5 ICBMs That Could End the World
Вставка
- Опубліковано 4 лют 2023
- As the war in Ukraine keeps on raising tensions between two nuclear powers, it is a possibility that we can wake up to the world of Mad Max and start collecting soda caps for currency like in the Fall Out series.
These five bad boys could turn the world into a real-life version of 'Thanos' snap, so hold onto your seats!
The Trident D5, also known as the Trident II, is a ballistic missile launched from a submarine. The United States and the United Kingdom have deployed these missiles.
RS-24 YARS (SS-29 NATO name) was developed both as a road-mobile and silo-based system, that would use the same missile as RS-12M Topol-M. Yars is planned to become the mainstay of the ground-based component of Russian nuclear force.
The Minuteman III is a silo-based missile. With the removal of the LGM-118 Peacekeeper, the Minuteman III has become the only US land-based ICBM in service. It was the first MIRV capable missile.
Being the most powerful ICBM in China’s inventory Dongfeng-41 (DF-41) carries up to 10 Multiple Independently-targetable reentry vehicles.
RS-28 SARMAT is a very capable missile, mainly because of its high speed and extremely high throw weight. Sarmat is capable of carrying hypersonic glide vehicles along with other types of warheads.
If you want to learn about the nuclear winter, please check out our “Imagine That” series video, where we draw a good picture of life after a planet-wide nuclear apocalypse.
Join our UA-cam channel by clicking here: bit.ly/3asNo2n
Find us on Instagram: bit.ly/3PM21xW
Find us on Facebook: bit.ly/3t2Huvb
Find us on Twitter: bit.ly/3wQfXzA
Find us on TikTok: bit.ly/3wNsBOu
Get the latest stories: interestingengineering.com/
Support IE for high-quality journalism: interestingengineering.com/su... - Наука та технологія
⚙ Want to know more about the latest tech and innovations? Don’t Miss Out!
*SUBSCRIBE & HIT THE BELL* 👉bit.ly/SubscribeNowIE
number 1 is chines balloon
World most deadly airborne attack system 😂😂😂
China numbah 1
MILES!!!
ANOYINGGGGGGGG
Poseidon….. even though it’s considered a torpedo….. 100mt of nuclear tsunami terror….💀💀☢️☢️
figment of Putin's imagination
@@jasonrist6582🏳 😂😂
@@jasonrist6582 It's real. you can check
RS-28 Sarmat carries 12-15 nuclear warheads and can strike anywhere in the world.
Do you give any credence to the performance capabilities of the AVANGARD HGV??
Yeah too bad it's so big that it failed last week. So no Sarmat, but if you can only build 10 per year than US is not worried about any missile China or Russia can launch! 😮
It doesn't even work reliably yet
I’ll take any proven technology over a BS system from Prussia any day.. bye thankyouuuuu 😂
Full of bull crap
"MILES!!" WTF!
Awesome vid bro! Thanks 👌
You know what’s more scarier? It would be “leaders that could end the world”
Damn crazy world, these ICBMs can crumble the world so many times before we even know they are coming.
I'm afraid of the Sarmat Satan 2 Armageddon weapon 🥺
What if it falls on your head while you eating popcorn 🤔🙄
Who ever made it was obsessed with Satan I guess .
@@bipash_9720😆😆
Love how your editor played with volumes 😍
MILES
The warheads are ejected just after the boost phase, not after the midcourse phase. This is very important, as it makes the ICBM immune to antiballistic missile defense, which is a midcourse defense.
How do u know bro
Can i get more info
@@Guywithmoustache69
It means that radar cannot detect small warheads at high altitudes
Nah, ballistic can & are mostly shot down in the endstage, even hypersonic ones (cuz they have to slow down). It might depend on the system how they would intercept it but different systems can do it: Aegis system (ships), Patriot sams & THAAD. Satellites on other hand can detect the incoming missile & also determine which are real or which are decoy.
@@bekeneel
No system can shoot down ICBMs in end stage.
Don't be in wrong perception
@@bekeneel There was only 1 successful ICBM intercept via Aegis. That's not a ICBM defence system, but only for midrange BMs. For Patriot and THAAD there are no tests done, but these systems also are not designed for ICBMs. GMD on the other hand had 20 ICBM tests, 10 of them successful. So, only GMD is a theoretically viable defence against ICBMs. Of course, under realistic conditions even the GMD would fail spectacularly for multiple reasons, one of them I mentioned above. Others include fake warheads, chaff, mylar balloons, the number of ICBMs that would be launched in a realistic scenario and many more. The terminal phase is less than 1 minute, more like 30 seconds. There is no time to intercept and the slowing down of the warheads is insignificant, they are still coming at 20 Mach. THAAD is designed to intercept 6 Mach. Patriot is just a scam, it cannot intercept Scud BMs reliably, let alone ICBMs. Satellites have no ability to identify fake warheads or decoys. That is purportedly done by radars, like the LRDR, however no tests have been conducted that show that this stuff works. In short, all of this technology is a scam and there is no defence from ICBMs.
Where are the North Korean and Indian ICBMs here. For the Chinese ICBMs these use a Beidou GPS Russians Glonass
India has own navigation system, irns
MT on the sarmat stands for mega ton, not metric ton
As a boomer generation, I love the Soviet SS20 ICBM with 10 independent reentry warheads
"love" is a strong emotion for something that's design to murder thousands and thousands..
@@nimmha6708 Millions, not thousands. It is still loveable though.
@@endcapitalism5274 "Millions" reminds me of the number of death's your profile picture's dude is responsible for.... But capitalism is worse right? Can I ask you... If you want to "End Capitalism", what do you want? What is better in your opinion?
@@nimmha6708 You should stop reading Mein Kampf my Nazi friend and learn some history, it was not Stalin, but Nazi Germany that killed millions. Fortunately this time dozens of thermonuclear warheads are aimed at German cities, just in case Germany tries something stupid again, like in WW1 and WW2.
@@endcapitalism5274 F*ck Hitler, F*ck Stalin.
Both are responsible for millions of deaths.
What about KH-17 from North Korea range 15.000km MERV capable 10 pcs 100-200Kt, or 1 warhead 10Mt or hypersonic glide vehicle 20mach + speed?!
They don't want to admit that North Korea is right up there with some of the big boys when it comes to Nuclear missiles.
couldn't feed their people but spends billions to rockets....
Those are 1st generation missiles compared to the Trident 2 which is the most powerful icbm missile in the world. Most accurate, holds the most mirvs, and is smaller than Russian or Chinese sub. Launched or any launched Intercontinental Ballistic Missile.
@@virginccyy7645 Trident is obsolete vs even Voievoda class not to speak to Bulava (sea) , Yars (land) and Sarmat and in China DF-21(sea), DF-26(land), DF-41 (appeox. similar to Sarmat) in North Koreea KH-15 ( Voievoda class) and KH-17 ( Sarmat class) and 1st stage Sarmat, DF-41, And KH can also launch Avangard (28+Mach), DF-17 (20+Mach) and similar undisclosed name glide hypersonic vehicle in PR North Korea ...
And soon I presume this year Idiotic West will see Burevesnik.... Nuclear hypersonic cruise missile unlimited range for 6monts non stop drive low altitude, stratosphere and space capable, nuclear 2+Megaton, fully maneuverability...
@@garfield12344уже год прошёл, долго она добирается, должно быть даёт концерты по городам Европы😂😂😂
Great do it. The Earth experiment is si disfunctional might as well shut it down.
Russia has a heavy ICBM that can launch a single 50-100 megaton warhead.
RS 28 Sarmat,DongFeng 41,and LGM 30G Minuteman are my favorite ICBMs
Really, can you tell us why you favor those 3 missiles?
@@kirkschoolfield4173cuz it’s better than usa
U Forgot about Indian Agni 5 with MIRV When ur counting ICBM below 8000KM Range.
He did not forget, just different game lol
@@shabotages What game ?
The Agni-V is a very inferior ICBM compared to the ICBM of other countries...
India's largest ICBM Agni-V can carry 1,500 kilogram nuclear payload, Operational range: 5,000 km.
The Russian ICBM RS-28 Sarmat known as "Satan II", can carry 10,000 kilogram nuclear payload, Operational range: 18,000 kilometres.
China's ICBM The Dongfeng-41 (DF-41) can carry 2,500 kilogram nuclear payload, Operational range: 13,000 kilometres.
USA's Trident D5 submarine ICBM can carry 2,800 kilogram nuclear payload, Operational range: 12,000 kilometres. ..
@World Latest Technology(WLT) Lungi u have Lungi flying kang loo missiles. 🤷♂️😝
@@WR-NC-ASPL There r other missiles as well in the video & ur info on Agni 5 is incomplete. It's not inferior, its affordable bulk production missile with hypersonic speed of mach 25. So technically unstoppable. Apart from Sarmat no other missiles has that speed. All Chinese & US missiles has 15 - 17 mach.
MILES!
This put me off the video so much lol
Yeah, I agree, what with the " MILES"😂😂😂
What about hwasong 15 and 17
Old school t star bomba
So Sarmat has a yield of one metric ton (according to narration) ? Give me a dinner of sprouts and a lighter and I'm sure I can beat that.
"MILES!"
*_Little Boy and Fat Man yielded 15-20 kt. Today's ICBM's have 10 at 300 kt - 1 mt._*
A single ICBM carrying up to 10 individual warheads with yields 20 - 100 times more powerful can be the start of a very bad nightmare. With the SALT limits, each side might have only 5,000 city destroying nuclear bombs. That's sufficient to hit every major city several times. Next time you visit NYC - be sure to wear your white hazard suit.
*_If we are all going to die anyway, I'd rather be at ground zero and be vaporized._*
Dont worry....you will keep waiting like cold war era guys did
@@chrisivory121 Thanks for comment. After both US and Russia figured out mutual destruction was not in their best interests, their nuclear ambitions decreased.
I won't hold my breath that we are heading into a nuclear war anytime soon. Ukraine might be a bargaining chip and Russia's flexing it's nuclear muscle is all bluster.
Most are 375 - 500 kilotons
@@j.d.604 Thanks for comment
When the world ended, we shall all face the reality with no exceptions
MILES!
Blast yield of One Metric Tonne.
Why everything now sounds AI to me?
You forgot the ICBMS that North Korea has. There ICBMS have a 15000 km range and are very hard to track
RPGL - IBM
u forgot to mention the US RS30 & 32 😅
MILES!!
I noticed you never credited Russia even when you were talking about their system
adimin is western i fear
The commentator is from west so no need ....but we move and no going back .....is obvious russia has the best icbm
Megaton blast yield is equivalent to a million tons of TNT not a metric ton
I'm not worried. We create it so we can destroy ourselves
Danger
MILES!!!!!!! -you say!?
Mt means metric tonne lol..its megaton
all good things must come to an end. people in us have heard of this saying but really have no clue what it means 😂
Because they've number 1 before there was even a chart. The problem with all the previous fallen empires is that they lacked nuclear carriers and nuclear submarines, not to mention air superiority, expensive drones, you know, stuff on Ukraine's Christmas list. I feel bad for the guy declaring war on the west. Even if they invaded the US, the citizens have more guns than the military...
@@danhtran6401 enough of this wet dream US can't defend against hypersonic missiles. And Texas power grid died from a winter. The American people are divided by politics race religion and class nobody trust each other. The economy will not sustain a war it barely sustained covid.
@@marshalljulie3676 lol....go take your meds Julie...
@@danhtran6401 the citizens? LOL. 40% of them are morbidly obese, another 30% are overweight. Good Luck with Americans trying to fight a prolonged guerilla warfare.
@@carmilliadokklafar9250 sadly there are too many privileged people but I assure you, that's not the military, qualifications and training is required....but I know what you're saying.... it's okay, we need people like them to sit at desks and innovate.....not everyone has the stomach for wars
The Peacekeeper could carry twelve nuclear warheads, the Minuteman III only carried one warhead out of the three it was capable of due to the START treaty. With tensions between the West and Russia/China, there is a good chance the peacekeeper missile may make a comeback.
I think it should be brought back.
Minuteman III has always carried three missiles. Peacekeeper was awesome to watch launch though.
@@jaybee9269 From the National Museum of The United States Air Force Website. "Though Minuteman III can carry three warheads, each missile has been limited to one by international treaty since 2005"
@@dexterplameras3249 >> Thanks, I stand corrected. So they’re almost pointless. Midgetman was pretty pointless except in its mobility.
MILES I'm now deaf
MmiiiIiilleesss
Man, nailed it with authentic background music. Dude shows cultural sensitivity.
Nuclear ☢️ Weapons are MAD.
(Like Mad Max)
Mutual Assured Destruction
Miles!!!!!!🤬
😂😂😂
ICBM acronym inter continental ballistic missile
Why does he scream "MILES"? It reminds me of Tom Segura screaming "BIKES".
Good bye to everyone on earth
The Us has only 400 land based icbms
MILES
You unfortunately missed the ultimate mobile super heavy liquid fueled North Korean Hwasong 17! This is one of those absolutely killer missiles in existence!
North Korea only has 3 missiles. US have 415 Minutemen 3 missiles and 14 Ohio Submarine carrying 24 Trident IIs missiles with 14 bombs each.
No nation can even build an ICBM that can carry 10 let alone 14! That's how far US missile system is ahead of China and Russia who are still trying to build a missile with Tridents capabilities, but they can't
@@virginccyy7645I think you missed the sarcasm lol
This some scary stuff!!!
The Soviet SS-18 was the deadliest ICBM ever..
Scary the little man Putin holds the key to that missle. Very scary place this could be instantly.
And is from Russia, u should have said that...
The new supersonic missiles fly low on earth
The Trident II missile is useleless, it needs to be much pointier.
the US needs to reject the treaty of limiting warheads on missiles, and make them 14 again. Enough playing around.
No Winners but ALL Losers
Addendum; The most deadly *we know of* .
surya missile💫 🇮🇳has hypersonic speed of 28 mach and range can be more than 18000km .and also has MIRV technology which can hit multiple target by one missile..
Where is North korea missiles?
They're only good for parades
In North Korea
I don't think north korean missiles have much juice
Who knows
Russia and America
It only takes 1!
Did you forget to say " miles " and added later to the video???
Why not Agni in this list?It it not true that we ate talking much but doing nothing.
Parang tatagilid yung carrier truck ng icbm pagnaglaunch imagine mbigat na bala maglalaunch sa lupa ng walang bwelo ha to reach mach 25. Share ko lng hehe
The world belong to the most High God not humans so those are just mere threat to the world.
Amen 🙏🏿
Yeah and no God is going to save humanity when we start ending life with nuclear weapons. all gods be praised. :(
The smaller the country in a nuclear conflict the greater the chance of total annihilation, we all would suffer immensely & everyone would regret the outcome, none amongst us is really that evil or that mad so let's all chill & recognise the beauty of our species yeh 😀, peace & unconditional love, now go play with your toys but quit hurting each other, suffering comes at a cost dudes, 🌏 🤝💚
And stay with the best
This guy forgot to tell about friend county north Korea 😃
YOO THE CHINESE MUSIC THAT PLAYS OVER THE CHINESE MISSILE LMAO
MILES
*MILES*!!!
Where is Agni - 5 ;-;
Keep it secret. Id!ot
There is a song. The end of the world
5:00 so no explosive power info? just hrow in random info in ant order
the russian dont play when it comes to icbm
Putting Minuteman III on this list while leaving off the Buluva wrecked your credibility. Minuteman III, regardless of its expected upgrades, is still a very old design and it's core architecture limits the ability to upgrade it to our adversary's weapons. BTW, putting Minuteman III above YARS is downright laughable.
Putting anything above Trident is bs. Its the best icbm in the world. Above Sarmat. Plus US have 312 missiless, not 5 or 10.
@@virginccyy7645 Really? Pray tell, how many hypersonics does it carry? Doesn't have the throw weight of an SS-28 either. Trident > Buluva. That much is true. Minuteman does not belong on this list. Try to be objective here. First law of Sun Tzu and all. Know thy enemy and know thyself.
The Minuteman ICBM silos are designed to soak up the bulk of a Russian (or Chinese) first strike. One warhead per missile, and one missile per hardened silo. The silos are hardened against anything except a direct hit, and they are spread out enough to require a direct hit for each and every silo. For the Russians to be sure, they would likely need to assign multiple warheads to every silo.
There are 400 silos spread across 4 bases in the center of the country, which in theory would require 1,000 warheads to destroy at the very least. START limits both Russia and the US to 1,550 deployed warheads, which means Russia would need to expend at least 63% of its allotted warheads on taking out the ICBM fields in an area with low population, low military value and at a location that maximizes the warning time for the US.. No need for a super advanced missile when it is largely designed to be used as cannon fodder..
Even if the Russians take out every silo, that still leaves the 14 Ohio class submarines out on permanent patrol and their 1,152 warheads unaccounted for by the Russians, as well as 80 B-2 or B-52 strategic bombers capable of launching nuclear tipped cruise missiles or nuclear gravity bombs like the B61.. The Trident II missiles on the 14 American Ohio class submarines and 4 British Vanguard class submarines are arguably the most advanced and reliable ICBM’s in the world and represent the bulk of the “real” deterrent capabilities for the US (and all of the UK’s). Minuteman III is not an obsolete missile by any means. It was designed to (and still can) carry 3 warheads, it is fully MIRV capable. It only carries one warhead currently because the total deployed warhead count is limited by treaty. It is better to have 400 warheads on 400 spread out missiles rather than having 400 warheads on only 167 missiles, though the second option sounds a bit cheaper to operate. The Russians have essentially chosen the latter of those two positions, their launchers are mostly road mobile rather than being positioned in hardened silos. But, USA's main nuclear deterrent are the submarine launched UGM-133A Trident II missiles. Each missile can carry up to eight 100 kiloton nuclear warheads. Because the Trident II SLBM makes up the majority of warheads and is faster, just as accurate and has a longer range than the systems currently in use by Russia (including the proposed specs of the Sarmat). The Minuteman 3 makes an easier target because it is land based in silos whereas the Ohio SSBN’s are mobile all around the world.. Even if Russia destroys all of USA's land based ICBM, there are 14 USA nuclear submarines remaining hidden in the sea in different areas of the world, that carry total of 1,152 nuclear warheads. These 1,152 nuclear warheads from the 14 USA nuclear submarines are enough to destroy everyone of 1,117 cities and towns in Russia.
How many nuclear missile subs does the U.S. have? USA has 14 ballistic missile submarines. The Ohio class of nuclear-powered submarines includes the United States Navy's 14 ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs)..
Do U.S. submarines carry nuclear missiles? Each submarine can carry 24 submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) designated Trident D5 with range of 12,000 km and each missile can carry up to eight 100 kiloton nuclear warheads (about 30 times the explosive force as the Hiroshima bomb). The USA submarines can launch these nuclear missiles while still submerged in the sea without surfacing. Assuming an average of twelve operational submarines with 24 launch tubes each and four warheads per missile, these USA submarines carry total of 1,152 nuclear warheads. While the total number carried by Russian submarines is 624 nuclear warheads. Russia’s operational nuclear force consists of 11 nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs), separated into three classes. The Delta and Boreii, the current active classes, can carry up to 16 SLBMs (the SS-N-23 “Skiff” and the Bulava SS-N-32) that are capable of delivering up to 624 nuclear warheads.. If you add the nuclear 225 warheads from the 4 UK submarines and 290 warheads from 4 French submarines along with the 1,152 warheads from 14 USA submarines, then the total number of nuclear warheads from NATO submarines itself will be above 1500. That will be the end of Russia. Just the nuclear warheads from NATO submarines are enough to destroy everyone of the 1,117 cities and towns in Russia. No need to launch any NATO land based ICBM or nuclear bomber aircraft.
NATO's has 400 Minuteman III land based ICBM missiles and 464 Submarine launched Trident II D5 SLBM Missiles (336 missiles from 14 USA submarines, 64 missiles from 4 British submarines, 64 missiles from 4 French submarines) with total of 6065 nuclear warheads on 914 nuclear missiles with many MIRV Multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles. It is enough to destroy every city and town in Russia. There will be 6 nukes each for everyone of 1,117 cities and towns in Russia. While Russia will have to use its 6225 nuclear warheads to destroy 30 NATO countries. NATO has 914 ICBM including submarine SLBM, while Russia has only 491 ICBM including submarine SLBM.
Russia needs large ICBM like Sarmat because majority of Russia's nuclear warheads are in land based ICBM. But, USA does not need a huge missile like Sarmat. Because, majority of USA's nuclear warheads are in it's 14 Ohio class nuclear submarines. USA's main nuclear strike force is it's 14 Ohio class nuclear submarines that carries 20[a] × Trident II D5 SLBM range 11,300 km; with up to 12 MIRVed W76 or W88 (475 ktTNT) nuclear warheads each. USA has a Total of 1,142 nuclear warheads in 14 Ohio class submarines. Unlike Russia's land based ICBM, these submarines are always invisible and can launch these nuclear missiles underwater without surfacing. The New START arms control treaty, limits both the U.S. and Russia to 800 ICBM launchers or bombers and 1,550 deployed warheads. Russia is deploying it's 1550 warheads in 491 ICBM launchers including submarines. While USA is deploying it's 1550 warheads in 736 ICBM launchers including submarines. So, because USA has more number of ICBM than Russia, USA does not need a large ICBM like Sarmat that can carry 10 warheads together, because USA already has 400 Minuteman III ICBMs and 14 nuclear-capable Ohio-class submarines carrying 336 Trident ICBM. So, USA has already reached the maximum allowed number of ICBM under The New START arms control treaty. But, Russia has fewer number of ICBM than USA. So, Russia is putting more nuclear warheads in each ICBM and creating huge ICBM like Sarmat that can carry 10 warheads each. Sarmat is simply a large ICBM, the largest ICBM anyone has ever bothered to build. The three-stage, solid-fuel missile is 115 feet long and 9.8 feet wide with a total, fueled weight of 458,000 pounds. The missile can boost up to ten tons into low-Earth orbit, including, “Ten large warheads. Sarmat’s huge capacity is a double-edged sword. If the missile encounters a mechanical problem and fails to launch or gets intercepted by Anti-missile system, that’s ten nuclear weapons lost for Russia and a large hole in Moscow’s targeting plan. Russia’s ability to use Sarmat will also be constrained by the New START arms control treaty, which limits both the U.S. and Russia to 800 missile launchers or bombers and 1,550 deployed warheads.. Just 150 Sarmat missiles, each maxed out with 10 warheads, could carry almost all of Russia’s allowable 1500 nukes, leaving just 50 for the rest of Moscow’s nuclear triad, including mobile ICBMs such as the truck-mounted Topol-M, Borei-class missile submarines, and strategic heavy bombers. The constraints of New START make it likely Russia will build only a limited number of Sarmats in order to beat down U.S. missile defenses, giving the rest of Moscow’s nuclear forces a freer hand.. Instead of developing a huge ICBM like Sarmat that can carry 10 MIRVs with a blast yield of 750 kT each, USA already has 400 minuteman ICBM that can carry 3 warheads of 170-kiloton each. The majority of USA's nuclear warheads are in it's 14 nuclear submarines. The Ohio class of nuclear-powered submarines includes the United States Navy's 14 ballistic missile submarines (SSBNs) .. At 24 Trident II missiles apiece, each Ohio-class submarines carries 20[a] × Trident II D5 SLBM with up to 12 MIRVed W76 or W88 (475 ktTNT) nuclear warheads each. So, it always better to attack the enemy with 10 minuteman ICBM carrying 1 nuclear warhead each like USA is doing. Than attacking the enemy with only 1 Sarmat ICBM carrying 10 warheads like Russia is doing.. A single Sarmat missile armed with 10 warheads could target a large area. But, 10 minuteman ICBM will produce more destruction in Russia as it will target 10 separate areas and destroy more area.. So, there is no advantage in building in large ICBM like Sarmat that can carry 10 nuclear warheads together.
Err.. "1Mt" is 1 megaton, not 1 metric tonne.
The US sub launched icbms have either 90-100 kilotons warheads or 455 kilotons warhead. A few have low yield 5 kiloton yield
And make the best as well.
Indian Agni 5??
Agni-V is a very inferior ICBM compared to the ICBM of other countries...
India's largest ICBM Agni-V can carry 1,500 kilogram nuclear payload, Operational range: 5,000 km.
The Russian ICBM RS-28 Sarmat known as "Satan II", can carry 10,000 kilogram nuclear payload, Operational range: 18,000 kilometres.
China's ICBM The Dongfeng-41 (DF-41) can carry 2,500 kilogram nuclear payload, Operational range: 13,000 kilometres.
USA's Trident D5 submarine ICBM can carry 2,800 kilogram nuclear payload, Operational range: 12,000 kilometres.
@@WR-NC-ASPL lol agni 5 missile range is 8000km
@@whysoserious7553 .. . even if Agni has 8,000 km range, all the other missiles in the list have over 12,000 km range and so can hit any part of the earth. Whereas Agni can hit only Asia and some parts of Africa. Agni cannot hit other continents.. Also, other ICBM can carry 1000 kilogram warheads more than what Agni can carry. So, Agni is an useless missile compared to the other missiles in this list..
@@WR-NC-ASPL Watch news varient of agni V..
@@MonuSharma-nz2pf .. what is the range of the new variant
He started with the five not the ten , so don't complain.
India's agni v (8000-10,000) km range with 10 mirv & [500 kt] overall yield while
hiroshima little boy(15 kt) .
Also india that can send spacecraft to moon,mars and can launch 104 satellite
at once could easily make ICBM with 18000 km range in less than a year
And this channel still ignoring india come on bruh wake up 😉😉.
They are typical Western mindset. We shouldn't care what they think or rank us. When war comes, it's the missile that answers, not these rankings
Bhai tu thoda pagal hai kya??
@@Banditxam4 Kay hua bhai
The USA should withdrawl from the START treaty an aggressively pusue a policy of strategic nuclear superiority over both Russia and China. They cannot keep up with us in an all out arms race. "We prefer it this way. No peace in our time!" - William Shakespeare
They are all out of their minds
Biden dont believe russia has that missile or he just forgot about it hahaha
the us missile capabilities look quite tame compared to russia's
I hope the US updates its nuclear arsenal with hypersonic cruise missiles and hypersonic glide vehicles, on top of minuteman III replacement. more nukes please!
yes because even 20k nukes aren't enough in this world! -.-
WHY WORRY?! 😁 LIFE IS A TEMPORARY ASSIGNMENT. 🙏🏻❤️🕊️🌏
Amen Brother looking for the next journey
С уважением к народу США. Не хочу никаких конфликтов вообще. Но одно скажу что наше ядерное оружие реально и очень очень не приятно. Давайте жить дружно дружно на этом шарике. Нас много простых землян .. А кто хочет жаркого пусть между собой на острове ловят тараканов покушать.
Люди! Очнитесь.. 🙏😊
Phil. ICBM just being quiet & lowkey.. 😏😏😅🥹
jk🤪😬
All that capabilaty yet an insufficient plan and effort to feed the population of the world. What are we truly worth to ourselves?
'
at 105 - 145 the rocket launch fly to china / north korea from moscow...
oooops
Ill send ICBM to school children in the USA.
Those rockets won't launch themselves, you know it's time! We've had a good run - see you all in hell, guys!
You don’t mess with Russia
Beijing and Moscow in the crosshairs, look out!
One sarmat will completely destroy your country 😅
@@deanmoxom1330 Yeeeeey. And you believe anyone would survive? You think there's no payback? =/
Where is agni 5
India's Agni-V is a very inferior ICBM compared to the ICBM of other countries...
India's largest ICBM Agni-V can carry 1,500 kilogram nuclear payload, Operational range: 5,000 km.
The Russian ICBM RS-28 Sarmat known as "Satan II", can carry 10,000 kilogram nuclear payload, Operational range: 18,000 kilometres.
China's ICBM The Dongfeng-41 (DF-41) can carry 2,500 kilogram nuclear payload, Operational range: 13,000 kilometres.
USA's Trident D5 submarine ICBM can carry 2,800 kilogram nuclear payload, Operational range: 12,000 kilometres.
@@WR-NC-ASPL 😁😁😁 you believe on paper information haaa. Chines experts believe this agni 5 range is 8500km+ few days ago India conduct the test (hybrid vriyant of agni 5) . Some experts says agni 5 have (mirv) capability . And agni 5 have capital to lift 2.5 ton warhead 😁😁 means this missile is capable to lift 3-6( 300 killoton nuclear warheads). Means 1 agni 5 missile is capable to destroy whole Pakistan. And surya icbm , agni 6 ICBM is in underdevelopment. Bye
@@naveenmishra4033 .. even if Agni has 8,500 km range, all the other missiles in the list have over 12,000 km range and so can hit any part of the earth. Whereas Agni can hit only Asia and some parts of Africa. Agni cannot hit other continents. Also, other ICBM can carry 1000 kilogram warheads more than what Agni can carry. So, Agni is an useless missile compared to the other missiles in this list..
@@WR-NC-ASPL sir india have only one enemy and this enemy is China and agni 5 is capibal to hit entire china. Agni 5 cover whole Asia, 2/3 Africa,2/3 europe, 90% russia and this missile accuracy is very dangerous 15-20 m cep with 300 killoton mirv warhead 😉
@@naveenmishra4033 .. But, China's ICBM are much superior than India's ICBM in operational range, warhead payload and MIRV.
China's Dongfeng-41 (DF-41, CSS-20) has.. Operational range 13,000 kilometres (8,100 mi)[1].. Maximum speed Mach 25 (30,600 km/h; 19,000 mph; 8.51 km/s).. Warhead up to 10 MIRVs, 2,500 kg (5,500 lb)
Agni-V has Operational range: 7,000-8,000 kilometres (4,300-5,000 mi) · Terminal phase: Mach 24 (29,400 km/h; 18,300 mph; 8.17 km/s) ... Warhead up to 3 MIRVs, 1,500 kg..
ICBM with nuclear weapons need not have accuracy in meters because, the whole area of many kilometres is going to be destroyed ..
MILES
wtf bro?
'
come on american company must make many more beeter bigger strongger missiles
miles📢