1949 Westinghouse Television TV set Commercial

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 45

  • @douglasfernandes9969
    @douglasfernandes9969 3 роки тому +4

    Very nostalgic and a journey through time.

  • @jalilmuhammad8270
    @jalilmuhammad8270 2 роки тому +2

    Speaking of the zoom-out of the title card in the beginning of this video, CBS would later be acquired by Westinghouse and subsequently Viacom, thus marking the end of the Westinghouse name in the electronics industry.

    • @jamesslick4790
      @jamesslick4790 Рік тому

      Westinghouse was from Pittsburgh, PA. Here's where it gets weird. KDKA (radio) was a Westinghouse station (Natch!) in 1949 Pittsburgh had only one TV station. (WDTV, Channel 3) It was on the DuMont TV network. That station was BOUGHT by Westinghouse in 1954 moved to Channel 2, Became KDKA-TV and IS a CBS station It's the only major network station in Pittsburgh that's owned by the network. The ABC affiliate (CH 4 WTAE) is owned by Hearst. The NBC affiliate (CH 11, WPXI) is owned by Cox. TL;DR: It took FIVE YEARS for Westinghouse's own headquarters city to line up with this ad! LOL. Another Westinghouse TV history bit: RCA developed "compatible color" (NTSC) But Westinghouse beat them to the market by selling the FIRST consumer NTSC color set! Source: From Pitttsburgh, Many family members worked for various Westinghouse divisions.

  • @Juliaflo
    @Juliaflo 2 роки тому +2

    Always happy to see what television was like before I was born.

  • @pcno2832
    @pcno2832 4 роки тому +2

    1:49 The "synchro-tune" must have been something like the AFC circuits on FM radios that locked the tuner onto the strongest signal. It worked as long as the stations were spaced well apart.

    • @philipnasadowski1060
      @philipnasadowski1060 2 роки тому

      It just was an inter carrier design, which was still new back then. With an inter carrier set, the picture and sound are automatically tuned in at the same time, because they are separated at the detector in the IF circuits.
      All sets built after about 1950 were like this.
      Philip had automatic fine tuning in the late 40’s, but it was expensive to build into the set

  • @roadtripboy
    @roadtripboy 3 роки тому +3

    $269 for a 12" in 1949. I paid $250 for a 13" RCA in the 1985. It's interesting the pricing pretty much stayed the same for several decades.

    • @johanvangelderen6715
      @johanvangelderen6715 Рік тому +2

      You forgot about inflation though.

    • @roadtripboy
      @roadtripboy Рік тому +2

      @@johanvangelderen6715 I didn't forget. It just wasn't important to me.

    • @jamesslick4790
      @jamesslick4790 Рік тому

      @@johanvangelderen6715 Here is the INTERESTING part though: The 13" TV in 1985 would have been color AND solid state (except for the picture tube...) I had the same thought about (radio) Scanners. I bought a scanner for $99 in 1979 that had 4 (crystal controlled) channels. I bought a scanner for $99 in 2012 with 500 channels and could be programmed via a PC!

  • @hebneh
    @hebneh 13 днів тому

    “Electronic Magnification” - the answer to a question that no one ever asked.

  • @goodmaro
    @goodmaro 11 років тому +7

    Interesting, that zoom feature, but apparently you could only zoom it on the center. Also interesting that other receivers then were implied as having separate tuning for video & sound. You would think that with NTSC you could only tune overall as this set did; possibly they meant something else by "tuning".

    • @Rocket_scientist_88
      @Rocket_scientist_88 5 років тому +3

      Robert Goodman I grew up with an old B&W set from the 1950s, and I recall the “tuning” knob was just something that would give you a finer ability to focus on the broadcast frequency. In other words, it was a “fine tuning” knob. When you were closer to the center of the band, the picture and sound came in clearer. One knob, signal clearer for both pic and sound.
      I’m an engineer today and I love having the ability to manually control things like this. Too bad I can’t, especially with today’s digital TVs.

    • @roadtripboy
      @roadtripboy 3 роки тому

      You could tune them separately because in NTSC the video and sound are broadcast separate from each other. The TV combines them together.

    • @ABobby077
      @ABobby077 3 роки тому

      @@Rocket_scientist_88 was that "AFC" or "AFT"? Seems I remember TVs from the 60's/70's that had an "AFC" or "AFT" setting/knob.

    • @jamesslick4790
      @jamesslick4790 Рік тому +1

      @@ABobby077 No, He was talking about manual fine tuning. "AFC" (automatic frequency control) or AFT (automatic fine tuning)

  • @laststopbeforeheaven
    @laststopbeforeheaven 6 місяців тому

    You can be sure ... If it's Westinghouse!❤

  • @loveisall5520
    @loveisall5520 2 роки тому +1

    That $269 in 1949 Dollars translated to $3368 in 2022 Dollars. No wonder a lot of people couldn't afford one!

  • @johanvangelderen289
    @johanvangelderen289 4 роки тому +2

    The 1949 price of 270 dollars is equivalent to 2,940 dollars in today's money.

  • @adamhauck6058
    @adamhauck6058 Рік тому

    I'm sold!
    I'll be there to see you tomorrow... but I'm not sure you're still alive.

  • @luisreyes1963
    @luisreyes1963 2 роки тому +4

    Two things no longer in existence: Live TV drama & American-made TVs. ☹️

  • @johanvangelderen6715
    @johanvangelderen6715 Рік тому +1

    According to the USA CPI Calculator
    270 dollars in 1949
    Is equivalent to 3,400 dollars in 2023.
    All that money for a 12 inch screen.
    Many people would rather purchase a second hand car.

  • @karenroy9045
    @karenroy9045 2 роки тому +2

    Westinghouse was way before its time.

    • @jamesslick4790
      @jamesslick4790 Рік тому

      You can be SURE! 👍😊👍

    • @luisreyes1963
      @luisreyes1963 Місяць тому

      The programs were better back then, as well. 😁

  • @jscott1000
    @jscott1000 4 роки тому +2

    Ignoring inflation TVs cost about the same now as they did 70 years ago.

  • @debrareisdorf309
    @debrareisdorf309 3 роки тому

    Fascinating.

  • @facundobresan1009
    @facundobresan1009 3 роки тому

    Fantastic!!!

  • @sh-ig9fm
    @sh-ig9fm 4 роки тому +2

    How does this film exist I thought film couldn't be shown on TV and TV couldn't be transferred to film intill the 1950s

    • @roadtripboy
      @roadtripboy 3 роки тому +3

      It's called Kinescope. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinescope

    • @sh-ig9fm
      @sh-ig9fm 3 роки тому

      @@roadtripboy I didn't think it was possible then I thought that was a 50s this I saw a video where the guy sed that most TV shows weren't put onto film until the 50s

    • @jamesslick4790
      @jamesslick4790 Рік тому +1

      @@sh-ig9fm Film could ALWAYS be shown on TV. It was VIDEOTAPE that didn't exist until the 1950s. All of the pre-1956 TV content you see today ("I love Lucy" for example) were shot on film. The REVERSE was the issue. "Live" TV could not be recorded (as a video signal) so they used (more or less) a film camera aimed at a video monitor (Kinescope). Videotape allowed for the recording of the actual video signal (not just filming a screen!). The first videotape recorders were sold in 1956. A lot of old TV shows were on film into the 1980s. This is why HD rereleases are possible. Film can be rescanned at a higher resolution than old TV could reproduce, If the show was on videotape instead of film, You are stuck with the old TV resolution.

  • @mariopario8637
    @mariopario8637 3 роки тому +1

    The phone I'm watching this on cost less that 270 not taking inflation into account

  • @MisterSelfHelp
    @MisterSelfHelp  11 років тому +3

    Not sure, but it was not uncommon for them to slightly mis-lead in order to sell more units.

    • @bobboscarato1313
      @bobboscarato1313 6 років тому +2

      It is called marketing and it has been around since Adam and Eve ((remember the apple?).

    • @jamesslick4790
      @jamesslick4790 Рік тому

      I don't really see what's misleading in this ad.

  • @karenroy9045
    @karenroy9045 2 роки тому +1

    I paid $139 for my 45” smart TV on Black Friday 3-years ago.

  • @mikezampardi1770
    @mikezampardi1770 2 роки тому +1

    your Gonna Realize in Time
    That Your Elder, Has Another Problem, With The Future,

  • @bobboscarato1313
    @bobboscarato1313 6 років тому +2

    Westinghouse wasn't one of the best TV brands!