Yes but the majority of people also vote for rights and policies to avoid personal responsibility. I cant think of a single time majority have voted for the rights for more personal responsibility.
Get rid of Albo & Labor, give One Nation the balance of Power in the Senate, rid Australia of the Misinformation Bill, Digital ID Bill, Identity Identification Bill, RBA Reform Bill, control, control, control, censorship, censorship, censorship
If these clowns are bypassing the process to get this through then they are breaking laws. Simple.... you see.... Government was made by law and is bound br law.
What about the disinformation by roadworks contractors with their signs which say "Road Works Ahead (60)" when there's nothing going on but they couldn't be bothered collecting their signs after the job last month? They should go to jaill for all the trouble they cause innocent people.
The proposal is "fascist" or communism (basically the same thing, only difference is who owns the means of production) and should be TOTALLY rejected. There is already vastly too much censorship on the internet, this forum being a classic example.
Build to Rent Scheme allowing WEF to be corporate landlords, 'rent forever & be happy', coincides with Labors RBA Reform Bill which reduces the amount of stamp duty for Corporations & allows them access to Australia to Compete with Australian home buyers
It’s so dangerous,here are some points .. 1. The bill's vague terms allow the government to classify almost any opposing opinion as "misinformation," turning it into a tool for silencing critics. 2. Even factually accurate content can be censored for "lacking context," paving the way for the suppression of legitimate debates. 3. With low harm thresholds, the law could easily be misused to block information that challenges the government on issues like public health. 4. By forcing tech companies to enforce the law, over-censorship is likely, as they will prioritize avoiding penalties over protecting free speech.
@@ThatGuy-ze5kk I agree it won't happen when the degens run the show but it would be easier.1 state in the US made id mandatory to access porn sites and overnight 85% decrease.
@@ThatGuy-ze5kkYeah, but Scummo said many times “ we’ll make the jab as enforceable as possible”. He even got that dick&*@d army colonel Frew (or whatever his name is) threatening the public as said “take it or else”. So Liberal and Labor are different sides of the same WEF coin.
Prove your statement that the Medieval period was warmer than it is currently. Tell me how you can tell what the temperature was a thousand years ago from ice cores. I've asked you repeatedly dipstick.
Being lectured to about 'social responsibility' by a political class that abandoned their facade of acting in the interests of their own people long ago....the Hypocrisy overfloweth. Standard of living & by extension lifestyle choices/opportunity is directly proportional to the cost of living. You could raise a family & own your own home with a backyard on a single income in our grandparents generation....AND whilst living in a prosperous, safe, ethnically & culturally homogenous society.
None of what he just listed, has any mention in this BILL , what he just listed can even be associated with Mis and Dis-information, he is speaking of indictable offences which should be dealt with in the judicial system. Although one would have a problem with that process in this country looking at the latest examples of a justice system, either it is not a problem social media platforms have to be forced to police. Albatross is attempting to push through something completely different and way more controversial, against non criminals.
Parents are at fault, instead of sheild children tgey are actively promoting social media to them....buy a mobile phone and give it to a child without supervision is a serious recipe for disaster. Make an age limit stick MUST require GOOGLE to enforce their policy when I comes to devices and children, the account is NOT THE USER . .the user is the child and the parent is in breach of Google 'Community Standards Agreement' thus makes the Parent RESPONSIBLE. If you're a parent allowing your child to use a device in your name to access content influencing radical ideas, porn, criminal activity etc. THEN YOU ARE THE PROBLEM AS MUCH AS THE SERVICE PROVIDER IS THE PROBLEM!😡
It’s so dangerous,here are some points .. 1. The bill's vague terms allow the government to classify almost any opposing opinion as "misinformation," turning it into a tool for silencing critics. 2. Even factually accurate content can be censored for "lacking context," paving the way for the suppression of legitimate debates. 3. With low harm thresholds, the law could easily be misused to block information that challenges the government on issues like public health. 4. By forcing tech companies to enforce the law, over-censorship is likely, as they will prioritize avoiding penalties over protecting free speech.
Musk is 100% correct
Musk is 100% a nutter.
Politicians talk about Responsibility But Display None Themselves.
Yes but the majority of people also vote for rights and policies to avoid personal responsibility. I cant think of a single time majority have voted for the rights for more personal responsibility.
Why don't we start with the PM and MSM. Queensland has passed 3 years jail for bad posts.
Intimidation tactics
LMFAO. You will need to go back to Newsmax soon.
Get rid of Albo & Labor, give One Nation the balance of Power in the Senate, rid Australia of the Misinformation Bill, Digital ID Bill, Identity Identification Bill, RBA Reform Bill, control, control, control, censorship, censorship, censorship
As Ronald Reagan said, the 9 most terrifying words in the english language are: 'I'm from the government, and I'm here to help'.
Remember 2 weeks ago when this was about children and has turned into centralised information in rapid pace
Elon is spot on time to get rid of albosleezy
If these clowns are bypassing the process to get this through then they are breaking laws. Simple....
you see....
Government was made by law and is bound br law.
We just need to remember what happened during the pandemic to remember that we shouldn’t trust government
@johnhoyle4401
Which they are now suffering the consequences. Myocardial,Cancers,Infertility etc etc.
So we trust conspiracy theorists, and YT health experts?
@johnhoyle4401what lies John it's safe and effective 😂😂😂
@johnhoyle4401John your joke makes me clot 😂😂😂like a pfizer
@@Brains_Into_Monumentsusing the old puppet Hans Reichardtsohn?
Who paid Dominion $750 million for telling lies?
@@colonelklink9911 that was a settlement out of court so it wasn't actually proven to be a lie or true. So that makes your statement a lie.
@@immune2PR of course, Rupert paid US$750 million to Dominion because he is innocent.
🤯
What about the disinformation by roadworks contractors with their signs which say "Road Works Ahead (60)" when there's nothing going on but they couldn't be bothered collecting their signs after the job last month? They should go to jaill for all the trouble they cause innocent people.
Witnessed that last weekend where they forgot to take the reduce speed sign from 110km to 80km and caused a traffic jam.
George Orwell
we the people want full freedom of speech
Both plans sound bloody terrible. Kids get bullied at school you gonna ban them from attending school until they turn 16?
What if the truth/disinformation is found in a book? Ban libraries.
Just has to be an opinion that undermines their agenda and corporate interests. Anyone who is mature enough to question is the target of this bill.
Well we actually saw what Australia did during the Covid lockdown so you really don't have much to talk about.
Clennell you must have forgotten elbo himself is the king of misinformation.
The proposal is "fascist" or communism (basically the same thing, only difference is who owns the means of production) and should be TOTALLY rejected. There is already vastly too much censorship on the internet, this forum being a classic example.
Build to Rent Scheme allowing WEF to be corporate landlords, 'rent forever & be happy', coincides with Labors RBA Reform Bill which reduces the amount of stamp duty for Corporations & allows them access to Australia to Compete with Australian home buyers
Control the narrative. That is our aim.
musk for PM
How come they dont block nappie sniffer sites?lknow why
The problem is Albo knows in the future, every politician will become accountable for their actions... cough cough mass vaccinations 😢.
Thank god Coleman finally gets it
insane
You can't see anything they are talking about on the internet unless you access the dark web
It’s so dangerous,here are some points ..
1. The bill's vague terms allow the government to classify almost any opposing opinion as "misinformation," turning it into a tool for silencing critics.
2. Even factually accurate content can be censored for "lacking context," paving the way for the suppression of legitimate debates.
3. With low harm thresholds, the law could easily be misused to block information that challenges the government on issues like public health.
4. By forcing tech companies to enforce the law, over-censorship is likely, as they will prioritize avoiding penalties over protecting free speech.
How can you defend the Australian government lies ,
D COLEMAN...SPOT ON, LET THE PEOPLE LEARN THE TRUTH.....
Wouldn't it be easier to ban pornography
and end a multi billion dollar industry??
never gunna happen
@@ThatGuy-ze5kk I agree it won't happen when the degens run the show but it would be easier.1 state in the US made id mandatory to access porn sites and overnight 85% decrease.
Musk. 😎
Misinformation means truth to good people all over the world thats a fact
LNP talking free speech is rich, after Covid.
The response to COVID was demanded and enforced by Labor states.
it was the state labor governments calling the shots there mate 🤗
@@ThatGuy-ze5kk enabled and encouraged by ScoMo. States couldn’t have locked down without the LNP green light.
@@ThatGuy-ze5kkYeah, but Scummo said many times “ we’ll make the jab as enforceable as possible”. He even got that dick&*@d army colonel Frew (or whatever his name is) threatening the public as said “take it or else”. So Liberal and Labor are different sides of the same WEF coin.
Criminal acts can be specified rather than this bill which is about shutting down the truth of how high the criminal class actually is.
Be careful what you print online Big Brother's watching
The biggest spreader of misinformation at the moment is John Hoyle and his merry band of clowns😂
Jack Richardson and Tinfoil Hoyle..they still haven’t apologised to us that they got everything wrong
@@Prognosis__they are cowards weak men who should be squatting to pee😂
@johnhoyle4401John your psychotic rants don't benefit your mental health are you ok today😂
Prove your statement that the Medieval period was warmer than it is currently. Tell me how you can tell what the temperature was a thousand years ago from ice cores. I've asked you repeatedly dipstick.
@@Prognosis__Because I didn't. Vaccines save lives.
Being lectured to about 'social responsibility' by a political class that abandoned their facade of acting in the interests of their own people long ago....the Hypocrisy overfloweth.
Standard of living & by extension lifestyle choices/opportunity is directly proportional to the cost of living.
You could raise a family & own your own home with a backyard on a single income in our grandparents generation....AND whilst living in a prosperous, safe, ethnically & culturally homogenous society.
@@micphoenix8200 it's way worse than hypocrisy. It's contradictory (illogical)
Musk is 100% right, totally about free speech.
Aged care should be free for the aged and also at the same standards that CEOs would have as aged care
This proposal is fucking ridiculous.
None of what he just listed, has any mention in this BILL , what he just listed can even be associated with Mis and Dis-information, he is speaking of indictable offences which should be dealt with in the judicial system. Although one would have a problem with that process in this country looking at the latest examples of a justice system, either it is not a problem social media platforms have to be forced to police. Albatross is attempting to push through something completely different and way more controversial, against non criminals.
Australia is not one of the great democracies in the world
How can Gov’s just make up ‘fines’ when it suits them 🤔
Why isn't there any talk about the fines for individual's that's supposed to be up to a 1000 units at $275 a unit that's $275,000
And what else isn't he saying they will use it for much more than he mentioned it will.
Definition of a expert, ex means unknown quantity and the spert means a drip under pressure .
The ZuckerBook tactic been used by the same people again.😆
This is a vote winner or vote loser, are you listening Peter Dutton?
Parents are at fault, instead of sheild children tgey are actively promoting social media to them....buy a mobile phone and give it to a child without supervision is a serious recipe for disaster. Make an age limit stick MUST require GOOGLE to enforce their policy when I comes to devices and children, the account is NOT THE USER . .the user is the child and the parent is in breach of Google 'Community Standards Agreement' thus makes the Parent RESPONSIBLE.
If you're a parent allowing your child to use a device in your name to access content influencing radical ideas, porn, criminal activity etc. THEN YOU ARE THE PROBLEM AS MUCH AS THE SERVICE PROVIDER IS THE PROBLEM!😡
ALBO'S AUH DEMOE' WHO'S GOWWIN INDA LAYBOUR 🤰😳😲👋🤪
👋🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🗣
Ha ha ha ha ha.
Sly News Australia will shut their doors for good.
You always say that, predictable little beings that you are, but it won't ever happen.
@@EmperorDalekTARDed who paid Dominion US$ 750 million for telling lies?
🤡
@@EmperorDalekTARDed who paid Dominion $750 for telling lies? Rupert did.
@@EmperorDalekTARDed can you make a mock account for me too? Just like the Catholic Church, I like playing with kiddies.
@@EmperorDalekTARDed can you create a mock account for me please? I feel left out.
Sky News Political Editor Andrew Clennell. ...seriously? 😂🤣
Yes, probably the best political reporter on here.
👤🇺🇲VANCE 2024X
@johnhoyle4401lockup your pets 😂😂😂
@johnhoyle4401 How's the AZ boosters these days, tinfoil hoyle???😂
@@thehon.antiexperimentaldru3475he's only up to 8 😂😂he's still needs more
@@merlinite- You seen that Hyper bot??? It reckons it's had 290+ hits. Well, it's used up my 10 gov brought😂
@@thehon.antiexperimentaldru3475 no I haven't seen him hope the safe and effective find him 🙏
true
vote for libs this time
🛂🌏☯️🌌👣
Sky News Australia, We could make a great team, wanna be friends?
It’s so dangerous,here are some points ..
1. The bill's vague terms allow the government to classify almost any opposing opinion as "misinformation," turning it into a tool for silencing critics.
2. Even factually accurate content can be censored for "lacking context," paving the way for the suppression of legitimate debates.
3. With low harm thresholds, the law could easily be misused to block information that challenges the government on issues like public health.
4. By forcing tech companies to enforce the law, over-censorship is likely, as they will prioritize avoiding penalties over protecting free speech.