What Is Deadweight Loss?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 60

  • @mitalikshatriya6365
    @mitalikshatriya6365 4 роки тому +50

    i read several other websites before visiting this. This was the only one that made me understand.

    • @Ajeet1458
      @Ajeet1458 4 роки тому

      😊 Same with me...

  • @sharifshabir5398
    @sharifshabir5398 3 роки тому +12

    First time I understand economic concept like this
    Thank you dear

    • @juanlu3958
      @juanlu3958 2 роки тому +1

      Go check the land value tax,the tax system without any deadweight loss

  • @kikikiki8381
    @kikikiki8381 11 місяців тому +29

    So how do I lose weight

  • @adamallred7615
    @adamallred7615 5 років тому +16

    This was really helpful, thank you!

  • @hanamuneer8233
    @hanamuneer8233 4 роки тому +4

    I dont get it

  • @hennymehta8484
    @hennymehta8484 3 роки тому +1

    What do mean by benefit of the trip? It's satisfactory benefit?

  • @jffryh
    @jffryh 6 років тому +4

    @2:58 "negative externalities"

    • @Summerofsam
      @Summerofsam 6 років тому +1

      Yes! I think this should have been stated in the beginning. If you don't finish the full video you might never be able to catch that information.

  • @nryle
    @nryle 6 років тому +5

    Great vid, easy to follow.

  • @DereC519
    @DereC519 2 місяці тому

    ty

  • @kshytyj
    @kshytyj 5 років тому +3

    Thank you. It was really helpful.

  • @stressedhaish69420
    @stressedhaish69420 Рік тому +3

    Nero?

  • @FinEconTalks
    @FinEconTalks Рік тому

    Thanku

  • @shakibahmed9777
    @shakibahmed9777 5 років тому

    Thanks

  • @absolomgapara174
    @absolomgapara174 2 роки тому

    Now thats how to explain!

  • @xX3laal9amtXx
    @xX3laal9amtXx 4 роки тому

    احب هذي القناة لانها جعلت مادة الاقتصاد سهلة وممتعة ❤️❤️

  • @alparslankorkmaz2964
    @alparslankorkmaz2964 3 роки тому +1

    Nicely explained.

  • @sultonmamadchorshanbiev1972
    @sultonmamadchorshanbiev1972 5 років тому +1

    Thanks for good explanation!

  • @nicenice8143
    @nicenice8143 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you, this helped a lot!

  • @FeraldiMarco
    @FeraldiMarco Рік тому

    thanks for simplifying the explanation!

  • @berlinkersaint815
    @berlinkersaint815 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you , I finally understand

  • @sineadamadi6204
    @sineadamadi6204 3 роки тому +3

    It’s the fact that the music went silent at the exact time I understood this 😍

    • @-s9314
      @-s9314 3 роки тому

      lol sameee

  • @ThePeterDislikeShow
    @ThePeterDislikeShow 4 роки тому

    Approximately how much deadweight loss is there in the economy?

  • @kelvinmugini6793
    @kelvinmugini6793 2 роки тому

    imekaa poa sana

  • @eftiefti190
    @eftiefti190 3 роки тому +1

    u explained very welll❤

  • @TorySlusher
    @TorySlusher 4 роки тому

    Why aren't the central banks which are all doing Nirp considered to be a deadweight loss? Serious question. I guess someone will say that they're inviolable or sacrosanct because someone created little pieces of paper (laws/exemptions) and placed them inside of fancy buildings (which grants them the rights to do these things). Simply put, better than the rest of us and therefore not held accountable for anything, ever.

  • @TheRoamingPrepper
    @TheRoamingPrepper 4 місяці тому

    Great video. thanks for sharing

  • @imrnp
    @imrnp 2 роки тому

    how is there no revenue if the government gets the tax

  • @driip5981
    @driip5981 3 роки тому

    Excellent explanation

  • @Meghaa71
    @Meghaa71 3 роки тому +1

    Superb 🙌🙌🙌🙏
    It was easy to catch..
    Watching at 3:30am 😬😬
    Still intersting

  • @sharonmusee673
    @sharonmusee673 Рік тому

    Super helpful!

  • @loicklepine8490
    @loicklepine8490 4 роки тому +1

    Why isn't the new price 3$ ? 2$ + 1$ because of the tax?

    • @Footballpro0987
      @Footballpro0987 2 роки тому

      the producers decreases his profit by 50 cents and bares the 50 cent tax.

  • @benjaminbauer425
    @benjaminbauer425 3 роки тому

    Explanation looks incomplete to me. Lets take the bus example. But if I have 50$ but the bus cost me 60$ due to tax, they say it is not made up for in value because there is no revenue, but i will still spend it on something else (maybe i go to a restaurant instead).
    I dont study Economics, I study competition law and so Im trying to understand why monopolies are bad. Sofar I havent come across any good explanation.

  • @lucasleite694
    @lucasleite694 3 роки тому

    intro music hella nostalgic

  • @vintjoseph7450
    @vintjoseph7450 3 роки тому +1

    how can you make something so simple complicted :-P :-P ?

  • @tarun_235
    @tarun_235 3 роки тому

    good vdo keep it up

  • @CvnDqnrU
    @CvnDqnrU 5 років тому +3

    When you say "market inefficiency" you mean the government, right?

    • @videakias3000
      @videakias3000 5 років тому +4

      not necessarily,sometime market fails and government has nothing to do with it.
      government wasn't the one responsible for the video game crush of 1983

    • @CvnDqnrU
      @CvnDqnrU 5 років тому

      @@videakias3000 How's that related?

    • @videakias3000
      @videakias3000 5 років тому

      @@CvnDqnrU dammit,for a moment i thought you said market failure.
      i guess it is not related to what you said.

    • @discojohn8753
      @discojohn8753 4 роки тому

      @@videakias3000 That was not a free market failure. The president of Atari was inside trading, which led to a bubble, which led to a collapse. The only reason free markets work is because nobody has the advantage. Milton Friedman famously said "You have to choose if you are pro business, or pro free market." That was a result of someone being pro business, not a free market failure.

    • @videakias3000
      @videakias3000 4 роки тому

      @@discojohn8753 how was the pressident of atari responsible for the fact that there were too many consoles in the market and that many games didn't mantion in their box the name of the console that they were suppossed to play on?

  • @thaingan6378
    @thaingan6378 4 роки тому

    why trip to NY equal 1 and 0 ??

    • @justkira3242
      @justkira3242 4 роки тому

      the one means that 1 trip was taken before tax. After tax, 0 trips were taken.

  • @miltonfriedmann2664
    @miltonfriedmann2664 11 місяців тому +1

    T

  • @xxitzzcasteexx4377
    @xxitzzcasteexx4377 2 роки тому

    「目標を指定してお金が必要」、

  • @doseoffaiyaz
    @doseoffaiyaz Рік тому

    You lose 10 dollars worth of a trip.
    The bus driver/company loses 10 dollars worth of revenue.
    The government loses tax revenue.
    The world is worse off.

  • @jzk2020
    @jzk2020 6 років тому +9

    Can you calculate the dead-weight loss of African Americans being disenfranchised, disproportionately targeted by the prison industrial complex and generally the unwillingness of White America to invest & treat them just like they would treat their own fellow white Americans.
    Thank you.

    • @diogocoelho293
      @diogocoelho293 6 років тому +1

      Asshole

    • @Boristien405
      @Boristien405 6 років тому +3

      C. Lincoln - Here’s a fun fact: deadweight loss doesn’t happen without government intervention... situation is applicable here too. Government has always been the deadliest and most discriminatory organization, and people want to give it MORE value.

    • @jffryh
      @jffryh 6 років тому +1

      negative externalities happen without government intervention

    • @Boristien405
      @Boristien405 6 років тому

      jffryh - They can. That doesn’t mean the deadweight loss we are talking about will happen. In a perfectly competitive market, DWL is impossible. And monopolies have no history of taking form without the help of government.