RULE CONTROVERSY - was this ball put back in play properly?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 6

  • @einer1314
    @einer1314 17 днів тому +1

    Thanks for the videos. Enjoy your week,

    • @fivebarofdoom
      @fivebarofdoom  17 днів тому

      Thanks for watching, you too! Happy new year! 🎈

  • @stephenschmall4635
    @stephenschmall4635 17 днів тому +1

    At first I was thinking it would be a terrible rule even if it was a rule violation. But then I was able to come up with a reasonable justification for a requirement to move the ball in that case (yes,acknowledging the current rules only require contact). If you're timing that match, it'd be a lot harder to tell if a player made contact or not if the ball doesn't move (they could even fake contact and wait an extra second then go into a texas T). Ball movement is a lot easier to see to start the possession clock. I normally dislike rule quibbles and really dislike them if they seem arbitrary, but at least I've convinced myself there's a sensible (though minor) piece of substance here. If they change the rules requiring movement of the ball on that second figure, I wouldn't object to the change.
    Keep up the good work on videos!
    I remember listening to your interviews years ago. 😊

    • @fivebarofdoom
      @fivebarofdoom  17 днів тому

      That’s a good point that it’s easier to tell if the ball was touched if you had to move it. Thanks Stephen! :)

  • @youbluethatone1017
    @youbluethatone1017 16 днів тому +1

    VERY ILLEGAL!! Any League I played in wouldn’t allow that!!

    • @macoxford
      @macoxford 6 днів тому

      so what other home rules does your league use?