Thanks. I have no tools to measure the effect. I'm just happy for the perfectly working transforming wing. This was pure try and error. But it ended up well.
@@wellreally831 That is true. To bei honest, i simply enjoy flying. I don't care too much about data☺️ Just having fun after a lot of hard work building RC SCRAPPY.
Da stecken fast 2 Jahre freies Bauen und Entwickeln drin. Das würde sehr teuer. Vermutlich werde ich SCRAPPY nie verkaufen. Zumindest nicht in absehbarer Zeit. Danke trotzdem für das Interesse😊
the slats serve to enable a higher angle of attack while the flaps are extended (they reduce stall angle ), but you didn't use a larger angle of attack at all and why you have double slats, they don't make sense because it would logically mean that you would use some incredible angle of attack, over 12 degrees, rather try with a movable leading edge like on the f16 plane.I have flaps on my plane that can be lowered up to 65 degrees and the plane descends at an angle of 45 degrees with the longitudinal axis of the plane being almost horizontal and the speed is half of the normal approach speed
@@RCnerd74 I'm sorry, but I don't know what that plane should look like, but I understand aerodynamics and structures, and this is an unusual combination for me, I intend to make a wing that will be able to change the structural angle like the corsar f-7/8, which would increase the angle difference between the thrust of the engine and lift on the wing, which would give an incredible climbing gradient
@@makantahi3731 Mike Patey is one of the best STOL builders in the world. It is built this way for a reason, and it works. You sound like an armchair engineer. You post without knowing the facts. People like you need to start to listen more rather than give advice without knowing all the details. It's very cringe and misinforming. You can't expect the RC version to work the same when the wing loading is so high compared to stock. The transforming wing increases the wing cord for more lift. You talk as if you are so sure of yourself without knowing what plane it is built after. He gave you a link to the video and I bet you felt awkward knowing you ae wrong and never replied back to him, lol
You are not able to make a STALL plane from heawy plane by adding transforming wing as is possible to see in your video. You need to reduce waight, if possible, dramatically.
@@Dzordzikk It was not the target to build a lightweight stol plane. It was to build an RC replica of Mike Patey's full scale bushplane prototype called SCRAPPY. There is no way to put that many functions in it and keep it light weight. The transforming wing reduces take off and landing speed anyways. If you don't know the full scale version built by Mike Patey, just search for Mike Patey Scrappy on UA-cam. You will find a ton of build videos. Full scale SCRAPPY didn't end up as a lightweight stol plane äs well. Same situation as for RC SCRAPPY.
@@RCnerd74 I know Scrappy, but dont understand why you build it. All you add into it only add weight and reducing start and landong speed is very low. Betterto build it without it.
Great job designing RC Scrappy. Mike Patey would be proud. The transforming wing looks realistic. You should be proud of your build. Cheers.
Thank you. Appreciate your great comment😊 Still working on little modifications. More UA-cam content about RC SCRAPPY will follow. Cheers.
Amazing that you were able to reproduce that incredible transforming wing by Mike Patey in an RC model.
@@iangadget3848 Thank you☺️
Those wheels and shocks are cool looking.
Amazing job.. Congrats.. Wonderful modeling job..
@@SteffenRC Thanks. This build was a hell of an adventure😅
Nice work sir!
Thank you!
Looks great! Would be nice to see actual data, if this has a similar effect for such a 'small' plane
Thanks. I have no tools to measure the effect. I'm just happy for the perfectly working transforming wing. This was pure try and error. But it ended up well.
@@RCnerd74 Ah, OK, thought it should be doable with regular telemetry data (GPS, maybe pitot, AOA from an IMU)
@@wellreally831 That is true. To bei honest, i simply enjoy flying. I don't care too much about data☺️ Just having fun after a lot of hard work building RC SCRAPPY.
Nice plane & great vid!
Thanks. More SCRAPPY vids will follow.
Awesome stuff man!
Thank you. More stuff will follow.
Awesome
Thanks 😊
Kann ich ihn kaufen ???😊
Da stecken fast 2 Jahre freies Bauen und Entwickeln drin. Das würde sehr teuer. Vermutlich werde ich SCRAPPY nie verkaufen. Zumindest nicht in absehbarer Zeit. Danke trotzdem für das Interesse😊
Hammer geiles teil falls intresse zum verkauf besteht bitte sofort melden 😊
It seems that Scrappy has an attitude when it comes to flight characteristics
Well, the weight doesn't help to make it fly easy. But as soon as you are familiar with it, it's fun to fly. But always a little challenge.
the slats serve to enable a higher angle of attack while the flaps are extended (they reduce stall angle ), but you didn't use a larger angle of attack at all and why you have double slats, they don't make sense because it would logically mean that you would use some incredible angle of attack, over 12 degrees, rather try with a movable leading edge like on the f16 plane.I have flaps on my plane that can be lowered up to 65 degrees and the plane descends at an angle of 45 degrees with the longitudinal axis of the plane being almost horizontal and the speed is half of the normal approach speed
He tried to mimic the original Scrappy by doing the double slats.
I simply rebuilt rhe SCRAPPY transforming wing made by Mike Patey. This is why it looks the way it looks.
@@RCnerd74 I'm sorry, but I don't know what that plane should look like, but I understand aerodynamics and structures, and this is an unusual combination for me, I intend to make a wing that will be able to change the structural angle like the corsar f-7/8, which would increase the angle difference between the thrust of the engine and lift on the wing, which would give an incredible climbing gradient
@@makantahi3731 Just check the following video. This is how this wing design works. ua-cam.com/video/JcckHHiYkL0/v-deo.htmlsi=P8za4L8dEzan3iBm
@@makantahi3731 Mike Patey is one of the best STOL builders in the world. It is built this way for a reason, and it works. You sound like an armchair engineer. You post without knowing the facts. People like you need to start to listen more rather than give advice without knowing all the details. It's very cringe and misinforming. You can't expect the RC version to work the same when the wing loading is so high compared to stock. The transforming wing increases the wing cord for more lift. You talk as if you are so sure of yourself without knowing what plane it is built after. He gave you a link to the video and I bet you felt awkward knowing you ae wrong and never replied back to him, lol
gseht super us. chame dä fluger mau chase? lg miran.
Great Work! Don't know if you might be interested in a UA-cam video collab. (PCBWayDaisy) 😃
You are not able to make a STALL plane from heawy plane by adding transforming wing as is possible to see in your video. You need to reduce waight, if possible, dramatically.
@@Dzordzikk It was not the target to build a lightweight stol plane. It was to build an RC replica of Mike Patey's full scale bushplane prototype called SCRAPPY. There is no way to put that many functions in it and keep it light weight. The transforming wing reduces take off and landing speed anyways. If you don't know the full scale version built by Mike Patey, just search for Mike Patey Scrappy on UA-cam. You will find a ton of build videos. Full scale SCRAPPY didn't end up as a lightweight stol plane äs well. Same situation as for RC SCRAPPY.
@@RCnerd74 I know Scrappy, but dont understand why you build it. All you add into it only add weight and reducing start and landong speed is very low. Betterto build it without it.
@@Dzordzikk This is called scale building.