Steven Strogatz’s Secrets of Math Communication

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 бер 2022
  • Steven Strogatz - the acclaimed mathematician and author - hosts the new Quanta Magazine podcast "The Joy of Why." On March 18, 2022, he joined Quanta editor Thomas Lin for a Simons Foundation Presents conversation about teaching, writing and podcasting.
    "The Joy of Why" is a Quanta Magazine podcast about curiosity and the pursuit of knowledge, featuring interviews with leading researchers about the great scientific and mathematical questions of our time. Listen now: link.chtbl.com/the-joy-of-why...
    Quanta Magazine is an editorially independent publication supported by the Simons Foundation.
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 54

  • @QuantaScienceChannel
    @QuantaScienceChannel  2 роки тому +14

    Subscribe to "The Joy of Why," a new podcast from Quanta Magazine and Steven Strogatz: link.chtbl.com/the-joy-of-why-youtube

    • @ridasadam1919
      @ridasadam1919 2 роки тому

      Our

    • @farhanaf832
      @farhanaf832 2 роки тому

      Can u make video about Boinc distributed computing software?

  • @leontedumitru
    @leontedumitru 2 роки тому +48

    This channel is just on another level. Great content

  • @maxtsivourakis137
    @maxtsivourakis137 2 роки тому +28

    Steven is an amazing human being.

    • @energyeve2152
      @energyeve2152 2 роки тому +2

      I had applied to the program in Cornell and I somehow got in contact with him and had a phone call with him. He’s very generous and great to speak to. I feel blessed and lucky to have gotten a moment to speak to such a great teacher.

  • @davyroger3773
    @davyroger3773 2 роки тому +9

    This guy is spot on about loving a topic! Unfortunately too many teachers actually make students not only feel dumb but hate a subject. Once curiosity is engaged and the student starts to derive pleasure from the problems it self, the job of the teacher is completed

  • @prelude2752
    @prelude2752 Місяць тому

    Thank you Steven for your honest and inspiring words.Thanks to the interviewer for his well chosen questions.

  • @belalsherif553
    @belalsherif553 2 роки тому +11

    Infinite powers: best intro to calculus ever.
    Strogatz is a great man

  • @bendavis2234
    @bendavis2234 2 роки тому +5

    I wish I had a teacher like Steven for my calculus class. It’s so important that the teacher actually loves their subject!

  • @abhijitpradhan9831
    @abhijitpradhan9831 2 роки тому +12

    Beautiful talk by Steven strogatz .

  • @othmanelkaddioui4364
    @othmanelkaddioui4364 Рік тому +2

    I admire how honest this man is and i would like to thank quanta magazine for this content

  • @avinkon
    @avinkon Рік тому +3

    Humble and a great story teller

  • @energyeve2152
    @energyeve2152 2 роки тому +6

    The dictation function for writing sounds like such a great idea for people that struggle to write like myself. Thank you for sharing that!

  • @loranelizabeth9148
    @loranelizabeth9148 Рік тому

    Such a terrific, engaging, FUN, interview! Thank you so much, Steven!

  • @dylanparker130
    @dylanparker130 2 роки тому +6

    Really enjoyed this & love the channel!

  • @anirbanc88
    @anirbanc88 Рік тому +1

    i have tried to learn math in so many ways, and this session gave me a porfound change, thank you! loved this!

  • @bpolat
    @bpolat 2 роки тому +2

    Great content. Thank you.

  • @sweetbluealien
    @sweetbluealien Рік тому +1

    Brilliant interview! ♾️❤️

  • @lucytkmts
    @lucytkmts 2 роки тому +1

    There are not many people who can talk genuinely honestly out of his or her own heart and Steven is the one

  • @davidwilkie9551
    @davidwilkie9551 2 роки тому +1

    Thank Steven's Wife and Daughter for Sync, it's good to read along with Professor Susskind's lectures that tend toward Holographic Principle Perspective Imagery. GD&P Actuality here-now-forever helps.

  • @lucytkmts
    @lucytkmts 2 роки тому +1

    More and more I realize that EACH people is different in everything, in any aspect of human actions and thinking. So what is most challenging is how to describe or simply talk what each wants to have understood. In this internet world knowlege is not a big challenge but HOW to describe is, which is as he says to intrigue his or her love on what we want to share. It should start with one simple sentence: What is it that you feel you would dream to have right now?

  • @voroldrwarfff8858
    @voroldrwarfff8858 2 роки тому +1

    What a man

  • @myhumblebeginnings
    @myhumblebeginnings 2 роки тому +1

    Steven Strogatz is a humble guy.

  • @uasserkamal2002
    @uasserkamal2002 2 роки тому +3

    this magazine gives me a different look to science

  • @mustbegross
    @mustbegross Рік тому

    I can relate to him on how you would gradually fall in love with something difficult in the first place.

  • @KaiseruSoze
    @KaiseruSoze 2 роки тому +4

    I do hope to see "the joy of why" on youtube.

    • @QuantaScienceChannel
      @QuantaScienceChannel  2 роки тому +7

      We don't plan to release episodes of the podcast on UA-cam, but you can find them here: link.chtbl.com/the-joy-of-why-youtube

    • @MarcosBitachi
      @MarcosBitachi 2 роки тому +3

      @@QuantaScienceChannel Thank you very much

    • @voroldrwarfff8858
      @voroldrwarfff8858 2 роки тому +1

      Its on spotify too !

  • @jurgenstephanopolus5095
    @jurgenstephanopolus5095 Рік тому

    "help the student fall in love with the question"
    That's it.

  • @dipmadk.b5774
    @dipmadk.b5774 2 роки тому

    777👍 bring more content on mathematics

  • @bygabop9368
    @bygabop9368 2 роки тому

    The most striking feature of exp(at) is that it is the eigenfunction of the linear operator, I believe.

    • @j.p.mccarthy9713
      @j.p.mccarthy9713 2 роки тому

      Of "a" linear operator. Which one?

    • @bygabop9368
      @bygabop9368 2 роки тому

      Of any linear operator, I mean all of them.

    • @bygabop9368
      @bygabop9368 2 роки тому

      Any order derivative or any order integral….

    • @j.p.mccarthy9713
      @j.p.mccarthy9713 2 роки тому

      There are linear operators that are not differentiation.

    • @bygabop9368
      @bygabop9368 2 роки тому

      @@j.p.mccarthy9713 choose a generic one, for instance T{x} = a x
      If T is any linear operator than x is a comple exponential.

  • @austingonzalez1148
    @austingonzalez1148 2 роки тому +9

    9:27. We're overproducing and failing at distribution? Sounds like he's a mathematics Karl Marx! haha. Proofs from each according to their ability, to each according to their proof need.

  • @prostatecancergaming9531
    @prostatecancergaming9531 10 місяців тому

    He’s the Feynman of math

  • @mahkhi7154
    @mahkhi7154 2 роки тому

    Your Math does Not have the CONSTRUCTS to describe Complicated Software Involving 100's of Variables.
    Your Math can do: Y=2X - A 2D Graph. Y=2X+3Z - a 3D Graph.
    If you develop that math for Complex Software you'll Get UML and Programming Languages such as ADA, C++ and Visual Basic. A programming Language is Formal. if it was Informal, the Computer wouldn't Know how to Run it.

  • @teslasam2713
    @teslasam2713 2 роки тому +1

    Hello 🥰guyzs

  • @ScottDBowen
    @ScottDBowen 2 роки тому

    Test

  • @Rigel_nz
    @Rigel_nz 2 роки тому

    Hallo

  • @chief-men-no1186
    @chief-men-no1186 2 роки тому

    .124500+.542100=.6666
    Forwards+backward^values=values^backwards+forwards
    Forwards and backwards truth read makes truth read backwards and forward.
    (F+B)read^truth=truth^read(B+F)
    All rights reserved. No rights waived for creative material with comments.

  • @gmaf79
    @gmaf79 2 роки тому +4

    Math is the only thing that can't be copyrighted or patented. This fact greatly reduces the number of people researching math to only mathematicians, who get paid handsomely to do math.
    Creativity will very rarely blossom from this structure making mathematics greatly handicapped.

    • @Flaystray
      @Flaystray 2 роки тому

      Math can't be patented, making the only people who do it those who like it, therefore it's greatly handicapped. Got it 👍

    • @gmaf79
      @gmaf79 2 роки тому

      @@Flaystray Wrong. Making only people who get paid do it.

    • @adityakhanna113
      @adityakhanna113 Рік тому

      Oh math can very well be patented. Algorithms are patented all the time. Theorems can probably come under Intellectual property and if mathematicians wanted the y could patent their findings. But math people are too nice to do that

  • @chief-men-no1186
    @chief-men-no1186 2 роки тому +1

    Grammatically-correct-sentence-expression
    5+5=10=5+5.
    complete-sentence-showing-fact-showing-sentence-complete.
    1+1=2=1+1=2
    Complete-sentence-showing+complete-sentence-showing+complete-sentence-showing=fact showing sentences complete
    Be to-show must-show-to-be
    1=1. 👈complete sentence
    Complete sentence shows cause=cause shows sentence complete.
    Complete sentence shows facts
    10=10. 👈 does that show to-be Complete sentence
    Verb shows-&-says what noun says-&-does.
    Verb-speaks-&-says what-noun-say-&-does=(=)make/equal/show/says/amount-to-value-to-amount/fact=correct-expression-grammar
    Subject(fact)-verb(does)-what ?
    Does(what)what(shows)does
    Does(when)
    Does(how)
    ---(line(string)from/for cause)storyline
    Conjunction=+=connection🪢(connects-&-makes-connection-for)
    5🪢5=10
    Subject-verb-connection(conjunction)-
    1--fact(value)noun(subject)
    +=conjunction-to-preposition=+
    1--value(fact)subject(noun)
    =(=)2 values of 1 value of 2 value
    Shows/declares/states/storyline
    All rights reserved. No rights waived for creative material from comments.