I need to keep searching to find those deals! And yeah I agree, the Canon is more modern than the Minolta. That paired with a modern 40mm lens makes the Canon a breeze to shoot with!
4:36 is the prime example why in practice digital is far superior to film. Unless you have an absurdly amount of money to shoot a single scene with an entire roll of film, digital would always be better because it encourages you to take photos at various different angles, zoom in or out while getting away or closer to the subject for different perspective.
Thanks for this video! I just bought 6 rolls of Kodak Ultramax 400. Here in Canada, it’s almost $60 for 3 rolls 😳 But it’s worth it. I completely feel the same way as you described about the tactile experience of loading the film, rewinding it and the anticipation to see how the images came out. All your images came out stunning!
$20 a roll is wild! But it's absolutely worth it! Shooting film is such an incredible process that can be so rewarding. I hope you're enjoy the Kodak 400!
Thank you for a really interesting video. I found the comparison of digital vs analogue quite illuminating After having seen the Ultramax images, I found the digital images and video beautiful but rather disturbing; a reaction that I wasn't expecting. Having acquired far too many old lenses for use on my EM5, I've started doing analogue once again and researching the different options that are available both in the choice of emulsion and also the variety of scanning options that are available. It's really sad that films and development have become so expensive as it is a real discouragement to anyone wishing to start in analogue photography I find it quite bizarre that a really good quality SLR can cost less than one film plus processing.
Maybe you should buy a Half Frame camera. I use the original Pen F, but there are less expensive options out there. Olympus made many of these, but I hear the Canon Demi is a great camera too.
I shoot film on my original Pen (non-F) but the drawback that became apparent to me recently in the city is that its not a great camera for taking photos on the move due to its fully manual nature that it made me consider getting the Kodak Ektar H35N or the Canon Sure Shot Multi Tele (aka Prima Tele or Autoboy Tele 6). But when im able to take my time throughout the scenes, it shines.
Its not you. NYC can really be rough on an in camera meter. The exposure range can be super bright skys to dark shadows because of the buildings. Try traveling from Downtown to uptown and shoot looking east. This should keep the sun behind you. You will find the deepest shadows in Downtown and mid town. Also adjust your exposure because your meter can be easily fooled.
You can save a bit by bulk loading film and using a DSLR instead of getting the lab to scan it. I also find the DSLR scans look much better than the results I got from the lab and you have more latitude for editing although you might need some additional Lightroom plugins to to convert the color negatives accurately.
I tried DSLR "scan", but it feels wrong to make a photo of the negative/positive film. And its a lot of time. There are a lot of labs scanning in high-res and TIFF format and im ok with spending 5€/$ more per roll. In the end id like to have a good scanner and developing myself. But it takes time and time is money... same with selfmade DSLR "scans"..
@@kaic9276 The way I see it is a scanner is basically a type of digital camera taking a picture of the negative and converting it to digital. When the labs scan the images they decide on the amount of sharpening, color balance etc.. with a raw file you're starting with more of a blank canvas. You're right, depending on your setup it can b a pain to do. I spent half an hour scanning in two rolls yesterday. I'd hate to do it with 10 or 20. If I had a choice I'd print them in a darkroom, I think that's the ultimate, but that's just too expensive and not practical for me
I noticed that the lens on front of your Minolta is an aftermarket one, not a true Minolta Rokkor. As a fan of Rokkor lenses for years, they often exceed the competition. If you’ve never shot with a real Minolta lens- you have to try it!
Oh man, that's a shame for your photo of New York, the digital one is epic! Maybe we crossed path, I spent a lot of time near Little Island in NYC in 2023, shooting models at Pier 57 during the whole month of August.
I'm just happy to still have the digital image! And I was there in July/August so we may have passed by! Sounds like an amazing location for a photoshoot!
I actually really prefer the film photo from the boat. It has a beautiful dreamy soft and nostalgic feel. There’s more mystery there somehow. Just picked up some Ultramax 😊
Lucky you! Where I live a roll Ultramax sets you back around 13$. Interestingly Portra 400 costs 15$. So, at the end of the day, it’s not really a huge difference.
Those film images are beautiful.. that shot was rather soft because you was shooting wide open.. the iphone is a wide lens with little to no optical narrow depth of field that's why it's sharper. Try Orwo NC 500 for a different aesthetic
I picked up film photography during Covid. I have a Canon AE-1 and a cheap Nikon. I bought a bunch of old Canon F lenses. I got some nice shots on the Fuji susperia I wish I could share.
Always used portra. Initially NC then VC for a while then when they changed, 160. I like the consistency from box to box and always know what it will look like. Never tried the more general purpose high street films. May give this a go for just snaps. This reminds me of early fuji. Need to get a 35m first. Sold all my 35 gear over 10 years ago.
Beautiful photos man!
Thank you! 🙌🏻
Thanks for the upload. It was a good watch and before all helpful! 👍
Glad you enjoyed the video! Thanks for watching!
I routinely find 3-roll packs of UltraMax online for $25. And clearly, your Canon works better than the Minolta.
I need to keep searching to find those deals! And yeah I agree, the Canon is more modern than the Minolta. That paired with a modern 40mm lens makes the Canon a breeze to shoot with!
Which Minolta do you have? I got the SRT 101
All film is worth shooting, we don't have much to pick from
truth
4:36 is the prime example why in practice digital is far superior to film. Unless you have an absurdly amount of money to shoot a single scene with an entire roll of film, digital would always be better because it encourages you to take photos at various different angles, zoom in or out while getting away or closer to the subject for different perspective.
Interesting to hear your thoughts on this film! Really like the photos you captured too :) 👏
Thank you!
Thanks for this video! I just bought 6 rolls of Kodak Ultramax 400. Here in Canada, it’s almost $60 for 3 rolls 😳 But it’s worth it. I completely feel the same way as you described about the tactile experience of loading the film, rewinding it and the anticipation to see how the images came out. All your images came out stunning!
$20 a roll is wild! But it's absolutely worth it! Shooting film is such an incredible process that can be so rewarding. I hope you're enjoy the Kodak 400!
Thank you for a really interesting video. I found the comparison of digital vs analogue quite illuminating After having seen the Ultramax images, I found the digital images and video beautiful but rather disturbing; a reaction that I wasn't expecting.
Having acquired far too many old lenses for use on my EM5, I've started doing analogue once again and researching the different options that are available both in the choice of emulsion and also the variety of scanning options that are available. It's really sad that films and development have become so expensive as it is a real discouragement to anyone wishing to start in analogue photography I find it quite bizarre that a really good quality SLR can cost less than one film plus processing.
Those New York City ones on film look so good! No need for black and white! Love the colors! They look super mystical.
Thank you! 🙏
Maybe you should buy a Half Frame camera. I use the original Pen F, but there are less expensive options out there. Olympus made many of these, but I hear the Canon Demi is a great camera too.
I shoot film on my original Pen (non-F) but the drawback that became apparent to me recently in the city is that its not a great camera for taking photos on the move due to its fully manual nature that it made me consider getting the Kodak Ektar H35N or the Canon Sure Shot Multi Tele (aka Prima Tele or Autoboy Tele 6). But when im able to take my time throughout the scenes, it shines.
I've been thinking about giving a half-frame camera a try! Time to search FB marketplace!
@ I’ve got the Pen F Half Frame (Double Stroke)
Great video just scooped up 2 rolls of ultra max for $15 at Walgreens there is still light 💡 at the end of the tunnel out here 😂😂 edit 36exp 💪🏾
I just paid 8 bucks. Is that good?
That's better than I can find in my area!
Its not you. NYC can really be rough on an in camera meter. The exposure range can be super bright skys to dark shadows because of the buildings. Try traveling from Downtown to uptown and shoot looking east. This should keep the sun behind you. You will find the deepest shadows in Downtown and mid town. Also adjust your exposure because your meter can be easily fooled.
Thanks for this! Useful. And some great photos!
Thanks for watching!
You can save a bit by bulk loading film and using a DSLR instead of getting the lab to scan it. I also find the DSLR scans look much better than the results I got from the lab and you have more latitude for editing although you might need some additional Lightroom plugins to to convert the color negatives accurately.
I tried DSLR "scan", but it feels wrong to make a photo of the negative/positive film. And its a lot of time.
There are a lot of labs scanning in high-res and TIFF format and im ok with spending 5€/$ more per roll.
In the end id like to have a good scanner and developing myself.
But it takes time and time is money... same with selfmade DSLR "scans"..
@@kaic9276 The way I see it is a scanner is basically a type of digital camera taking a picture of the negative and converting it to digital. When the labs scan the images they decide on the amount of sharpening, color balance etc.. with a raw file you're starting with more of a blank canvas.
You're right, depending on your setup it can b a pain to do. I spent half an hour scanning in two rolls yesterday. I'd hate to do it with 10 or 20.
If I had a choice I'd print them in a darkroom, I think that's the ultimate, but that's just too expensive and not practical for me
I noticed that the lens on front of your Minolta is an aftermarket one, not a true Minolta Rokkor. As a fan of Rokkor lenses for years, they often exceed the competition. If you’ve never shot with a real Minolta lens- you have to try it!
I'll have to look one up and give it a try!
Oh man, that's a shame for your photo of New York, the digital one is epic! Maybe we crossed path, I spent a lot of time near Little Island in NYC in 2023, shooting models at Pier 57 during the whole month of August.
I'm just happy to still have the digital image! And I was there in July/August so we may have passed by! Sounds like an amazing location for a photoshoot!
I actually really prefer the film photo from the boat. It has a beautiful dreamy soft and nostalgic feel. There’s more mystery there somehow. Just picked up some Ultramax 😊
Thanks! I hope the Ultramax is treating you well!
My office is right next to B&H and they are selling Ultramax/36 for 8.99 each. I'm not sure if that's a good price, I haven't searched elsewhere.
That’s better than I’ve been able to find in my area!
Lucky you! Where I live a roll Ultramax sets you back around 13$. Interestingly Portra 400 costs 15$. So, at the end of the day, it’s not really a huge difference.
Sad! Hopefully more options will become available at a cheaper price!
Those film images are beautiful.. that shot was rather soft because you was shooting wide open.. the iphone is a wide lens with little to no optical narrow depth of field that's why it's sharper. Try Orwo NC 500 for a different aesthetic
Thank you! I'll have to look up that film stock!
Will pushing it 1 stop make the photos come out more nostalgic ?
Unfortunately I’m not sure! I’ve never pushed film before, but I’m thinking I need to try doing this soon!
In india its almost $18.only budget option here is substandard respools
It's getting expensive!
I easily find Ultramax in 36 exposure rolls at walgreens for $9.26 (which is including tax)
I need to go back and check my Walgreens! $9.26 isn't too bad!
Just keep shooting! The beauty of film and vintage cameras is getting unexpected results…
It's a fun process for sure!
I picked up film photography during Covid.
I have a Canon AE-1 and a cheap Nikon.
I bought a bunch of old Canon F lenses. I got some nice shots on the Fuji susperia I wish I could share.
That's awesome! I've heard that the Canon AE-1 is a great camera!
Black and white film may be cheaper, but the lab processing is more expensive. I never cared for Kodak Gold, so I'll take Kodak Max 400 any day.
Kodak Ultramax 400 is such a great film stock that's easy to get a hold of!
I just payed 16€ for one roll lmao
ooooooof that's tough 🥲
i cant lie, if you only shot 3 roles in a whole year, film wasnt for you to begin with
People have lives outside of film cameras, I can’t lie
@@Shola_Omishakin thanks for the update Sola
Always used portra. Initially NC then VC for a while then when they changed, 160. I like the consistency from box to box and always know what it will look like. Never tried the more general purpose high street films. May give this a go for just snaps. This reminds me of early fuji. Need to get a 35m first. Sold all my 35 gear over 10 years ago.
Time to get some new (old) 35mm gear again!