I don’t think he’d consider it necessary. He already (rightly), considers his own books as a collective tome chronicling the provenance of Britain’s economic and social decline so he’d basically just say, ‘Read what I wrote twenty years ago!’ . . .
@@edwardcatt2399 I disagree with that. I think it would be good if he made documentaries, instead of just seeing him on a panel format arguing with others. Maybe just him. I would like him to write his memoirs, time he spent in Russia, he is, despite being very cranky, a decent chap
@@eddyk2016 - I actually don’t find him particularly ’cranky’, but I see where where you’re coming from. He has a polite but firm assertiveness about him for sure.
@@edwardcatt2399If you look up the word cranky in the dictionary, you will see Peter’s face. Yes, he does come across a really decent man. He’s very honest. What I really admire about him, is that he is the complete opposite of a people pleaser. He has given me the spur, to speak my mind and never, agree to the ideology or views of the mob/sheep
Here is a question: Is the end goal Inequality, but not inequality based on if your parents can afford private school or a house in a good school area...etc.... but Inequality based on 1) How intelligently born you are. 2) Testosterone / progesterone levels : Which define how long and hard you can work. This is a better and fairer form of inequality for sure. SN
I agree, 100% Equality of opportunity is important. Playing Devil's advocate, it's still an inequality, just based on intelligence etc instead. Which is better for sure.@@Rootle2
Great to see Ray Winstone and Peter Hitchens together. Two of my favourite people.
Brilliant comments by Mr. Hitchens
Peter needs to have his own podcast or his own channel, history & politics and current affairs. That would be very popular
I don’t think he’d consider it necessary. He already (rightly), considers his own books as a collective tome chronicling the provenance of Britain’s economic and social decline so he’d basically just say, ‘Read what I wrote twenty years ago!’ . . .
@@edwardcatt2399 I disagree with that. I think it would be good if he made documentaries, instead of just seeing him on a panel format arguing with others. Maybe just him. I would like him to write his memoirs, time he spent in Russia, he is, despite being very cranky, a decent chap
@@eddyk2016 - I actually don’t find him particularly ’cranky’, but I see where where you’re coming from. He has a polite but firm assertiveness about him for sure.
@@edwardcatt2399If you look up the word cranky in the dictionary, you will see Peter’s face.
Yes, he does come across a really decent man. He’s very honest. What I really admire about him, is that he is the complete opposite of a people pleaser. He has given me the spur, to speak my mind and never, agree to the ideology or views of the mob/sheep
I do really like to see Peter smiling
Where was this?
Definitely not Scotland.
@@lee4171, that much was clear.
Here is a question: Is the end goal Inequality, but not inequality based on if your parents can afford private school or a house in a good school area...etc.... but Inequality based on 1) How intelligently born you are. 2) Testosterone / progesterone levels : Which define how long and hard you can work.
This is a better and fairer form of inequality for sure. SN
Whose end goal are you talking about?
All societies are unequal and always will be.
It's about equality of opportunity. Everyone should have the chance to achieve their personal highest potential
I agree, 100% Equality of opportunity is important. Playing Devil's advocate, it's still an inequality, just based on intelligence etc instead. Which is better for sure.@@Rootle2
Yes…the great tragedy of inequality of ability. Very costly for those without any.
The guy hosting this is rather irritating.
The host is chirpy, but trying too hard.