The MOST ANCIENT Place in Jerusalem? (City of David and Hezekiah Tunnel)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 чер 2022
  • This is the MOST ANCIENT place in Jerusalem! At the City of David, we will watch the Bible come to life. 🕊️
    With: @indianaftali
    For more ⬇
    Website Articles: www.i24news.tv/en
    Social Media:
    Facebook: / i24newsen
    Twitter: / i24news_en
    Instagram: / i24news

КОМЕНТАРІ • 40

  • @abhinavbhatnagar1566
    @abhinavbhatnagar1566 Рік тому +7

    Love to india from india😘🙏😉😊

  • @thetruth-bysudeepdigal653
    @thetruth-bysudeepdigal653 8 місяців тому

    That's pretty cool & unique name India.. love from India🇮🇳

  • @raulcorrea9923
    @raulcorrea9923 3 місяці тому

    I would love to visit Israel one day

  • @SalesforceUSA
    @SalesforceUSA Рік тому +3

    I am an Aryan from Germany. I like Israeli news

  • @REUBENITEsisinthetruthahmawan
    @REUBENITEsisinthetruthahmawan Рік тому +1

    FAITH BOOSTER THROUGH POWER OF OUR HEAVENLY FATHER YAHAWAH BAHA SHAM YAHAWASHI RIGHT HAND SIDE. 😉😚🤗🤭😎🥳✌👍✊👏💪🍷🥧🍨🎂🍸🍹🥂🍾🌈👑

  • @shevetlevi2821
    @shevetlevi2821 Рік тому +1

    Thank you.

  • @zamfully
    @zamfully Рік тому +1

    Watching India is do much fun

  • @devmudawari8949
    @devmudawari8949 Рік тому +5

    Israel is Great 🙏❤️

  • @eliseolopez2790
    @eliseolopez2790 10 місяців тому

    Leaves in trees blossom ruins of the chosen show yourself s

  • @lawrencewarren3054
    @lawrencewarren3054 Рік тому +3

    Cooooool !

  • @onlineactivity2349
    @onlineactivity2349 Рік тому

    Tikkun HaBRIT movie by Rabbi Yaron Reuven

  • @melvincaramba2942
    @melvincaramba2942 Рік тому +1

    Baruch HaShem Adonai Elohai YESHUA Ben Dovid. Majority of the archeologists in Eretz Yisroel are very humble and honest. They are the one who told the very TRUTH of ALL TRUTH. They told the whole world about the whole TRUTH that Eretz Yisroel is the One and Only CHOSENED PROMISED Sovereign LAND on the planet. AND, YERUSHALAYIM is the One and Only ETERNAL HOLY CAPITAL of all HOLY HEBREWS ( excluding the LGBTQIS ). Hallelujah hallelujah amen amen

    • @mannymannyson6720
      @mannymannyson6720 Рік тому

      Jesus was not ben David. The fools Even say he had no father making him not ben David. Can't use mother or step father for that either

  • @tomasgomes737
    @tomasgomes737 Рік тому +3

    🙏🇮🇱🇹🇱

  • @VargaErwin
    @VargaErwin Рік тому +1

    Greetings

    • @onlineactivity2349
      @onlineactivity2349 Рік тому

      Tikkun HaBRIT movie by Rabbi Yaron Reuven

    • @tmcge3325
      @tmcge3325 9 місяців тому

      Salem or Shalem which is Jerusalem....maybe even older than 5,000. Salem had a King there and he gave Abraham wine and bread and Blessed Abraham. This King had no parents, no wife and no children and Abraham gave him tenths and honored him as King and The Priest of the Most High God. King Melchizedek

  • @thetruth9494
    @thetruth9494 Рік тому

    Even if David had existed he was not the king he is made out to be. According to biblical scholars there was no such thing as a kingdom but tribes very loosely united who chose David as their chieftain to lead them if the need arose. Besides, Jerusalem, the so called city of David was nothing of the kind. It was a city built by the Jebusites, a Canaanite tribe. It seems that Israelis know little of history. The water which this India creature talks about was brought to Jerusalem by the Jebusites and then it was further developed by King Hezekiah.

    • @tamaralexander9379
      @tamaralexander9379 Рік тому +3

      But evidnence show there was such a kingdom. David made Jerusalem what it is and the capital of the united kingdom. It seems u know little of history.

    • @thetruth9494
      @thetruth9494 Рік тому

      @@tamaralexander9379 If you believe in mythical history is another thing. Biblical scholars and archeologists give a different story altogether. You should read Israel Finkelstein to see how wrong you are. Thus is just a summary of what he wrote and btw which other biblical scholars agree with.
      "There's even more debate over how powerful David's kingdom was, what territory it controlled and whether David's kingdom was ever the "united monarchy" that is supposed to have united the Jews.
      Israel Finkelstein, an archaeology professor at Tel Aviv University, has argued that David's kingdom was more modest than what the Hebrew Bible claims.
      "Over a century of archaeological explorations in Jerusalem - the capital of the glamorous biblical United Monarchy - failed to reveal evidence for any meaningful 10th-century building activity," Finkelstein wrote in the book "One God - One Cult - One Nation: Archaeological and Biblical Perspectives" (de Gruyter, 2010). "10th-century Jerusalem was no more than a small, remote highlands village, not the exquisitely decked-out capital of a great empire." "

    • @tamaralexander9379
      @tamaralexander9379 Рік тому +3

      @@thetruth9494 A new archaeological study has found evidence supporting the belief that a monarchy just might have united the lands during this important period, while also serving as a reminder of how biases in archaeology can change how we view the past.
      Archaeologists Avraham Faust and Yair Sapir from Bar Ilan University in Israel recently published their radiocarbon dating findings on a dig site at Tel 'Eton that pushed the date of the site's establishment to between the 11th and 10th century BCE.
      Not only does the evidence suggest an Israeli governor was ruling in a Judean town at a crucial period, it serves as a reminder of the challenges archaeologists face in accurately dating ancient sites.
      Archaeologists have uncovered what they believe may be King David's Palace in the Judean Shephelah. Royal storerooms were also revealed in the joint archaeological excavation of the Hebrew University and the Israel Antiquities Authority at Khirbet Qeiyafa. These are the two largest buildings known to have existed in the tenth century BCE in the Kingdom of Judah.
      And its go on and on.

    • @thetruth9494
      @thetruth9494 Рік тому

      @@tamaralexander9379 I suggest you read just a little but more about the findings of Abraham Faust and Yair Sapir. Their findings just prove that a house was found but whether it is Israelite or not is not even clear. What these two archaeologists say is that a house was built on the foundations of another house which definitely was Canaanite as Canaanite artefacts were found.
      As to the so called palace of David, nothing was found to link it directly to David or even the Israelites. You do know that a good number of other Canaanite tribes lived in different regions over this land. So such sites could have belonged to them as well. I said that King David "ruled" over a loosely united people because the Israelites just like the Canaanites lived spread across all the land sharing the land between them. Some areas were under Israelite rule others under the Canaanite one. So unless clear proof indicating who built and lived in certain sites is actually found nothing can be stated for sure.

    • @lindaphillips4246
      @lindaphillips4246 Рік тому +1

      David invaded and took over the early city of Salem. He expanded the city and ruled from it because God Himself has claimed the city as His own.