18:56 you could have done more if you hadn't summoned cross-sheep first and just used the fusion spell, discard ceruli and graph, discard silva, bounce genta with graph, summon akashik with rein and graph, bounce silva with rein, then with graph, go into cross-sheep, use fusion spell from grave, discard ceruli, discard silva, cross- sheep summon snow and then continue
Personally, I prefer the previous build that didn't have Dealings because I don't want the opponent to draw into a potential handtrap. Also, I really liked the 2nd Ceruli not just due to Kashtira deck rip, but also in order to loop it with Reignbeaux. You SS 1st Ceruli, discard Reignbeaux then Reignbeaux summons the 2nd Ceruli and also grabs Sillva ready to get discarded. I'm also playing Destrudo and Plaguespreader to maximize Foolish Burial and get value from random discards, building bodies for Saryuja as well as Baronne access.
not a bad idea, interesting stuff! aaron furman topped ycs LA this weekend and was playing DWD and 1 ceruli, so i think it's worth trying out that build, but I also wanna experiment with what you said here! thanks for the ideas!!
@@BeanMagoon If you playtest by yourself, having only 1 Ceruli, 3 DWD, and 8 Dangers will probably go full combo 7/10 times. But I really don't want to allow the opponent to improve their hand, with Droll seeing main-deck status. That's also the reason I don't like that Danger ratio. You need to have a lvl8 since you can pivot into Jackalope to get Giantrainer, also Chupa is a fiend while this lineup of dangers can brick the 3 Gates (I've seen lists with 2 Gates and more dangers for example)
Respectfully, I would consider cutting dealings for basically anything else. Your opponent is going to side in Droll if they know what they are doing. Don’t give them extra opportunities to see it, or it will end your turn.
Hello Yishan, I've been watching your Math in Yugioh playlist videos, and I thought of a question that I'm hoping you can help me on: for Master Duel, if I have 3 Maxx "C", 3 droplet, and 3 dark ruler no more in a 40 card deck, combing the probabilities of P(X=x) 30.11% for Maxx "C" (sample size 5) and P(X=x) 43.5% for 3 droplet and 3 dark ruler no more (sample size 6), what would the math be behind the new P(X=x) for seeing either only 1 Maxx "C" in a starting hand of 5 or only 1 of either droplet or dark ruler no more in a going second hand of 6? would the math be the same to find the P(X≥x)? Thanks in advance.
Droll and shifter are rough but against those decks I side in floodgates like skill drain, because no one runs back row hate against dark world. People will actually side it out and sometimes a skill drain can completely shut a deck down
@@jbsc97 playing against dark world when you can start is quite easy and never have been an issue. The problem is when going 2nd and in this scenario skill drain is usless
Why banish the Sillva and looking at your hand so what if they ash your genta you have 2 gates in hand the look on their face will be in despair when they realize they wasted a ass blossom
18:56 you could have done more if you hadn't summoned cross-sheep first and just used the fusion spell, discard ceruli and graph, discard silva, bounce genta with graph, summon akashik with rein and graph, bounce silva with rein, then with graph, go into cross-sheep, use fusion spell from grave, discard ceruli, discard silva, cross- sheep summon snow and then continue
@2:50 Note that Snoww is Mandatory while Genta isn't so you don't have an option in that chain
@18:00 same with Archives, it has to be CL2
Personally, I prefer the previous build that didn't have Dealings because I don't want the opponent to draw into a potential handtrap.
Also, I really liked the 2nd Ceruli not just due to Kashtira deck rip, but also in order to loop it with Reignbeaux. You SS 1st Ceruli, discard Reignbeaux then Reignbeaux summons the 2nd Ceruli and also grabs Sillva ready to get discarded.
I'm also playing Destrudo and Plaguespreader to maximize Foolish Burial and get value from random discards, building bodies for Saryuja as well as Baronne access.
not a bad idea, interesting stuff! aaron furman topped ycs LA this weekend and was playing DWD and 1 ceruli, so i think it's worth trying out that build, but I also wanna experiment with what you said here! thanks for the ideas!!
@@BeanMagoon If you playtest by yourself, having only 1 Ceruli, 3 DWD, and 8 Dangers will probably go full combo 7/10 times. But I really don't want to allow the opponent to improve their hand, with Droll seeing main-deck status.
That's also the reason I don't like that Danger ratio. You need to have a lvl8 since you can pivot into Jackalope to get Giantrainer, also Chupa is a fiend while this lineup of dangers can brick the 3 Gates (I've seen lists with 2 Gates and more dangers for example)
It has nothing to see with the video, but your voice is really good! Deep, beautiful. Do you practice it, or do you "train" it sometimes?
I do like the cross-sheep combo I wish I thought if it when I got 5th at the Houston regional I woulda won it 😆
Respectfully, I would consider cutting dealings for basically anything else.
Your opponent is going to side in Droll if they know what they are doing. Don’t give them extra opportunities to see it, or it will end your turn.
what i needed
Hello Yishan, I've been watching your Math in Yugioh playlist videos, and I thought of a question that I'm hoping you can help me on: for Master Duel, if I have 3 Maxx "C", 3 droplet, and 3 dark ruler no more in a 40 card deck, combing the probabilities of P(X=x) 30.11% for Maxx "C" (sample size 5) and P(X=x) 43.5% for 3 droplet and 3 dark ruler no more (sample size 6), what would the math be behind the new P(X=x) for seeing either only 1 Maxx "C" in a starting hand of 5 or only 1 of either droplet or dark ruler no more in a going second hand of 6? would the math be the same to find the P(X≥x)? Thanks in advance.
Im not gona say it. Im not gona say it
shifter droll nib or ggwp
Nib is usually not too bad actually (it depends) but yeah shifter and droll are rough.
Droll and shifter are rough but against those decks I side in floodgates like skill drain, because no one runs back row hate against dark world. People will actually side it out and sometimes a skill drain can completely shut a deck down
"card outs deck" 🤯🤯🤯
@@jbsc97 playing against dark world when you can start is quite easy and never have been an issue. The problem is when going 2nd and in this scenario skill drain is usless
@@Yishan That's why I play more level 4s and pass on Bagooska if my opponent uses Shifter or Droll.
Why banish the Sillva and looking at your hand so what if they ash your genta you have 2 gates in hand the look on their face will be in despair when they realize they wasted a ass blossom