I love reading the comment section. So many people arguing about things they know nothing about. Repeating things that they heard on different videos and acting like they have some kind of specialist training in archeology and science. It's hilarious! Then when someone points out their error, they start with the name calling. Also, there's always some guy complaining about the voice over, the accent, the pronunciation. I'm telling you it's comedy gold.😂😂😂😂😂😂 Please don't stop! Keep it up! I'll continue to laugh!
This is the best edited, documentary type unbiased film I’ve ever experienced regarding Baalbek . No sensationalism, or conspiracy theory crap. Truly a high level project done by a well informed group of people. I’m sending this to everyone I know in spite of the weird ai narrator.
It’s not a slave thing. It’s a pride/ego thing. I enjoy placing large stones too, and it’s not too crazy to imagine what could be moved with a concerted, multigenerational effort.
BobbyBanks77 Who is telling you they can’t be moved? How did you get that in your mind? They obviously did move them. That was the whole point of doing it, to blow YOUR mind. And it worked
@@wompbozer3939 check out a channel called Sacred Geometry Decoded and a channel called History Maze. They both have several videos on ancient tech, without the cultic nonsense. Wally Wallington is an individual who moves several tons without much effort, using the old skills. Enough material out there which makes one question the agenda of those that hold up that 'can't be done' mantra.
@@wompbozer3939 not so much that it was *moved* but that the joints were perfectly fitted. think about it, how could you ensure a perfect joint without trial and error with a *1000 ton* stone?
In my opinion, I have always loved the story of Baalbeck since I was a child and I can say that it is the best video ever made about the mystery of Baalbeck. In fact we will never know the truth about Baalbeck mistery. Congratulations Rio Brazil
I just love this. I was born in Beirut under foreign service and went here as a child. I try to imagine what this amazing place looked like when it was new.
An interesting detail can be seen at 10:53. The natural features of the stone (quartz inclusions etc.) continue over the joinery. This means the stones were already neighbors in the quarry and were then cut and reassembled. However, modern saws are at least 1 cm thick which means you lose some material as you cut. The ancients, however, managed to cut without losing any material. I don't believe in aliens, but the least you have to admit is that the ancient builders had technical capabilities now lost to us. Who would even tackle such a project unless he had the capability to move these stones with ease?
What's so strange is all these megastructures that you see around the world are not finished there is still rubble everywhere around every structure that you see just like a construction site once the job is done it's cleaned up around it to look neat all these structures still have the stone laying everywhere something stopped them from building on any further
It never fails to impress me how much effort and the amount of resources ancient people would use to construct these types of awesome structures. Humans are capable of amazing feats. You would think that we could really accomplish a lot if we could just get our shit together.
The Romans left clear engineering drawings on moving megaliths: Wooden wheels were constructed on each end of the megalith, turning the megalith into a large axle. Then numerous ropes were wound around the stone axle and a large number of men, oxen and horses pulled on the ropes and the whole thing rolled. Large wheels go over large obstacles. This is the reason there are no drag marks. The stone isn't drug and it isn't even pulled over rollers. The holes on the stones are for pegs to hang the marble facade. Often the marble facades were looted to build other buildings. This happened to the marble in the Roman Coliseum which was looted to build St. Peter' Basilica and some of other parts of the Vatican. After the marble is taken, what is left is the base structural stone with holes in it.
All great efforts generally come down to tension - or using the tensile strength of the molecule - and vegetables i.e. ropes (windlasses) pulled by grass-fed oxen. In our day the cost of the production of wind turbines and their maintenance put into nylon spinnaker sails instead and deployed in ocean currents for electrolysing sea-water would return million-fold in the achievement of purpose. At the heart is tensile strength and it is to be supposed that the ancients understood this very well.
@@williamusrex6417 There are piles of chips left over from quarrying. The megalith is moved with wedges off the stone shelf it was harvested onto the pile with the ends exposed and then large wheels built around the ends. Wooden wheels which are wide can support a large stone as an axle the same way you or I could build a small wheel around a brick using toothpicks and sewing threads which would support the weight of the brick. I haven't seen the illustrations, but suspect four bundles of tree trunks each making up a quarter of a circle with a flat bottom to go up against each side of the monolith are lashed around the monolith and then some tree trunks placed where the bundles meet to protect the edges of the monoliths to create wheels.
@@shivshankredemption5024 Since the engineers, architects and workers all over the world without being in communication with each other can analyze similar problems and arrive at similar solutions, different civilizations can cut, move and place monoliths. These just require societies to have the willingness to invest substantial resources in projects. This occurs with cathedrals and sports arenas.
However they did it, there were once people intelligent enough to manufacture and move these stones. Judging from the comments below, that will surely never happen again.
Nice presentation. Those "chisel" Mark's are pretty intriguing never seen them so detailed before. Cool stuff, they were super precise placing them huh.
I dont even think the romans or greeks had anything do with anything. Because the trilithons as big as they are. The rest of the structures are made of the same stone and display the same coloration of the sediment in the stone. Ive been there. And ive seen things only my eyes know what they are. No one else knows. Clues to the age and erosion etc. This structures were amazing back then. Amazing. 12000 years ago. It was an honor to visit this site. Great honor. If only i could see what was docked in those massive stones in that time. I wonder why they left that one in the quarry though. ? ...
Humans did not create these megaliths nor did extraterrestrials... They were engineered and constructed by the men of renowned mentioned in the Holy Bible GENESIS 6.... a.k.a. NEPHILIM also mentioned in the PRE-FLOOD Apocryphal book of Enoch found in the DEAD SEA SCROLLS , Numbers etc......
Cesar Esteves - Tartarians? we’re never taught about Tartaria that appears on 14-1500 maps. Their architecture is worldwide and they were 12-13 ft tall people. A few were left by camera era and there are legit photos. look in google images for Tartaria maps. crazy
The Megaliths ,the Stone Henge ,the Pyramids etc were quiet likely constructed by the preflood Nephilims who were superior to mortal man and were men of renown (Genesis 6:4).
No historic, arqueological nor paleontologyc proof found to base your claim tho. And the bible was writen approx. from the year -900 to the 300. And those stones were carved more or less 10-15 thousans years ago.
What an amazing piece of investigative archeology! The Romans made a big deal of transporting the Egyptian obelisks ..yet these obelisks are a fraction of the size and weight of the Baalbek megaliths! And they make no mention of that. It sounds like even they didn't know where these massive rocks came from or who put them there. It's clear that Baalbek stones were carved and put there long before the Roman civilization. Just another evidence for lost ancient high technology. I'm seriously starting to contemplate the human race has been 'reset' several times by cataclysms!
For the megalithic stones base, why did not cut the stones into smaller size so that they could be easily moved and lifted. Besides, why did the jointing have to be that perfectly fitted ？
many ancient artifacts are finished to a much higher degree than their functional utility would demand, we know this from ancient hand axes of both Neanderthals and modern humans right through to products from modern times...it's a human trait. In an age of mass production and disposable items it seems other wordly but until recent times it was common.
@@kc3718 What ?....you said 'ancient axes' ???....omg.....this is precisely why the human race is fckd....the capacity for critical thinking has diminished here to the level of squirrels...smh
Why do anything in that case? If you are going to go to the effort of doing something, I'd hope that 100% effort would be put in to achieve perfection.
I agree with Manu. The only thing comparable today is the Atlas lifting platform at Nasa where the concrete and streel go down over 40'. I'm not a geologist, however, the weathering of the rock looks like a minimum of 250,000 years old to me.
It may have been discovered during the Roman era times but the Romans did not build this. They simply didn't have the knowledge or the skill level to accomplish these structures. And they were in ruins even back then
I think the accent and narration were Just Fine, if not superb for being of foreign origin. I am a native English speaker who speaks two other languages. Excellent job. I understood every single word and this was a highly enjoyable and informative documentary 👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽
Sorry it's not geopolymer. You can see the marks where the blocks were cut from the quarry and they have 1000 ton blocks still in the quarry completely cut to size and shape but still attached to the bedrock..maybe geopolymer was used at some ancient sites around the world but not here.
U r the first human to describe ancient enigma ad is, without exaggerating, repeating falsehoods or idiotically accepting the wrong written history. Thank u
One question why was it necessary to built with these big and heavy blocks. Was there a gravity distortion which made weights less heavy or was it important the wall wouldnt wash away..?
At 24:30 it is strange that why the stone on top left hand side was broken up there instead of falling down in whole piece. It probably hit by extreme power from above.
This is where the Romans learned to make the best concrete from the best ashes. This is clearly seen on the facade cracks and decorations. Natural rock doesn't crack like that.
Yeah it's up there with finger nails on a chalk board. But being a self proclaimed Reverend i'm sure a bit of sadomasochism is all part and parcel with selling your soul lol.
The large blocks in the quarry were carved out at an angle to facilitate their removal. Cutting the blocks from the bedrock at that angle serves to simultaneously create the ramp that allows the removal of the block from the resulting pit. This would have been a time-and-effort saving measure used during the quarrying process.
@@thepolyhobbyist True - but do not underestimate the value of of having your 1,200 ton block completely sitting on its upward sloping angle with a solid wall behind it to use as a backstop from which to lever the block up the slope and out of the pit.
800 TONS? That is 1,600,000 pounds!! moved by log rollers? no way, would crush them, pulled by ropes? I can't imagine how many ropes it would have taken to move over 1.5 million pounds, even IF you could make rollers or a 'sled' that it would not out right crush! Remember this was done BEFORE the Romans, they built ON it.
As someone who works as a stone Mason 3rd generation. I can tell you working with stone and granite is not easy. And talk about lost knowledge...there are less and less of us every year. It's hard to find aprentences or any willing to learn. It's been a dying trade for a long time. Between the math and the hard work. Not many want to put in the effort.
I’ve been a Mason for 10 years, 30 now. I fell in love with the craft realizing the oldest buildings on the planet are made of stone. I’d love to build the next pyramids
The courtyard blocks are not roman! Those are also older..the style is found in different older megalithic places! Somehow it seems like there were one big catastrophe where the building stopped, then they build again, something happened again and then came the romans. But who know what under the plattform! The base must be at least over 10000 years old
Excellent video Ombio! Bravo! I can tell you with confidence the larger stones are well over 12000 years old and the reason they stopped was due to the flood. They kept a record of their accomplishment in making/moving/hoisting/aligning those giant stones…and I will post a video soon showing exactly that! Click on my playlist to see other 12000 year old stones that tell their story. I am the Last Natufian! Cheers!
@@isupportyou9929 For the same reason we continue to build after every disaster: at some point life goes on and risks are taken by those in charge. Cheers.
I wish i could visit this sites. I will travel the world one day and visit each one of them. This is the platform that was constructed as a docking station.
Let's not forget that this area was the main source of massive Cedar trees which the Phoenicians traded for goods all over the Mediterranean. If there was ever an ideal place to build massive wooden structures for moving giant stones, this was it.
Geoffrey S Tuttle, Cedar trees are very very soft wood and have virtually no tensile strength to support megaliths. The giants, descendants of the Annunaki built the megaliths in my view.
Your video us superb. Good images. It seems quite unbiased so I congratulate you. However, I guess there are some inaccuracies. biased. It is argued by the Mainstream that Baalbek is roman, that it cannot be old since the Trilithon stones and the limestone quarry stones do not show signs of erosion similar to the Sphinx of Giza. Even more that there are no ancient records previous to the Bronze Age talking about the site. Romans were famous by leaving historical written records of their buildings. In this case, there are just 4 ancient texts speaking about Baalbek. Antonius Pius started the construction of the Large Court in the II century AD, which was finished by his son Septimus Severus and was continued to be worshipped till the kingdom of Elagabalus (1) (2). His son Carcalla finished the Propylea. The roman emperor Phillip the Arab (Marcus Juluis Philipus), built the Hexagonal Court in between the two former structures. Later on, Constantinus the Great, demolished the Venus Temple in order to build a Basilica in the III century. Justinian carried away the remaining 8 granite columns to Hagya Sophia in Constantinopla(3). There is NO SINGLE document about the Jupiter and Bacchus's Temples. If they were so skilled why not to quarry granite near Constantinopla, and had to unmount, cut and transport over 1000 km 8 heavy columns??? Sphinx erosion in Giza was due to run-off water, which didn't take place in Baalbek (not a plateau). There are several evidences that Baalbek could have been buried under "several meters of mud" and clay. Thus erosion would have NOT happened. (5) A layer of as of 30 cm between the Bronze and Iron Age reinforces the statement. Drawings in the Temple of Bacchus cannot be seen below 10 meters high (there are pictures). But anyway, the best way assess the truth of this is to watch collections of vintage photos of Baalbek, of which there are hundreds (even video footage) on the web (I can provide a bunch of them). To evaluate the reach of the sludge just take a look at some ancient Pregnant Woman pictures and compare them with current ones (will see the lower part which is 5 meters high, almost completely buried, and al field arround full of slit. Going on with the erosion you may appreciate it in the PRE-ROMAN PODIUM (8) and the columns (again I can provide pictures). Granite sawing cuts like the ones at Giza can be found everywhere. In fact, it was so buried with sludge that beside the Pregnant Woman it was discovered in 2014!!! the so-called Baby-Stone (1600 tons) under more than 5 meters below the Pregnant Woman (1200 tons) stone. There could be some discussion about whether the base of the stones in the quarry is finished or not, but that's beyond the scope of this comment. There are some webs that shows a collection of drawing and pics from the XVII-XVIII centuries where the burial and rubble spread all around is manifest. The South Wall of Bacchus Temple (to the left as you enter) is badly damaged (it has been somewhat repaired during last decade, but I have older pictures), showing clear signs of black burning and vitrification, especially compared with the North Wall (to the right). Probably a plasma wave or discharge? (speculative). just open your mind, unbias it, and take a fresh glance at the Podiums; it's a sort of Sesame Street exercise for children: Large Stones below (50-300 tons), Small 'bricks' to both sides and above. LARGEEE-SMALLLL The Podium is a pre-roman terrace which is acknowledge by Lohman and other mainstream historians (9). In fact, there are papers that acknowledge the uncertainty about the TWO PODIUMS. In relation t1o the repairing column mentioned by Hanckock (I think is not so important), it is probably a Roman or Arab repair. Romans are supposed to be more intelligent than that. Even my 3 year old nephew knows it makes no sense to place a cylinder under a hole to support squared stones. If they were so skilled, why shouldn't they cut a squared stone to make the repair?? More questions: why did they left big stones in the quarries (1 km away from Baalbek)? Why no record or writing account of such incredible feats? Why didn't they built that huge Temples in Rome itself, instead doing it in a desert in the middle of nowhere? If the quarries were covered with slit which reached the level of the Podium Base (and the Trilithon, 10 meters in Bacchus temple) that explains why erosion didn't happen. Additionally it explains why no other accounts were made of the site, since even today new discoveries are being unearthed. Ir Romans would have noticed the Pregnant Woman or the Second Stone they would have used it as an easy material source (something like this happened in the Second Stone, from which some slabs were cut, probably by the Arabs). About moving the stones very bad references are given. Video is full of speculation such as saying that the western wall is a retaining wall which is mere lucubration and can't prove it. Another supposition is that Romans built the founding stones in the Jerusalem Temple. To assign a monument to a specific people one must have some evidence, yet there are none about Jupiter and Bacchus Temple, the Podium or the monoliths in the quarries. The Roman soldier and historian Ammianus Marcellinus (400 AD), wrote about the time of Augustus Emperor (14 AD) anD the LATERAN OBELISK (found in laying Karnak) : “...as for this one recently brought in, he neither ventured to meddle with it nor move it, overawed by the difficulties caused by its size” (11). Then about the periord of Constantine the Great (312 AD) he writes: "...After these provisions, the aforesaid emperor departed this life and the urgency of the enterprise waned, but at last the obelisk was loaded on the ship, after long delay, and brought over the sea and up the channel of the Tiber, which seemed to fear that it could hardly forward over the difficulties of its outward course to the walls of its foster-child the gift which the almost unknown Nile had sent. But it was brought to the vicus Alexandri14 distant three miles from the city. There it was put on cradles15 and carefully drawn through the Ostian Gate and by the Piscina Publica and brought into the Circus Maximus”. (11) So if the romans COULD NOT MOVE the LATERAN OBELISK (just 330 tons) in the time of Augustus, how do you want us to believe that 200 years later they were able to manage 1200-1600 tons blocks!!! NOTE: Not one of the Egyptian obelisk stolen by Rome weighed more that 330 tons!!! (12). First modern SUPER-CRANE able to lift nominal 1,000 tons was Krupp K 10001 built in 1971 (15). It was a mix of mobile and fixed crane and was constructed to build the Olympic Munich Stadium. The subject of the THUNDERSTONE (pedestal of Peter the Great horseman statue) is at best flimsy. The 1500 tons block, moved some impressive 6 km over an ICY MARSH land, was apparently split from the base rock by lightning, which could have some issues on its density (speculative). There is just one paper in french by J.P Adam (17) and some circling references from wiki to wiki. Even if Romans knew about winches, pulleys or capstans, it doesn't mean they were able to move such stones. The proof is they didn't move the monoliths in the quarries (probably because they were buried and unnoticed) and they could NOT even move the LATERAN OBELISK of 330 tons. We could argue about the wooden sleigh devised by Carbury (greek architect) which half meter thick base was protected by a cooper-tin-calamine alloy (bronze with calamine). Did romans knew calamine? To finnish with this, that XVII century men were capable of moving such a stone doesn't imply the romans could. Otherwise it is a Fallacy. Endeed, it's written by themselves they COULD NOT MOVE A 330 tons OBELISK. Bear in mind that modern 20th century man had serious issues to build a 6 meters high pyramid in Mark Lehner's Nova Experiment with 2-3 ton blocks. Nippon Corporation also had serious headaches to transport such blocks through the Nile from Turah quarry to setup a 20 meter high roughly unpolished pyramid. And the 20 more advanced countries in the world spent 6 years to disassemble Abu Simbel Temple needing to cut in small portions in order to move it up the slope when Aswan Dam was finished in the 60's. About the age, well there's no evidence as we cannot date rock. But it's possible to speculate with a lesser gravity, so it would belong to pre-Flood age.
Built by giants: 2 Samuel 21: 15 And the Philistines were again fighting against Yisra’ĕl, so Dawiḏ and his servants with him went down and fought against the Philistines. And Dawiḏ was weary, 16 and Yishbo-Benoḇ - who was one of the sons of the giant, the weight of whose bronze spear was three hundred pieces, who was bearing a new sword - spoke of striking Dawiḏ. 17 But Aḇishai son of Tseruyah came to help him, and struck the Philistine and killed him. Then Dawiḏ’s men swore to him, saying, “Do not go out with us to battle any more, lest you put out the lamp of Yisra’ĕl.” 18 And it came to be afterward, that there was a battle again with the Philistines at Goḇ. Then Sibbeḵai the Ḥushathite struck Saph, who was one of the sons of the giant. 19 And there was a battle with the Philistines again at Goḇ, where Elḥanan son of Ya‛arĕy-Oreḡim the Bĕyth Leḥemite struck Golyath the Gittite, the shaft of whose spear was like a weaver’s beam. 20 And there was a battle in Gath again, where there was a man of great height, who had six fingers on each hand and six toes on each foot, twenty-four in number. And he also was descended from the giants. 21 And he reproached Yisra’ĕl, and Yehonathan son of Shim‛i, the brother of Dawiḏ, struck him. 22 These four were born to the giant in Gath, and they fell by the hand of Dawiḏ and by the hand of his servants.
1 Chronicles 20: 6 And there was fighting again at Gath, where there was a man of great size, with twenty-four fingers and toes, six and six. And he too was born to the giant. 7 And he reproached Yisra’ĕl, and Yehonathan son of Shim‛a, Dawiḏ’s brother, struck him. 8 These were born to the giant in Gath, and they fell by the hand of Dawiḏ and by the hand of his servants.
1 Chronicles 22 Benayah was the son of Yehoyaḏa, the son of a brave man from Qaḇtse’ĕl, who had done many deeds. He struck two lion-like Mo’aḇites. He also went down and struck a lion in the midst of a pit on a snowy day. 23 And he struck a Mitsrian, a man of great height, five cubits tall. And in the Mitsrian’s hand was a spear like a weaver’s beam, and he went down to him with a staff and wrenched the spear out of the Mitsrian’s hand, and killed him with his own.
Deuteronomy 1 28 Where are we going to? Our brothers have made our hearts melt, saying, “The people are greater and taller than we, the cities are great and walled up to the heavens, and we saw the sons of the Anaqim there too.”
Deuteronomy 2:21 a people as great and numerous and tall as the Anaqim. But יהוה destroyed them before them, and they dispossessed them and dwelt in their place, 22 as He had done for the descendants of Ěsaw, who dwelt in Sĕ‛ir, when He destroyed the Ḥorites from before them.
Deuteronomy 9:1 “Hear, O Yisra’ĕl: You are passing over the Yardĕn today, to go in to dispossess nations greater and stronger than yourself, cities great and walled up to the heavens, 2 a people great and tall, the descendants of the Anaqim, whom you know, and of whom you heard it said, ‘Who does stand before the descendants of Anaq?’ 3 “And you shall know today that יהוה your Elohim is He who is passing over before you as a consuming fire - He does destroy them and subdue them before you. So you shall dispossess them and destroy them quickly, as יהוה has said to you.
DewNot BDeceived Amen... If only they'd read The Living God breathed Word of what was, is, and is to come. Sadly, they don't like to stand being corrected; they'd rather believe fables
@@maybeitsmelissa7712 What's to come is not what most Christians think because they want it spoon fed to them. I used to be one of those. Not any more. This is not what the Heavenly Father wants! We are warned throughout the Scriptures about deception. 2 Corinthians 11:11 Why? Is it that I do not love you? Elohim knows! 12 And I shall go on doing as I do, in order to cut off the occasion from those desiring an occasion, so that in that which they boast, they might be found also as we are. 13 For such are false emissaries, deceptive workers, masquerading as emissaries of Messiah. 14 And no wonder! For Satan himself masquerades as a messenger of light! 15 It is not surprising, then, if his servants also masquerade as servants of righteousness, whose end shall be according to their works!d 16 Again I say, let no one think me to be a fool. And if otherwise, at least receive me as a fool, for me to also boast a little. 17 What I speak, I speak not according to the Master, but as in foolishness, in this boldness of boasting. 18 Since many boast according to the flesh, I too shall boast. www.bible.com/bible/316/2CO.11.TS2009
@@dewnotbdeceived80 Thank you for sharing, and proclaiming. Prayer and the gospel is the best advice, help to give anyone. = JESUS = The greatest Gift 🙏🕊
@@maybeitsmelissa7712 Mel, praise your belief and loving commitment. Consider the name Jesus www.hiddenbible.com/jesuszeus/jesuszeus.html His real name is more like Yehushua
No, according to Bhagavad Gita it was built by spider-legged gnomes. But then again according to the book of Thor it was manufactured by IKEA and assembled in place... I'm not sure what the book of Aztecs say; something like HEAD-JAGUAR-JAGUAR-HEAD-FOOT.
Thank you, I think that more people should be interested in our deep past. Perhaps we could do away with war and other problems if we knew our real past. I am surprised that no one has found a way to completely destroy these places, they are dangerous to the El ites.
Why is it dangerous to the elites? They love all the sacred geometry of ancient structures, the occult religious/spiritual origins of these sites and their purposes. These sites are like treasure to them.
no Romans built the Temple by the time Roma was born the Temple was already toppled down and got covered with dirt and ashes this happened during the Exodus when the Israelites were leaving ancient Egypt and coming to the land
One of the most complete and info dense documentaries on Baalbeck I've ever seen. e.g. at 8:23 Some of those 'chisel' marks resemble the result of machines like, or similar to, underground mining machines we use today. e.g. google images: "underground continuous grinder machines"
2:58 please explain how da hell that top piece is defying gravity??? I can see a node for the next one but is that with friction really holding it up😵💫
Notice on the outer face of that block there is a damaged and eroded 'lump or knob', those are used for alignment and in this case the knob on the block below is preventing that block from sliding off.
Need help with voice acting
Narrator's voice is soothing to me lol xxxx thanks for awesome vid.
Dont be mean.If you are mad at someone, look to yourself.
What accent is that?
still better than the Ancient Architects guy
I really liked this guy's unusual accent! I cannot figure out what it is! But it's pleasant sounding.
"The inhuman scale" pretty well sums it up. Wonderfully done and explained, thank you so much.
I love reading the comment section. So many people arguing about things they know nothing about.
Repeating things that they heard on different videos and acting like they have some kind of specialist training in archeology and science. It's hilarious!
Then when someone points out their error, they start with the name calling.
Also, there's always some guy complaining about the voice over, the accent, the pronunciation. I'm telling you it's comedy gold.😂😂😂😂😂😂
Please don't stop! Keep it up! I'll continue to laugh!
This is the best edited, documentary type unbiased film I’ve ever experienced regarding Baalbek . No sensationalism, or conspiracy theory crap. Truly a high level project done by a well informed group of people. I’m sending this to everyone I know in spite of the weird ai narrator.
It’s not a slave thing. It’s a pride/ego thing. I enjoy placing large stones too, and it’s not too crazy to imagine what could be moved with a concerted, multigenerational effort.
BobbyBanks77 Who is telling you they can’t be moved? How did you get that in your mind? They obviously did move them. That was the whole point of doing it, to blow YOUR mind. And it worked
@@wompbozer3939 check out a channel called Sacred Geometry Decoded and a channel called History Maze. They both have several videos on ancient tech, without the cultic nonsense.
Wally Wallington is an individual who moves several tons without much effort, using the old skills. Enough material out there which makes one question the agenda of those that hold up that 'can't be done' mantra.
@@wompbozer3939 not so much that it was *moved* but that the joints were perfectly fitted. think about it, how could you ensure a perfect joint without trial and error with a *1000 ton* stone?
Austin Kole Carlisle I didn’t do it- but they did!
Thanks. Well thought out, concise and without super wild speculation.
Really superb Baalbek production! Some new angles and a bit of a travelog made this so fun and scientific.
In my opinion, I have always loved the story of Baalbeck since I was a child and I can say that it is the best video ever made about the mystery of Baalbeck.
In fact we will never know the truth about Baalbeck mistery.
Congratulations
Rio Brazil
I just love this. I was born in Beirut under foreign service and went here as a child. I try to imagine what this amazing place looked like when it was new.
An interesting detail can be seen at 10:53. The natural features of the stone (quartz inclusions etc.) continue over the joinery. This means the stones were already neighbors in the quarry and were then cut and reassembled. However, modern saws are at least 1 cm thick which means you lose some material as you cut. The ancients, however, managed to cut without losing any material. I don't believe in aliens, but the least you have to admit is that the ancient builders had technical capabilities now lost to us. Who would even tackle such a project unless he had the capability to move these stones with ease?
What's so strange is all these megastructures that you see around the world are not finished there is still rubble everywhere around every structure that you see just like a construction site once the job is done it's cleaned up around it to look neat all these structures still have the stone laying everywhere something stopped them from building on any further
we experienced a global cataclysm 12,900 years ago
The romans finished it but locals destroyed it
It never fails to impress me how much effort and the amount of resources ancient people would use to construct these types of awesome structures. Humans are capable of amazing feats. You would think that we could really accomplish a lot if we could just get our shit together.
It's because they believed in something bigger than themselves. The great cathedrals where not build by atheists.
@@daveh9217 This "believing in something" is the reason why we're still here in the first place...
Thank you for producing the version with the English translation
The Romans left clear engineering drawings on moving megaliths: Wooden wheels were constructed on each end of the megalith, turning the megalith into a large axle. Then numerous ropes were wound around the stone axle and a large number of men, oxen and horses pulled on the ropes and the whole thing rolled. Large wheels go over large obstacles. This is the reason there are no drag marks. The stone isn't drug and it isn't even pulled over rollers.
The holes on the stones are for pegs to hang the marble facade. Often the marble facades were looted to build other buildings. This happened to the marble in the Roman Coliseum which was looted to build St. Peter' Basilica and some of other parts of the Vatican. After the marble is taken, what is left is the base structural stone with holes in it.
Lewis Doherty How do you get wheels under a megalith? What kind of wooden wheels could take the immense weight???
All great efforts generally come down to tension - or using the tensile strength of the molecule - and vegetables i.e. ropes (windlasses) pulled by grass-fed oxen.
In our day the cost of the production of wind turbines and their maintenance put into nylon spinnaker sails instead and deployed in ocean currents for electrolysing sea-water would return million-fold in the achievement of purpose.
At the heart is tensile strength and it is to be supposed that the ancients understood this very well.
Yeah, because the "Romans" totally built these things all over the world.
@@williamusrex6417 There are piles of chips left over from quarrying. The megalith is moved with wedges off the stone shelf it was harvested onto the pile with the ends exposed and then large wheels built around the ends. Wooden wheels which are wide can support a large stone as an axle the same way you or I could build a small wheel around a brick using toothpicks and sewing threads which would support the weight of the brick. I haven't seen the illustrations, but suspect four bundles of tree trunks each making up a quarter of a circle with a flat bottom to go up against each side of the monolith are lashed around the monolith and then some tree trunks placed where the bundles meet to protect the edges of the monoliths to create wheels.
@@shivshankredemption5024 Since the engineers, architects and workers all over the world without being in communication with each other can analyze similar problems and arrive at similar solutions, different civilizations can cut, move and place monoliths. These just require societies to have the willingness to invest substantial resources in projects. This occurs with cathedrals and sports arenas.
Thank you very much, excellent footage and narration. Keep up the great work, we really appreciate it!
The floor of the Temple of Jupiter is interesting.
That’s the ceiling. As above so below
Best examination of this site I've seen so far. Amazing work!
well made; its about time someone takes interest in this amazing structure that sinks back in the abyss of human history.
Compliments. A very good work. This video shows very well these old structures..
Very good video. Thanks for that.
Thanks guys great video
Many engineers puzzled on accomplishments in antiquity
That is Fantastic. I would like to go back to Lebanon and tour Baal Beek
Went there during my honeymoon. The scale of Baalbek is enormous. -Beth Blume
However they did it, there were once people intelligent enough to manufacture and move these stones. Judging from the comments below, that will surely never happen again.
Most cannot see it! The precision, the shaping and moving these megaliths are a true testament to the ingenuity of man. It just floors me!
Funny! Well said!
@@KentBDouglas92 Not man !!!......plse dont try compare skyscrapers to this impossible to replicate megalithic stone masonry
Cringe
@@RedBCPride82your mom is cringe af bruh
Nice presentation. Those "chisel" Mark's are pretty intriguing never seen them so detailed before. Cool stuff, they were super precise placing them huh.
I like how the robotic narrator goes from Irish, Scottish and to it's Canadian accents lol. 😂
I dont even think the romans or greeks had anything do with anything. Because the trilithons as big as they are. The rest of the structures are made of the same stone and display the same coloration of the sediment in the stone. Ive been there. And ive seen things only my eyes know what they are. No one else knows. Clues to the age and erosion etc. This structures were amazing back then. Amazing.
12000 years ago.
It was an honor to visit this site. Great honor.
If only i could see what was docked in those massive stones in that time. I wonder why they left that one in the quarry though. ? ...
It's amazing what ancient people could achieve. Today, people struggle to pronounce the word "stone" without sounding "stewned".
Humans did not create these megaliths nor did extraterrestrials... They were engineered and constructed by the men of renowned mentioned in the Holy Bible GENESIS 6.... a.k.a. NEPHILIM also mentioned in the PRE-FLOOD Apocryphal book of Enoch found in the DEAD SEA SCROLLS , Numbers etc......
@@cesaresteves579 Hahaha 😂
@@cesaresteves579
Everyone knows that. Only cuckoos thinks otherwise.
maybe it’s a stupid computer voice. nobody says stewn
Cesar Esteves - Tartarians? we’re never taught about Tartaria that appears on 14-1500 maps. Their architecture is worldwide and they were 12-13 ft tall people. A few were left by camera era and there are legit photos. look in google images for Tartaria maps. crazy
Feel like having found Ponds of Gold viewing these in English...thnXx Ombio
The Megaliths ,the Stone Henge ,the Pyramids etc were quiet likely constructed by the preflood Nephilims who were superior to mortal man and were men of renown (Genesis 6:4).
No historic, arqueological nor paleontologyc proof found to base your claim tho. And the bible was writen approx. from the year -900 to the 300. And those stones were carved more or less 10-15 thousans years ago.
@Eidelmania no
Very nice job Ombio.
Thank you for sharing this.. 👍
Excellent investigation you guys. Best one I’ve seen yet. You captured fantastic detailed footage. Thanks for this one.
Fascinating video! Thank you very much for this. The comments are equally as good. Most of them anyway.
Liked, shared and subbed.
Baalbek in nordic language would be Balbäck, which means Boulder Creek or Big Boulder Creek.
What an amazing piece of investigative archeology! The Romans made a big deal of transporting the Egyptian obelisks ..yet these obelisks are a fraction of the size and weight of the Baalbek megaliths! And they make no mention of that. It sounds like even they didn't know where these massive rocks came from or who put them there. It's clear that Baalbek stones were carved and put there long before the Roman civilization. Just another evidence for lost ancient high technology. I'm seriously starting to contemplate the human race has been 'reset' several times by cataclysms!
The temple was built by Salomon according to verbal history of "local" bedouines.
AND OURSELVES! That’s happened before too
where do you think the origins of Gods came from? from the work that man "discovered" that he couldn't even replicate.
@20:42 The Romans didn't cut or move those blocks. That's why they never mentioned it.
gee you know a lot about classical Era engineering techniques!
For the megalithic stones base, why did not cut the stones into smaller size so that they could be easily moved and lifted. Besides, why did the jointing have to be that perfectly fitted ？
good questions. for the jointing maybe its for protection against earth quakes, im not sure tho
many ancient artifacts are finished to a much higher degree than their functional utility would demand, we know this from ancient hand axes of both Neanderthals and modern humans right through to products from modern times...it's a human trait. In an age of mass production and disposable items it seems other wordly but until recent times it was common.
You are so idiotic.....this was precisely why it was done this way.....because it was not designed or built by humans !!.....the smoking gun, ok ?
@@kc3718 What ?....you said 'ancient axes' ???....omg.....this is precisely why the human race is fckd....the capacity for critical thinking has diminished here to the level of squirrels...smh
Why do anything in that case? If you are going to go to the effort of doing something, I'd hope that 100% effort would be put in to achieve perfection.
What are the names of the Dmitry Letakhovsky pieces that are used in this video?
Great ambient music (e.g. around the 2:06 mark, onward)
WANT!!
kajio-no.bandcamp.com/album/baalbek-megaliths . Enjoy!
"Unknown method!" Yeah, I think that covers it!
I agree with Manu. The only thing comparable today is the Atlas lifting platform at Nasa where the concrete and streel go down over 40'. I'm not a geologist, however, the weathering of the rock looks like a minimum of 250,000 years old to me.
It may have been discovered during the Roman era times but the Romans did not build this. They simply didn't have the knowledge or the skill level to accomplish these structures. And they were in ruins even back then
I like the new, added information that I've never heard before. Thank you!
I think the accent and narration were Just Fine, if not superb for being of foreign origin. I am a native English speaker who speaks two other languages. Excellent job. I understood every single word and this was a highly enjoyable and informative documentary 👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽
Brother sounds like a sober Charlie Sheen
Very well done.
Geopolymer concrete blocks poured in big formworks directly in their final position.
Sorry it's not geopolymer. You can see the marks where the blocks were cut from the quarry and they have 1000 ton blocks still in the quarry completely cut to size and shape but still attached to the bedrock..maybe geopolymer was used at some ancient sites around the world but not here.
skynet82y Shame on you
U r the first human to describe ancient enigma ad is, without exaggerating, repeating falsehoods or idiotically accepting the wrong written history. Thank u
One question why was it necessary to built with these big and heavy blocks. Was there a gravity distortion which made weights less heavy or was it important the wall wouldnt wash away..?
The voice is stranger than Baalbek.
It's a synthesized voice.
I’m from Baalbek 🤟🏻
What great information!!! You're a credit to the one,s who are listening! Thank you so very much for sharing!
At 24:30 it is strange that why the stone on top left hand side was broken up there instead of falling down in whole piece. It probably hit by extreme power from above.
Trying to imagine what it all looked like when it was brand new….INCREDIBLE in scale now but must have been magnificent!!
This is where the Romans learned to make the best concrete from the best ashes. This is clearly seen on the facade cracks and decorations. Natural rock doesn't crack like that.
Great narration. Love the Voice.
Yeah it's up there with finger nails on a chalk board. But being a self proclaimed Reverend i'm sure a bit of sadomasochism is all part and parcel with selling your soul lol.
I work in construction and those cut marks on the stone look just like the marks on wood when you cut it with a saw.
Wow... They look the same as saw marks on wood? Well then I’m sold.
see: 'Underground continuous mining machines' on Google images. :)
"looks like" but isn't.
The large blocks in the quarry were carved out at an angle to facilitate their removal. Cutting the blocks from the bedrock at that angle serves to simultaneously create the ramp that allows the removal of the block from the resulting pit. This would have been a time-and-effort saving measure used during the quarrying process.
Well perhaps. Remember that you have to remove the slope at the top first. So timesaving can be argued.
@@thepolyhobbyist True - but do not underestimate the value of of having your 1,200 ton block completely sitting on its upward sloping angle with a solid wall behind it to use as a backstop from which to lever the block up the slope and out of the pit.
Looks like was was completed but blown apart or destroyed at some point before the romans.
This is a fantastic publication thanks very much for sharing all the very best phil the ancient alternative view...
this makes me want to cry because I just dont understand. how it was done. 800 ton blocks.. . mark twain says it was a race of giants and gods
Same way the Russians moved the Thunderstone. We have plenty of evidence for that. Did you not listen to the video?
800 TONS? That is 1,600,000 pounds!! moved by log rollers? no way, would crush them, pulled by ropes? I can't imagine how many ropes it would have taken to move over 1.5 million pounds, even IF you could make rollers or a 'sled' that it would not out right crush! Remember this was done BEFORE the Romans, they built ON it.
@@lorretta69you cant compare those
@@valentinapejic7023 you can’t compare those? What do you mean by those? Explain.
As someone who works as a stone Mason 3rd generation. I can tell you working with stone and granite is not easy. And talk about lost knowledge...there are less and less of us every year. It's hard to find aprentences or any willing to learn. It's been a dying trade for a long time. Between the math and the hard work. Not many want to put in the effort.
How lucrative of a profession is it?
I’ve been a Mason for 10 years, 30 now. I fell in love with the craft realizing the oldest buildings on the planet are made of stone. I’d love to build the next pyramids
Where is the accent from? Half Original James Bond-half Canadian radio station DJ....weird stuff.
Irish with north American by the sounds of things
Seen many videos on this but never saw the precision joints between the hint stones
I was going to comment the same thing 👍🏼
clearly machined.
The courtyard blocks are not roman! Those are also older..the style is found in different older megalithic places! Somehow it seems like there were one big catastrophe where the building stopped, then they build again, something happened again and then came the romans. But who know what under the plattform! The base must be at least over 10000 years old
Everyone knows that
Thoroughly enjoyed this.
Yo Charlie Sheen...I like your channel.
Excellent video Ombio! Bravo! I can tell you with confidence the larger stones are well over 12000 years old and the reason they stopped was due to the flood. They kept a record of their accomplishment in making/moving/hoisting/aligning those giant stones…and I will post a video soon showing exactly that!
Click on my playlist to see other 12000 year old stones that tell their story. I am the Last Natufian! Cheers!
Then why did they continue the construction after the flood past？
@@isupportyou9929 For the same reason we continue to build after every disaster: at some point life goes on and risks are taken by those in charge. Cheers.
I wish i could visit this sites. I will travel the world one day and visit each one of them. This is the platform that was constructed as a docking station.
Lets go!!
@@platersmom
🙂hopefully.
Sean Connery and Owen Wilson?
Perfect cross between, dead on!
I'm in the minority here. I like the accent.
Let's not forget that this area was the main source of massive Cedar trees which the Phoenicians traded for goods all over the Mediterranean. If there was ever an ideal place to build massive wooden structures for moving giant stones, this was it.
Geoffrey S Tuttle, Cedar trees are very very soft wood and have virtually no tensile strength to support megaliths. The giants, descendants of the Annunaki built the megaliths in my view.
The narrator sounds like an alien from outer space is trying to speak like locals to fit in.
Where is this dude's weird ass accent from?
@@driakos yeah I've never heard anyone who speaks like this. It's a very bizarre accent
It's a computer-generated synthetic voice reading from the transcript. Not a human.
@@LeoScarpelli it's the weirdest computer generated voice I've ever heard. Then again I'm used to microsoft sam and all those other generic voices
Is this a electronic voice or real? What accent is this ? Great doc by the way
Your video us superb. Good images. It seems quite unbiased so I congratulate you. However, I guess there are some inaccuracies.
biased.
It is argued by the Mainstream that Baalbek is roman, that it cannot be old since the Trilithon stones and the limestone quarry
stones do not show signs of erosion similar to the Sphinx of Giza. Even more that there are no ancient records previous to the Bronze Age talking about the site.
Romans were famous by leaving historical written records of their buildings. In this case, there are just 4 ancient texts speaking about Baalbek. Antonius Pius started the construction of the Large Court in the II century AD, which was finished by his son Septimus Severus and was continued to be worshipped till the kingdom of Elagabalus (1) (2). His son Carcalla finished the Propylea.
The roman emperor Phillip the Arab (Marcus Juluis Philipus), built the Hexagonal Court in between the two former structures.
Later on, Constantinus the Great, demolished the Venus Temple in order to build a Basilica in the III century. Justinian carried away the remaining 8 granite columns to Hagya Sophia in Constantinopla(3). There is NO SINGLE document about the Jupiter and Bacchus's Temples. If they were so skilled why not to quarry granite near Constantinopla, and had to unmount, cut and transport over 1000 km 8 heavy columns???
Sphinx erosion in Giza was due to run-off water, which didn't take place in Baalbek (not a plateau). There are several evidences that Baalbek could have been buried under "several meters of mud" and clay. Thus erosion would have NOT happened. (5) A layer of as of 30 cm between the Bronze and Iron Age reinforces the statement. Drawings in the Temple of Bacchus cannot be seen below 10 meters high (there are pictures). But anyway, the best way assess the truth of this is to watch collections of vintage photos of Baalbek, of which there are hundreds (even video footage) on the web (I can provide a bunch of them). To evaluate the reach of the sludge just take a look at some ancient Pregnant Woman pictures and compare them with current ones (will see the lower part which is 5 meters high, almost completely buried, and al field arround full of slit. Going on with the erosion you may appreciate it in the PRE-ROMAN PODIUM (8) and the columns (again I can provide pictures). Granite sawing cuts like the ones at Giza can be found everywhere. In fact, it was so buried with sludge that beside the Pregnant Woman it was discovered in 2014!!! the so-called Baby-Stone (1600 tons) under more than 5 meters below the Pregnant Woman (1200 tons) stone. There could be some discussion about whether the base of the stones in the quarry is finished or not, but that's beyond the scope of this comment.
There are some webs that shows a collection of drawing and pics from the XVII-XVIII centuries where the burial and rubble spread all around is manifest. The South Wall of Bacchus Temple (to the left as you enter) is badly damaged (it has been somewhat repaired during last decade, but I have older pictures), showing clear signs of black burning and vitrification, especially compared with the North Wall (to the
right). Probably a plasma wave or discharge? (speculative). just open your mind, unbias it, and take a fresh glance at the Podiums; it's a sort of Sesame Street exercise for children: Large Stones below (50-300 tons), Small 'bricks' to both sides and above. LARGEEE-SMALLLL
The Podium is a pre-roman terrace which is acknowledge by Lohman and other mainstream historians (9). In fact, there are papers that acknowledge the uncertainty about the TWO PODIUMS. In relation t1o the repairing column mentioned by Hanckock (I think is not so important), it is probably a Roman or Arab repair. Romans are supposed to be more intelligent than that. Even my 3 year old nephew knows it makes no sense to place a cylinder under a hole to support squared stones. If they were so skilled, why shouldn't they
cut a squared stone to make the repair??
More questions: why did they left big stones in the quarries (1 km away from Baalbek)? Why no record or writing account of such incredible feats? Why didn't they built that huge Temples in Rome itself, instead doing it in a desert in the middle of nowhere?
If the quarries were covered with slit which reached the level of the Podium Base (and the Trilithon, 10 meters in Bacchus temple) that explains why erosion didn't happen. Additionally it explains why no other accounts were made of the site, since even today new discoveries are being unearthed. Ir Romans would have noticed the Pregnant Woman or the Second Stone they would have used it as an easy material source (something like this happened in the Second Stone, from which some slabs were cut, probably by the Arabs).
About moving the stones very bad references are given. Video is full of speculation such as saying that the western wall is a retaining wall which is mere lucubration and can't prove it. Another supposition is that Romans built the founding stones in the Jerusalem Temple. To assign a monument to a specific people one must have some evidence, yet there are none about Jupiter and Bacchus Temple, the Podium or the monoliths in the
quarries.
The Roman soldier and historian Ammianus Marcellinus (400 AD), wrote about the time of Augustus Emperor (14 AD) anD the LATERAN OBELISK (found in laying Karnak) : “...as for this one recently brought in, he neither ventured to meddle with it nor move it, overawed by the difficulties caused by its size” (11). Then about the periord of Constantine the Great (312 AD) he writes: "...After these provisions, the aforesaid emperor departed this life and the urgency of the enterprise waned, but at last the obelisk was loaded on the ship, after long delay, and brought over the sea and up the channel of the Tiber, which seemed to fear that it could hardly forward over the difficulties of its outward course to the walls of its foster-child the gift which the almost unknown Nile had sent. But it was brought to the vicus Alexandri14 distant three miles from the city. There it was put on cradles15 and carefully drawn through the Ostian Gate and by the Piscina
Publica and brought into the Circus Maximus”. (11)
So if the romans COULD NOT MOVE the LATERAN OBELISK (just 330 tons) in the time of Augustus, how do you want us to believe that 200 years later they were able to manage 1200-1600 tons blocks!!! NOTE: Not one of the Egyptian obelisk stolen by Rome weighed more that 330 tons!!! (12).
First modern SUPER-CRANE able to lift nominal 1,000 tons was Krupp K 10001 built in 1971 (15). It was a mix of mobile and fixed crane and was constructed to build the Olympic Munich Stadium. The subject of the THUNDERSTONE (pedestal of Peter the Great horseman statue) is at best flimsy. The 1500 tons block, moved some impressive 6 km over an ICY MARSH land, was apparently split from the base rock by lightning, which could have some issues on its density (speculative). There is just one paper in french by J.P Adam (17) and some
circling references from wiki to wiki. Even if Romans knew about winches, pulleys or capstans, it doesn't mean they were able to move such stones. The proof is they didn't move the monoliths in the quarries (probably because they were buried and unnoticed) and they could NOT even move the LATERAN OBELISK of 330 tons. We could argue about the wooden sleigh devised by Carbury (greek architect) which half meter thick base was protected by a cooper-tin-calamine alloy (bronze with calamine). Did romans knew calamine?
To finnish with this, that XVII century men were capable of moving such a stone doesn't imply the romans could. Otherwise it is a Fallacy. Endeed, it's written by themselves they COULD NOT MOVE A 330 tons OBELISK. Bear in mind that modern 20th century man had serious issues to build a 6 meters high pyramid in Mark Lehner's Nova Experiment with 2-3 ton blocks. Nippon Corporation also had serious headaches to transport such blocks through the Nile from Turah quarry to setup a 20 meter high roughly unpolished pyramid. And the 20
more advanced countries in the world spent 6 years to disassemble Abu Simbel Temple needing to cut in small portions in order to move it up the slope when Aswan Dam was finished in the 60's. About the age, well there's no evidence as we cannot date rock. But it's possible to speculate with a lesser gravity, so it would belong to pre-Flood age.
Someone not only knows their history, but is well versed in some of the latest science as well...
Awesome comment.
Amazing structures! Unfortunately I could only stand 10 minutes of the narrator!
The design of these buildings remind me of important buildings throughout Europe and America, with the triangular shape over the columns, Petra also
those are called neoclassical. a copy of the classical (roman & greek), during a revival of the style beginning in europe in the 1700s.
That was not built by the Romans
Was there when I was a kid, still remember it.
Incredible place ❤️
Did I understand what is being said? The Romans in part built on top of another older city? Enjoying the quality of the video and narration. Thank you
It is obvious that the structure was not completed due to the fact that some of the stones are cut but still in the quarry.
a brilliant logical explation of bioligy/observation/chemestry
8:23, those cut marks as seen in all the megalithic sites around the world.
yeah because a lot of people figured out how to make this thing called a "pickaxe"
Wow, great new video! Thank you
Built by giants: 2 Samuel 21: 15 And the Philistines were again fighting against Yisra’ĕl, so Dawiḏ and his servants with him went down and fought against the Philistines. And Dawiḏ was weary, 16 and Yishbo-Benoḇ - who was one of the sons of the giant, the weight of whose bronze spear was three hundred pieces, who was bearing a new sword - spoke of striking Dawiḏ. 17 But Aḇishai son of Tseruyah came to help him, and struck the Philistine and killed him. Then Dawiḏ’s men swore to him, saying, “Do not go out with us to battle any more, lest you put out the lamp of Yisra’ĕl.”
18 And it came to be afterward, that there was a battle again with the Philistines at Goḇ. Then Sibbeḵai the Ḥushathite struck Saph, who was one of the sons of the giant.
19 And there was a battle with the Philistines again at Goḇ, where Elḥanan son of Ya‛arĕy-Oreḡim the Bĕyth Leḥemite struck Golyath the Gittite, the shaft of whose spear was like a weaver’s beam.
20 And there was a battle in Gath again, where there was a man of great height, who had six fingers on each hand and six toes on each foot, twenty-four in number. And he also was descended from the giants. 21 And he reproached Yisra’ĕl, and Yehonathan son of Shim‛i, the brother of Dawiḏ, struck him.
22 These four were born to the giant in Gath, and they fell by the hand of Dawiḏ and by the hand of his servants.
1 Chronicles 20: 6 And there was fighting again at Gath, where there was a man of great size, with twenty-four fingers and toes, six and six. And he too was born to the giant. 7 And he reproached Yisra’ĕl, and Yehonathan son of Shim‛a, Dawiḏ’s brother, struck him. 8 These were born to the giant in Gath, and they fell by the hand of Dawiḏ and by the hand of his servants.
1 Chronicles 22 Benayah was the son of Yehoyaḏa, the son of a brave man from Qaḇtse’ĕl, who had done many deeds. He struck two lion-like Mo’aḇites. He also went down and struck a lion in the midst of a pit on a snowy day. 23 And he struck a Mitsrian, a man of great height, five cubits tall. And in the Mitsrian’s hand was a spear like a weaver’s beam, and he went down to him with a staff and wrenched the spear out of the Mitsrian’s hand, and killed him with his own.
Deuteronomy 1 28 Where are we going to? Our brothers have made our hearts melt, saying, “The people are greater and taller than we, the cities are great and walled up to the heavens, and we saw the sons of the Anaqim there too.”
Deuteronomy 2:21 a people as great and numerous and tall as the Anaqim. But יהוה destroyed them before them, and they dispossessed them and dwelt in their place, 22 as He had done for the descendants of Ěsaw, who dwelt in Sĕ‛ir, when He destroyed the Ḥorites from before them.
Deuteronomy 9:1 “Hear, O Yisra’ĕl: You are passing over the Yardĕn today, to go in to dispossess nations greater and stronger than yourself, cities great and walled up to the heavens, 2 a people great and tall, the descendants of the Anaqim, whom you know, and of whom you heard it said, ‘Who does stand before the descendants of Anaq?’ 3 “And you shall know today that יהוה your Elohim is He who is passing over before you as a consuming fire - He does destroy them and subdue them before you. So you shall dispossess them and destroy them quickly, as יהוה has said to you.
DewNot BDeceived Amen... If only they'd read The Living God breathed Word of what was, is, and is to come. Sadly, they don't like to stand being corrected; they'd rather believe fables
@@maybeitsmelissa7712 What's to come is not what most Christians think because they want it spoon fed to them. I used to be one of those. Not any more. This is not what the Heavenly Father wants! We are warned throughout the Scriptures about deception. 2 Corinthians 11:11 Why? Is it that I do not love you? Elohim knows! 12 And I shall go on doing as I do, in order to cut off the occasion from those desiring an occasion, so that in that which they boast, they might be found also as we are. 13 For such are false emissaries, deceptive workers, masquerading as emissaries of Messiah. 14 And no wonder! For Satan himself masquerades as a messenger of light! 15 It is not surprising, then, if his servants also masquerade as servants of righteousness, whose end shall be according to their works!d 16 Again I say, let no one think me to be a fool. And if otherwise, at least receive me as a fool, for me to also boast a little. 17 What I speak, I speak not according to the Master, but as in foolishness, in this boldness of boasting. 18 Since many boast according to the flesh, I too shall boast. www.bible.com/bible/316/2CO.11.TS2009
@@dewnotbdeceived80 Thank you for sharing, and proclaiming. Prayer and the gospel is the best advice, help to give anyone. = JESUS = The greatest Gift 🙏🕊
@@maybeitsmelissa7712 Mel, praise your belief and loving commitment. Consider the name Jesus www.hiddenbible.com/jesuszeus/jesuszeus.html His real name is more like Yehushua
No, according to Bhagavad Gita it was built by spider-legged gnomes. But then again according to the book of Thor it was manufactured by IKEA and assembled in place...
I'm not sure what the book of Aztecs say; something like HEAD-JAGUAR-JAGUAR-HEAD-FOOT.
Narrator sounds a bit like Charlie Sheen 👍
Baalbek - Baal/Enlil/Yahwei/Zeus God of Jupiter hence the Jupiter temple.
EXCELLANT! Thank you.
Thank you, I think that more people should be interested in our deep past.
Perhaps we could do away with war and other problems if we knew our real past.
I am surprised that no one has found a way to completely destroy these places, they are dangerous to the El ites.
Why is it dangerous to the elites? They love all the sacred geometry of ancient structures, the occult religious/spiritual origins of these sites and their purposes. These sites are like treasure to them.
Well I watched the whole thing....thank you for reading this comment. Have a great day👍
Now watch Brien Foerster on Baalbeck and other places by him on here.
no Romans built the Temple by the time Roma was born the Temple was already toppled down and got covered with dirt and ashes this happened during the Exodus when the Israelites were leaving ancient Egypt and coming to the land
The original people of Lebanon are Christians and we are still here
Chirstianity came atleast 2000 yrs after the ruins ,are you mad
Another christard
One of the most complete and info dense documentaries on Baalbeck I've ever seen.
e.g. at 8:23 Some of those 'chisel' marks resemble the result of machines like, or similar to, underground mining machines we use today. e.g. google images: "underground continuous grinder machines"
True. That's the mistery, there's yet to be found tools, or machinery used to carve those stones.
Who ever moved the trilithons, it must have been easy for them.
maybe they casted/poured it on site, or some similar techinique but with no transportation of huge blocks needed at all.
@@Yarblocosifilitico Nope...!..massive granite slabs have been found at quarries far away at all the megalithic sites........
Maybe not easy, but def routine
2:58 please explain how da hell that top piece is defying gravity??? I can see a node for the next one but is that with friction really holding it up😵💫
Notice on the outer face of that block there is a damaged and eroded 'lump or knob', those are used for alignment and in this case the knob on the block below is preventing that block from sliding off.
I love hearing about 628 ton blocks moved on wood rollers. I really lifts me up when I'm down...
Claiming Roman Empire while showing right facing Tartarian Griffin. Amazing.
Hey, you read my mind. This guy does not know the meaning of reset.
Good music too
The holes in the blocks are probably how the machining tools were mounted to shape them.
You, a peasant: "Stone".
Me, an aristocrat: _"Stewn"._
The temple complex shape reminds me of the temple of man (Luxor) in Egypt