God vs Evolution - Who Created Humans? The Blind Watchmaker - FutureIQ
Вставка
- Опубліковано 27 лип 2024
- How evolution created humans and other complex life forms? Find out in this episode.
It is very difficult to fathom how evolution works and how a unicellular organism can turn into a complex living being like a Tiger or a Human. To help you learn the theory of evolution in an effective manner, we decided to go with an example of how an eye could have evolved from just a simple bacterium. Once you understand how a complex design can be formed by evolution by natural selection, you’ll be able to apply similar logic to explain other complex designs you find in nature.
More videos for you:
Diamonds are a scam: • Diamonds Are a Scam, N...
Opportunity cost: • This Video Will Cost Y...
Books mentioned in the video:
The Blind Watchmaker: tapthe.link/BlindWMRichardDaw...
Hope you enjoyed FutureIQ by Navin Kabra and Shrikant Joshi. Do hit us up on Twitter:
@ngkabra / ngkabra
@shrikant / shrikant
Listen it on the podcast provider of your choice: tapthe.link/FutureIQRSS
Watch other episodes of The FutureIQ podcast: • The FutureIQ Podcast S...
Chapters:
00:00 Introduction
00:22 The real question
01:16 The watchmaker analogy
03:10 Explaining the intermediate steps
06:10 From patch to the eye
12:03 Cornea
13:49 The time span
16:00 Why should I care?
17:00 The scope of evolution
#futureiq #evolution #theoryofevolution
Books mentioned in the video:
The Blind Watchmaker: tapthe.link/BlindWMRichardDawkinsFIQD
More videos for you:
Diamonds are a scam: ua-cam.com/video/EjJ4GmcgukU/v-deo.html
Opportunity cost: ua-cam.com/video/fgtiC6RkRwg/v-deo.html
A humble advice for the host ...Do not Overreact Bro 😂
Be positive bro
Really he is toooooo expressive, and that irritates..
Even I felt
Haha exactly. His one of the main dialogues is " Channel band karwayega ye" 😅
This is cheap version they are trying to recreate zerodha type of videos but with science
I recently discovered your channel and I really love how you manage to explain things without dumbing it down too much.
But only thing I would suggest is that the anchor should not interrupt the speaker so much. I understand your enthusiasm and love the format of conversation but we need a listener and a speaker. If you keep interrupting neither of you can make your point.
Thanks for the suggestion. We'll keep that in mind.
-navin
Simply, one of the best programme on knowledge of modern topics. No dubious reasoning. No political slant. Thankyou.
Thank you for the great discussion! Very insightful... Please do theory of simulation vs reality - would love to know Navin's perspective about this topic. Like Srikanth's reactions - keeps the video conversation flow and interesting! Well done team👍 and BW, keep the content coming
Great work guys. Need more science based podcasts in our country. Please keep it up.
The theory of disuse is even more fascinating. We can make Vitamin D from sunlight, but we can't synthesize Vitamin C from our diet. However, animals like frogs and horses can. When out primate ancestors moved into the trees they started eating much more fruit and veg which supplies Vit. C on its own. The apparatus for making it was not essential for survival anymore, so "bad" mutations that destroyed this ability were not fatal, and there was no penalty for such mutations. Over time the ability to make Vit. C was lost.
We can also answer why organism still have vestigial organs by asking the question why going through the evolutionary timeline.
I like their match and really interesting and completely mindful. I like the question asking habit of the host ...his expression and wat reminds our confusion...👍👍
Teachers are always teachers. My parents were and even today they talk like him. No need presentation material, they can convey the message clearly, as long as you pay attention
Thank you!
-navin
This is an awesome series guys. I am hooked to this Pls keep going. Can you have "donate" button or patreon, or some other mechanisms that we can contribute a bit and help keep you going? Thanks!
Thank you, @Vivek. For now, just continue liking and sharing it with your friends!
👍
Hey UA-cam, can you mute the host or just reverse the evolutionary process for him
Navin's pateince is really giving in 17:07 - 17:17 - 17:30
I admit that sometimes I tend to go overboard with my enthusiasm but here's a secret: Navin actually enjoys the banter.
That said, I do wish/hope you could be kinder with your words! :)
- Shrikant
@@TheFutureIQ I'm sorry for the derogatory words but plz in the future podcast, for the sake of continuity & for Navin knowledge, plz plz be patient and just be a listener🙏
Well I finally didn't understand the confusion of the interlocutor. Is he creationist or an evolutionist?
Creation is through the mechanism of evolution, just like adult form through being baby, plant through the seed
❤
The scientist is seriously explaining ....but then the anchor is unnesserily laughing loudly in between...reasons best known to him only.
Hmmmm……the question is how/why does the first mutation occur…!!??😊 Who/ what causes it….There lies the DESIGNER.
Then who designed the designer?
Ya but there is an inherent assumption that an intelligent creature designed it na, it would probably be better to say "we don't know" Idk for sure
Also, there are many random mutations, the ones who get such a mutation which helps them survive, become more in number with time(cuz the ones who don't get it die), again some random mutation which helps these organisms survive might happen, and the cycle goes on
It is randomness -navin
@@thimbaiah9005 Mutations are spelling mistakes , syntax errors in a perfect code. It does not make the code any better it only creates an error signal and the code doesn't work.
@@zasyed114 Yes, agreed
Who created that intelligent being?
Eye is a marvel of natural engineering via evlution thru millions of eyes of evolution. If people can not accept that fact, then envoke god to justify it's complexity.
Engineering ....a word used to define purpose. nature....unconscious force. And you convince yourself nature engineers. Wow
Grt
Now I understand why @ngkabra does not believe in thumb rule 😅
Only the Right Hand Thumb Rule. I'm all in favour of the Left Hand Thumb Rule 😂
-navin
Sir’s name
It's in the video description
Navin and Shrikant
All of this was great until the guy mixed up biological evolution with cultural evolution. The two work very differently -- cultural evolution relies on memory and knowledge passed down from generation to generation, and is simply *not* driven by *random* mutation. Just because you can construct language that seems to describe them both at the same time does not mean there is any commonality of reason.
Ram and Krishna not made universe? 👻
They made the universe through the mechanism of evolution
This guy should get Nobel peace prize joined by Host.little knowledge very dangerous
Science ka bc basic ki raita kar diya aap dono ne
Mann it takes alot of More Faith to Believe in Your Theory how eye was made...rather then An intelligent designer made it 😇
Until the intelligent designer starts thinking "Where did I come from?". Did I evolve or an Intelligent designer made me?
Conundrum captured beautifully in Rig Veda, Nasadiya Sukta. Answer: The Sukta leaves it at that, doesn't answer. That is the perfect answer as per me.
Also, they have really sped it up. There is much much more evidence and many more steps, which they have not presented for the sake of brevity. You can always pursue it as a scientist. One of 3 things will happen:
1. Disprove them and find a better theory and get a Nobel
2. Understand it perfectly and be enlightened
3. Find God!
All worthy pursuits!
Unless you have already ransomed your brain, life and spirit to the darkness! Unless you are seeking, you are in darkness. Videos on your channel point to that.
Please read embryology before reaction you can see similarly between embryos of reptile , chick
Evolve doesn't mean humans came from animals
what?
We are always watching out for you 🔺
Just 2.5K views for this content vs lahks for gibberish focusing of bakwas of so called celebrities who's life is nothing to deliberate about
Thank you for your kind sentiment. We keep working and the views will increase. Karmanyevaadhikaraaste. -navin
We are not of this world. When was man made on earth, what about the mass extension. Man must have gone with the dinosaur. We are not of this world, our first father and mother were from another world. If we see some of the old historical buildings, today we are unable to build them today.
Srikanth is blocking the flow
Change the host
Why?
These are a lot of unproveable suppositions & situations that have to randomly occur over billions of years to be true. It oddly Sounds like "Faith".
For intelligent designer gang here is a question, who created god.
Brother asked a very good question rest is history 😅
The universe could not have created itself; it could not have come from nothing. Nothing cannot produce something. If nothing existed before the beginning of the universe, there would be no universe today. Though it is hard for us to comprehend fully, an eternal, nonmaterial first cause was necessary.
God Himself has always existed, as He is not constrained by the physical dimensions of spacetime, nor is He subject to the physical laws that He Himself created, including cause and effect. Hence, God is the uncaused First Cause.
How eye developed is well explained british evolutionist richard dawkins. This may be posted on you tube.
The blue shirt guy i love, the guy on the right is very annoying. plz speak less. Let him talk.
Host is very irritating
Host is too talkative
Holy Quran
[7.179] And We have certainly created for Hell many of the jinn and mankind. They have hearts with which they do not understand, they have eyes with which they do not see, and they have ears with which they do not hear. Those are like livestock; rather, they are more astray. It is they who are the heedless.
Very childish arguement. There's no God.
those who believe in the Theory of evolution should watch the documentary by Naked Science called "Was Darwin Wrong" its available on youtube.
Time is greatest intelligent designer. Still our eye has a flaw. Interconnect that takes the signal from eye to brain for interpretation actually covers the light sensitive area thus reducing its light responsivity. An intelligent designer would not make such mistake. This flaw is indicative of engineering by time. And yes if you find a functioning watch on desert either some human showed up or you will not find. This evolution doesn’t.t have design leap anywhere time engineering is always gradual.
The idea that the eye evolved from a simple light-sensitive patch raises some important questions, especially when considering the second law of thermodynamics, which states that entropy, or disorder, in a system tends to increase over time. Evolution suggests a gradual increase in complexity, but this seems counterintuitive to entropy. The eye, with its intricate structure and precise functionality, appears to defy this natural tendency toward disorder. While some argue that energy from the sun can drive the increase in complexity, energy alone isn't enough. There must be highly specific processes and mechanisms to direct this energy into creating such a complex and efficient organ
The development of the eye begins in the embryo, directed by a precise sequence of genetic instructions. Specific genes, such as Pax6, play crucial roles in initiating the formation of the eye. The coordinated expression of these genes results in the differentiation of various eye components, such as the lens, retina, cornea, and optic nerve. Each part must develop correctly and in the right sequence for the eye to function.
The eye does not function in isolation; it must work in perfect harmony with the brain. Visual information captured by the retina is transmitted through the optic nerve to the visual cortex in the brain, where it is processed into images. This requires a complex neural network and precise biochemical signaling pathways, all of which are encoded in DNA.
The eye exhibits what is known as irreducible complexity. It means that the removal or alteration of any one part renders the entire system nonfunctional. For example, without a properly formed lens, the retina cannot focus light correctly, making vision impossible. This interdependence of parts makes the gradual evolution of the eye through random mutations highly improbable, as each part would need to evolve simultaneously to maintain functionality.5. Information Origin: The origin of the vast and specific information encoded in DNA poses another significant challenge to evolutionary theory. The likelihood of random mutations producing the highly organized and functional genetic code needed for the development of complex organs like the eye is astronomically low. Natural selection, which acts on existing variations, cannot create new information or increase complexity by itself.