Resolution process in Artificial Intelligence | CNF | Resolution Graph | Part-3 | (Eng-Hindi) | #7
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 вер 2024
- In this video CNF and Resolution with example is explained
Comment your valuable reviews and Subscribe WELL ACADEMY
Follow us on :
Facebook : / wellacademy
Instagram : / well_academy
Twitter : / well_academy
resolution in artificial intelligence examples,
resolution in artificial intelligence
Convert into FOL
resolution,fol,artificial intelligence,well academy,resolution steps in ai,resolution explanation,resolution in ai,resolution in artificial intelligence,artificial intelligence resolution,resolution explanation with example,what is resolution in ai,resolution working in ai,resolution in artificial intelligence examples,resolution in artificial intelligence,Convert into FOL,Rules FOL to CNF
Agr Ap Topic Suggest krna chahte ho to yaha link me di gayi video ke me comment kare
Click on This Link
ua-cam.com/video/afsrQF-PTGg/v-deo.html
Talk With Abdul Channel For Interesting Videos and Live Sessions :
goo.gl/tqB4qX
Well Academy Last step sir..
That you proved by contradiction...can u please explain
If at the place of alive we
Sir , how you decide the parameters of graph ?? .. I have a confusion here on the graph .. how to choose the parameters ?? Means the sentence on each line and on that basis we replacing the things .. but how will decide ?
Bhai pehle jo video banaye hai usko samajh le aur badme naye upload kr.Tera tujhe hi pata nahi tu kya bol rha hai kya likh rha hai...
Pls make the video on script method in ai
waltz algorithm please make video on it
it is quite difficult but easy rahegaa !
chutiye jesa explanation hai
😂🤣
For those of you who are still confused, replace the last predicate NOT alive OR killed with NOT alive OR NOT killed and then follow the procedure in the video. Everything works out fine at the end.
Dude please don't just divert from the original problem ,keep it simple and understandable!
Sir this is very confusing bcos there is a lot of error correction in this video.....Can you again make this video????
Sir u have explained nicely but at some places, there are flaws like one of them is u suddenly introduced 2 more cnf how plz tell
killed and alive once
In the resolution graph it's not about finding "common literals". It's about contradicting literals by finding complimentary literals (example a and not-a are complimentary). Example p(x) and not-p(x) V h(x) would resolve to form h(x) because not-p(x) contradicts p(x).
Nevertheless thank you for rest of the explanation. It helped me.
great! it makes sense now.
The solution will differ if u correct the last cnf because killed(x) V alive(x) will come which means in last resolution graph it will come alive(x) rather than (negote alive(x)) , also this video was not at all satisfying. Got more confused after watching this.
look , here you need to choose the opposite of killed that is ~killed(x) reason being then the killed(x) of the question and ~killed (x) will cancel out and the remaing will be ~alive(x) now replace x with ajay and then choose the opposite of ~alive(ajay) which is alive(ajay) and then it cancels out to give null value hence successfully contradicted the statement
@@omprakash4810 Thanks
www.javatpoint.com/ai-resolution-in-first-order-logic
Same thing he just renamed and copy paste....I will suggest to visit this website it will clear u more
@@bhaskarsinha3955 thanks.
@@omprakash4810 yes brother you are right....actually 4:56 par sahi predicate is( negate(alive) v negate(killed)) ......so jab isko resolve karenge with (killed) then we will get (negate(alive)) as final thing which could further be resolved with (alive(ajay)) as a final step to get null at the end.
It's very complicated but helpful
last k do predicate logic kese le lie apni marzi se?
hme kese pta chalega kese lene h
why u have not include food (apple) and food (chicken) in CNF?
and I didn't understand notalive (Ajay) to alive(Ajay)
how we can prove Ravi not like peanuts as he is alive?
I can't understand this.
please if you have time then explain me
A lot of helpful vedio thanx sir
Provided this valuable vedio
We people open these lectures when exams are overhead....... Get the concept and relax ur bursting mind.
6:18 will be useful for copying😅
nyc video munna bhaiya
thank you so much sir,it helped alot
ap bhut acha samjhate hai
I didn't understand why the third statement was divided. On what basis was it divided?
Wonderful
How did you took the FOL statements negation killed(x)->alive(x) and negation alive(x)->killed(x). The question doesn't contain these statements.
But that is common sense. The one who is not killed is definitely alive, and the one who is killed is definitely alive.
Thanks a ton bro
Sir, Why you didn't added negation in the first example after dropping implies(--->)..!!??
Awsome !
Thanks bro nice explain
Thanks lot of . please upload
PDDL (Planning Domain Definition Language) with example.
Helpful
In this video when u started with eg section Der was 5pts 5was Rita eats wat Ajay eats
Next cmg to this video while considering killed (ajay) and tkng 5pt both are positive so u need to consider 4pt only so that u ll get alive(ajay)
It is quit difficult but easy
😂😂😂
You are awesome, it’s really helping at the last moment before the final exam !
Thank you so much sir :)
Thnku so much sir bht e achi explanation hai
You messed up a little . Although great explanation
Sir i think the solution is wrong the 5th FOL is --alive(x) V --killed(x) not --alive(x) V killed(x).
Please go through once again and also u left out the last statement Rita eats that Ajay eats.
Can i ask that there was 7 FOL but How can they reduced to 5 while making the resoultion graph and where is the food(apple) and Rita ???
Sir i did not understand that why we add 2fol next, you told in this that the 4 sentence is not enough i. e, bt my question is that what is sentence for this two fol
i think it would be better to take one more example which will give the final proof statement
Sir, can you please explain using another example which contains existential quantifier in it.
sir you forgot last statement to convert in FOL and i think there is a mistake in converting FOL to CNF in eats(ajay,peanuts)/\alive(ajay).
how u make killed out of resolution where trend is only to omit predicates if one is normal and one is negation of it plz reply
Explain it more clear
video dekh ke lag rha hai aapko bhi abhi tak samhaj nhi aayi hai !!!
Last CNF correct karke phirse video banao please
camera thodi door set kre kyu ki poore lecture me aap board k samane aa jate ho or pichhe likha hua kuch dikhta hi nahi hai......
CORRECT ANSWER: ua-cam.com/video/hfCnPG10XFs/v-deo.html
very nice content and explanation, thanks sir
Kyo add kre ga kaise kre ge . Pta kaase chle ga ke yeh predicate add krne a
how you use the last 2 extra fol killed and alive one???
please delete this mess you have created with multiple post corrections or upload the fresh one.
anyways, thanks for the video!
is topic me cnf convert ki samj ni ayi bs baqi sab video bhut ache se samj ai
last video me ayaka pura confuse kar diya....jitna v 2 video me sikha isme khichdi ban gaya pura..
Woh sab thike but thoda side hote jao yaar board dekhne toh do bachoo ko :P
as u said that we have to replace quantifiers with skolem constant but and u don't do any such in this example. please explain?
Coz there is no such sentence in the above example which contains existential quantifiers,also you nee to drop universal quantifiers in each sentence. Skolem constant is used in existential quantifier.
Also give eg for existential quanifiers
WOW....the way you teach is so amazing......you are so good at teaching man....
Bhai kaise explain kiya hai, kuch samajh nhi aa rha
same bro bas example btasey hy
Nice explanation... Keep going... thumbs up.. for all the lectures....
ye vdo thk se samajh me nahi araha sir so munch confusion is there can u plzzz explain thoroly
thank you so much sir..please add some other video on AI topics..Again thank you
Please do it more neatly next time.
You said in the previous video that we have to rename the variables according to the rules but you haven't changed the variables here. So can you please tell clearly why we are not changing the variables?
Bro, please re upload the video with the correction, it gets really difficult this way.
thankyou bhaiya.....you are great
Thank you so much sir. It really helped me alot to understand the concepts.
Nice video bro
We needs more videos in this Subject
😀
thnk u sir..its simply n easy to understand resolution process.!!!!
+Pansuriya Deepa
You are most welcome
Positive comments pe hi reply krega Kya bdsk
Saved my exam bro.
Bhai last me KIlled(x) and killed(ajay) dono positive hai to remove kaise hoga woh?..please reply fast
it is killed(ajay) and (v)~alive(x) v ~killed(x). So you get ~alive(ajay). It was a mistake as mentioned in the video.
Graph me Ajay/x chahiye na....?
sir graph ma last sy smj ni aai boht confusion ha please clear it sir..
wait a minute, there was a step with which you have used 5th statement in resolution graph, there killed(x) had not been cancelled with not killed(x) then too you have proceeded with not alive(x), its not the correct explanation please correct it
good job👌🏻👌🏻✌🏻
itni adds ni dalni chahiye bhai
thank you so much sir, your video was really helpful
Wastage
There Is A Mistake In Last CNF .. Check it Again And Reply
Superb tuts
please be prepare for that sum before you shoot video.because in some time you just add new cnf without telling them where it came from.it is quite hard to understand.
include more resolution examples in this playlist,wff,making semantic network
And where is the 5th sentence for rita
bhai kuch nai smjha upar se aur confuse ho gaya hu kal exam hai mera mei bolta hu video nikalde baki log ka bhala hoga
John will marry mary if mary loves john plz .. convert it into fol n cnf!🙏🙏
thanks u so much sir
Videos acche hai but kuch bhi kar lete ho bhai! 5:25 ko wo sentence seperate kaise ho sakta hai!?
make video once again , there are lots of mistake and according to resolution principle we can eliminate only those part which are opposite . ex : 1) a^b 2)~b ==> a , make your concepts clear and then make it once again .
Resolution graph kafi confusing h.Kuch bhi smjh me nhi aya.
This is not English, please add English subtitles / translation.
this video will definely not help me in my exam please try to make a nice version of it
Not explained well
you realy need to specific about the data and you should understand whether u are being able to explain in a well manner....literally gav alot of tym on this particular video but the topic is still not clear....!!!
Standardization of variables kaha h bhai...
Jo nhi janta h wo to eesko hi sahi manega... This is not good.
Graph samaj nahi aaya
Sir.. ye cnf conversation thoda aalag laga or fol k examples ko hum match nhi kr parre hai cnf se.. or fir ye graph bhi thoda confusing hai.. sir ye Mera no. Hai 7796766380 please sir aagar aap free hoge to mere doubts clear kr dijye..
There are lots of mistakes in this video.... It confused people... Please re upload with correction.
Will upload another example soon
Well Academy if possible please do it in 2or3 days... I have my exam on Thursday.... Well i get the method from this example but still want to clear some confusion.
Yaar kisne kisko pass kiya bhai
😓😓😓 its difficult Bhaiya😪😪
This video was not that clear reconsider it doing again
confusing video please make more simple video
its very difficult 😫
What are the facts for last 2 FOLs?
Very confusing...
topic hi bkwas hai
Abe poora poora samjha bhai