This 2x2 and 4x4 cubes are game-changing. They not only make me turn accurately, but they are so loud and catchy that we are thankful that GAN exists. With the brilliant tile design, nobody can ever peel the stickers off. They can't even turn the cube so the cube will always be solved. But if you can't scramble it you can't solve it, like a 1x1. Absolutely ridicu- er, amazing. Love the work Rubik's is doing.
J perm, I watched your video series of how you started cubing. It inspired me to get a Pyramid and a Rubix cube. I had a LOT of fun. Thank you for inspiring me to a new world I never knew about!
just found out about your channel and just wanna say thank you, before watching your videos i used begginer method but now i use f2l i still am pretty slow but getting faster and i am learning 2 look pll and oll and your tutorials are THE BEST so thanks
Hi Jperm Love the videos. You are how I learned the rubiks cube. I appreciate that very much. I just wanted to know how long should it take to learn beginner oll and pll (average). Thanks! Kepp up the great work, you are an amazing teacher
hey jperm congrats on 1 mill thanks sooo much for so many entering and helpful vids i remeber my first cubes they were all Rubiks because there the original "the best" my 4x4 was unbelievablyy bad I was so surprised that the are actual good 4x4s, p.s your the best you inspired me to go to a competition and get my fers ever sub 10 BG (your biggest fan)
maybe to see which core magnets are stronger on the gan 11 m pro, you could put triangle magnets on one side and octagon magnets on the other and then turn the right and left side to see which one moves the middle layer. also, thanks 4 the great video!
Hey J perm! I found out your channel a year ago and I just wanna say, that your doing amazing! Only because of you, I am able to solve a 2 by 2, 3 by 3 and a 4 by 4 under a minute! keep up the great work!
Hey j perm big fan, I know you probably won’t see this but I just want you to know that you got me into cubing and really helped me with it I went From solving 3 minutes to 20 seconds and I just want to thank you for that
You’re welcome or I’m sorry Take this as you wish Well you could probably get a decent estimate without taking into affect the deceleration. Velocity would be V=x/t We’re trying to find x (displacement). You could get the velocity by using the cube as a reference and take the amount of frames (time) it takes to move a certain amount of pixels (displacement ). Then get the time before we hear the box hit the ground (ignoring the height of the table and the amount of time it takes for the the box to fall). Then you could finally figure out how far the table extends. Though you wouldn’t know how far the table extends in the other direction. I would actually calculate it, but frankly I don’t want to
hey a fellow canadian! just found your channel and already i like it, used to be into watching rubix cube videos and i think you are pulling me back in, anyways, great video!
J Perm, can you do a video answering FAQ on Rubiks brand Rubiks Cubes? Like why they don’t have a beginner friendly cube like these but also very professional ones like the ones GAN makes? Or why Rubiks is so bad in the first place and what they should/can/need to do to have better Rubik’s cubes?
Hoi, Dylan! When I started cubing we used to call the CFOP method "Friedrich Method". Ever heard about that? All your content is great and this is hands down the best cubing channel easily. Peace!
Hi J perm I just wanted to say I love your videos and I've been subbed since 400k. Keep up the unbelievable work and hope you can read Chinese ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️🥇
I just got a pb of 55.56 and it s all thanks to you jperm i only watched your videos to get that time, rn i m trying to learn f2l and it s really hard to undestand it but i ll keep practicing
There is now a new version of the Rubiks 3x3 (probably spinmaster?) That actually seems pretty good to me. It is my quietest official Rubiks brand cube and seems to turn pretty well. Would be nice to see your impressions.
You should create a discord server so we can ask questions and make suggestions but also have somewhere else to talk about cubing other than your comment section. I like your channel, good job! :D
I really like the Rubik's brand. I know they're slow and not simple, but they're very nice for people who have no idea what they're doing. It helped me go through the algorithms very slowly and then once I got faster I upgraded to a much better cube... But with the 3x3s when I started really getting into it, I got a speedcube right away and I kept overturning the crap out of it and losing my place and it was very frustrating. So I enjoy starting with a much slower cube that requires time.
8:12 my guesses: speed: 3+8+45 = 55s rubiks: 6+13+60 = 1min21s time wasted due to hardware limitations: 26s edit: Actual Results [spoilers]: speed: 4+9+35 = 48 rubiks: 7+18+dnf = rubiks brand is bad
Hey J Perm! Congrats on 1mil btw. Anyway, I would really like to know what your editing system is. I am trying to run my own cubing channel, and I would appreciate it!
I think they should put a instruction booklet on how to assemble the cubes. That way, the begginers will look inside the instruction and assemble their cube.
I have the originals from the 1980's when they first were sold, plus the 1983 Professor's 5x5x5 cube. The 1981 4x4x4 was named Rubik's Revenge, and its internals was a slotted sphere and long narrow legs on the center pieces, which made it fragile. The Professor's cube had a internal structure like a cube within a cube, and later 4x4x4 like Eastsheen used a similar internal structure. I also have a Chinese "Magic" 6x6x6 with corners and outer edges same size as rest of pieces.
Hi Jperm! I have a 3 by 3 scramble I think you would like( f2l and oll skip scramble) Scramble: D' F' L2 D2 F2 B R2 F2 U2 R2 F U2 L2 D2 F' L2 U2 If you try it a few times you'll get it 😉
@@wojtekpollok5782 I am not completely sure how it was made because I saw it in another UA-cam video. If you look up “F2L and OLL skip scramble, that should be the video 📹
I absolutely love your content, and I've always rooted for you and how you've taken cubing to whole new audiences by making it as accessible and understandable as you possibly can. But I feel like you always over-exaggerate when a cube is "bad," i.e. turns poorly, is sluggish, or just not your style. Cubing hardware across the board is exceptional now, from pretty much any speedcube manufacturer, and while that does allow for the threshold of quality to evolve and make for newer puzzles to have to achieve far more to make a niche for themselves, I feel like your criticisms of cubes like the new Rubik's 4x4 forget just how far cubing hardware has come in the last 12+ years. It's nowhere near as bad as the Eastsheen, the Meffert's 4x4, or even the Maru 4x4. I absolutely love your content, and I always look forward to each upload, and I know a lot of the criticism your hurl at these cubes is in good fun, but the context and perspective of how good hardware is now could be a bigger talking point in these impression/review videos. I'll admit, though - that 2x2 makes no sense. Literally just 2 more screws and springs and that cube could be so much more usable. I'd love to see if cutting the rivets and replacing them with screws and springs would make the cube even remotely better.
The difference is that when we judge cubes now, we do it in the context of their current competition. Sure the rubiks 4x4 is better than a 4x4 from 10 years ago, but if you’re buying a 4x4 today, you make the decision by comparing it to current hardware. Because if this there’s no point in comparing a rubiks 4x4 to a 4x4 from last decade
I understand your criticism, as these cubes are good compared to how bad they could get. But I make the comparison in the context of what's currently available. If you had an eastsheen 4x4 now, I'd still say it's bad because you could easily get one that is much better.
Hey, Jperm You should do a challenge where you try to solve a scrambled cube to the cube in a cube pattern. It's hard and I don't think you've done a video about this before.
I feel like there should be a subset called jpll or jpv which stands for j perm last layer and j perm variation which is when you do an algorithm and then your pll is a jperm.
5:28 I have the old rubik 4x4. Its the worst. Half of the time when I turn the top layer the bottom layer is also turned which is VERY annoying. I’m also wondering, why are my white corners are flipped.
Hello, please consider doing this challenge: solve a monochrome shape-mod of Rubik's cube WITHOUT LOOKING AT ALL. Example of puzzles like that: the heart shaped puzzle (easier level), ghost cube (more difficult level). This means you have to rely on touching and feeling the pieces, and be careful with similar pieces. The heart puzzle has some pairs like that and wouldn't make smooth surface with the wrong pieces or wrong orientation of the centers.
Hes not scared on cuting his finger cuz itl Hurt but bc of demonitycason
yeah
@@JPerm hello mr i perm
@@everythinginacube.7960 its L perm
@@JPerm I love your vids I learned intuitive f2l, 2 look oll and PLL from you please reply
SO TRUE
This 2x2 and 4x4 cubes are game-changing. They not only make me turn accurately, but they are so loud and catchy that we are thankful that GAN exists. With the brilliant tile design, nobody can ever peel the stickers off. They can't even turn the cube so the cube will always be solved. But if you can't scramble it you can't solve it, like a 1x1. Absolutely ridicu- er, amazing. Love the work Rubik's is doing.
Best Comment!
GAN 2x2 and 4x4 also not really good
Gan does 4x4?
@@tarinachow8779 yeah the 460, but it was a total flop. The inner layers were terrible.
Rubik's should get rid of the ball core and use magnets on their cubes
Now we just need Jperm to main Rubik's brands.
And that's why he's better than max park
@@pecareca6735 confirmed!
Agree
Agreed
@@JPerm so do it
If that 4x4 released like 10 years ago it would actually be one of the best 4x4s in the market lol
That 4x4 blows my mind, after 40 years they finally made a decent one. Shows there's always hope for improvement
"You can see them shaking with fear. No, that's just cuz they don't have magnets in them"
- J Perm, 2022
9:12
I laughed too much at this😂☠️
Ok now I need to get that 4x4…
Hi Kewbix! First reply!
You kewbix big fan
why did you need that 4x4 😂😂
Congrats on 100k
That's a good Idea considering your hoard of other rubiks brands 🤣
J perm, I watched your video series of how you started cubing.
It inspired me to get a Pyramid and a Rubix cube.
I had a LOT of fun.
Thank you for inspiring me to a new world I never knew about!
J perm keeping us entertained♥️♥️ you are reason why I started to cube 3 years ago😊 and I am quite good now. Thank you Dylan
love the video!!
you started my cubing career thank you continue your work!❤️
just found out about your channel and just wanna say thank you, before watching your videos i used begginer method but now i use f2l i still am pretty slow but getting faster
and i am learning 2 look pll and oll and your tutorials are THE BEST so thanks
2 years later speed check what's the average
Hi Jperm Love the videos. You are how I learned the rubiks cube. I appreciate that very much. I just wanted to know how long should it take to learn beginner oll and pll (average). Thanks! Kepp up the great work, you are an amazing teacher
Your videos are always helpful and entertaining and inspired me to start cubing again. Thank you J Perm, keep up the great work :)
hey jperm congrats on 1 mill thanks sooo much for so many entering and helpful vids i remeber my first cubes they were all Rubiks because there the original "the best" my 4x4 was unbelievablyy bad I was so surprised that the are actual good 4x4s,
p.s your the best you inspired me to go to a competition and get my fers ever sub 10 BG (your biggest fan)
maybe to see which core magnets are stronger on the gan 11 m pro, you could put triangle magnets on one side and octagon magnets on the other and then turn the right and left side to see which one moves the middle layer. also, thanks 4 the great video!
Challenge: Every time you solve a 3x3 a random finger is removed (or a finger of your choosing) and can no longer touch the cube on the next solve
You are also not allowed to get any blood on the cube
@@sillowillo HOL UP
You’re guaranteed to just accidentally touch it with the forbidden finger at some point
@@PikKraken8 WAIT A MINUTE
Hey J perm! I found out your channel a year ago and I just wanna say, that your doing amazing! Only because of you, I am able to solve a 2 by 2, 3 by 3 and a 4 by 4 under a minute! keep up the great work!
also him: joined 7 months ago
@@unknown-wn3ez you can watch youtube without an account
Nice vid as always Dylan!
I learned beginner cfop because of you thank you so much ❤️
J perm, can you please get the Yj yushi v2 m 6x6 because I want to know your opinion on it
JPerm I learned 3x3 from you I learned CFOP aswell you helped me get into cubing, now I have over 7 cubes!
Love your videos man
I’m getting my fan 2x2 skewb and a 3x3 for my friend tomorrow and I really enjoyed this video keep it up
love this epic unboxing of the new rubiks cubes!
Hey j perm big fan, I know you probably won’t see this but I just want you to know that you got me into cubing and really helped me with it I went From solving 3 minutes to 20 seconds and I just want to thank you for that
"Our only hope is for Rubik's to partner with YJ or MoYu"
-J Perm 2022
Yes
Yes
Moyu is prob the best company rn
Imagine they partner with V-Cube
I learned beginner cfop because of you thank you so much! I love you
wooo another Rubik's brand video that I can binge in the background :D
I always like your reaction to new rubiks brands 😂
5:21 if we measure the velocity and deceleration of that packaging, we can finally work out how far the table extends beyond the screen
You’re welcome or I’m sorry
Take this as you wish
Well you could probably get a decent estimate without taking into affect the deceleration. Velocity would be V=x/t
We’re trying to find x (displacement). You could get the velocity by using the cube as a reference and take the amount of frames (time) it takes to move a certain amount of pixels (displacement ). Then get the time before we hear the box hit the ground (ignoring the height of the table and the amount of time it takes for the the box to fall). Then you could finally figure out how far the table extends.
Though you wouldn’t know how far the table extends in the other direction.
I would actually calculate it, but frankly I don’t want to
@@snow17048 dude. Are you a physicist or something?
@@jlpainter1151 Nope, just a high schooler who is studying for her physics final next week 😂
@@snow17048 lol. Your good
@@snow17048High school is gonna be HARD BRUH
hey a fellow canadian! just found your channel and already i like it, used to be into watching rubix cube videos and i think you are pulling me back in, anyways, great video!
Great vid like always
2:10 satisfaction 😄
#asmrcube
At least they moved away from the terrible ball core on the 4x4. Also the new 3x3 has a spider core now!
Oh wait really? Noice!👍
Is the new 3x3 different to the gan rubiks speed cube? Visually looks similar
@@the1barbarian781 I think so, for one it's almost impossible to take apart.
@@the1barbarian781 Yes its different
I just ordered a J Perm 2 x 2 and a bag! Can't wait till they come
cant wait to main these it will give me such good times!!!!
5:53 Cubehead be like
The rubiks 4x4 looks like it has amazing modding potential.
hi J Perm, nice work on the new 100K subs on top of 1M!
J Perm, can you do a video answering FAQ on Rubiks brand Rubiks Cubes? Like why they don’t have a beginner friendly cube like these but also very professional ones like the ones GAN makes? Or why Rubiks is so bad in the first place and what they should/can/need to do to have better Rubik’s cubes?
Fun fact, the new 3x3 has screws and springs on all centres and can reverse corner cut better than the tornado v2m
I have it and I set it up lol
@@hycubing same lol
real?
@@__________________________MARK yes
Which 3×3 cube y'all talking about
Hoi, Dylan! When I started cubing we used to call the CFOP method "Friedrich Method".
Ever heard about that?
All your content is great and this is hands down the best cubing channel easily. Peace!
it's called Fridrich coz it was invented by Jessica Fridrich and they are the same
It’s common name of cfop in slavic countries
I love your yours and yours the reason for me to be a cuber now
this is fun to watch while im learning oll
The 2x2 Rubik's Brand looks AMAZING! I think I'll buy it and throw my way to much expensive Gan 251
I recently bought that 2x2 and was blown away at how badly it locks up. Looks like you felt the pain, too.
Same
Hi J perm I just wanted to say I love your videos and I've been subbed since 400k. Keep up the unbelievable work and hope you can read Chinese ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️🥇
I just got a pb of 55.56 and it s all thanks to you jperm i only watched your videos to get that time, rn i m trying to learn f2l and it s really hard to undestand it but i ll keep practicing
When you realize that jperm solves 2x2, 3x3 & 4x4 faster than you solve a 3x3
There is now a new version of the Rubiks 3x3 (probably spinmaster?) That actually seems pretty good to me. It is my quietest official Rubiks brand cube and seems to turn pretty well. Would be nice to see your impressions.
I have it, it works really well
Oh and I wanna see the better Rubiks speed cube
Same i have it
@@E46SedanGamingno its not a speedcube
Funny detail man i like it
Jperm your the most underrated youtuber your creative and I’m say your the most creative person and the best you really are the best
JPerm spoke in French. I can die peacefully.
O CANADA
7:32 That's faster than my PB 😭😭
Its 2 seconds faster than mine
:(
Bruh how did u find my comment 1 mo th later bruh 😂😂
@@rio1628 timed beta
@@NobodyYKIN 7 months 🗿🗿
Its crazy cause i found it a year later@@rio1628
Good vid u just got a new subscriber 🤗
You should create a discord server so we can ask questions and make suggestions but also have somewhere else to talk about cubing other than your comment section.
I like your channel, good job! :D
You got me into cubing now it's been a year Now I can Solve the cube in 18 seconds you are a legend Dylan thank you so much for everything!
18 buuuuhhh do you do 2lll?
@@tripily5533 18 is good
@@electronium2667 yes that's what I mean sorry
@@tripily5533 no bro I know CFOP
@@electronium2667 thanks
8:51 3 edge already made after the slice and not even single parity in 4x4 wth🤯🤯
Yeah! Thats pretty lucky!
Congrats on 1 million. Sorry for the late congratulations btw.. I got a lot of homework to do these days...
Amazing turning
I really like the Rubik's brand. I know they're slow and not simple, but they're very nice for people who have no idea what they're doing. It helped me go through the algorithms very slowly and then once I got faster I upgraded to a much better cube... But with the 3x3s when I started really getting into it, I got a speedcube right away and I kept overturning the crap out of it and losing my place and it was very frustrating. So I enjoy starting with a much slower cube that requires time.
8:12 my guesses:
speed: 3+8+45 = 55s
rubiks: 6+13+60 = 1min21s
time wasted due to hardware limitations: 26s
edit: Actual Results [spoilers]:
speed: 4+9+35 = 48
rubiks: 7+18+dnf = rubiks brand is bad
Man you got me into cubing loveyour vids
Hey J Perm!
Congrats on 1mil btw.
Anyway, I would really like to know what your editing system is. I am trying to run my own cubing channel, and I would appreciate it!
I think they should put a instruction booklet on how to assemble the cubes. That way, the begginers will look inside the instruction and assemble their cube.
ew no
Yea but then less people will want it
What would you think Jperm's reaction would be if these cubes were better than any speedcube?
I'd start by breaking my PBs
True. I didn't think through that. That's the most reasonable answer.
Maybe I should buy a better 7x7.
"wow these cubes are better than any speedcube" something like that
@@doodoopoo Also true. You and Jperm can answer a question with a very intelligent answer,
@@JPerm lol if speedcubes disappeared the wr will be 11.4
I have the originals from the 1980's when they first were sold, plus the 1983 Professor's 5x5x5 cube. The 1981 4x4x4 was named Rubik's Revenge, and its internals was a slotted sphere and long narrow legs on the center pieces, which made it fragile. The Professor's cube had a internal structure like a cube within a cube, and later 4x4x4 like Eastsheen used a similar internal structure. I also have a Chinese "Magic" 6x6x6 with corners and outer edges same size as rest of pieces.
Hi I really enjoy your videos
I'm surprised that Rubik's made a bad 2x2 but good 4x4. I would expect it to be the other way around.
I guess they tried harder since the old Rubik's 4x4s were soooooooo bad.
@@JPerm I have the older rubik's 2x2 and it was probably better than the new one but it had no corner cutting
Hi Jperm! I have a 3 by 3 scramble I think you would like( f2l and oll skip scramble) Scramble: D' F' L2 D2 F2 B R2 F2 U2 R2 F U2 L2 D2 F' L2 U2
If you try it a few times you'll get it 😉
Well... this is an awesome scramble, but did you make it by youself or was it mad by a computer?
@@wojtekpollok5782 I am not completely sure how it was made because I saw it in another UA-cam video. If you look up “F2L and OLL skip scramble, that should be the video 📹
hey jperm everyone in my school that knows how to solve a 3x3 has learnt it from you! (I also learnt from you) So thanks!
J PERM YOU ARE THE BEST I LOVE YOUUU AND YOUR VIDSSS 👑👑👑❤️❤️
The moment when Jperm's Rubiks brand solves are faster than your PB's...
I like how my 2x2 pb is 3.47 except that it is a rubbish time
@@kamranhussain2210 That is exactly the same as the 3x3 world record
@@kamranhussain2210 3.47 is good compared to my 7 sec pb
@@wolf219_yt I know that, that is why I like it
@@cactus2 yeah, but back when I practiced 2x2 I averaged 8-12 seconds
Who wants him to solve a Redi CUbe with no help?
Nice video. The relay part was the most interesting, and it's a good idea for Rubik's to have a partnership with Moyu.
I mean they partnered with gan before, but went back to making their own stuff after that
Please review the new Rubik's speed cube, it is sooo much more quiet and faster (at least that what I've heard). Also good content, keep it up :D
I absolutely love your content, and I've always rooted for you and how you've taken cubing to whole new audiences by making it as accessible and understandable as you possibly can.
But I feel like you always over-exaggerate when a cube is "bad," i.e. turns poorly, is sluggish, or just not your style. Cubing hardware across the board is exceptional now, from pretty much any speedcube manufacturer, and while that does allow for the threshold of quality to evolve and make for newer puzzles to have to achieve far more to make a niche for themselves, I feel like your criticisms of cubes like the new Rubik's 4x4 forget just how far cubing hardware has come in the last 12+ years. It's nowhere near as bad as the Eastsheen, the Meffert's 4x4, or even the Maru 4x4.
I absolutely love your content, and I always look forward to each upload, and I know a lot of the criticism your hurl at these cubes is in good fun, but the context and perspective of how good hardware is now could be a bigger talking point in these impression/review videos.
I'll admit, though - that 2x2 makes no sense. Literally just 2 more screws and springs and that cube could be so much more usable. I'd love to see if cutting the rivets and replacing them with screws and springs would make the cube even remotely better.
The difference is that when we judge cubes now, we do it in the context of their current competition.
Sure the rubiks 4x4 is better than a 4x4 from 10 years ago, but if you’re buying a 4x4 today, you make the decision by comparing it to current hardware. Because if this there’s no point in comparing a rubiks 4x4 to a 4x4 from last decade
I understand your criticism, as these cubes are good compared to how bad they could get. But I make the comparison in the context of what's currently available. If you had an eastsheen 4x4 now, I'd still say it's bad because you could easily get one that is much better.
@@JPerm I feel like I missed it in the video but how much did the 4x4 cost?
Pog so early
Great content, can't wait until Rubik's one by one
Good luck on you up coming comp
Love your content
great vid keep making content
That’s is some of the best cube that I’ve seen
@Jperm , I actually have the mini cube as well and i used to have the old one and now i have the new one (which you also have as well).
Thanks a lot I love your videos
‘I’ll deal with it later ‘
Jperm: *Quits during a relay*
Me: Impossible
I love how loud the Rubik’s cube was!
I just recently bought the Rubik’s mini and wondered if it was a good cube. Thanks for your opinion!
Hey, Jperm
You should do a challenge where you try to solve a scrambled cube to the cube in a cube pattern. It's hard and I don't think you've done a video about this before.
Can you try taping an edge and a corner piece together and trying to solve a cube and then tape more blocks
Thanks Jperm for getting me into cubing 👍
i'm french and i love how you say words in french like "niveau de défi"
Hey man, can you do the axis cube, i have been struggling with it for a while and wanted to see if u can do a tutorial about the axis cube
Thanks for getting me into cubing! Love your videos!
we all want jperm do more square 1 to make him feel good every time he sloves it
I ordered ur limited edition cube! ITS SO GOOD!
I feel like there should be a subset called jpll or jpv which stands for j perm last layer and j perm variation which is when you do an algorithm and then your pll is a jperm.
5:28
I have the old rubik 4x4. Its the worst. Half of the time when I turn the top layer the bottom layer is also turned which is VERY annoying.
I’m also wondering, why are my white corners are flipped.
Hello, please consider doing this challenge: solve a monochrome shape-mod of Rubik's cube WITHOUT LOOKING AT ALL.
Example of puzzles like that: the heart shaped puzzle (easier level), ghost cube (more difficult level).
This means you have to rely on touching and feeling the pieces, and be careful with similar pieces. The heart puzzle has some pairs like that and wouldn't make smooth surface with the wrong pieces or wrong orientation of the centers.
Omg i just got your cube it’s really good