best equipment and tech" the americans sound really russian right now

    • @thomgizziz
      @thomgizziz 9 днів тому

      @@DAloyalking Wait isn't that what the chinese shills, like you, are doing here?

  • @ThePuma1707
    @ThePuma1707 15 днів тому +11

    So many experts on the Chinese 6th gen project here, impressive!

    • @andrewstachowski3375
      @andrewstachowski3375 15 днів тому

      i sure will trust the keyboard commie who lives with his mommy lmao

    • @WestoidBreaker
      @WestoidBreaker 14 днів тому

      ​@@andrewstachowski3375poor thing have mommy issues

  • @PrimeV88
    @PrimeV88 10 днів тому +5

    Tom Cruise flew the NGAD prototype in Top Gun 2 though..😄

    • @thomgizziz
      @thomgizziz 9 днів тому +1

      China literally thought that the darkstar was a real plane.

  • @Statueshop297
    @Statueshop297 15 днів тому +5

    Well nobody knows. Nobody in the comments section is going to convince me otherwise.
    Anyone who claims anything about these aircraft is living in cloud cuckoo land.

    • @elC1d774
      @elC1d774 15 днів тому +2

      True, but the Indians are shitting their pants. All news channels were mad because the Indian airforce is still stuck on 4th gen. Oh and I am not Chinese, just so you know.

    • @davidz7858
      @davidz7858 15 днів тому

      @@elC1d774 haha, you make another nail on Indian coffin

  • @paulmurgatroyd6372
    @paulmurgatroyd6372 5 днів тому +3

    No one has any idea how good that new fighter is, let's see it in action. The Chinese government will tell you anything.

    • @shenmisheshou7002
      @shenmisheshou7002 5 днів тому +5

      Well, lets see the F-22 and F-35 in air supremacy roles... The F-35 and F-22 have never shot down anything if you don't count the Chinese spy balloon (what a massive joke, that the Chinese were overlying use with freaking BALLOONS!!!!!!). No US aircraft has shot down a Russian or Chinese enemy fighter since 1970. We may never see the US engage a Chinese or Russian fighter. That war will be a nuclear war.

    • @zhangchris1278
      @zhangchris1278 5 днів тому +1

      @@shenmisheshou7002 首先核战争不大会发生,俄乌战争就已经说明一切。而且如果发生核战争,美国一艘核潜艇就可以毁灭中国所有领土,这不是我胡吹,为什么不会发生核战争,因为核战会让统治者自己也成为那个代价,战争背后是政治博弈,既然是博弈,你见过自己掀桌子自杀的吗?其次你应该庆幸没有发生过大国之间战斗机互相击落的情况,因为那会导致战争升级。美国在芯片,高精尖领域仍然遥遥领先这点是不能否认的,现在国内最大的问题是经济问题,而不是战争

    • @nulnoh219
      @nulnoh219 5 днів тому

      The Chinese didn't say anything. They just flew 2 planes. Everything is speculation and best guesses by others.

  • @godzillamothra5983
    @godzillamothra5983 13 днів тому +5

    it doesn't really matter if you are just one or two step ahead, what matter who can reach finish line. The Sino-US competition is a marathon.

    • @insectioninsection
      @insectioninsection 13 днів тому +1

      It is very inappropriate to compare the military competition between countries to a marathon. If it were a marathon, the German Third Reich and the Soviet Union would not be ended, and the winner would not give the loser a chance.

    • @justink1985
      @justink1985 13 днів тому

      @@insectioninsection drugs are bad, bro.😂💀

    • @insectioninsection
      @insectioninsection 13 днів тому

      @@justink1985 If you eat too much salt, it will turn into poison, bro. This world itself is a world where the powerful enslave ordinary people. Only fools believe that there is a difference between capitalism and communism

    • @chrisxmx
      @chrisxmx 13 днів тому +1

      如果真是马拉松就别比了,中国已经跑了好几千年他还在,美国一共存在了多少年?

  • @Superpooper-2020
    @Superpooper-2020 15 днів тому +16

    Two different 6th generation stealth fighter, hypersonic drone, first and largest amphibious assault ship, and now h20 bomber, anti china folks are going bonkers online

  • @ToddGrindle
    @ToddGrindle 12 днів тому +8

    Lol, so much cope in this comment section.

    • @penskepc2374
      @penskepc2374 11 днів тому +3

      Not being embarrassingly naive isn't cope. You have to be next level gullible to take CCP claims at face value. I bet you think their economy is still growing, too 😂

    • @pineapplesareyummy6352
      @pineapplesareyummy6352 11 днів тому +7

      @@penskepc2374 The CPC is far more trustworthy than the US regime.

    • @Seastallion
      @Seastallion 11 днів тому

      ​@@pineapplesareyummy6352
      That's hilarious. Not that I think that the US government is particularly trustworthy, but compared to the CCP? By far.

    • @voidtempering8700
      @voidtempering8700 11 днів тому +1

      ​@@penskepc2374What claims are you referring to?

    • @TheSwegBucket
      @TheSwegBucket 11 днів тому +1

      @@pineapplesareyummy6352 "the government that censors it's own people and doesn't have freedom of speech is more trustworthy" LMAO

  • @-qsprey7881
    @-qsprey7881 15 днів тому +2

    Since no one has given an analytical solution to the Navier-Stokes equations, it is extremely hasty to conduct computer simulations and skip the test flight stage to finalize the plan for supersonic aircraft. You just have a misunderstanding about the J-20. The PLA will hardly reveal any information about the projects in the development stage. The J-20 did not skip any stage but had already conducted a lot of secret test flights before the announcement. The same is true for the J-36 this time. Unlike the US military, which hypes up the projects under development, such as the F-35 and F-22, which even include many failed projects such as the AGM-183A LRHW/CPS arrw HACM. They clearly announced the performance parameters and hyped them up before the project failed. So you still believe that the US army is different this time? They kept it secret even though they had test fly? ? ?

  • @aquilesca5tr0
    @aquilesca5tr0 13 днів тому +4

    it´s funny how china is fully embracing stealth and rejecting maneuverability so russian bots can´t keep saying that stealth is overrated

    • @陈宫-k4m
      @陈宫-k4m 12 днів тому

      中国的导弹技术全球第一这个没任何争议吧?我私下问过沈阳飞机厂的飞机设计师和空空导弹设计师,他说过机动性只有一项是有用的,就是超音速巡航,越快越好。因为你的作战飞机越快的速度抵达战场就能掌握更好的主动权,并且发射空空导弹的飞行包线也更好。。其他的机动性没任何用处,因为空空导弹过载高达18个G,飞机根本不可能靠机动性躲避空空导弹

    • @ricardoricardoricardoricardo
      @ricardoricardoricardoricardo 12 днів тому

      Schizo source.

    • @thomgizziz
      @thomgizziz 9 днів тому

      If they were embracing stealth then they f'd up pretty hard.

  • @chillstep4life
    @chillstep4life 14 днів тому +9

    According to American logic, if you come out with it 1st than everyone else copied you. I guess NGAD is a copy of chinese 6th gen 😂😂

  • @Nr-yl8pj
    @Nr-yl8pj 6 днів тому +5

    Test fly Vs PPT image → "caught up". Talking about win win win.

    • @TheGreatShawnY
      @TheGreatShawnY 3 дні тому

      Let me see that American Gen 6 test fly then.

  • @herbys68
    @herbys68 15 днів тому +2

    The video doesn't go into two very relevant parts of the discussion: what each plane can do, and how mature their operations are. We don't know if the new Chinese planes match or even exceed their American planned counterparts, or they may even fall far behind, being closer in stealth, propulsion, avionics and other systems to a fifth generation American fighter. Not having such information makes the comparison moot, since even if China fields the airplanes first it could mean "China beats the US to deployment with more advanced planes than the US has" or "China fields competitors to the B21, F35 and F22 years or decades late". The other point is operational readiness, the US has years of experience operating a fleet of stealth aircraft in actual conflicts, whereas China has none. China also has no experience operating stealth planes from aircraft carriers either. So that's an area that will add a few years at least to whatever the final timelines happen to be for their operational fleets.

  • @akamebanane811
    @akamebanane811 14 днів тому +17

    The NGAD isnt real , the J 36 is.

    • @loremasteringwion9930
      @loremasteringwion9930 14 днів тому +2

      It's just not revealed to the public yet. Think about that

    • @akamebanane811
      @akamebanane811 14 днів тому +4

      Cope more

    • @loremasteringwion9930
      @loremasteringwion9930 14 днів тому +1

      The US, unlike China, does not brag about it's latest toys

    • @johnsilver9338
      @johnsilver9338 14 днів тому +1

      Funny. They can't even make J-20 as stealthy as F-35. And their are 3 - 4 times more F-35s than J-20 with around 600 in US arsenal.

  • @ricardoricardoricardoricardo
    @ricardoricardoricardoricardo 12 днів тому +4

    The NAFOID coping is insane.

  • @quezdonivey5518
    @quezdonivey5518 12 днів тому +8

    Funny how 6th Gen isn’t even a real thing 😂 when the US was deciding between the YF 23 and the YF 22 these companies marketing department came up with the name 5th Gen fighter to make it sound cooler and stand out from the other fairly new aircraft at the time. And then since then everybody has adopted that terminology and labeling this and that 5th Gen and 6th Gen. Theres a reason the F-35 isn’t called a 6th Gen fighter even though by everyone’s logic it would be smh.

    • @ihzamahendra926
      @ihzamahendra926 12 днів тому +3

      It's a downgraded F-22, calling it a 5th Gen plane is already generous.

    • @carlosreid51
      @carlosreid51 12 днів тому +1

      I doubt china has any gen 6th plane yet when they hardly have 5th gen that working well

    • @MrSpiritmonger
      @MrSpiritmonger 12 днів тому +3

      ​@@carlosreid51bullshit, China absolutely has working 5th gens, the copium in West is insane.

    • @beauty-x8v
      @beauty-x8v 12 днів тому +1

      Go ahead and pretend to be asleep and do nothing and be surprised.😂​@@carlosreid51

    • @rogerfaint499
      @rogerfaint499 12 днів тому +1

      @@carlosreid51 We at think-tanks (in USA) pray to god that China doesn't have but intelligence seemed to indicate that China is well ahead.

  • @JinKee
    @JinKee 15 днів тому +4

    2:07 gonna cost “hundreds of millions per tail”? Okay, make NGAD tailless.

  • @jacobjones630
    @jacobjones630 15 днів тому +5

    I love these videos, i hate the people commenting

  • @jakXDbaby
    @jakXDbaby 15 днів тому +10

    I’ll be honest the design does look cool

    • @wenbo595
      @wenbo595 15 днів тому +2

      It's like stealth version of Saab draken. Like draken and f22 had a baby

  • @user-vv7ir1pl4j
    @user-vv7ir1pl4j 12 днів тому +5

    the us is cooked. the way they develop tech is too slow now. the f22 is a 1980s design and they haven’t made anything better since

    • @kingwing3203
      @kingwing3203 12 днів тому +1

      可以向中国进口先进战机

    • @jwolf4948
      @jwolf4948 12 днів тому +3

      Except the NGAD that flew in 2020, or the B-21 over a year ago... sit back down, your stupid will infect people.

    • @connor4366
      @connor4366 12 днів тому

      Literally the f35 and NGAD.

    • @jwolf4948
      @jwolf4948 12 днів тому

      @@connor4366 Don't forget the B-21

    • @月见有四
      @月见有四 11 днів тому

      @@jwolf4948 b21?速度突破不了1马赫的飞机也能是6代机?还是你们美国说的只要在NGAD计划里面的所有飞机都是6代机,不管性能,不论作用。还是把你们的ppt先实现把。空中优势J36

  • @Tanktaco
    @Tanktaco 14 днів тому +3

    It's gonna be a tense 10 years.

  • @november6259
    @november6259 12 днів тому +13

    Chinese forum stated there is no gen6 jets, it’s just a j7, essentially a reverse engineered mig21 with plastic components bought on temu.

    • @blusq-q8g
      @blusq-q8g 11 днів тому +6

      Yes,i'm Chinese,you are absolutely right!

    • @ShawnShiYinzhu
      @ShawnShiYinzhu 11 днів тому +1

      确实

    • @DivineStream359
      @DivineStream359 11 днів тому +1

      Funny 😁

    • @IblameBlame
      @IblameBlame 10 днів тому

      It's actually a Sopwith Camel with some cardboard taped on it. Somebody needs to tell US strategists this!

  • @196cupcake
    @196cupcake 15 днів тому +4

    Important to keep the B-21 in mind. Arguably, it could also launch air to air missiles.

    • @统一台湾-l2n
      @统一台湾-l2n 15 днів тому +9

      B21 fly like a turtle

    • @196cupcake
      @196cupcake 15 днів тому +2

      @@统一台湾-l2n which can be fine. it's for BVR, not BFM

    • @edkst98
      @edkst98 15 днів тому

      ​@@统一台湾-l2n the chinese H20 is a paper plane that literally only exists on paper lol

    • @comediangj4955
      @comediangj4955 14 днів тому +2

      ​@@196cupcake it's not fine, missiles gets boosted by the speed of the launching aircraft. And after launch the aircraft needs to run away because most likely the enemy missile is on its way to you. Being subsonic is a MAJOR disadvantage in BVR.

    • @196cupcake
      @196cupcake 14 днів тому

      @@comediangj4955 The video ended up making the same point I made in my comment. I wrote my comment before watching the whole video.

  • @btkt6464
    @btkt6464 7 днів тому +6

    "caught up"? if theres one thing that america is still good at it would be coping. lets face it we Chinese are AHEAD in 6th gen aircraft development, whether u like it or not

    • @cameronspence4977
      @cameronspence4977 7 днів тому

      You understand the us tested a 6th gen prototype 5 years ago, right?
      The J20 isnt even stealthy. The J35 that you so obviously copied, you didn't even bother to change the name, isn't even in service yet. You still dont even have an equivalent to the F22. This aircraft isnt even small enough to fight a modern fighter jet at close range, and isnt stealthy enough to evade US radar.
      Please dont make me laugh😂

    • @yoiashi
      @yoiashi 7 днів тому +2

      Show the video footage of that or just shut up ​@@cameronspence4977

    • @SuperScarab
      @SuperScarab 7 днів тому

      @@yoiashi search it up in net genius, US has already a tested a 6th gen prototype and NGAD will enter service in 2030

    • @btkt6464
      @btkt6464 5 днів тому

      @@cameronspence4977 blah blah blah u mad mad. i've made my points clear and its up to you to man up and face the reality

  • @TheCourierGaming
    @TheCourierGaming 13 днів тому +2

    Lets talk about how 56 billion in 2018 would now be 70 just 7 years later..

  • @WuLao-r6x
    @WuLao-r6x 14 днів тому +6

    I think everyone is too sensitive. China is only a developing country.Any advanced technology you see comes from the United States or the West.This should only be what they use to scare people.Cao Mengde said:let's continue playing music, continue dancing.🎉🎉

  • @mettaworldpeace9836
    @mettaworldpeace9836 2 дні тому +4

    caught up?

  • @itsmuhammad2305
    @itsmuhammad2305 15 днів тому +10

    So much fuss over a 5.5 gen plane. Both the US and the China don't have the balls to go against each other. It's all political games and leverage strategies.

    • @Exodlus
      @Exodlus 15 днів тому

      I think China could reasonably take Taiwan so long as only the US is defending it

    • @ProfessorPottsy
      @ProfessorPottsy 15 днів тому +3

      @@ExodlusI think they only have a chance if the USA isn’t quick with its reactions and doesn’t drag its feet politically for putting full support towards the defense of Taiwan.
      China would only have a month or two at most to make some major gains, and only if they make those major gains that fast would they have a chance at full success of taking over the island of Taiwan

    • @Cuck_life
      @Cuck_life 15 днів тому +1

      @@Exodlus It will takes months of build up to mount an invasion force that the us will see on satellite so they will have ample warning that its coming.

    • @nathanDrake-nd
      @nathanDrake-nd 14 днів тому

      @@ProfessorPottsy China is just patiently waiting for the US congress to dismember the US navy like the Britains did with the Royal Navy. Most of the ships of US navy is beyond 30 years service life. 7 of all 11 Aircraft carriers are beyond 30 years old, every single one of the Ticonderoga-class cruiser are more than 30 years old, more than half of all the destroyers are also more than 30 years old. It is public record that US navy had been retiring twice more ships every year than built new ships in the recent decade, while China during the same time deploy more tons of ships every years than the entire French Navy. In 15 years time US navy will reduce to half the size of today while China navy will be twice the size of US navy then. China really believe time is on their side.

    • @WestoidBreaker
      @WestoidBreaker 14 днів тому

      ldi0t take because why would the Chinese want to fight Chinese with no apparent reason,?

  • @TheBigExclusive
    @TheBigExclusive 14 днів тому +3

    How TF can we be talking about 6th Gen Fighters when we barely have 5th Gen. Most countries are struggling to create or buy 5th Gen fighters. They are very expensive.

    • @terrainofthought
      @terrainofthought 14 днів тому +1

      expensive for the trillion dollar economies? I think not.