As a retired soldier, if we could tag our soldiers with microscopic chips to find them, we would have done it. If we can't tag soldiers, why would the medical profession be interested in tagging you?
My autistic son watched this with me when I was relaxing after work last week. My son; "...and they call me the dumb one? Wait... so if I already have autism... and I get a vaccine... do I get skill points?" I about fell out of my chair. Thanks for the good memories man. Keep up the good work.
I think the point his is making, is that fart particles are much larger than viral ones, so if they don't filter poo stink, how are they filtering smaller things?
As a parent of a child with Autism, I'm grateful for your simple explanation of the "vaccine causes autism" I'd read up on it upon my son's diagnosis, as people were telling me I'd caused his autism by vaccinating him. The problem is the signs of autism start to appear around the same time certain immunizations are due. It really is sad we have access to more information than ever before, but are too stupid to know what to do with it.
It’s unfortunate people were so unkind. All we parents just do the best we can with the information we are given and it’s not our faults that we are lied to by powerful interests . Lots of parents have reversed their kids’ diagnoses of autism with dietary changes and heavy metal detox. Focus on your child’s health first and foremost and watch the symptoms diagnosed as autism disappear! It can be a challenge because so much crap food is engineered to be addictive but it can be done. I know this for certain.
@@iadhdki9535 As someone with autism, you are wrong. Autism is not something that can be reversed, nor would you want to reverse it. It is a genetic condition that alters the structure and pathways of the brain. Nothing you do will cause or stop the presentation of autism. The reason the symptoms seem to get less with age is that autistic people learn to mask their traits in order to avoid rejection by society. You probably know people with autism and have no idea. As a society we need to stop the stigmatization of autism and other neurodivergent conditions and accept people for who they are.
@@iadhdki9535 You CANNOT 'reverse autism', no matter what you do, be it dieting or 'heavy metal detox', because it's GENETIC in nature, that is 'caused by variation in the genes of our body', and thus mostly hereditary, so you cannot do anything about it, only adapt to the way your brain is wired. And I say it as an autistic adult myself. Please, for the love of common sense and all actual science and medicine based on approved research, get your facts straight, do your own research and stop torturing kids with pseudoscience.
@@thejarjosh Thats just your personal experience, it does not extrapolate to anyone (hell, its not even that normal). For contrast, i know someone who didnt want to use masks and had the chance to get vaccinated by covid but didnt bc "vaccines bad". A week or so he got covid, and died painfully without the chance to calm his pain other than putting him to sleep. LOL its all about the anti-vax / anti-mask propaganda.
@@thejarjosh I didnt intend for what i said to be true. Just a representation thats the contrary to what you say. You said that you know someone who does not use mask nor vaccinate, and its the healthiest person you've ever met. I told you i know someone who does not use mask nor vaccinate, yet he died in agony bc of not taking the corresponding measures. Both are personal experiences (mine being an hypothetical one), saying the opposite but arguing the same way "i know this guy that does x and hes x". Yet, you say that yours is true bc yes and mine is not bc its a lie and because big pharma. This does not make sense. Stop for a moment and think about it. Think of what you'd answer me, and put it the other way but throw the same non-fundamented arguments. Why would either one be true or not? what does determine it? What you have there is a big big bias dude.
The only (sad) problem with videos like this is that no matter how much care, dedication, research and effort that is put into them, the ones who are listening aren't the ones who need to hear it the most. Those who would actually benefit from this information will just pull out the requisite "ur bad, science bad, me smarter science man because Facebook tell me magic crystal heal disease, so vaccine poison" card, and ignore any actual evidence. That said, even if they never reach those who need it most, I personally still love your videos. Keep em coming, Prof.!
Maybe the ones who need to see it won't, but these videos give solid arguments to people who may be dealing with a loved one who's buying into antivax conspiracies.
The reason for that is because of how conspiracy theories work. By definition a conspiracy theory cannot be falsified. Therefore, it is impossible to prove a conspiracy theory wrong. You can provide evidence to suggest their outcome is very unlikely, but you really cannot prove them, out right wrong. The same actually applies to a scientific theory. Scientific theories forbid certain elements or aspects. As a result, when scientists conduct research, they aren't trying to support their theory. Let me give you a prime example of what I mean from the one and only James Randy. Imagine that you believe in Santa Claus and we are having a discussion about his existence. You ask me to prove that he doesn't exist. I take you up on that and fly to the North Pole. I look high and low, however, he isn't there. No lapland, no elves, no rain deer and no Santa. I record my observations and come to the conclusion that he is not real. I come back and present you with the evidence supporting the idea that he doesn't exist. Your response is, "well Santa is magic, he simply turned himself and Lapland invisible upon your arrival." That doesn't mean that's what actually happened. But, I can't prove that he didn't just turn invisible. In other words, conspiracies are based on confirmation bias. An individual who believes in a conspiracy theory wants it to be true. They will twist and bend evidence to suit their narrative. If you try to prove a scientific theory by looking for proof of your theory, you run the risk of doing the same. That's why criminal investigations are based purely on the evidence. In reality, criminal investigators will not make up stories based on evidence they will just look at evidence from a surface level. This is because, they run the risk of bending the narrative if they don't. Conspiracy nuts that see this video will make their own explanations for why their view is correct and adhere to confirmation bias.
I think occasionally a person who is slipping into the conspiracy theory might find this and have their minds changed. That's all you can hope for. If you're lucky they will go on to help change other people's minds. I can't see any negatives to trying to educate people about these issues. I think it justifies the work PDE put in to create it and is performing a public service by providing accurate information as a counterpoint to the deluge of ignorance on social media.
I don't know if you realize how impactful content like this is, but my s/o had major vaccine hesitancy. I showed them this video and it definitely quelled a lot of those fears they had. So thank you for this.
I think vaccine hesitancy is a good thing. Vaccine paranoia is a problem however. Vaccines like any medicine aren’t inherently side effect free and the chief principle of both medicine is benefit vs harm. For instance, we’re not getting vaccinated for cholera bc the benefit is too little compared to the potential harm. It’s not just good but necessary to view things through the lens of benefit-harm weighing. I think it’s a misconception that skepticism is a bad or unscientific thing, it’s a fundamental in performing science on the contrary. Only ideas that can hold their own past skepticism survive which is also why vaccines have survived. The problems arise when people behave irrationally through paranoia and hysteria, not when people are skeptical.
@@ExternusArmy I don't think anyone is saying all skepticism and all hesitance are negative. They where hesitant to get a vaccine that was and is proven safe and effective. Hence, vaccine hesitancy. Vaccine paranoia is a different animal altogether, like you said. But largely irrelevant to what I was stating above.
@@ExternusArmy and to be clear, we where both skeptical of the vaccine, until evidence suggested it was safe and effective. The science won me over but my s/o just needed a little extra push, which is why I praised this video.
@@ExternusArmy I think your take on skepticism is off by a fair margin. I agree almost completely otherwise. There is a difference between skepticism and mistrust. And a lot of what is considered skepticism is actually distrust. (I think there is a better word, will update is I remember it later). They can look a lot like each other.
as an autistic adult, thank you professor dave for making videos like this! it’s so frustrating seeing people think that my neurotype is such a terrible thing that they would negate protecting their children from diseases to try and avoid it.
@@jericho6231 not sure if your response was supposed to be ironic, sarcastic or something in between, but Dave puts forward a much more compelling argument backed up with easily researched facts than the meme photo your friend Gary with 1 ex wife, 2 kids who call another man “dad” and a glittering career as a “lifestyle blogger/truth seeker” posted onto his Facebook page.
Hey Dave, long time viewer. I know this won't get a reply since I'm not some insane rambling idiot, but I appreciate you man. Every video of yours, I see you taking time out of your day and interacting with comments for videos over a year old. Gotta love your dedication to calling out stupidity and pushing critical thinking. Hope your weekend is good man
Good video, I also like professor Delores Cahill s videos, and many other doctors and scientists that have different, understanding and views. And with non ionising technology I find the scientists and researchers, that know and have experience in that field ✌️. And the ukcolumn.org team to learn about propaganda 😁
@@TheHayleydavison If you like this video then there's no way you can also like anything Cahill has to say. She sits squarely alongside Kaufman and Wakefield and her opinions stand against all that Dave covers in this video.
@@frankwilson3265 I like to listen to other views and perspectives and see how they convince others or see their facts and references and then I investigate further their facts and references. It's all quite interesting 🙏 there isn't just one or two professors and scientists in one country with one view. There are hundreds of professors, scientists,in many countries,with many different research papers, many different research institutions. To teach is not to show one side of the coin, it's to offer a coin to the student to look at both sides of the coin 😉 or to particularly have some kind of naming names slagging match is just personal and egotistical,not educational 🙏
@@TheHayleydavison I agree with that, but not where the debates around the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic are concerned. Sometimes the scientific community is split down the middle on something. Then I am more than happy to listen to both sides of the argument. Sometimes the scientific community are split over several different views, with each fairly well represented and usually with common ground shared among them. Then I'm very interested in all of those views and look to see where each has merit. But neither of those things are the case with the current "debate". What we have is 99%+ of the scientific community being of one opinion and a fringe factor with opposing views. The likes of Boschee, Cahill, Sunetra Gupta, Coleman etc. When these people come on the radar of COVID-Deniers, lockdown protestors etc, they are instantly elevated within the movement and presented as the "side" of the argument. If on the other hand a scientist's view forms part of consensus view, the vast, vast majority are simply unheard of because what they have to say is unremarkable and therefore there is no-one pointing to them excitedly saying "Listen to what this person has to say". This does not form a debate where views are represented in the ratios in which they are held. All it does is create false equivalence.
Outstanding. You’ve made a complex topic crystal clear for me anyway. And I’ve been looking for a video like this so I can both get a better understanding of vaccines for myself and hopefully to share with others. I’ve had both my COVID vaccines and I’m extremely grateful for this. Thanks
Well maybe listen to presidential candidate Kennedy who says the vaccine against Covid did not work and is not safe. They are more dangerous than getting Covid.
Indeed, a good recent example is Thunderf00t's video on SpaceX. In an attempt to try to show that "SpaceX isn't all that great", he examines the NASA paper "The Recent Large Reduction in Space Launch Cost" from 2018 which compares the cost to launch the now retired Space Shuttle versus a modern Falcon 9. In the video, everything points towards SpaceX being cheaper than the Shuttle and in the end, it is a meandering video with a lot of speculation which doesn't really prove any particular point. Yet the takeaway for some of his viewers is "wow... I never knew SpaceX was so bad!" because they are pre-disposed to thinking Thunderf00t is a reliable, unbiased source. I think this recent video has proven that otherwise.
The anti-vaccine nonsense is not skepticism. Skeptical thinking involves looking at the data and forming a rational conclusion. These folks are conspiracy theorists, which is a different animal altogether.
These people don't practice skepticism. Paranoia and skepticism are not the same thing. Paranoia involves cherry-picking information that conforms to their existing cognitive bias (in order to feel like they've broken through the fog, cracked some kind of code and figured out who the shadowy figures are... when in reality they'res still deep within a fog of ignorance.)
@@atom6_ I wouldn't like to throw myself in with the diehard fans, but seems he's done the same thing again and ignored everything that contradicts him?
As someone with autism(asperger syndrome) I'm extremely tired of these cons treating me as a science experiment gone wrong and that me being autistic is the worst fate imaginable. They seriously act like we are dying from a horrific disease, and not real people with feelings who can have a great life just like anyone else. Even IF a vax caused my autism (it didn't) I'd still take autism over having died as a child from smallpox, polio, or measles. Rock on. 🤙Also, do I get more autistic if I get more vaccines?
@@RealAlphaMango It's not worth it man, you can't convince people like this guy of anything that is supported by copious amounts of valid scientific literature.
i found this channel called spirit science... it’s so insane i wouldn’t be recommending it for a video... except it has over a million subscribers and they’re probably the most bat shit crazy theories i’ve ever heard
I have given up trying to explain the computer/passport tracking nonsense with my son. But I am worried because he and his girlfriend lean toward no vaccines at all for their child. It's very frustrating. I grew up in the polio era and understand the importance of vaccines, not to mention correct research.
A lot of people who distrust science in some ways don't distrust it because of some 'alternative fact' but because of how it makes them feel: in control. Perhaps if you restructured what you were saying around helping your son feel in control, it might help you reach some common ground?
In regards to Wakefield you missed a couple of points in that a trial at the UK supreme Court found him guilty of kidnapping, fraud and conducting unauthorised tests on children and the UK has been trying to get him back from the US with no luck, btw the trial was done in his absence because by then he had already fled, he also has a massive list of ethical charges against him, though I don't blame you for letting that point go as it is so large that it would be a whole documentary on its own
There needs to be. The only ones I see specifically about him either take his side or none, in spite of the blatant evidence against him. This man should have been jailed years ago.
@@berniethekiwidragon4382 I wonder how much of a hero someone would be if they could think up a way to get his sorry ass back to the UK... By whatever means necessary. I personally can't think of any methods to achieve that, but there must be some out there. Maybe someone could just ask him to go back... 🤣🤣🤣
@@berniethekiwidragon4382 Old comment, I know, but you might be interested in hbomberguy's "vaccines - a measured response" video essay. It went into great detail about Wakefield's fraudulent paper, his actions regarding the children in the study, and the conflicts of financial interest that were likely the driving force behind the paper. Also, hbomb is pretty engaging :)
Thanks for all the great info. I do think leaving out the lack of culpability for vaccine manufacturers is a problem as well as the long history of pharmaceutical companies settling lawsuits for false claims and misrepresentation without a single CEO ever going to jail.
I too agree that vaccine makers should never have been granted blanket immunity against lawsuits (by President Reagan in 1986). Though we vaccinated our daughter in late 90's (with no injuries), my views changed in 2015 when my healthy 7mo old dog died within hours of her 7-in-1 jab. I now dread all needles. I would rather take risk in getting the actual infection/disease naturally and allow our immune system to fight it off organically. My three remaining dogs haven't been to a vet in 8yrs. I pay attention to what I feed them (no processed crap). I am of the firm belief that man will never really be able to fully understand the immune system (because our bodies behave in highly complex ways once we breach the closed-loop system to study the process). I am not anti-science; but I am definitely anti-$cience, funded solely by profiteering mobs of Wall Street. I hope to one day start trusting science without fearing it. At the moment, I am s#it scared of all synthetic drugs and invasive procedures. If I get seriously injured in an accident, I may not have any other choice.
Can we discuss the reason why vaccine manufacturers are indemnified by western governments against law suits from individuals who suffer adverse reactions? Can we discuss why the vaccine manufacturers opted to not supply vaccines (protecting against this indescribably dangerous disease) to developing countries who's own governments would not provide an indemnity?
@@mfctrv2139 It’s certainly true that the vaccine and medicine industry is still an industry, and the big companies will still do anything they can to make money. But that doesn’t take away from how important vaccines are today, since if you didn’t have them you would probably die of a disease you can’t pronounce the name of.
Hey Professor, I really love your videos and your way of explaining complex subjects in a way the public understands them. I just would like to add about the myocarditis problem of Moderna vaccines, since I was personally affected by it. I'm with you, that vaccines do have side effects, but the benefits outweigh them by far. But I still think we should talk about the side effects and not deny their existence, this only hurts those affected and gives the wackjobs a talking point. So here goes my personal story, read if you want :) I got my second shot of the Moderna vaccine after receiving AstraZeneca for the first. After two days I started having chest pain and my left arm went partially numb. In the hospital blood tests showed a highly elevated troponin level, indicating damage to my heart muscle. The levels went down after 2 days and I did not experience any severe longterm damage, but still experience chest pain when exercising and in stressful situations due to scarring. I don't like to talk about it to friends and colleagues because most either think I'm a antiscience idiot or I find out that they are.
Great presentation. I am someone who is vaccine hesitant. A lot of this stems from lapses in objectivity and critical thinking from the medical community and media. For instance, the first thing I did when presented with the idea that there could be a problem with the current vaccine schedule given to children was to ask my general practitioner: hey doc, could there be anything wrong with the current vaccine schedule, in theory? Without hesitating to even consider my question he said no. That is not a reasonable or scientific answer and it unnerved me. I saw it for what it was. Advocacy mixed with annoyance at what he sees as anti-science. He was doing his part to combat the "stupidity." But the entire conversation around this issue is full of people telling other people who have questions to shut up and stop being morons. People making videos like this would do better not to paint skeptics or questioners as morons and should not use a mocking tone. Questioning and skepticism are essential parts of a scientific process and worldview. They should never be suppressed. This has only gotten worse with Covid. The mainstream media's mandate to correct for what they see as the stupid anti-vax movement has ruined their objectivity and tainted their judgement. A recent episode of Fresh Air with Terry Gross illustrates this. She was interviewing a person billed as a vaccine expert. In the intro she noted that his child has autism. And yet he is an advocate for vaccines for children. Supposedly this was proof of his intellectual honesty. What she didn't mention until a ways into the interview, before quickly sweeping past it, was that he was an owner in a company working very hard to bring a covid vaccine to market. He was completely incentivized to be pro-vaccine. Not only did Gross not think this would make him an inappropriate subject on the matter, she didn't even seem to acknowledge the apparent conflict of interest. And on and on. My questions about this video: When he says in passing that the link between vaccines and autism were disproven, what does that mean? What do you say to the theory that vaccines might not contain a dangerous level of metal in their doses alone but that some people may already have high metal levels in their body from their environment and other factors and a vaccine could push them over the threshold into toxicity? Is it valid to be concerned that mnra vaccines, while they are not a new technology, are being administered to the public for the first time? Isn't it a scientific approach to be cautious about potential long-term effects? Is there anything wrong with the fact that we are vaccinating the control groups, i.e. erasing the controls? What does proper vaccine testing in clinical trials even mean? If the mrna technology was so airtight long before covid, why wasn't it used to combat other infectious diseases worldwide? What about the broader issue that we could create a culture where showing vaccine compliance becomes mandatory for participation in society? The current covid vaccines may be acceptable in theory but there is no way to postulate about future vaccines since they don't exist. I personally find it disturbing to imagine having to get regular injections for the rest of my life. The conversation around questioning the current batch of vaccines has been too strong-handed for my taste. And I know this is as good as it's going to get since this is the first pandemic in the current era. I have to imagine that if regular injections become a new normal, it will become impossible to question in any meaningful way every new vaccine by every new company that is rolled out. This is problematic for me. This video illustrates many of the principles and consistent factors at play in the vaccine discussion but only when they support a conclusion of vaccines being an overwhelmingly positive technology. This video does not, however, talk about other constants throughout history, including government mishandling of medical technology and a consistent m.o. of choosing to apologize (when caught) rather than ask permission (thalidomide, agent orange, nuclear weapons testing both underground on U.S. soil and in the stratosphere, meddling in the affairs of other sovereign countries).
Let's respond to some of your questions: 1) link between autism and vaccines disproven: it is. Simple. Large-scale studies on the population have shown there is no increase in the rate of autism in vaccinated vs unvaccinated individuals. 2) the amount of metal (ions) in vaccines is so low that if this were the last drop it would be dwarfed by the many other "last drops" 3) mRNA vaccines have been used in clinical trials before, with good success. We already have background levels for lots and lots of different conditions from years/decades of data, so it is not really a concern we are 'erasing' the controls, because, again, we already have that control data. We already know the general levels of, say, blood clots 4) don't know what you mean with this one 5) This is easily answered: it is expensive technology. You would only use it for severe infectious diseases which (sadly, I might say) are very prevalent in developed countries. Another obvious issue is that we already have vaccines for many infectious diseases, so just making an mRNA-based vaccine would require it to be a lot better than the old vaccines, as the former is so much more expensive than the latter, at least for now. 6) We already have such a culture for many other things. Walking around naked is in the vast majority of places culturally not acceptable. It is often even *mandatory* to wear clothes. The gliding scale you propose is in itself a gliding scale.
@@Marco-it2mr Thanks for the reply. Regarding #1, that doesn't sound like proof in any meaningful way. A really scientific study has controls. What would be the control factor there? This is the problem with this issue, there is no ethical way to study it or create controls for vaccine trials. Also - and I don't want this to sound too harsh - but it's obnoxious that you wrote "simple." It's not, in fact, simple. Regarding #3, I'm not sure how far back the trials go that you're referring to but I think it's safe to say that they don't go far enough back to show long-term results. So even if your point stands that the clinical trials for previous uses of mrna technology had preserved their controls, it's still not long term. But that doesn't speak to the current covid vaccines, for which there is both no long term data and for which the control group is currently being erased. Regarding #4, I just don't understand the reasoning behind the studies. Normal scientific studies control for as many variables as possible. Whereas with these vaccine trials, people are either administered a vaccine or a placebo and then asked to go about their lives and see who catches covid. The participants control their exposure, not the people running the experiment. I would assume that many of the people who signed up for the vaccine trials were people with an already high level of anxiety about catching Covid, meaning they would be lowering exposure already. Maybe if the sample sizes are large enough, variables like this don't matter as much. But it just doesn't feel very objective to me. Regarding #6, I realize that living in a society requires compromise. And that there is no absolute freedom for anyone. Totally on board with that. But I think we should be concerned with establishing a new paradigm because new paradigms are very hard to turn back. Think of something like income tax, for instance. It was created in 1909. Many people assume it is an idea that goes back to the founding of this country and they also assume that it's always been this way and is beyond questioning. I don't have an opinion on income tax, I'm just pointing out that there is an inertia to reversing large social systems once they've been implemented. Every year people complain about Daylight Savings Time. Nobody has changed it. Every election people complain about the Electoral College System. Nobody changes it. I feel like we are on the verge of creating a culture of permanent forced injections and it is worrisome to me.
@@danieljohnson1213 1) the controls are non-vaccinated people. They exist and in far larger numbers than you would think. It is, thus, simple. 3) there are studies from the early 2010s. But again, we can compare the current COVID-vaccinated population to the "averages" we know from the recent 'past' (which could be as late as 2019). 4) So, your suggestion would be to deliberately expose these people to the virus...which is unethical! Remember that the people themselves do not know whether they received the vaccine or the placebo, so both groups are very likely to behave similar, even if it is "similar" in their attempts to not get infected. 6) You are comparing, for lack of a better term, "peer pressure" to vaccinate to LAWS.
@@danieljohnson1213 _there is no ethical way to study it or create controls for vaccine trials_ What? Double blind clinical studies for vaccines do exist and they were applied for the COVID ones. A very close friend of mine participated in the ones for Pfizer. He didn't know if he got the vaccine or a placebo for almost a year. Your fears are just based on misinformation.
@@Marco-it2mr 1) Those are just people in society, not participants in a study. Is that a meaningful control? Wouldn't a control be to get a fixed group of participants and then, while controlling variables such as environment, apply vaccines to some and not to others? Obviously it would be unethical to do this because what we are testing for is potential harm by either option. Also, where is there a significant population of non-vaccinated children in the west? Even if individual numbers of non-vaccinated children add up, I would imagine they are still scattered around with too much dissimilarity between environments. Anyway, I don't want to come off as too argumentative. I'm genuinely curious about how these studies were administered and why they are considered conclusive proof. 3) That's not long term though 4) No, I'm saying that you can't do that, because it would be unethical for the same reasons that you can't study the effects of vaccines on children in an controlled environment. That's my hangup understanding how these studies prove anything by strict scientific standards. I take your point that they would all behave essentially the same in theory. 6) I'm speaking of something more substantial than peer pressure. A culture where there are penalties for not being vaccinated. You can't fly. You can't go to gyms. You don't get promoted at work. This isn't far fetched. I've already heard two stories from friends who were heavily pressured by their work supervisors to get the vaccine.
I mean, if you don’t Trust him you can just look up this stuff for yourself lmaoo but I’ll save you the time: everything he said in this video was factuaö
@@jonathansilvestri7648 youre not as clever as you think you are if you dont realise the above is a joke mimicking what anti vaxxers say You think a guy like Dave would have barely passed biology? LOL
@@tiaan7032 i mean im not very familiar with dave haha maybe he didn't do to great in highschool biology but found a love for science later in life? idk. It just didn't sound like a joke is all LMAO
I was never anti-vaxxer. I got the COVID vaccine without fear but I still learned many things in this video. Very instuctive and easy to understand (which is important for such a subject). I was unaware of the origins of the mercury myth and the NaCl example was an excellent way to explain how the presence of a mercury atom in a compound does not equal a mercury atom by itself. I did not know that but I'm glad I do now. I immensely appreciate your work and by tackling subjects like these, you are doing the world a great service by fighting against misinformstion. Respect!
Agreed. I guess watching Dave figuratively kick the living sh*t out of flat earthers IS more entertaining, which would explain why those have 1,200,000 plus views.
I send all of my medical students to your channel for basic science review. But I have to say...If you can sum up all the disinformation you've heard about vaccines in a 30 minute video, you haven't heard very many or you deserve a Nobel prize. :)
Hey I saw what you said about mRNA vaccines, and I have a bit of a question for you. Do you believe that after the COVID stuff finally gets fully eradicated that we will switch to using only this new system to create new vaccines or do you believe there is still some merit to using the previous system? I'd like to know your thoughts.
I think it will depend on the pathogen, I'm not really aware of what would make one approach more desirable than another but I'm sure it varies, it's a good question!
The coronaviruses simply don't work for vaccinations using the same methods as other vaccines, learned by trial and error what works. So they had to find another way. Maybe comparable to what weight loss/control methods work for a person. It varies.
mRNA is a new vaccine technology that has transformed the management of infectious disease. There’s no way that the older methods can compete with the molecular precision and timelines of getting a vaccine into arms. Vaccines for influenza have been produced in fertilized chicken eggs in the past, and it’s a primitive and costly way to go. It takes billions of eggs, for one which must be set aside months prior to influenza season. Once the virus is inoculated in the eggs, all the eggs have to be harvested for virus, and all egg protein and contaminants must be purified away, and the virus inactivated. Despite this, egg proteins have sometimes been present at levels high enough to cause immune reaction in patients. mRNA is here to stay and will replace not only conventional vaccine platforms for infectious disease, but also allows for vaccines against cancer and other conditions.
You should mention the difference between chemicals ingested vs injected too though. You had a good starting example with formaldehyde, especially considering that the body produces it itself, but neglected to go into detail on it. I think it’s important, as you say in your other videos, to not just plainly say something happens, but to go into detail about the process and the reason you chose it as an example in the first place.
Yeah, aluminum is a neurotoxin and has the ability to cross the blood brain barrier. Considering aluminum is used in many vaccines as the “adjuvant” and the purpose of a adjuvant being a compound that stays in the body for a long time which the antigen binds with so you have a consistent immune response for a long term. Of course, they have done studies to ascertain the toxicity of the dosage of aluminum right? The only study that has been done and cited only tested the toxicity of INGESTED aluminum in adults. They never tested injection toxicity and never did any toxicity tests with children or infants at all. If you seriously try to equate effects of ingestion and injection then you have left the bounds of a scientific conversation.
I think it would be beneficial to have graphs showing just how small the doses are instead of just giving the numbers, it's just a way for that information to hit home a little harder, and make visualization of the disparity's between the two easier.
Must be easy not watching a single second of a video and just baselessly accusing people of plagiarism so that you can avoid challenging the lies you’ve chosen to believe.
@@deletedchannel9945 lmao, you clearly have not watched or have not understood anything said in this video. "Misinformed", you don't know how stupid that sounds coming from you.
Was just watching an old episode of Law & Order: SVU that dealt with vaccinations. What stood out to me as odd was that the Irish Catholic Conservative Detective Stabler was supporting mandated vaccines and the Liberal Democrat Detectives Benson and Munch were arguing against mandates and how it should be up to the individual to decide. Oh how times have changed. The episode wasn't even really that old (2008).
Thanks for the video. You have a great no nonsense way of informing people on a subject. SO much so I bought your book not once but twice and gave the second copy to my daughter to read
This guy contradicts himself over n over. If to much of anything can be bad for you, then how did you come to the conclusion that big pharma and the CDC aren't responsible for the SPIKE in autism AFTER rolling together vaccines into ONE large dose. The CDC was sued AND LOST that case for lying and NOT sharing all those studies they the CDC never had. But the CDC did hire a third-party to study if they're in the right; turns out the the third-party stated in federal court that "given the heavy metals in the American diet as well as a large dose of multiple vaccines; it's HIGHLY LIKELY that it vary well COULD push children and some adults over the threshold, but further testing would be needed." This guy is an influencer and there are MANY people IN THIS FEILD of whom have studied further then this self proclaimed professor that holds a bachelors degree in chemistry. And these many people in this medical business that he made a UA-cam topic, have come forward expressing GREAT CONCERN. A smart person would look at all sources, listen to all points, dismiss immediately anyone who trys to shame, categories, or name calls people into believing them such as the above big pharma influencer. Its dangerous not allowing people to make decisions for themselves and their families on matters of THEIR OWN HEALTH. I recommend standing up for our people and discontinue any notification from this guy and just lose all his videos for what he's pushing without being objective, for categorizing folks, name calling (anti-vaxers, etc..), and misinforming as well as telling people to ridicule others for their thoughts and concerns. He's not a good person. Read more 1 2 Show more replies Anthony Conigliaro 1 year ago As a retired soldier, if we could tag our soldiers with microscopic chips to find them, we would have done it. If we can't tag soldiers, why would the medical profession be interested in tagging you? 2.3K 169 Philip Michel 1 second ago This guy contradicts himself over n over. If to much of anything can be bad for you, then how did you come to the conclusion that big pharma and the CDC aren't responsible for the SPIKE in autism AFTER rolling together vaccines into ONE large dose. The CDC was sued AND LOST that case for lying and NOT sharing all those studies they the CDC never had. But the CDC did hire a third-party to study if they're in the right; turns out the the third-party stated in federal court that "given the heavy metals in the American diet as well as a large dose of multiple vaccines; it's HIGHLY LIKELY that it vary well COULD push children and some adults over the threshold, but further testing would be needed." This guy is an influencer and there are MANY people IN THIS FEILD of whom have studied further then this self proclaimed professor that holds a bachelors degree in chemistry. And these many people in this medical business that he made a UA-cam topic, have come forward expressing GREAT CONCERN. A smart person would look at all sources, listen to all points, dismiss immediately anyone who trys to shame, categories, or name calls people into believing them such as the above big pharma influencer. Its dangerous not allowing people to make decisions for themselves and their families on matters of THEIR OWN HEALTH. I recommend standing up for our people and discontinue any notification from this guy and just lose all his videos for what he's pushing without being objective, for categorizing folks, name calling (anti-vaxers, etc..), and misinforming as well as telling people to ridicule others for their thoughts and concerns. Why not dig in and discuss the whistle blowers, the THOUSANDS of professionals whom have "great concern" the peer reviewed studies that have numbers like "1 in 800"?! Does anyone here know what that means? Are you reliant on this asshole for your do diligence? Can you really stand by as the athletes drop and tell yourself and YOUR LOVED ONES .. nothing unusual here take another jab.. ...? He's not a good person
Simply one of the best rational speakers, or speaker *for* rationality I've come across. Your canny mix of pure facts with a tinge of 'bite' in your delivery, and done very clearly and succinctly is exactly how these kinds of topics should be approached I think. Plus it's just a very 'listenable' style without distracting glitz and video 'bling'. I don't mind some of that for entertainment sake, but getting down to basics in a clear and BS free way is refreshing. Super good job on this and so many others. Thanks!
Arguing against a anti-Vaxxer is like playing chess against a pigeon. No matter how good you are, the pigeon would knock over all the pieces, poop on the box, declare him/herself the winner and fly away
As a severe asthmatic and ex molecular geneticist, I can only implore people to get the vaccine. I was lucky enough to receive my first dose this week and the worst that happened was a sore arm, with a tiny headache. Please listen to this guy and get it. People like me need you to, to protect us.
@@lydiabentley3413 Let me make this clear: There is *no* link between vaccinations and ms. This is a quote from the Multiple Sclerosis Trust . "Numerous studies have investigated a possible link between having a vaccination and later developing multiple sclerosis or another autoimmune disease. In 2018, researchers collected all the published data together on HPV (human papillomavirus vaccine) and Hepatitis B vaccine and found no association between these vaccines and MS or other autoimmune disease. Other researchers have looked at the vaccines for influenza, MMR (Measles, mumps and rubella), polio, typhoid fever and the BCG vaccine for tuberculosis. None of these vaccines resulted in an increased risk of developing MS. The BCG vaccine may delay progression from CIS to full MS. The diphtheria and tetanus vaccinations may be associated with a decreased risk of MS." (mstrust.org.uk/a-z/vaccination-and-immunisation)
@@lauracusumano9473 From the first line of the wikipedia article: A vaccine is a biological preparation that provides active acquired immunity to a particular infectious disease. Whatever you think a vaccine is supposed to do doesn't matter. You are not an immunologist or an epidemiologist. If you think that vaccines are some sort of scam you need to present evidence.
@@lydiabentley3413 Oh yes, Dr Buttar, a conspiracy mythologist, anti-vaccine proponent, and osteopath. Mine are *not* beliefs. Please have a vaccination and wear a mask. It will save a life, your life or someone you love.
@@lauracusumano9473 I am right. Can you refute it? How about Merriam Webster? www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/attenuated The fact is that you have a preconception that doesn't fit reality. I am sorry but reality isn't going to change just because you don't understand it.
Yes dave. Thanks alot! I was self wondering how could this vaccine come up so quickly. Have to say, that this made me a bit skeptic. But now i know it and it gives additional security. Its just really bad, that the vaccine production cant hold up to the need. In our 15000 soul town, we had after waiting for several weeks, 20 vaccines. Now we have to wait another 3 weeks until more comes up. Its just terrible how slow this all goes.
A good analogy I saw was that normally, vaccine production is like trying to drive across a busy city in the height of the rush hour. Covid vaccines are like the local council banning all other traffic and you being given a police escort through the city. In a sports car.
It is hardly suprising that vaccine production is taking some time to ramp up and that there are some initial teething problems. Actually it is impressive just how efficient the whole process has been. Likely there will be adequate vaccines for everyone, in western countries by spring. The rest of the world will have to wait a bit longer, but governments are stepping up to plate for that too.
This guy contradicts himself over n over. If to much of anything can be bad for you, then how did you come to the conclusion that big pharma and the CDC aren't responsible for the SPIKE in autism AFTER rolling together vaccines into ONE large dose. The CDC was sued AND LOST that case for lying and NOT sharing all those studies they the CDC never had. But the CDC did hire a third-party to study if they're in the right; turns out the the third-party stated in federal court that "given the heavy metals in the American diet as well as a large dose of multiple vaccines; it's HIGHLY LIKELY that it vary well COULD push children and some adults over the threshold, but further testing would be needed." This guy is an influencer and there are MANY people IN THIS FEILD of whom have studied further then this self proclaimed professor that holds a bachelors degree in chemistry. And these many people in this medical business that he made a UA-cam topic, have come forward expressing GREAT CONCERN. A smart person would look at all sources, listen to all points, dismiss immediately anyone who trys to shame, categories, or name calls people into believing them such as the above big pharma influencer. Its dangerous not allowing people to make decisions for themselves and their families on matters of THEIR OWN HEALTH. I recommend standing up for our people and discontinue any notification from this guy and just lose all his videos for what he's pushing without being objective, for categorizing folks, name calling (anti-vaxers, etc..), and misinforming as well as telling people to ridicule others for their thoughts and concerns. He's not a good person. Read more 1 2 Show more replies Anthony Conigliaro 1 year ago As a retired soldier, if we could tag our soldiers with microscopic chips to find them, we would have done it. If we can't tag soldiers, why would the medical profession be interested in tagging you? 2.3K 169 Philip Michel 1 second ago This guy contradicts himself over n over. If to much of anything can be bad for you, then how did you come to the conclusion that big pharma and the CDC aren't responsible for the SPIKE in autism AFTER rolling together vaccines into ONE large dose. The CDC was sued AND LOST that case for lying and NOT sharing all those studies they the CDC never had. But the CDC did hire a third-party to study if they're in the right; turns out the the third-party stated in federal court that "given the heavy metals in the American diet as well as a large dose of multiple vaccines; it's HIGHLY LIKELY that it vary well COULD push children and some adults over the threshold, but further testing would be needed." This guy is an influencer and there are MANY people IN THIS FEILD of whom have studied further then this self proclaimed professor that holds a bachelors degree in chemistry. And these many people in this medical business that he made a UA-cam topic, have come forward expressing GREAT CONCERN. A smart person would look at all sources, listen to all points, dismiss immediately anyone who trys to shame, categories, or name calls people into believing them such as the above big pharma influencer. Its dangerous not allowing people to make decisions for themselves and their families on matters of THEIR OWN HEALTH. I recommend standing up for our people and discontinue any notification from this guy and just lose all his videos for what he's pushing without being objective, for categorizing folks, name calling (anti-vaxers, etc..), and misinforming as well as telling people to ridicule others for their thoughts and concerns. Why not dig in and discuss the whistle blowers, the THOUSANDS of professionals whom have "great concern" the peer reviewed studies that have numbers like "1 in 800"?! Does anyone here know what that means? Are you reliant on this asshole for your do diligence? Can you really stand by as the athletes drop and tell yourself and YOUR LOVED ONES .. nothing unusual here take another jab.. ...? He's not a good person
Reminds me of all the people that freak out because I'll eat apple cores. Most people will say 'they have cyanide' to which I say 'I'll die from eating too many apples before I die from cyanide poisoning from apple seeds.'
The "viruses exist but don't cause disease" idea reminds me of "CO2 is real, but doesn't affect the climate" which is said by some climate change deniers.
"Researchers at the Wellcome Sanger Institute and EMBL's European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI) have identified over 140,000 viral species living in the human gut, more than half of which have never been seen before. The paper, published today (18 February 2021) in Cell, contains an analysis of over 28,000 gut microbiome samples collected in different parts of the world. The number and diversity of the viruses the researchers found was surprisingly high, and the data opens up new research avenues for understanding how viruses living in the gut affect human health." www.google.com/amp/s/www.technologynetworks.com/immunology/news/amp/140000-virus-species-found-in-the-human-gut-345766 Sorry to say, but Dave is just as clueless as his UA-cam audience
@@keisi1574 The article you've linked does indeed prove that microorganisms are essential to our existence. No one here is disputing that though. The difference is that there are still certain bacteria and viruses that are infectious and dangerous, not the kind you want as part of a healthy gut microbiome. Those are what are important to immunize against.
I really appreciate the concise point by point way you explain the different aspects of what has needlessly become a controversial topic. My own personal experience has made me a vaccine advocate. When I was young there was a very real chance of catching one of the highly contagious diseases that had killed people for centuries. One of my friends had polio, another diphtheria and both of my parents had tuberculosis. Thus we regarded vaccines as a blessing and got our jabs in school. Out of the hundreds I knew who got multiple vaccinations over the years none suffered any serious side effects and these deadly diseases have been largely wiped out. I also find it ironic that anti-vaxers use technology developed through science to denigrate science while having no knowledge about science.
It's a wonder they don't include charcoal, the "lead" in pencils, or diamonds, in their diets. It's carbon, after all. All of our food consists of molecules made with carbon. 🙃
@@berniethekiwidragon4382 Indeed! Also, I wonder why they keep consuming salt in one way or another. They are, after all, expert chemists, and they should know sodium is highly reactive, and chlorine is extremely toxic 🤔
Hey Dave, great video! I love what you're saying but one thing I can't seem to get real clarification on is the natural immunity vs. the Vaccine? I don't ever get flu shots & I don't get the flu. I have all of my vaccinations from childhood & I'm in no way anti-vax but if you've already had the virus or even multiple strains of it do you already have all of the protection the vaccine will offer? Just curious because I've had different medical professionals give me two different responses. Thanks!
If you ask a vaxx pusher they will tell you to get the vaxx. If you ask me i will say no vaxx. Its your right to do either. Natural herd immunity has been know way before vaxxes. Big pharma stole the term herd immunity and attached it to their product aka vaxxes.
I was born much too late to have been vaccinated for Smallpox. I will still get emotional any time that I hear someone talk about it in the past tense, it really shows what humanity can do when we decide to work together on something. I hope that we can get that sort of attitude for Climate Change and truly universal health care sooner rather than later.
Hey Dave and greetings from healthcare industry. I absolutely love your videos and this one as well was spot on. Yet I want to raise two talking points of this video, and would love your opinions on them. 1) Back in the 2020 when I sat on the medical info conserning the J&J co.'s Pfizer vaccine that was appointed to the medical professionals by our corresponding agency to FDA, the info was very specific about the issue of the mRNA vaccine not giving protection for the infection per se but instead against the severe form of the infection. The info also included the fact that taking the mRNA vaccination will not stop you from spreading the virus potentially. Later we've seen the jab work in practice having had a +95 % national coverage with two shots not doing the trick and with over 80 % coverage with the third shot still not helping to gain herd immunity. Therefore the only gain with the new vaccines seems to be on personal level if even that. 2) As a healthcare professional, yet not a microbiologists, there are concerns about the autoimmune system failures. The original vaccines do work exactly as you described but the mRNA vaccines bring up the questions about the body's own cells working their way into making alien protein into the bloodstream. In the autoimmune diseases the body's own immune system attacks the body's own tissues by failing to recognize the tissue correctly - to put it very simply. There have been cases where the mRNA vaccines have caused such incidents where there was no other explaining factor found. Admittedly, there is a personal pick on this one, as I had to be fighting against "the system" for my spouse who got nephritis interstitialis due to the first jab (got confirmed later in the special healthcare after months of fighting). While having to dive into the matter and "specialize" in the kidney diseases (while it's rather far form my own field of work), I found out that there were others as well and similar rare tissue inflammation patients that had had them from the jab. To conclude this message I want to stress that I most definitely am on the side of science and I would be working on a whole other field of expertise should the medical science be dismissed in the history, but there are some issues concerning the newest vaccines that we aren't too ready to speak of in very definite sense yet.
To answer the biology side of things For part 2: simplified - A cell has genetic material (DNA) and has mechanisms to express genes in the DNA that code for different kinds of proteins (called protein synthesis, we can go from DNA to mRNA to protein). Again simplified - a virus is composed of genetic material (either DNA or RNA depending on the virus) encapsulated by an envelope made of lipids and structural proteins. A virus works by going into a cell and using the host cell's own mechanisms to read it's genetic material to make more of itself synthesizing the virus's proteins and by replicating the its genetic material. The more of itself it can make, the more rapidly it can spread to other cells. As our cells are creating the structural proteins, some of them are presented on the surface of the cell, these proteins are called antigens. Our immune system can recognize that as foreign and create antibodies. The mRNA vaccine isolates the genetic material to only the part that codes for the structural proteins (i.e. the part that our immune system can recognize and make antibodies) but not the rest of the virus so it can't spread. So either way, the body's own cell mechanisms are being used. Part 1: Vaccines themselves aren't fighting the infection, they are triggering our own immune system to create antibodies so we can have a faster response if we were to encounter the same antigens again.
@@MmEbady Thank you for explaining the very basics that I already know. The issue on mRNA vaccines is that they don't work the same way as the regular vaccines do. So you may disregard that entirely. Since original post, there's come variety of studies which you can check from Google Scholar for example. Start by applying "covid vaccine nephritis". You will find heaps.
@@smhkd90 And I explained how the mRNA vaccine works using the same mechanisms as a virus does and by logic (and if you already know all this) the same mechanisms as a regular vaccine with dead or weakened virus. So, our own cells are making "alien proteins" in all cases. Thanks for the google suggestions, it would be better to get information from experts in the field such as immunologists rather than youtube. But from my limited research, autoimmune adverse events following immunization occurs with other vaccines and aren’t just limited to mRNA vaccines. Some explanations are that it can be from immune response or from adjuvants in the vaccine. Since the COVID virus is also associated with nephritis, it’s most likely from immune response. Good luck on your search for an answer! Hopefully further research can make future vaccines with less side effects. Mahroum, N., Lavine, N., Ohayon, A., Seida, R., Alwani, A., Alrais, M., ... & Bragazzi, N. L. (2022). COVID-19 vaccination and the rate of immune and autoimmune adverse events following immunization: insights from a narrative literature review. Frontiers in immunology, 13, 872683. Seida, I., Alrais, M., Seida, R., Alwani, A., Kiyak, Z., Elsalti, A., ... & Mahroum, N. (2023). Autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA): past, present, and future implications. Clinical and experimental immunology, 213(1), 87-101. Ng, J. H., Zaidan, M., Jhaveri, K. D., & Izzedine, H. (2021). Acute tubulointerstitial nephritis and COVID-19. Clinical Kidney Journal, 14(10), 2151-2157. Klomjit N, Zand L, Cornell LD, Alexander MP. COVID-19 and Glomerular Diseases. Kidney Int Rep. 2023 Jun;8(6):1137-1150. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.03.016. Epub 2023 Mar 27. PMID: 37274308; PMCID: PMC10041821. Bouquegneau, Antoine; Erpicum, Pauline; Grosch, Stéphanie; Habran, Lionel; Hougrand, Olivier; Huart, Justine; Krzesinski, Jean-Marie; Misset, Benoît; Hayette, Marie-Pierre; Delvenne, Philippe; Bovy, Christophe; Kylies, Dominik; Huber, Tobias B.; Puelles, Victor G.; Delanaye, Pierre; Jouret, Francois. COVID-19-associated Nephropathy Includes Tubular Necrosis and Capillary Congestion, with Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 in the Nephron. Kidney360 2(4):p 639-652, April 2021.
I have autism and this makes me see red. Autism is by definition is "neuro diverisity" which TLDR means basically you think differently. EVERYONE is on this spectrum, people with autism are just higher on said spectrum. If there was any drug that affected autism, I would have taken it already. The only drugs that affect the brian which is not the way people think, are addictive drugs and neurological poisons. Neuro poisons/venom attack the brain/nervous system and cause it to feel so much pain that you die or causes paralysis. You already know what addictive drugs do so I don't need to explain this. The only known treatment for autism is therapy and attention from loved ones. I am glad you have made this video to show people how absurd these claims are. Thank you very much.
I’m on the spectrum too and these claims about vaccines causing autism make my blood boil. They’re implying that autism is worse than polio or measles, which is messed up.
@@northernskies86 "They’re implying that autism is worse than polio or measles" Some of them go further, and outright state that DEAD is better than on-the-spectrum. As I am on the spectrum, too, I can't help but take that kinda personally... Here's the fun part: some of these ppl pay me thousands of $ to help their kids score better on their LSAT... ie, to think *more as I do*.
Aspies have a higher need for GABA production and also need better fuel for the brain due to increased amount of neural connections. Common neurotypical diets do not contain enough "energy" to support the increased connections. Apsie brains are literally being starved due to incorrect diets which will increase the severity of the symptoms. Try following a Keto diet, fat is a better fuel for the brain and take l-glutamine to help increase GABA production, you can also eat various foods to help GABA as well. Note: The above suggestions is based on white papers and studies I have read. Gotta love our hyper focus. ;) Anyways the above has helped me lower the severity of the symptoms.
You are not autistic we dont need therapy or treatment because there is nothing wrong with us and what you just said is right out of the autism speaks handbook. 2.Thats the other lie aswell of everybodies on the spectrum theyre not our brains are significantly different to a neurotypical person and our dna is different aswell.|What the genesists call autistic genes .
I am fully vaccinated and have had faith in vaccines for a long time. For me it can be hard to blame many who are terrified because I was also ignorant to many of these concepts regardless of my willingness to vaccinate. Misinformation is a terrible thing, and further misinformation based on fear is sadly also a terrible thing. Thank you Dave for being more educated than I, and for putting into words what I cannot. Ignorance is only temporary if you are just willing to learn.
@@owlristocrat1151, arrogance in the sense of they think they know everything, arrogance in the sense that they are biased and unwilling to accept information, or arrogance in the sense of they know they are wrong but hold their position anyways?
@@owlristocrat1151 And yet here we are, states with low vax rates have fared the same or better than those with high vax rates (also with far fewer draconian laws and lockdowns). People getting 3 or 4 covid shots, thinking they are somehow making society a better place. Let me guess, you were one of those "if it saves one life" people yet you are also cheering on the U.S. getting involved in the war in Ukraine?
@ckots have you come across some new information? I’m not exactly sure where you are taking this question. I’m unaware of any hubris in my comment since I admired ignorance.
Hey Dave, love your videos on debunking pseudoscience (like this one)! Have you ever done any research on chiropractic? I did some looking into it about 20 years ago, in college, and concluded it was complete pseudoscience, but I keep hearing about it every so often from people in real life or even videos on YT. Just curious. I'm sure it's still bunk, but would be nice to know if there have been any critical developments either way since I first looked into it. Keep up the great work!
I wouldn't go so far as to say that the entire field of chiropractics is pseudoscience, but the field is overflowing with charlatans. It may be a good topic to tackle delicately at some point.
In Asia many people wear masks voluntarily when they are feeling sick, because they care about each other that much - and some people now, during a global pandemic, are refusing to wear a mask, then blame the virus on the Chinese although they are most likely producing and spreading the virus themselves.
This guy contradicts himself over n over. If to much of anything can be bad for you, then how did you come to the conclusion that big pharma and the CDC aren't responsible for the SPIKE in autism AFTER rolling together vaccines into ONE large dose. The CDC was sued AND LOST that case for lying and NOT sharing all those studies they the CDC never had. But the CDC did hire a third-party to study if they're in the right; turns out the the third-party stated in federal court that "given the heavy metals in the American diet as well as a large dose of multiple vaccines; it's HIGHLY LIKELY that it vary well COULD push children and some adults over the threshold, but further testing would be needed." This guy is an influencer and there are MANY people IN THIS FEILD of whom have studied further then this self proclaimed professor that holds a bachelors degree in chemistry. And these many people in this medical business that he made a UA-cam topic, have come forward expressing GREAT CONCERN. A smart person would look at all sources, listen to all points, dismiss immediately anyone who trys to shame, categories, or name calls people into believing them such as the above big pharma influencer. Its dangerous not allowing people to make decisions for themselves and their families on matters of THEIR OWN HEALTH. I recommend standing up for our people and discontinue any notification from this guy and just lose all his videos for what he's pushing without being objective, for categorizing folks, name calling (anti-vaxers, etc..), and misinforming as well as telling people to ridicule others for their thoughts and concerns. He's not a good person. Read more 1 2 Show more replies Anthony Conigliaro 1 year ago As a retired soldier, if we could tag our soldiers with microscopic chips to find them, we would have done it. If we can't tag soldiers, why would the medical profession be interested in tagging you? 2.3K 169 Philip Michel 1 second ago This guy contradicts himself over n over. If to much of anything can be bad for you, then how did you come to the conclusion that big pharma and the CDC aren't responsible for the SPIKE in autism AFTER rolling together vaccines into ONE large dose. The CDC was sued AND LOST that case for lying and NOT sharing all those studies they the CDC never had. But the CDC did hire a third-party to study if they're in the right; turns out the the third-party stated in federal court that "given the heavy metals in the American diet as well as a large dose of multiple vaccines; it's HIGHLY LIKELY that it vary well COULD push children and some adults over the threshold, but further testing would be needed." This guy is an influencer and there are MANY people IN THIS FEILD of whom have studied further then this self proclaimed professor that holds a bachelors degree in chemistry. And these many people in this medical business that he made a UA-cam topic, have come forward expressing GREAT CONCERN. A smart person would look at all sources, listen to all points, dismiss immediately anyone who trys to shame, categories, or name calls people into believing them such as the above big pharma influencer. Its dangerous not allowing people to make decisions for themselves and their families on matters of THEIR OWN HEALTH. I recommend standing up for our people and discontinue any notification from this guy and just lose all his videos for what he's pushing without being objective, for categorizing folks, name calling (anti-vaxers, etc..), and misinforming as well as telling people to ridicule others for their thoughts and concerns. Why not dig in and discuss the whistle blowers, the THOUSANDS of professionals whom have "great concern" the peer reviewed studies that have numbers like "1 in 800"?! Does anyone here know what that means? Are you reliant on this asshole for your do diligence? Can you really stand by as the athletes drop and tell yourself and YOUR LOVED ONES .. nothing unusual here take another jab.. ...? He's not a good person
The protected need to be protected from the unprotected by forcing the unprotected to use the protection that didn't protect the protected. Elementary, my dear Watson.
Hello Professor Dave. Thank you for your continued educational videos. I have a 30 year friendship at risk over my friend’s CoVID vaccine hesitancy. She’s gone deep into misinformation territory and it’s turned into such a Gordian knot I am at a loss as to how to help her. Showing your video to her, I know she will ask one question: “Why should I trust a UA-cam “professor” (yes, she would type it in quotes), over Dr Robert Malone the inventor of mRNA when he says it’s dangerous?” Yes, I know Robert Malone is a self-proclaimed inventor and basically the “Andrew Wakefield” of mRNA, but that is the question she will throw at me, and I’m still not sure how to answer her. Any recommendations?
Tell her I'm not saying anything that isn't well understood by the scientific community. Also if she thinks Malone "invented mRNA", she's bonkers, and needs to learn basic biochemistry. She also needs to stop trusting unhinged iconoclasts. People are liars. Malone is one of them.
Excellent summary : could make a useful part of the medical School curriculum. Though it is a pity I still can't receive Radio One on my vaccine site, even after 2 injections of micro-battery after the micro-receiver injection....
My understanding is that the "gut feeling" that vaccines caused autism was due in large part to the temporal proximity of vaccinations and the onset of recognizeable autism symptoms. From what I understand about autism, children don't start exhibiting obvious signs of autism until they about 2-3 years old. This is when they start walking, talking, and performing other motor and intellectual tasks that autistic children have trouble learning. The administration of some of the major childhood vaccinations (such as polio, TDAP boosters, and hepatitis) are done during this same time period. So parents would get the vaccines, then in the following months, start noticing that their child is is having trouble learning to walk, talk, etc., and since the vaccination was a "major medical procedure" that happened recently, they assume the two are linked. When in reality, the child was already autistic (from birth), and would have started developing noticeable symptoms at that time regardless of vaccinations.
@@HomeschoolingDepot1 It took all of 30 seconds to refute both of these quotes. Horowitz is a dentist, not a medical doctor. He has as much authority to comment on vaccines as I do to comment on cell biology or physics. Furthermore, his published books include such gems as "Healing Celebrations", which discusses healing using scripture. Religious mythology is as toxic to science as misinformation, and should remain separate. As for Shannon, this one was really easy. The quote you provided is commonly incorrectly used. A PDF of his original paper shows that the quote is incomplete and has been cherry picked in a way that, without context, gives the illusion of supporting anti-vax narrative. Quoting those with self-proclaimed authority and quoting those out of context are among the only weapons the anti-vax community has. Science doesn't lie. Vaccines save lives. There is absolutely no debate on this topic.
@@aposey89 science can be misrepresented, but it's not very good at promoting science, so misrepresentations aren't often talked about, like the guy in this video that didn't like the MMR vax when he had a vax to sell himself. The problems are the adjuvants, usually. This new jab is still in trial phase. I don't take crap that isn't disclosed. I am not so trusting. Watch WEF's Fourth Industrial Revolution for some reasons why. I also watched some chick take the jab on camera and drop after a few minutes. She's been scrubbed and settled.
Reading all the comments on these videos... I'm just now realizing how truly ignorant most of the population seems to be. I thought this stuff was mostly just common knowledge... I mean I do have an educational background in this, but I knew all of this stuff long before college.
@@siLence-84 I’m 13. I thought my generation was really stupid. It is. But anti-vaxxers really are closer to the intelligence of dust than all living life. Misinformation is rampant because of people’s tendency to blame and reject in times of fear. I want to know exactly his many people are like this and say that our human population is the current one minus all those idiots.
Dave, I would love to hear your thoughts on the origin of COVID without politics involved. I can’t seem to find any explanation without some type of politics involved.
This guy contradicts himself over n over. If to much of anything can be bad for you, then how did you come to the conclusion that big pharma and the CDC aren't responsible for the SPIKE in autism AFTER rolling together vaccines into ONE large dose. The CDC was sued AND LOST that case for lying and NOT sharing all those studies they the CDC never had. But the CDC did hire a third-party to study if they're in the right; turns out the the third-party stated in federal court that "given the heavy metals in the American diet as well as a large dose of multiple vaccines; it's HIGHLY LIKELY that it vary well COULD push children and some adults over the threshold, but further testing would be needed." This guy is an influencer and there are MANY people IN THIS FEILD of whom have studied further then this self proclaimed professor that holds a bachelors degree in chemistry. And these many people in this medical business that he made a UA-cam topic, have come forward expressing GREAT CONCERN. A smart person would look at all sources, listen to all points, dismiss immediately anyone who trys to shame, categories, or name calls people into believing them such as the above big pharma influencer. Its dangerous not allowing people to make decisions for themselves and their families on matters of THEIR OWN HEALTH. I recommend standing up for our people and discontinue any notification from this guy and just lose all his videos for what he's pushing without being objective, for categorizing folks, name calling (anti-vaxers, etc..), and misinforming as well as telling people to ridicule others for their thoughts and concerns. He's not a good person. Read more 1 2 Show more replies Anthony Conigliaro 1 year ago As a retired soldier, if we could tag our soldiers with microscopic chips to find them, we would have done it. If we can't tag soldiers, why would the medical profession be interested in tagging you? 2.3K 169 Philip Michel 1 second ago This guy contradicts himself over n over. If to much of anything can be bad for you, then how did you come to the conclusion that big pharma and the CDC aren't responsible for the SPIKE in autism AFTER rolling together vaccines into ONE large dose. The CDC was sued AND LOST that case for lying and NOT sharing all those studies they the CDC never had. But the CDC did hire a third-party to study if they're in the right; turns out the the third-party stated in federal court that "given the heavy metals in the American diet as well as a large dose of multiple vaccines; it's HIGHLY LIKELY that it vary well COULD push children and some adults over the threshold, but further testing would be needed." This guy is an influencer and there are MANY people IN THIS FEILD of whom have studied further then this self proclaimed professor that holds a bachelors degree in chemistry. And these many people in this medical business that he made a UA-cam topic, have come forward expressing GREAT CONCERN. A smart person would look at all sources, listen to all points, dismiss immediately anyone who trys to shame, categories, or name calls people into believing them such as the above big pharma influencer. Its dangerous not allowing people to make decisions for themselves and their families on matters of THEIR OWN HEALTH. I recommend standing up for our people and discontinue any notification from this guy and just lose all his videos for what he's pushing without being objective, for categorizing folks, name calling (anti-vaxers, etc..), and misinforming as well as telling people to ridicule others for their thoughts and concerns. Why not dig in and discuss the whistle blowers, the THOUSANDS of professionals whom have "great concern" the peer reviewed studies that have numbers like "1 in 800"?! Does anyone here know what that means? Are you reliant on this asshole for your do diligence? Can you really stand by as the athletes drop and tell yourself and YOUR LOVED ONES .. nothing unusual here take another jab.. ...? He's not a good person
Always been pro vax, but seeing how you presented the mRNA vaccine is definitely changing my mind because I was skeptical about the vaccine. I also notice the error I had on the virus and the mask. Not realizing that it’s main transmission was via water droplets (which now I remember seeing but my anti establishment bias probably got in the way of that). What I also didn’t know was how much red tape was removed and now I understand why the vaccine came out so fast. I guess once could argue that the red tape was removed so they can inject microchips in us much faster but even I think that’s a silly argument. One thing I don’t understand is why we need a second dose?
One dose isn't producing enough immunity. So they tried two doses and results were that it gave stronger immunity. It's essentially like what a booster does but it's a primary
We need a second dose because of waning immunity, your body doesn’t hold on to every pathogen it comes across if it only comes across it once, so getting a booster is like your body saying “oh, this happened again, alright I’ll take this seriously”
7:59 My brother almost died of appendicitis, and I would LOVE to have that man look my brother in the eye and try to tell him that he was just constipated.
@@deletedchannel9945 what doctor gives a child more then 50 vaccines at one appointment? That’s the only way you could be poisoned by vaccines. And that’s the minimum amount.
Thank you so much for yet another awesome video Professor Dave! Can you please, please enable additional subtitles so I can translate and share it with some people who don't speak English?
hey Dave could you make videos about the science of nutrition? there is plenty of misinformation about nutrition on the internet. i wanna learn what the science says. what is the healthiest diet?
Unprocessed plant based is best. Just make sure you hit all of your caloric needs and essential nutrient scores. A simple step in the right direction would be to switch out dairy milk with an unsweetened plant based. Experiment. See which ones you like.
@@joeylafrond2472 i ate whole-food plant-based for 2.5 years, following dr Greger's daily dozen. at first i felt good but by the end of it i developed severe burning sensations to the head and neck, as well as tinnitus. i did supplement with b12, as Greger recommends. The symptoms i mentioned gradually went away as i reintroduced animal products into my diet.
@@HakuCell Check out Mikaela Peterson's Lion Diet debate at Oxford from a few weeks ago. In a nutshell she sums up how an all meat diet cured her of all the ailments that haunted her throughout her life, as she had many autoimmune and mental health disorders. She claims they tested it on a larger population and apparently there was huge benefits, like people with type 2 diabetes getting off their insulin. Meat is the only form of sustenance that you can survive on solely, is another claim. I personally don't know much about it. If nothing else it's fascinating, and personally I want to try it and see if there's an impact on my ADHD focusing issues, depression, and anxiety. Besto luck.
I also suggest eating no more than 2000 calories a day to stay healthy. Although if your health is seriously in a bad shape go to 1500 to 1000 calories
I have a sister who got Guillain Barre syndrome back in 2015. My mother and I had very different views on vaccines from that point on, she was a firm believer in “Vaccines bad!” while I was “Vaccines are very helpful but every medication has side effects!” I feel very sorry for my sister as the disease will effect her until she’s 52 and that’s only if she gets treatment every 3 weeks. I just want to say, Thank you Dave. I can’t show this to my mother as I don’t want to be disowned from my family but this video has probably helped so many and I have more knowledge than ever before on this subject.
@@pdevine999 Mate, do you think I don’t know that? Of course those things happen! I have a family member who that happened to! But you must remember, if we didn’t have vaccines a lot of our planet would still be plagued by diseases we could easily die from because of our lack of immunity to them. Those people who are affected badly by vaccines, they are a small minority. Of course I feel so sorry for those people but just because some are affected badly doesn’t mean we shouldn’t vaccinate at all. Well some vegetables contain chemical compounds that increase chance of kidney stones, so I guess we should just stop eating vegetables! How about soda or fast food? They cause obesity. So I guess we should just ban them.
If you are looking for ideas on more videos, maybe explaining the AZ and J&J vaccines and pauses for blood clots? As always, your work is educational, thanks!
They deny the dangers of COVID-19 ("It only attacks the elders and people with preexisting conditions!"). The vaccine will be made of just _parts_ of COVID (eg RNA of COVID), since according to them COVID-19 isn't dangerous, neither is the vaccine.
The long term effects of what? The mRNA vaccine? The mRNA degrades and is eliminated by the body after a few days. We can check for this. Everything else in the vaccine has been used in other vaccines for decades. The only long term effects we don't know about are how long it will be effective for combating Covid-19, and the vanishingly small chance that the vaccine will provoke an immune response to non-covid organisms that use a similar spike protein. This would only be a problem if the non-covid organisms were beneficial to humans, but this is why they have clinical trials. To weed out such issues. Since the immune response only takes at most a couple weeks to completely destroy an organism in the body, any major effects from accidentally killing beneficial bacteria would have been discovered by phase 3 trials at the latest. I just got the moderna shot, and the only thing negative effect so far has been a sore arm for a couple days. I've heard some people develop a low grade fever and other flu like symptoms. These are intentional. They are the vaccine provoking an immune response.
Ask them to name one vaccine that we administer today that has ever caused widespread, long term effects. Imma give you a hint, there aren’t any. However the long term effects from covid-19 are very real and have been proven to exist
Great video. Any chance you have the time to explore if people who have been sick and recovered from covid need to be vaccinated? Or should they just be last in line to get the vaccines? What's the current preponderance of the evidence on that question?
If you get the covid, you’ll still have to be vaccinated later. Since the immune system doesn’t keep the antibodies’ « blueprints » against covid forever
This guy contradicts himself over n over. If to much of anything can be bad for you, then how did you come to the conclusion that big pharma and the CDC aren't responsible for the SPIKE in autism AFTER rolling together vaccines into ONE large dose. The CDC was sued AND LOST that case for lying and NOT sharing all those studies they the CDC never had. But the CDC did hire a third-party to study if they're in the right; turns out the the third-party stated in federal court that "given the heavy metals in the American diet as well as a large dose of multiple vaccines; it's HIGHLY LIKELY that it vary well COULD push children and some adults over the threshold, but further testing would be needed." This guy is an influencer and there are MANY people IN THIS FEILD of whom have studied further then this self proclaimed professor that holds a bachelors degree in chemistry. And these many people in this medical business that he made a UA-cam topic, have come forward expressing GREAT CONCERN. A smart person would look at all sources, listen to all points, dismiss immediately anyone who trys to shame, categories, or name calls people into believing them such as the above big pharma influencer. Its dangerous not allowing people to make decisions for themselves and their families on matters of THEIR OWN HEALTH. I recommend standing up for our people and discontinue any notification from this guy and just lose all his videos for what he's pushing without being objective, for categorizing folks, name calling (anti-vaxers, etc..), and misinforming as well as telling people to ridicule others for their thoughts and concerns. He's not a good person. Read more 1 2 Show more replies Anthony Conigliaro 1 year ago As a retired soldier, if we could tag our soldiers with microscopic chips to find them, we would have done it. If we can't tag soldiers, why would the medical profession be interested in tagging you? 2.3K 169 Philip Michel 1 second ago This guy contradicts himself over n over. If to much of anything can be bad for you, then how did you come to the conclusion that big pharma and the CDC aren't responsible for the SPIKE in autism AFTER rolling together vaccines into ONE large dose. The CDC was sued AND LOST that case for lying and NOT sharing all those studies they the CDC never had. But the CDC did hire a third-party to study if they're in the right; turns out the the third-party stated in federal court that "given the heavy metals in the American diet as well as a large dose of multiple vaccines; it's HIGHLY LIKELY that it vary well COULD push children and some adults over the threshold, but further testing would be needed." This guy is an influencer and there are MANY people IN THIS FEILD of whom have studied further then this self proclaimed professor that holds a bachelors degree in chemistry. And these many people in this medical business that he made a UA-cam topic, have come forward expressing GREAT CONCERN. A smart person would look at all sources, listen to all points, dismiss immediately anyone who trys to shame, categories, or name calls people into believing them such as the above big pharma influencer. Its dangerous not allowing people to make decisions for themselves and their families on matters of THEIR OWN HEALTH. I recommend standing up for our people and discontinue any notification from this guy and just lose all his videos for what he's pushing without being objective, for categorizing folks, name calling (anti-vaxers, etc..), and misinforming as well as telling people to ridicule others for their thoughts and concerns. Why not dig in and discuss the whistle blowers, the THOUSANDS of professionals whom have "great concern" the peer reviewed studies that have numbers like "1 in 800"?! Does anyone here know what that means? Are you reliant on this asshole for your do diligence? Can you really stand by as the athletes drop and tell yourself and YOUR LOVED ONES .. nothing unusual here take another jab.. ...? He's not a good person
Wakefield also horribly abused the children during the study, subjecting them to incredibly invasive and traumatic tests, including colonoscopies, which are not recommended for children due to the risk of perforation of the intestinal walls. One kid had *TWELVE PERFORATIONS* by the end. Many of the nurses and doctors working with him were horrified at what he was doing. Also, Wakefield shot himself in the foot by challenging the lawsuit, because he had to present all relevant evidence. It led to further discrediting his findings and study. 😆
Hbomberguy made an EXCELLENT video thoroughly examining everything that Andrew Wakefield has ever said and done in regards to vaccines. Although it seems like you've already seen it. 😅 If not, here it is: ua-cam.com/video/8BIcAZxFfrc/v-deo.html
As a retired soldier, if we could tag our soldiers with microscopic chips to find them, we would have done it. If we can't tag soldiers, why would the medical profession be interested in tagging you?
Mad respect for you and your comment. I salute with honor
Salute
Salute
You sir, are spitting facts
What a fantastic point
My autistic son watched this with me when I was relaxing after work last week.
My son; "...and they call me the dumb one? Wait... so if I already have autism... and I get a vaccine... do I get skill points?"
I about fell out of my chair. Thanks for the good memories man. Keep up the good work.
Skill points! That's so sweet lmao
My god, this is so funny....
Cute too.
Lmao your son is a master comedian
Put him in late-night talk show, you have yourself gold mine
SKILL POINTS OMG
Ive literally heard someone say, "I can smell a fart through my pants so how is a mask gonna help"
Depressing...
I think the point his is making, is that fart particles are much larger than viral ones, so if they don't filter poo stink, how are they filtering smaller things?
Smelling a fart through your pants is okay. It's smelling other peoples farts that's a problem.
Why are they holding their pants to their face?
Well it's a good thing we don't fart Covid all over the place lol.
Not to mention farting would encourage social distancing 🤔
@@ksara2883 We can't be sure we don't. The gut is a perfect place for SARS-CoV-2 to infect. Maybe why China have been using anal swabs to test 🤷🏻♂️
As a parent of a child with Autism, I'm grateful for your simple explanation of the "vaccine causes autism" I'd read up on it upon my son's diagnosis, as people were telling me I'd caused his autism by vaccinating him. The problem is the signs of autism start to appear around the same time certain immunizations are due. It really is sad we have access to more information than ever before, but are too stupid to know what to do with it.
It’s unfortunate people were so unkind. All we parents just do the best we can with the information we are given and it’s not our faults that we are lied to by powerful interests . Lots of parents have reversed their kids’ diagnoses of autism with dietary changes and heavy metal detox. Focus on your child’s health first and foremost and watch the symptoms diagnosed as autism disappear! It can be a challenge because so much crap food is engineered to be addictive but it can be done. I know this for certain.
@@iadhdki9535 As someone with autism, you are wrong. Autism is not something that can be reversed, nor would you want to reverse it. It is a genetic condition that alters the structure and pathways of the brain. Nothing you do will cause or stop the presentation of autism. The reason the symptoms seem to get less with age is that autistic people learn to mask their traits in order to avoid rejection by society. You probably know people with autism and have no idea. As a society we need to stop the stigmatization of autism and other neurodivergent conditions and accept people for who they are.
You did bro. It's hard I know. It sucks.
@@iadhdki9535 You CANNOT 'reverse autism', no matter what you do, be it dieting or 'heavy metal detox', because it's GENETIC in nature, that is 'caused by variation in the genes of our body', and thus mostly hereditary, so you cannot do anything about it, only adapt to the way your brain is wired. And I say it as an autistic adult myself.
Please, for the love of common sense and all actual science and medicine based on approved research, get your facts straight, do your own research and stop torturing kids with pseudoscience.
@@iadhdki9535 I’m not sure if the diet of a child effects their brain structure.
As an autistic person, the fact that people would rather have dead children than autistic ones irks me.
Same
@@thejarjosh Thats just your personal experience, it does not extrapolate to anyone (hell, its not even that normal). For contrast, i know someone who didnt want to use masks and had the chance to get vaccinated by covid but didnt bc "vaccines bad". A week or so he got covid, and died painfully without the chance to calm his pain other than putting him to sleep. LOL its all about the anti-vax / anti-mask propaganda.
@@thejarjosh a antimask cop died of covid like last week dude ....... im sure more have there just to dumb to admit there mistake before getting ill
@@thejarjosh I didnt intend for what i said to be true. Just a representation thats the contrary to what you say. You said that you know someone who does not use mask nor vaccinate, and its the healthiest person you've ever met. I told you i know someone who does not use mask nor vaccinate, yet he died in agony bc of not taking the corresponding measures. Both are personal experiences (mine being an hypothetical one), saying the opposite but arguing the same way "i know this guy that does x and hes x". Yet, you say that yours is true bc yes and mine is not bc its a lie and because big pharma. This does not make sense. Stop for a moment and think about it. Think of what you'd answer me, and put it the other way but throw the same non-fundamented arguments. Why would either one be true or not? what does determine it? What you have there is a big big bias dude.
@@thejarjosh Whatever, it does not make sense to keep on talking. Have a great day.
The only (sad) problem with videos like this is that no matter how much care, dedication, research and effort that is put into them, the ones who are listening aren't the ones who need to hear it the most. Those who would actually benefit from this information will just pull out the requisite "ur bad, science bad, me smarter science man because Facebook tell me magic crystal heal disease, so vaccine poison" card, and ignore any actual evidence. That said, even if they never reach those who need it most, I personally still love your videos. Keep em coming, Prof.!
Maybe the ones who need to see it won't, but these videos give solid arguments to people who may be dealing with a loved one who's buying into antivax conspiracies.
I'm spreading this video , I got some friends that need to here it....
The reason for that is because of how conspiracy theories work.
By definition a conspiracy theory cannot be falsified. Therefore, it is impossible to prove a conspiracy theory wrong. You can provide evidence to suggest their outcome is very unlikely, but you really cannot prove them, out right wrong.
The same actually applies to a scientific theory. Scientific theories forbid certain elements or aspects. As a result, when scientists conduct research, they aren't trying to support their theory.
Let me give you a prime example of what I mean from the one and only James Randy.
Imagine that you believe in Santa Claus and we are having a discussion about his existence. You ask me to prove that he doesn't exist. I take you up on that and fly to the North Pole. I look high and low, however, he isn't there. No lapland, no elves, no rain deer and no Santa.
I record my observations and come to the conclusion that he is not real.
I come back and present you with the evidence supporting the idea that he doesn't exist. Your response is, "well Santa is magic, he simply turned himself and Lapland invisible upon your arrival."
That doesn't mean that's what actually happened. But, I can't prove that he didn't just turn invisible.
In other words, conspiracies are based on confirmation bias. An individual who believes in a conspiracy theory wants it to be true. They will twist and bend evidence to suit their narrative. If you try to prove a scientific theory by looking for proof of your theory, you run the risk of doing the same.
That's why criminal investigations are based purely on the evidence. In reality, criminal investigators will not make up stories based on evidence they will just look at evidence from a surface level. This is because, they run the risk of bending the narrative if they don't.
Conspiracy nuts that see this video will make their own explanations for why their view is correct and adhere to confirmation bias.
I think occasionally a person who is slipping into the conspiracy theory might find this and have their minds changed.
That's all you can hope for. If you're lucky they will go on to help change other people's minds. I can't see any negatives to trying to educate people about these issues.
I think it justifies the work PDE put in to create it and is performing a public service by providing accurate information as a counterpoint to the deluge of ignorance on social media.
@@enhaxed7839 Definitely. To be honest, if I see people spreading misinformation about vaccines, I just send them a link to this.
I don't know if you realize how impactful content like this is, but my s/o had major vaccine hesitancy. I showed them this video and it definitely quelled a lot of those fears they had. So thank you for this.
I think vaccine hesitancy is a good thing. Vaccine paranoia is a problem however. Vaccines like any medicine aren’t inherently side effect free and the chief principle of both medicine is benefit vs harm. For instance, we’re not getting vaccinated for cholera bc the benefit is too little compared to the potential harm. It’s not just good but necessary to view things through the lens of benefit-harm weighing. I think it’s a misconception that skepticism is a bad or unscientific thing, it’s a fundamental in performing science on the contrary. Only ideas that can hold their own past skepticism survive which is also why vaccines have survived. The problems arise when people behave irrationally through paranoia and hysteria, not when people are skeptical.
@@ExternusArmy I don't think anyone is saying all skepticism and all hesitance are negative. They where hesitant to get a vaccine that was and is proven safe and effective. Hence, vaccine hesitancy. Vaccine paranoia is a different animal altogether, like you said. But largely irrelevant to what I was stating above.
@@ExternusArmy and to be clear, we where both skeptical of the vaccine, until evidence suggested it was safe and effective. The science won me over but my s/o just needed a little extra push, which is why I praised this video.
@@darthteck Is this the same guy as before or did you forget to switch accounts?
@@ExternusArmy I think your take on skepticism is off by a fair margin.
I agree almost completely otherwise.
There is a difference between skepticism and mistrust.
And a lot of what is considered skepticism is actually distrust. (I think there is a better word, will update is I remember it later).
They can look a lot like each other.
as an autistic adult, thank you professor dave for making videos like this! it’s so frustrating seeing people think that my neurotype is such a terrible thing that they would negate protecting their children from diseases to try and avoid it.
SHOW ME AN AUTISTIC PERSON THAT IS UNVACCINATED
@@Brian-gx7yx If this nonsense is true, why are so many vaccinated folks NOT autistic?
@@Brian-gx7yx I think you are a bot
@@johannsanchocuevas7854 Why do you think I am a BOT
@@johannsanchocuevas7854 Why do you think I am a BOT
"....one would presume that any carbon containing compound, like say sugar, must be a diamond." -- LOLOL!
Eggs contain carbon and sulfur. Therefore, they came from Leopold's rubber plantations. Eggs need to be canceled. Get woke, go nutrient broke, lol.
I laughed xD
LMAOOOO
@@jasonc0065 weird how most woke people actually follow the science at least in comparison to their opposition
@@excalibur2772 I don't the science of injecting RNA into your body. It's mutilation.
“Yeah I respect your opinion, but I read a post on Facebook....”
@Paul Stockton Facebook? Pfff... I just have Donald Trump's twitter feed injected in my arm
@@jericho6231 Wouldn't this channel fit the bill that you're describing?
😂😂😂
@@jericho6231 not sure if your response was supposed to be ironic, sarcastic or something in between, but Dave puts forward a much more compelling argument backed up with easily researched facts than the meme photo your friend Gary with 1 ex wife, 2 kids who call another man “dad” and a glittering career as a “lifestyle blogger/truth seeker” posted onto his Facebook page.
but but vaccines cells contain dead babies
Hey Dave, long time viewer. I know this won't get a reply since I'm not some insane rambling idiot, but I appreciate you man. Every video of yours, I see you taking time out of your day and interacting with comments for videos over a year old. Gotta love your dedication to calling out stupidity and pushing critical thinking. Hope your weekend is good man
Cult of personality
Can we all just take a moment and appreciate how Prof dave takes time to reply to the nonsense comments? He's the type of person we need in society.
Yes
Yes and there is so much nonsense on the internet and social networks
You must be as braindead as he is or as sold out. This nonsense about the covid jabs is borderline criminal.
@@andromedaaldebaran1378 No evidence to support that it's nonsense? Typical covidiot 🤣🤣🤣.
Yay reddit we did it
If I showed this to my mum she would say 'did you know sugar was a diamond'
She is pro vax but she gets confused easily.
heh heh. yep.
She's a little confused, but she got the spirit
@@Sovayer I've got the spirits too. Come on over. Let's get drunk out of our minds and jam out to Green Day.
time to sell "sugar"
Mom, did you know sugar is coal?
It's a shame that this stuff even needs to be debunked...
@@Oussama-sab me too
Good video, I also like professor Delores Cahill s videos, and many other doctors and scientists that have different, understanding and views. And with non ionising technology I find the scientists and researchers, that know and have experience in that field ✌️.
And the ukcolumn.org team to learn about propaganda 😁
@@TheHayleydavison If you like this video then there's no way you can also like anything Cahill has to say. She sits squarely alongside Kaufman and Wakefield and her opinions stand against all that Dave covers in this video.
@@frankwilson3265 I like to listen to other views and perspectives and see how they convince others or see their facts and references and then I investigate further their facts and references. It's all quite interesting 🙏 there isn't just one or two professors and scientists in one country with one view. There are hundreds of professors, scientists,in many countries,with many different research papers, many different research institutions. To teach is not to show one side of the coin, it's to offer a coin to the student to look at both sides of the coin 😉 or to particularly have some kind of naming names slagging match is just personal and egotistical,not educational 🙏
@@TheHayleydavison I agree with that, but not where the debates around the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic are concerned. Sometimes the scientific community is split down the middle on something. Then I am more than happy to listen to both sides of the argument. Sometimes the scientific community are split over several different views, with each fairly well represented and usually with common ground shared among them. Then I'm very interested in all of those views and look to see where each has merit. But neither of those things are the case with the current "debate".
What we have is 99%+ of the scientific community being of one opinion and a fringe factor with opposing views. The likes of Boschee, Cahill, Sunetra Gupta, Coleman etc. When these people come on the radar of COVID-Deniers, lockdown protestors etc, they are instantly elevated within the movement and presented as the "side" of the argument. If on the other hand a scientist's view forms part of consensus view, the vast, vast majority are simply unheard of because what they have to say is unremarkable and therefore there is no-one pointing to them excitedly saying "Listen to what this person has to say". This does not form a debate where views are represented in the ratios in which they are held. All it does is create false equivalence.
Outstanding.
You’ve made a complex topic crystal clear for me anyway.
And I’ve been looking for a video like this so I can both get a better understanding of vaccines for myself and hopefully to share with others. I’ve had both my COVID vaccines and I’m extremely grateful for this. Thanks
@@stephen3654 no, not at all. That’s all I’ve needed so far. So far so good. Are you anti vax ?
Well maybe listen to presidential candidate Kennedy who says the vaccine against Covid did not work and is not safe. They are more dangerous than getting Covid.
How's your heart doing? Cancer flare up yet?
Dave I love how to the point and matter of fact your videos are. I've been binging your debunk playlist for the last few days. Keep up the great work.
a little bit of skepticism is healthy.
but just like with everything else, overdosing makes it harmful. (Toxic Skepticism?)
Indeed, a good recent example is Thunderf00t's video on SpaceX.
In an attempt to try to show that "SpaceX isn't all that great", he examines the NASA paper "The Recent Large Reduction in Space Launch Cost" from 2018 which compares the cost to launch the now retired Space Shuttle versus a modern Falcon 9. In the video, everything points towards SpaceX being cheaper than the Shuttle and in the end, it is a meandering video with a lot of speculation which doesn't really prove any particular point.
Yet the takeaway for some of his viewers is "wow... I never knew SpaceX was so bad!" because they are pre-disposed to thinking Thunderf00t is a reliable, unbiased source. I think this recent video has proven that otherwise.
The anti-vaccine nonsense is not skepticism. Skeptical thinking involves looking at the data and forming a rational conclusion. These folks are conspiracy theorists, which is a different animal altogether.
These people don't practice skepticism. Paranoia and skepticism are not the same thing. Paranoia involves cherry-picking information that conforms to their existing cognitive bias (in order to feel like they've broken through the fog, cracked some kind of code and figured out who the shadowy figures are... when in reality they'res still deep within a fog of ignorance.)
@@OzearEimaj lol he just posted a reply video especially for you.
@@atom6_ I wouldn't like to throw myself in with the diehard fans, but seems he's done the same thing again and ignored everything that contradicts him?
“Is this Wi-Fi organic?” - Best book title ever!
No but my fart frequency is its so organic you can smell it
@@sunsetsleeper
5 ghz fartwith
My stash of plutonium-238 is organic so it must be healthy
@@patricksarama4963 FBI wants to know your location.
I just bought it and sent a copy to a friend.
Thank you for your effort and help! It’s frustrated to find out that many people who don’t know never even want to know.
As someone with autism(asperger syndrome) I'm extremely tired of these cons treating me as a science experiment gone wrong and that me being autistic is the worst fate imaginable. They seriously act like we are dying from a horrific disease, and not real people with feelings who can have a great life just like anyone else.
Even IF a vax caused my autism (it didn't) I'd still take autism over having died as a child from smallpox, polio, or measles. Rock on. 🤙Also, do I get more autistic if I get more vaccines?
I hope so, I've always connected more with neurodiverse people😂
Your ability to relentlessly pump out debunks, high quality education, and deep cuts always impresses me
@@deletedchannel9945 lol
@@deletedchannel9945 like what?
@@deletedchannel9945 how about you list those mistakes? Vaccines dont cause autism, they are completley fine, masks are effective, end of story
@@deletedchannel9945 any examples? Or just hot air
@@RealAlphaMango It's not worth it man, you can't convince people like this guy of anything that is supported by copious amounts of valid scientific literature.
i found this channel called spirit science... it’s so insane i wouldn’t be recommending it for a video... except it has over a million subscribers and they’re probably the most bat shit crazy theories i’ve ever heard
It's part of my next debunk.
@@ProfessorDaveExplains yayayayayayaayayyayyayayayayay
@Robbierobot574 also a lot of weird shit about the “hebrew race that runs the world”, not ok at all
@@ProfessorDaveExplains well anhk my frequency and send me to Atlantis! Looking forward to that one
@@ProfessorDaveExplains
Hopefully it comes soon.
I have given up trying to explain the computer/passport tracking nonsense with my son. But I am worried because he and his girlfriend lean toward no vaccines at all for their child. It's very frustrating. I grew up in the polio era and understand the importance of vaccines, not to mention correct research.
A lot of people who distrust science in some ways don't distrust it because of some 'alternative fact' but because of how it makes them feel: in control. Perhaps if you restructured what you were saying around helping your son feel in control, it might help you reach some common ground?
@@efulmer8675 Yes, that's probably what I'll need to do. It's a balancing act while arguing with circular logic that's very hard.
Your son is smarter than you.
In regards to Wakefield you missed a couple of points in that a trial at the UK supreme Court found him guilty of kidnapping, fraud and conducting unauthorised tests on children and the UK has been trying to get him back from the US with no luck, btw the trial was done in his absence because by then he had already fled, he also has a massive list of ethical charges against him, though I don't blame you for letting that point go as it is so large that it would be a whole documentary on its own
There needs to be. The only ones I see specifically about him either take his side or none, in spite of the blatant evidence against him. This man should have been jailed years ago.
@@berniethekiwidragon4382 I wonder how much of a hero someone would be if they could think up a way to get his sorry ass back to the UK... By whatever means necessary. I personally can't think of any methods to achieve that, but there must be some out there. Maybe someone could just ask him to go back... 🤣🤣🤣
@@berniethekiwidragon4382 Old comment, I know, but you might be interested in hbomberguy's "vaccines - a measured response" video essay. It went into great detail about Wakefield's fraudulent paper, his actions regarding the children in the study, and the conflicts of financial interest that were likely the driving force behind the paper. Also, hbomb is pretty engaging :)
The Flat Earth videos and whatnot are fun but this video is maybe the most important one you've ever done. Thank you!
Thanks for all the great info. I do think leaving out the lack of culpability for vaccine manufacturers is a problem as well as the long history of pharmaceutical companies settling lawsuits for false claims and misrepresentation without a single CEO ever going to jail.
I too agree that vaccine makers should never have been granted blanket immunity against lawsuits (by President Reagan in 1986). Though we vaccinated our daughter in late 90's (with no injuries), my views changed in 2015 when my healthy 7mo old dog died within hours of her 7-in-1 jab. I now dread all needles. I would rather take risk in getting the actual infection/disease naturally and allow our immune system to fight it off organically. My three remaining dogs haven't been to a vet in 8yrs. I pay attention to what I feed them (no processed crap). I am of the firm belief that man will never really be able to fully understand the immune system (because our bodies behave in highly complex ways once we breach the closed-loop system to study the process). I am not anti-science; but I am definitely anti-$cience, funded solely by profiteering mobs of Wall Street. I hope to one day start trusting science without fearing it. At the moment, I am s#it scared of all synthetic drugs and invasive procedures. If I get seriously injured in an accident, I may not have any other choice.
Can we discuss the reason why vaccine manufacturers are indemnified by western governments against law suits from individuals who suffer adverse reactions? Can we discuss why the vaccine manufacturers opted to not supply vaccines (protecting against this indescribably dangerous disease) to developing countries who's own governments would not provide an indemnity?
@@mfctrv2139 It’s certainly true that the vaccine and medicine industry is still an industry, and the big companies will still do anything they can to make money. But that doesn’t take away from how important vaccines are today, since if you didn’t have them you would probably die of a disease you can’t pronounce the name of.
@@mfctrv2139 Magically, developing countries didn't really get hit with covid somehow.
It was left out on purpose. It's all about promoting the narrative over an honest and objective look at things that is as neutral as possible.
I like your style and expertise, keep up providing real information.
Mikael from Finland
Hey Professor, I really love your videos and your way of explaining complex subjects in a way the public understands them. I just would like to add about the myocarditis problem of Moderna vaccines, since I was personally affected by it. I'm with you, that vaccines do have side effects, but the benefits outweigh them by far. But I still think we should talk about the side effects and not deny their existence, this only hurts those affected and gives the wackjobs a talking point. So here goes my personal story, read if you want :)
I got my second shot of the Moderna vaccine after receiving AstraZeneca for the first. After two days I started having chest pain and my left arm went partially numb. In the hospital blood tests showed a highly elevated troponin level, indicating damage to my heart muscle. The levels went down after 2 days and I did not experience any severe longterm damage, but still experience chest pain when exercising and in stressful situations due to scarring. I don't like to talk about it to friends and colleagues because most either think I'm a antiscience idiot or I find out that they are.
Great presentation. I am someone who is vaccine hesitant. A lot of this stems from lapses in objectivity and critical thinking from the medical community and media. For instance, the first thing I did when presented with the idea that there could be a problem with the current vaccine schedule given to children was to ask my general practitioner: hey doc, could there be anything wrong with the current vaccine schedule, in theory? Without hesitating to even consider my question he said no. That is not a reasonable or scientific answer and it unnerved me. I saw it for what it was. Advocacy mixed with annoyance at what he sees as anti-science. He was doing his part to combat the "stupidity." But the entire conversation around this issue is full of people telling other people who have questions to shut up and stop being morons.
People making videos like this would do better not to paint skeptics or questioners as morons and should not use a mocking tone. Questioning and skepticism are essential parts of a scientific process and worldview. They should never be suppressed. This has only gotten worse with Covid. The mainstream media's mandate to correct for what they see as the stupid anti-vax movement has ruined their objectivity and tainted their judgement. A recent episode of Fresh Air with Terry Gross illustrates this. She was interviewing a person billed as a vaccine expert. In the intro she noted that his child has autism. And yet he is an advocate for vaccines for children. Supposedly this was proof of his intellectual honesty. What she didn't mention until a ways into the interview, before quickly sweeping past it, was that he was an owner in a company working very hard to bring a covid vaccine to market. He was completely incentivized to be pro-vaccine. Not only did Gross not think this would make him an inappropriate subject on the matter, she didn't even seem to acknowledge the apparent conflict of interest. And on and on.
My questions about this video:
When he says in passing that the link between vaccines and autism were disproven, what does that mean?
What do you say to the theory that vaccines might not contain a dangerous level of metal in their doses alone but that some people may already have high metal levels in their body from their environment and other factors and a vaccine could push them over the threshold into toxicity?
Is it valid to be concerned that mnra vaccines, while they are not a new technology, are being administered to the public for the first time? Isn't it a scientific approach to be cautious about potential long-term effects? Is there anything wrong with the fact that we are vaccinating the control groups, i.e. erasing the controls?
What does proper vaccine testing in clinical trials even mean?
If the mrna technology was so airtight long before covid, why wasn't it used to combat other infectious diseases worldwide?
What about the broader issue that we could create a culture where showing vaccine compliance becomes mandatory for participation in society? The current covid vaccines may be acceptable in theory but there is no way to postulate about future vaccines since they don't exist. I personally find it disturbing to imagine having to get regular injections for the rest of my life. The conversation around questioning the current batch of vaccines has been too strong-handed for my taste. And I know this is as good as it's going to get since this is the first pandemic in the current era. I have to imagine that if regular injections become a new normal, it will become impossible to question in any meaningful way every new vaccine by every new company that is rolled out. This is problematic for me.
This video illustrates many of the principles and consistent factors at play in the vaccine discussion but only when they support a conclusion of vaccines being an overwhelmingly positive technology. This video does not, however, talk about other constants throughout history, including government mishandling of medical technology and a consistent m.o. of choosing to apologize (when caught) rather than ask permission (thalidomide, agent orange, nuclear weapons testing both underground on U.S. soil and in the stratosphere, meddling in the affairs of other sovereign countries).
Let's respond to some of your questions:
1) link between autism and vaccines disproven: it is. Simple. Large-scale studies on the population have shown there is no increase in the rate of autism in vaccinated vs unvaccinated individuals.
2) the amount of metal (ions) in vaccines is so low that if this were the last drop it would be dwarfed by the many other "last drops"
3) mRNA vaccines have been used in clinical trials before, with good success. We already have background levels for lots and lots of different conditions from years/decades of data, so it is not really a concern we are 'erasing' the controls, because, again, we already have that control data. We already know the general levels of, say, blood clots
4) don't know what you mean with this one
5) This is easily answered: it is expensive technology. You would only use it for severe infectious diseases which (sadly, I might say) are very prevalent in developed countries. Another obvious issue is that we already have vaccines for many infectious diseases, so just making an mRNA-based vaccine would require it to be a lot better than the old vaccines, as the former is so much more expensive than the latter, at least for now.
6) We already have such a culture for many other things. Walking around naked is in the vast majority of places culturally not acceptable. It is often even *mandatory* to wear clothes. The gliding scale you propose is in itself a gliding scale.
@@Marco-it2mr Thanks for the reply.
Regarding #1, that doesn't sound like proof in any meaningful way. A really scientific study has controls. What would be the control factor there? This is the problem with this issue, there is no ethical way to study it or create controls for vaccine trials. Also - and I don't want this to sound too harsh - but it's obnoxious that you wrote "simple." It's not, in fact, simple.
Regarding #3, I'm not sure how far back the trials go that you're referring to but I think it's safe to say that they don't go far enough back to show long-term results. So even if your point stands that the clinical trials for previous uses of mrna technology had preserved their controls, it's still not long term. But that doesn't speak to the current covid vaccines, for which there is both no long term data and for which the control group is currently being erased.
Regarding #4, I just don't understand the reasoning behind the studies. Normal scientific studies control for as many variables as possible. Whereas with these vaccine trials, people are either administered a vaccine or a placebo and then asked to go about their lives and see who catches covid. The participants control their exposure, not the people running the experiment. I would assume that many of the people who signed up for the vaccine trials were people with an already high level of anxiety about catching Covid, meaning they would be lowering exposure already. Maybe if the sample sizes are large enough, variables like this don't matter as much. But it just doesn't feel very objective to me.
Regarding #6, I realize that living in a society requires compromise. And that there is no absolute freedom for anyone. Totally on board with that. But I think we should be concerned with establishing a new paradigm because new paradigms are very hard to turn back. Think of something like income tax, for instance. It was created in 1909. Many people assume it is an idea that goes back to the founding of this country and they also assume that it's always been this way and is beyond questioning. I don't have an opinion on income tax, I'm just pointing out that there is an inertia to reversing large social systems once they've been implemented. Every year people complain about Daylight Savings Time. Nobody has changed it. Every election people complain about the Electoral College System. Nobody changes it. I feel like we are on the verge of creating a culture of permanent forced injections and it is worrisome to me.
@@danieljohnson1213
1) the controls are non-vaccinated people. They exist and in far larger numbers than you would think. It is, thus, simple.
3) there are studies from the early 2010s. But again, we can compare the current COVID-vaccinated population to the "averages" we know from the recent 'past' (which could be as late as 2019).
4) So, your suggestion would be to deliberately expose these people to the virus...which is unethical! Remember that the people themselves do not know whether they received the vaccine or the placebo, so both groups are very likely to behave similar, even if it is "similar" in their attempts to not get infected.
6) You are comparing, for lack of a better term, "peer pressure" to vaccinate to LAWS.
@@danieljohnson1213 _there is no ethical way to study it or create controls for vaccine trials_
What? Double blind clinical studies for vaccines do exist and they were applied for the COVID ones. A very close friend of mine participated in the ones for Pfizer. He didn't know if he got the vaccine or a placebo for almost a year.
Your fears are just based on misinformation.
@@Marco-it2mr 1) Those are just people in society, not participants in a study. Is that a meaningful control? Wouldn't a control be to get a fixed group of participants and then, while controlling variables such as environment, apply vaccines to some and not to others? Obviously it would be unethical to do this because what we are testing for is potential harm by either option.
Also, where is there a significant population of non-vaccinated children in the west? Even if individual numbers of non-vaccinated children add up, I would imagine they are still scattered around with too much dissimilarity between environments. Anyway, I don't want to come off as too argumentative. I'm genuinely curious about how these studies were administered and why they are considered conclusive proof.
3) That's not long term though
4) No, I'm saying that you can't do that, because it would be unethical for the same reasons that you can't study the effects of vaccines on children in an controlled environment. That's my hangup understanding how these studies prove anything by strict scientific standards. I take your point that they would all behave essentially the same in theory.
6) I'm speaking of something more substantial than peer pressure. A culture where there are penalties for not being vaccinated. You can't fly. You can't go to gyms. You don't get promoted at work. This isn't far fetched. I've already heard two stories from friends who were heavily pressured by their work supervisors to get the vaccine.
Hey, i barely passed high school biology, but let me tell you about the bleeding edge of molecular biology!
I mean, if you don’t Trust him you can just look up this stuff for yourself lmaoo but I’ll save you the time: everything he said in this video was factuaö
@@jonathansilvestri7648 youre not as clever as you think you are if you dont realise the above is a joke mimicking what anti vaxxers say
You think a guy like Dave would have barely passed biology? LOL
@@tiaan7032 i mean im not very familiar with dave haha maybe he didn't do to great in highschool biology but found a love for science later in life? idk. It just didn't sound like a joke is all LMAO
I can watch this at 2x speed and still hear you perfectly clearly 🙏
I was never anti-vaxxer. I got the COVID vaccine without fear but I still learned many things in this video. Very instuctive and easy to understand (which is important for such a subject). I was unaware of the origins of the mercury myth and the NaCl example was an excellent way to explain how the presence of a mercury atom in a compound does not equal a mercury atom by itself. I did not know that but I'm glad I do now. I immensely appreciate your work and by tackling subjects like these, you are doing the world a great service by fighting against misinformstion. Respect!
Why has this only got 42,000 views after nearly 3 months? This should be required watching for everyone.
Agreed. I guess watching Dave figuratively kick the living sh*t out of flat earthers IS more entertaining, which would explain why those have 1,200,000 plus views.
Because he is wrong about the covid gene therapy injection.
most people don't care about catching covid
@@alien4ever221fair
I send all of my medical students to your channel for basic science review. But I have to say...If you can sum up all the disinformation you've heard about vaccines in a 30 minute video, you haven't heard very many or you deserve a Nobel prize. :)
Doctor are you really a Doctor?
@@nothanksbro69 Yes, I am. Why?
@@docmike8601
Hi Doctor
You send you victims to this idiot I hope they get a better teacher next time
@@georgemoore7461
George you didn’t graduate school. Shut up.
Hey I saw what you said about mRNA vaccines, and I have a bit of a question for you. Do you believe that after the COVID stuff finally gets fully eradicated that we will switch to using only this new system to create new vaccines or do you believe there is still some merit to using the previous system? I'd like to know your thoughts.
I think it will depend on the pathogen, I'm not really aware of what would make one approach more desirable than another but I'm sure it varies, it's a good question!
Yeah, you should probably look for someone who works in the field of immunology.
The coronaviruses simply don't work for vaccinations using the same methods as other vaccines, learned by trial and error what works. So they had to find another way. Maybe comparable to what weight loss/control methods work for a person. It varies.
mRNA is a new vaccine technology that has transformed the management of infectious disease. There’s no way that the older methods can compete with the molecular precision and timelines of getting a vaccine into arms. Vaccines for influenza have been produced in fertilized chicken eggs in the past, and it’s a primitive and costly way to go. It takes billions of eggs, for one which must be set aside months prior to influenza season. Once the virus is inoculated in the eggs, all the eggs have to be harvested for virus, and all egg protein and contaminants must be purified away, and the virus inactivated. Despite this, egg proteins have sometimes been present at levels high enough to cause immune reaction in patients. mRNA is here to stay and will replace not only conventional vaccine platforms for infectious disease, but also allows for vaccines against cancer and other conditions.
@@ProfessorDaveExplains have you seen the increase in myocarditis and excess deaths, if so would you be willing to talk about it?
You should mention the difference between chemicals ingested vs injected too though. You had a good starting example with formaldehyde, especially considering that the body produces it itself, but neglected to go into detail on it. I think it’s important, as you say in your other videos, to not just plainly say something happens, but to go into detail about the process and the reason you chose it as an example in the first place.
Yeah, aluminum is a neurotoxin and has the ability to cross the blood brain barrier. Considering aluminum is used in many vaccines as the “adjuvant” and the purpose of a adjuvant being a compound that stays in the body for a long time which the antigen binds with so you have a consistent immune response for a long term. Of course, they have done studies to ascertain the toxicity of the dosage of aluminum right? The only study that has been done and cited only tested the toxicity of INGESTED aluminum in adults. They never tested injection toxicity and never did any toxicity tests with children or infants at all. If you seriously try to equate effects of ingestion and injection then you have left the bounds of a scientific conversation.
I think it would be beneficial to have graphs showing just how small the doses are instead of just giving the numbers, it's just a way for that information to hit home a little harder, and make visualization of the disparity's between the two easier.
Hey Dave, when you started making youtube videos, did you imagine in your entire life that you’d be doing this? Great vid btw.
Not at the start! But I sure am glad it turned out this way!
Must be easy not watching a single second of a video and just baselessly accusing people of plagiarism so that you can avoid challenging the lies you’ve chosen to believe.
@@deletedchannel9945 lmao, you clearly have not watched or have not understood anything said in this video. "Misinformed", you don't know how stupid that sounds coming from you.
@@deletedchannel9945 facebook posts and youtube vids > science
@@ProfessorDaveExplains you just deleted deleted channel’s argument
Was just watching an old episode of Law & Order: SVU that dealt with vaccinations. What stood out to me as odd was that the Irish Catholic Conservative Detective Stabler was supporting mandated vaccines and the Liberal Democrat Detectives Benson and Munch were arguing against mandates and how it should be up to the individual to decide. Oh how times have changed. The episode wasn't even really that old (2008).
I am a licensed gunsmith. I can tell you that stupid, and dangerous people do exist.
We need look no further than American public schools to find stupid and dangerous people with guns
I'm 5 seconds in and I already have to say, thanks for this, Dave
Thanks for the video. You have a great no nonsense way of informing people on a subject. SO much so I bought your book not once but twice and gave the second copy to my daughter to read
This guy contradicts himself over n over.
If to much of anything can be bad for you, then how did you come to the conclusion that big pharma and the CDC aren't responsible for the SPIKE in autism AFTER rolling together vaccines into ONE large dose.
The CDC was sued AND LOST that case for lying and NOT sharing all those studies they the CDC never had.
But the CDC did hire a third-party to study if they're in the right; turns out the the third-party stated in federal court that "given the heavy metals in the American diet as well as a large dose of multiple vaccines; it's HIGHLY LIKELY that it vary well COULD push children and some adults over the threshold, but further testing would be needed."
This guy is an influencer and there are MANY people IN THIS FEILD of whom have studied further then this self proclaimed professor that holds a bachelors degree in chemistry. And these many people in this medical business that he made a UA-cam topic, have come forward expressing GREAT CONCERN.
A smart person would look at all sources, listen to all points, dismiss immediately anyone who trys to shame, categories, or name calls people into believing them such as the above big pharma influencer.
Its dangerous not allowing people to make decisions for themselves and their families on matters of THEIR OWN HEALTH.
I recommend standing up for our people and discontinue any notification from this guy and just lose all his videos for what he's pushing without being objective, for categorizing folks, name calling (anti-vaxers, etc..), and misinforming as well as telling people to ridicule others for their thoughts and concerns.
He's not a good person.
Read more
1
2
Show more replies
Anthony Conigliaro
1 year ago
As a retired soldier, if we could tag our soldiers with microscopic chips to find them, we would have done it. If we can't tag soldiers, why would the medical profession be interested in tagging you?
2.3K
169
Philip Michel
1 second ago
This guy contradicts himself over n over.
If to much of anything can be bad for you, then how did you come to the conclusion that big pharma and the CDC aren't responsible for the SPIKE in autism AFTER rolling together vaccines into ONE large dose.
The CDC was sued AND LOST that case for lying and NOT sharing all those studies they the CDC never had.
But the CDC did hire a third-party to study if they're in the right; turns out the the third-party stated in federal court that "given the heavy metals in the American diet as well as a large dose of multiple vaccines; it's HIGHLY LIKELY that it vary well COULD push children and some adults over the threshold, but further testing would be needed."
This guy is an influencer and there are MANY people IN THIS FEILD of whom have studied further then this self proclaimed professor that holds a bachelors degree in chemistry. And these many people in this medical business that he made a UA-cam topic, have come forward expressing GREAT CONCERN.
A smart person would look at all sources, listen to all points, dismiss immediately anyone who trys to shame, categories, or name calls people into believing them such as the above big pharma influencer.
Its dangerous not allowing people to make decisions for themselves and their families on matters of THEIR OWN HEALTH.
I recommend standing up for our people and discontinue any notification from this guy and just lose all his videos for what he's pushing without being objective, for categorizing folks, name calling (anti-vaxers, etc..), and misinforming as well as telling people to ridicule others for their thoughts and concerns.
Why not dig in and discuss the whistle blowers, the THOUSANDS of professionals whom have "great concern" the peer reviewed studies that have numbers like "1 in 800"?!
Does anyone here know what that means?
Are you reliant on this asshole for your do diligence?
Can you really stand by as the athletes drop and tell yourself and YOUR LOVED ONES .. nothing unusual here take another jab.. ...?
He's not a good person
I don't usually condone capital punishment, but for Wakefield... I think I'd look the other way. ...who am I kidding? I'd pull the switch.
Simply one of the best rational speakers, or speaker *for* rationality I've come across. Your canny mix of pure facts with a tinge of 'bite' in your delivery, and done very clearly and succinctly is exactly how these kinds of topics should be approached I think. Plus it's just a very 'listenable' style without distracting glitz and video 'bling'. I don't mind some of that for entertainment sake, but getting down to basics in a clear and BS free way is refreshing.
Super good job on this and so many others. Thanks!
Arguing against a anti-Vaxxer is like playing chess against a pigeon. No matter how good you are, the pigeon would knock over all the pieces, poop on the box, declare him/herself the winner and fly away
As a wise man once said, "you cant win an argument against an idiot as they will deag you down to their level and beat you with experience."
As a severe asthmatic and ex molecular geneticist, I can only implore people to get the vaccine. I was lucky enough to receive my first dose this week and the worst that happened was a sore arm, with a tiny headache. Please listen to this guy and get it. People like me need you to, to protect us.
@@lydiabentley3413 Well, I had the polio vaccine many years ago and *do not* suffer from or with multiple sclerosis and this is much later in life!
@@lydiabentley3413 Let me make this clear: There is *no* link between vaccinations and ms. This is a quote from the Multiple Sclerosis Trust .
"Numerous studies have investigated a possible link between having a vaccination and later developing multiple sclerosis or another autoimmune disease. In 2018, researchers collected all the published data together on HPV (human papillomavirus vaccine) and Hepatitis B vaccine and found no association between these vaccines and MS or other autoimmune disease.
Other researchers have looked at the vaccines for influenza, MMR (Measles, mumps and rubella), polio, typhoid fever and the BCG vaccine for tuberculosis. None of these vaccines resulted in an increased risk of developing MS. The BCG vaccine may delay progression from CIS to full MS. The diphtheria and tetanus vaccinations may be associated with a decreased risk of MS." (mstrust.org.uk/a-z/vaccination-and-immunisation)
@@lauracusumano9473 From the first line of the wikipedia article: A vaccine is a biological preparation that provides active acquired immunity to a particular infectious disease.
Whatever you think a vaccine is supposed to do doesn't matter. You are not an immunologist or an epidemiologist. If you think that vaccines are some sort of scam you need to present evidence.
@@lydiabentley3413 Oh yes, Dr Buttar, a conspiracy mythologist, anti-vaccine proponent, and osteopath.
Mine are *not* beliefs.
Please have a vaccination and wear a mask. It will save a life, your life or someone you love.
@@lauracusumano9473 I am right. Can you refute it?
How about Merriam Webster?
www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/attenuated
The fact is that you have a preconception that doesn't fit reality. I am sorry but reality isn't going to change just because you don't understand it.
Yeah, maybe it was like a really REALLY good thing we got rid of smallpox? That is not how i want myself or others to die
It was also great how we found a literal cure for rabies.
THANK YOU!!! I’ve know far too many people who need to see this!
Just got the COVID vaccine today. No problems whatsoever.
The government loves you.
Yes dave. Thanks alot! I was self wondering how could this vaccine come up so quickly. Have to say, that this made me a bit skeptic. But now i know it and it gives additional security. Its just really bad, that the vaccine production cant hold up to the need. In our 15000 soul town, we had after waiting for several weeks, 20 vaccines. Now we have to wait another 3 weeks until more comes up. Its just terrible how slow this all goes.
A good analogy I saw was that normally, vaccine production is like trying to drive across a busy city in the height of the rush hour. Covid vaccines are like the local council banning all other traffic and you being given a police escort through the city. In a sports car.
There are three more companies about to get the green light to produce so hopefully things will be very different by the summer. Fingers crossed!
It is hardly suprising that vaccine production is taking some time to ramp up and that there are some initial teething problems. Actually it is impressive just how efficient the whole process has been. Likely there will be adequate vaccines for everyone, in western countries by spring. The rest of the world will have to wait a bit longer, but governments are stepping up to plate for that too.
CH you like in a town of 15k people? Damn that's a ghost town.
@@nothanksbro69 maybe, but for us in Switzerland thats not small, but also not big... The hole country haves only 8Million people so...
Thanks for the nice content, Dave! Found you yesterday and happy about it)
This guy contradicts himself over n over.
If to much of anything can be bad for you, then how did you come to the conclusion that big pharma and the CDC aren't responsible for the SPIKE in autism AFTER rolling together vaccines into ONE large dose.
The CDC was sued AND LOST that case for lying and NOT sharing all those studies they the CDC never had.
But the CDC did hire a third-party to study if they're in the right; turns out the the third-party stated in federal court that "given the heavy metals in the American diet as well as a large dose of multiple vaccines; it's HIGHLY LIKELY that it vary well COULD push children and some adults over the threshold, but further testing would be needed."
This guy is an influencer and there are MANY people IN THIS FEILD of whom have studied further then this self proclaimed professor that holds a bachelors degree in chemistry. And these many people in this medical business that he made a UA-cam topic, have come forward expressing GREAT CONCERN.
A smart person would look at all sources, listen to all points, dismiss immediately anyone who trys to shame, categories, or name calls people into believing them such as the above big pharma influencer.
Its dangerous not allowing people to make decisions for themselves and their families on matters of THEIR OWN HEALTH.
I recommend standing up for our people and discontinue any notification from this guy and just lose all his videos for what he's pushing without being objective, for categorizing folks, name calling (anti-vaxers, etc..), and misinforming as well as telling people to ridicule others for their thoughts and concerns.
He's not a good person.
Read more
1
2
Show more replies
Anthony Conigliaro
1 year ago
As a retired soldier, if we could tag our soldiers with microscopic chips to find them, we would have done it. If we can't tag soldiers, why would the medical profession be interested in tagging you?
2.3K
169
Philip Michel
1 second ago
This guy contradicts himself over n over.
If to much of anything can be bad for you, then how did you come to the conclusion that big pharma and the CDC aren't responsible for the SPIKE in autism AFTER rolling together vaccines into ONE large dose.
The CDC was sued AND LOST that case for lying and NOT sharing all those studies they the CDC never had.
But the CDC did hire a third-party to study if they're in the right; turns out the the third-party stated in federal court that "given the heavy metals in the American diet as well as a large dose of multiple vaccines; it's HIGHLY LIKELY that it vary well COULD push children and some adults over the threshold, but further testing would be needed."
This guy is an influencer and there are MANY people IN THIS FEILD of whom have studied further then this self proclaimed professor that holds a bachelors degree in chemistry. And these many people in this medical business that he made a UA-cam topic, have come forward expressing GREAT CONCERN.
A smart person would look at all sources, listen to all points, dismiss immediately anyone who trys to shame, categories, or name calls people into believing them such as the above big pharma influencer.
Its dangerous not allowing people to make decisions for themselves and their families on matters of THEIR OWN HEALTH.
I recommend standing up for our people and discontinue any notification from this guy and just lose all his videos for what he's pushing without being objective, for categorizing folks, name calling (anti-vaxers, etc..), and misinforming as well as telling people to ridicule others for their thoughts and concerns.
Why not dig in and discuss the whistle blowers, the THOUSANDS of professionals whom have "great concern" the peer reviewed studies that have numbers like "1 in 800"?!
Does anyone here know what that means?
Are you reliant on this asshole for your do diligence?
Can you really stand by as the athletes drop and tell yourself and YOUR LOVED ONES .. nothing unusual here take another jab.. ...?
He's not a good person
Reminds me of all the people that freak out because I'll eat apple cores.
Most people will say 'they have cyanide' to which I say 'I'll die from eating too many apples before I die from cyanide poisoning from apple seeds.'
Don't forget bananas. If you eat 10k of them in an hour, you'll die of radiation poisoning! :D
same thing for people that say fluoride is toxic. you'll die from just the water long before fluoride ever has a negative effect.
You are a fantastic content creator! I always walk away from your videos with a greater understanding. Thank you.
The "viruses exist but don't cause disease" idea reminds me of "CO2 is real, but doesn't affect the climate" which is said by some climate change deniers.
it's the same mentality, so no surprise it seems familiar.
@Robbierobot574 I've also seen talk of "green energy is to blame!" despite all forms of power being affected...
"Researchers at the Wellcome Sanger Institute and EMBL's European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI) have identified over 140,000 viral species living in the human gut, more than half of which have never been seen before.
The paper, published today (18 February 2021) in Cell, contains an analysis of over 28,000 gut microbiome samples collected in different parts of the world. The number and diversity of the viruses the researchers found was surprisingly high, and the data opens up new research avenues for understanding how viruses living in the gut affect human health."
www.google.com/amp/s/www.technologynetworks.com/immunology/news/amp/140000-virus-species-found-in-the-human-gut-345766
Sorry to say, but Dave is just as clueless as his UA-cam audience
@@thor4164 What does this have to do with what Dave said? Did you read the article you linked?
@@keisi1574 The article you've linked does indeed prove that microorganisms are essential to our existence. No one here is disputing that though. The difference is that there are still certain bacteria and viruses that are infectious and dangerous, not the kind you want as part of a healthy gut microbiome. Those are what are important to immunize against.
I really appreciate the concise point by point way you explain the different aspects of what has needlessly become a controversial topic.
My own personal experience has made me a vaccine advocate. When I was young there was a very real chance of catching one of the highly contagious diseases that had killed people for centuries.
One of my friends had polio, another diphtheria and both of my parents had tuberculosis. Thus we regarded vaccines as a blessing and got our jabs in school.
Out of the hundreds I knew who got multiple vaccinations over the years none suffered any serious side effects and these deadly diseases have been largely wiped out.
I also find it ironic that anti-vaxers use technology developed through science to denigrate science while having no knowledge about science.
Your final comment is poetic. May I quote you?
@@carolbilyeu6418 You sure can.
Morn'n Dave. You have no idea how fucked up things in TX have been for the last 5 days....Finally have had an entire day of power here....
With the molecule argument (from antivaxxers), water itself should be flamable on its own because it has oxigen
It's a wonder they don't include charcoal, the "lead" in pencils, or diamonds, in their diets. It's carbon, after all. All of our food consists of molecules made with carbon. 🙃
@@berniethekiwidragon4382 Indeed! Also, I wonder why they keep consuming salt in one way or another. They are, after all, expert chemists, and they should know sodium is highly reactive, and chlorine is extremely toxic 🤔
If every compound that had hydrogen acted like Hydrogen water would be flammable
If water was suddenly flammable it wouldnt take 5 minutes for someone to light the oceans on fire lol
Hey Dave, great video! I love what you're saying but one thing I can't seem to get real clarification on is the natural immunity vs. the Vaccine? I don't ever get flu shots & I don't get the flu. I have all of my vaccinations from childhood & I'm in no way anti-vax but if you've already had the virus or even multiple strains of it do you already have all of the protection the vaccine will offer? Just curious because I've had different medical professionals give me two different responses. Thanks!
If you ask a vaxx pusher they will tell you to get the vaxx. If you ask me i will say no vaxx. Its your right to do either. Natural herd immunity has been know way before vaxxes. Big pharma stole the term herd immunity and attached it to their product aka vaxxes.
Here's va fun fact: *YOU ARE NOT WORTH MICROCHIPPING*
You know you've been humiliated when the government doesn't even want to mind control you
@@stylesrj If I didn't hate everyone I'd like you.
But I've heard that the lizard people overlords have to know when we go get groceries as part of their world domination plan.
@@NinjaMonkeyPrime They only care if you buy eggplants.
I hate eggplants.
Some random guy: VacCiNes HaVe TraCKeRs
Me: Man, have you even looked at your phones?
@@goos8841 Facebook collects data, google eveen more... everything with amazon... also... well yeah
I was born much too late to have been vaccinated for Smallpox. I will still get emotional any time that I hear someone talk about it in the past tense, it really shows what humanity can do when we decide to work together on something. I hope that we can get that sort of attitude for Climate Change and truly universal health care sooner rather than later.
So how does this differe from monoclonal antibody treatment and is this efficacy greater in one of the other ?
Hey Dave and greetings from healthcare industry. I absolutely love your videos and this one as well was spot on. Yet I want to raise two talking points of this video, and would love your opinions on them.
1) Back in the 2020 when I sat on the medical info conserning the J&J co.'s Pfizer vaccine that was appointed to the medical professionals by our corresponding agency to FDA, the info was very specific about the issue of the mRNA vaccine not giving protection for the infection per se but instead against the severe form of the infection. The info also included the fact that taking the mRNA vaccination will not stop you from spreading the virus potentially. Later we've seen the jab work in practice having had a +95 % national coverage with two shots not doing the trick and with over 80 % coverage with the third shot still not helping to gain herd immunity. Therefore the only gain with the new vaccines seems to be on personal level if even that.
2) As a healthcare professional, yet not a microbiologists, there are concerns about the autoimmune system failures. The original vaccines do work exactly as you described but the mRNA vaccines bring up the questions about the body's own cells working their way into making alien protein into the bloodstream. In the autoimmune diseases the body's own immune system attacks the body's own tissues by failing to recognize the tissue correctly - to put it very simply. There have been cases where the mRNA vaccines have caused such incidents where there was no other explaining factor found. Admittedly, there is a personal pick on this one, as I had to be fighting against "the system" for my spouse who got nephritis interstitialis due to the first jab (got confirmed later in the special healthcare after months of fighting). While having to dive into the matter and "specialize" in the kidney diseases (while it's rather far form my own field of work), I found out that there were others as well and similar rare tissue inflammation patients that had had them from the jab.
To conclude this message I want to stress that I most definitely am on the side of science and I would be working on a whole other field of expertise should the medical science be dismissed in the history, but there are some issues concerning the newest vaccines that we aren't too ready to speak of in very definite sense yet.
No answer yet, professor hehe
What could he say? “Sorry, I didn’t get this one right”, he’s not gonna do that !
To answer the biology side of things
For part 2: simplified - A cell has genetic material (DNA) and has mechanisms to express genes in the DNA that code for different kinds of proteins (called protein synthesis, we can go from DNA to mRNA to protein).
Again simplified - a virus is composed of genetic material (either DNA or RNA depending on the virus) encapsulated by an envelope made of lipids and structural proteins. A virus works by going into a cell and using the host cell's own mechanisms to read it's genetic material to make more of itself synthesizing the virus's proteins and by replicating the its genetic material. The more of itself it can make, the more rapidly it can spread to other cells. As our cells are creating the structural proteins, some of them are presented on the surface of the cell, these proteins are called antigens. Our immune system can recognize that as foreign and create antibodies.
The mRNA vaccine isolates the genetic material to only the part that codes for the structural proteins (i.e. the part that our immune system can recognize and make antibodies) but not the rest of the virus so it can't spread.
So either way, the body's own cell mechanisms are being used.
Part 1: Vaccines themselves aren't fighting the infection, they are triggering our own immune system to create antibodies so we can have a faster response if we were to encounter the same antigens again.
@@MmEbady Thank you for explaining the very basics that I already know. The issue on mRNA vaccines is that they don't work the same way as the regular vaccines do. So you may disregard that entirely. Since original post, there's come variety of studies which you can check from Google Scholar for example. Start by applying "covid vaccine nephritis". You will find heaps.
@@smhkd90 And I explained how the mRNA vaccine works using the same mechanisms as a virus does and by logic (and if you already know all this) the same mechanisms as a regular vaccine with dead or weakened virus. So, our own cells are making "alien proteins" in all cases.
Thanks for the google suggestions, it would be better to get information from experts in the field such as immunologists rather than youtube. But from my limited research, autoimmune adverse events following immunization occurs with other vaccines and aren’t just limited to mRNA vaccines. Some explanations are that it can be from immune response or from adjuvants in the vaccine. Since the COVID virus is also associated with nephritis, it’s most likely from immune response. Good luck on your search for an answer! Hopefully further research can make future vaccines with less side effects.
Mahroum, N., Lavine, N., Ohayon, A., Seida, R., Alwani, A., Alrais, M., ... & Bragazzi, N. L. (2022). COVID-19 vaccination and the rate of immune and autoimmune adverse events following immunization: insights from a narrative literature review. Frontiers in immunology, 13, 872683.
Seida, I., Alrais, M., Seida, R., Alwani, A., Kiyak, Z., Elsalti, A., ... & Mahroum, N. (2023). Autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA): past, present, and future implications. Clinical and experimental immunology, 213(1), 87-101.
Ng, J. H., Zaidan, M., Jhaveri, K. D., & Izzedine, H. (2021). Acute tubulointerstitial nephritis and COVID-19. Clinical Kidney Journal, 14(10), 2151-2157.
Klomjit N, Zand L, Cornell LD, Alexander MP. COVID-19 and Glomerular Diseases. Kidney Int Rep. 2023 Jun;8(6):1137-1150. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.03.016. Epub 2023 Mar 27. PMID: 37274308; PMCID: PMC10041821.
Bouquegneau, Antoine; Erpicum, Pauline; Grosch, Stéphanie; Habran, Lionel; Hougrand, Olivier; Huart, Justine; Krzesinski, Jean-Marie; Misset, Benoît; Hayette, Marie-Pierre; Delvenne, Philippe; Bovy, Christophe; Kylies, Dominik; Huber, Tobias B.; Puelles, Victor G.; Delanaye, Pierre; Jouret, Francois. COVID-19-associated Nephropathy Includes Tubular Necrosis and Capillary Congestion, with Evidence of SARS-CoV-2 in the Nephron. Kidney360 2(4):p 639-652, April 2021.
I posted a link to this video on Facebook and it was removed as misinformation.
One of the best pieces of real information that exists.
Bruhmoment moms on Facebook be like: everything on Facebook is true, except the things that I think are fake
I have autism and this makes me see red. Autism is by definition is "neuro diverisity" which TLDR means basically you think differently. EVERYONE is on this spectrum, people with autism are just higher on said spectrum. If there was any drug that affected autism, I would have taken it already. The only drugs that affect the brian which is not the way people think, are addictive drugs and neurological poisons. Neuro poisons/venom attack the brain/nervous system and cause it to feel so much pain that you die or causes paralysis. You already know what addictive drugs do so I don't need to explain this. The only known treatment for autism is therapy and attention from loved ones. I am glad you have made this video to show people how absurd these claims are. Thank you very much.
I’m on the spectrum too and these claims about vaccines causing autism make my blood boil. They’re implying that autism is worse than polio or measles, which is messed up.
I'm sorry to hear how this bothers you. I've read a few comments from others and it's really horrible to hear how this has affected some.
@@northernskies86 "They’re implying that autism is worse than polio or measles"
Some of them go further, and outright state that DEAD is better than on-the-spectrum.
As I am on the spectrum, too, I can't help but take that kinda personally...
Here's the fun part: some of these ppl pay me thousands of $ to help their kids score better on their LSAT... ie, to think *more as I do*.
Aspies have a higher need for GABA production and also need better fuel for the brain due to increased amount of neural connections. Common neurotypical diets do not contain enough "energy" to support the increased connections. Apsie brains are literally being starved due to incorrect diets which will increase the severity of the symptoms. Try following a Keto diet, fat is a better fuel for the brain and take l-glutamine to help increase GABA production, you can also eat various foods to help GABA as well.
Note: The above suggestions is based on white papers and studies I have read. Gotta love our hyper focus. ;)
Anyways the above has helped me lower the severity of the symptoms.
You are not autistic we dont need therapy or treatment because there is nothing wrong with us and what you just said is right out of the autism speaks handbook. 2.Thats the other lie aswell of everybodies on the spectrum theyre not our brains are significantly different to a neurotypical person and our dna is different aswell.|What the genesists call autistic genes .
I am fully vaccinated and have had faith in vaccines for a long time. For me it can be hard to blame many who are terrified because I was also ignorant to many of these concepts regardless of my willingness to vaccinate. Misinformation is a terrible thing, and further misinformation based on fear is sadly also a terrible thing. Thank you Dave for being more educated than I, and for putting into words what I cannot. Ignorance is only temporary if you are just willing to learn.
@@owlristocrat1151, arrogance in the sense of they think they know everything, arrogance in the sense that they are biased and unwilling to accept information, or arrogance in the sense of they know they are wrong but hold their position anyways?
@@Deltamedic68w Any could work.
No need for faith when we know they work.
@@owlristocrat1151 And yet here we are, states with low vax rates have fared the same or better than those with high vax rates (also with far fewer draconian laws and lockdowns). People getting 3 or 4 covid shots, thinking they are somehow making society a better place. Let me guess, you were one of those "if it saves one life" people yet you are also cheering on the U.S. getting involved in the war in Ukraine?
@ckots have you come across some new information? I’m not exactly sure where you are taking this question. I’m unaware of any hubris in my comment since I admired ignorance.
Hey Dave, love your videos on debunking pseudoscience (like this one)! Have you ever done any research on chiropractic? I did some looking into it about 20 years ago, in college, and concluded it was complete pseudoscience, but I keep hearing about it every so often from people in real life or even videos on YT. Just curious. I'm sure it's still bunk, but would be nice to know if there have been any critical developments either way since I first looked into it. Keep up the great work!
I wouldn't go so far as to say that the entire field of chiropractics is pseudoscience, but the field is overflowing with charlatans. It may be a good topic to tackle delicately at some point.
@@FreddieFignewton & who doesn't think EVERY possible ailment can be cured by adjusting your spine...
@@jdmforever5583 nope. Someone told you that on the internet and you believed them. Be harder to trick, sweetie.
In Asia many people wear masks voluntarily when they are feeling sick, because they care about each other that much - and some people now, during a global pandemic, are refusing to wear a mask, then blame the virus on the Chinese although they are most likely producing and spreading the virus themselves.
That's assuming the Coronavirus even exists, but you do you.
@@henryford2950 ⬆️⬆️malaka
@@henryford2950 better take a look in the mirror to see if you exist, pinhead
@@gerdsfargen6687 Nice try.
This guy contradicts himself over n over.
If to much of anything can be bad for you, then how did you come to the conclusion that big pharma and the CDC aren't responsible for the SPIKE in autism AFTER rolling together vaccines into ONE large dose.
The CDC was sued AND LOST that case for lying and NOT sharing all those studies they the CDC never had.
But the CDC did hire a third-party to study if they're in the right; turns out the the third-party stated in federal court that "given the heavy metals in the American diet as well as a large dose of multiple vaccines; it's HIGHLY LIKELY that it vary well COULD push children and some adults over the threshold, but further testing would be needed."
This guy is an influencer and there are MANY people IN THIS FEILD of whom have studied further then this self proclaimed professor that holds a bachelors degree in chemistry. And these many people in this medical business that he made a UA-cam topic, have come forward expressing GREAT CONCERN.
A smart person would look at all sources, listen to all points, dismiss immediately anyone who trys to shame, categories, or name calls people into believing them such as the above big pharma influencer.
Its dangerous not allowing people to make decisions for themselves and their families on matters of THEIR OWN HEALTH.
I recommend standing up for our people and discontinue any notification from this guy and just lose all his videos for what he's pushing without being objective, for categorizing folks, name calling (anti-vaxers, etc..), and misinforming as well as telling people to ridicule others for their thoughts and concerns.
He's not a good person.
Read more
1
2
Show more replies
Anthony Conigliaro
1 year ago
As a retired soldier, if we could tag our soldiers with microscopic chips to find them, we would have done it. If we can't tag soldiers, why would the medical profession be interested in tagging you?
2.3K
169
Philip Michel
1 second ago
This guy contradicts himself over n over.
If to much of anything can be bad for you, then how did you come to the conclusion that big pharma and the CDC aren't responsible for the SPIKE in autism AFTER rolling together vaccines into ONE large dose.
The CDC was sued AND LOST that case for lying and NOT sharing all those studies they the CDC never had.
But the CDC did hire a third-party to study if they're in the right; turns out the the third-party stated in federal court that "given the heavy metals in the American diet as well as a large dose of multiple vaccines; it's HIGHLY LIKELY that it vary well COULD push children and some adults over the threshold, but further testing would be needed."
This guy is an influencer and there are MANY people IN THIS FEILD of whom have studied further then this self proclaimed professor that holds a bachelors degree in chemistry. And these many people in this medical business that he made a UA-cam topic, have come forward expressing GREAT CONCERN.
A smart person would look at all sources, listen to all points, dismiss immediately anyone who trys to shame, categories, or name calls people into believing them such as the above big pharma influencer.
Its dangerous not allowing people to make decisions for themselves and their families on matters of THEIR OWN HEALTH.
I recommend standing up for our people and discontinue any notification from this guy and just lose all his videos for what he's pushing without being objective, for categorizing folks, name calling (anti-vaxers, etc..), and misinforming as well as telling people to ridicule others for their thoughts and concerns.
Why not dig in and discuss the whistle blowers, the THOUSANDS of professionals whom have "great concern" the peer reviewed studies that have numbers like "1 in 800"?!
Does anyone here know what that means?
Are you reliant on this asshole for your do diligence?
Can you really stand by as the athletes drop and tell yourself and YOUR LOVED ONES .. nothing unusual here take another jab.. ...?
He's not a good person
This video was a large help. Thanks for uploading.
K so vaccines are fine. This is obvious, but why is no one protesting the use of dihydrogen monoxide. The stuff is everywhere in our lives
I know. I done studies on it, and found that it’s even in our water!
@@ejstudios6916 wait really. This is madness. Were We're screwed
For those who don’t get it...
Dihydrogen monoxide IS water
It’s even in the oceans too. The poor sea creatures!
The protected need to be protected from the unprotected by forcing the unprotected to use the protection that didn't protect the protected.
Elementary, my dear Watson.
What the fuck are you talking about, sherlock.
Hello Professor Dave. Thank you for your continued educational videos. I have a 30 year friendship at risk over my friend’s CoVID vaccine hesitancy. She’s gone deep into misinformation territory and it’s turned into such a Gordian knot I am at a loss as to how to help her.
Showing your video to her, I know she will ask one question: “Why should I trust a UA-cam “professor” (yes, she would type it in quotes), over Dr Robert Malone the inventor of mRNA when he says it’s dangerous?” Yes, I know Robert Malone is a self-proclaimed inventor and basically the “Andrew Wakefield” of mRNA, but that is the question she will throw at me, and I’m still not sure how to answer her. Any recommendations?
Tell her I'm not saying anything that isn't well understood by the scientific community. Also if she thinks Malone "invented mRNA", she's bonkers, and needs to learn basic biochemistry. She also needs to stop trusting unhinged iconoclasts. People are liars. Malone is one of them.
Even being charitable, to say Malone invented mRNA vaccines is akin to saying Ben Franklin invented the lightbulb.
@@Ravaxr But does Malone understand mRNA vaccines better than say, a UA-cam Professer?
@@joshualawson7604 It's more important to ask if he is being honest about it.
My advice is stop pushing your vaxx religion on to your friend.
Excellent summary : could make a useful part of the medical School curriculum. Though it is a pity I still can't receive Radio One on my vaccine site, even after 2 injections of micro-battery after the micro-receiver injection....
My understanding is that the "gut feeling" that vaccines caused autism was due in large part to the temporal proximity of vaccinations and the onset of recognizeable autism symptoms. From what I understand about autism, children don't start exhibiting obvious signs of autism until they about 2-3 years old. This is when they start walking, talking, and performing other motor and intellectual tasks that autistic children have trouble learning. The administration of some of the major childhood vaccinations (such as polio, TDAP boosters, and hepatitis) are done during this same time period. So parents would get the vaccines, then in the following months, start noticing that their child is is having trouble learning to walk, talk, etc., and since the vaccination was a "major medical procedure" that happened recently, they assume the two are linked. When in reality, the child was already autistic (from birth), and would have started developing noticeable symptoms at that time regardless of vaccinations.
Hit the nail on the head.
As a microbiologist, the countless anti-vaccine "arguments" over the last two years have been infuriating at bare minimum
Legend! im just a painter . thank you for wat yal do !
@@HomeschoolingDepot1 It took all of 30 seconds to refute both of these quotes.
Horowitz is a dentist, not a medical doctor. He has as much authority to comment on vaccines as I do to comment on cell biology or physics. Furthermore, his published books include such gems as "Healing Celebrations", which discusses healing using scripture. Religious mythology is as toxic to science as misinformation, and should remain separate.
As for Shannon, this one was really easy. The quote you provided is commonly incorrectly used. A PDF of his original paper shows that the quote is incomplete and has been cherry picked in a way that, without context, gives the illusion of supporting anti-vax narrative.
Quoting those with self-proclaimed authority and quoting those out of context are among the only weapons the anti-vax community has. Science doesn't lie. Vaccines save lives. There is absolutely no debate on this topic.
@@aposey89 science can be misrepresented, but it's not very good at promoting science, so misrepresentations aren't often talked about, like the guy in this video that didn't like the MMR vax when he had a vax to sell himself.
The problems are the adjuvants, usually. This new jab is still in trial phase. I don't take crap that isn't disclosed. I am not so trusting. Watch WEF's Fourth Industrial Revolution for some reasons why. I also watched some chick take the jab on camera and drop after a few minutes. She's been scrubbed and settled.
Reading all the comments on these videos... I'm just now realizing how truly ignorant most of the population seems to be. I thought this stuff was mostly just common knowledge... I mean I do have an educational background in this, but I knew all of this stuff long before college.
@@siLence-84 I’m 13. I thought my generation was really stupid. It is. But anti-vaxxers really are closer to the intelligence of dust than all living life. Misinformation is rampant because of people’s tendency to blame and reject in times of fear. I want to know exactly his many people are like this and say that our human population is the current one minus all those idiots.
Finally, another person who knows the actual singular of "bacteria." Not even the Plague Inc devs seem to know that.
Dave, I would love to hear your thoughts on the origin of COVID without politics involved. I can’t seem to find any explanation without some type of politics involved.
Zoonotic origin is still extremely likely, though accidental lab leak can’t be ignored as a possibility.
Try searching for peer reviewed studies.
YES! THANK YOU SO MUCH PROFESSOR DAVE!!!!!
kudos for making this, this should be aired on all national televisions before news...
This guy contradicts himself over n over.
If to much of anything can be bad for you, then how did you come to the conclusion that big pharma and the CDC aren't responsible for the SPIKE in autism AFTER rolling together vaccines into ONE large dose.
The CDC was sued AND LOST that case for lying and NOT sharing all those studies they the CDC never had.
But the CDC did hire a third-party to study if they're in the right; turns out the the third-party stated in federal court that "given the heavy metals in the American diet as well as a large dose of multiple vaccines; it's HIGHLY LIKELY that it vary well COULD push children and some adults over the threshold, but further testing would be needed."
This guy is an influencer and there are MANY people IN THIS FEILD of whom have studied further then this self proclaimed professor that holds a bachelors degree in chemistry. And these many people in this medical business that he made a UA-cam topic, have come forward expressing GREAT CONCERN.
A smart person would look at all sources, listen to all points, dismiss immediately anyone who trys to shame, categories, or name calls people into believing them such as the above big pharma influencer.
Its dangerous not allowing people to make decisions for themselves and their families on matters of THEIR OWN HEALTH.
I recommend standing up for our people and discontinue any notification from this guy and just lose all his videos for what he's pushing without being objective, for categorizing folks, name calling (anti-vaxers, etc..), and misinforming as well as telling people to ridicule others for their thoughts and concerns.
He's not a good person.
Read more
1
2
Show more replies
Anthony Conigliaro
1 year ago
As a retired soldier, if we could tag our soldiers with microscopic chips to find them, we would have done it. If we can't tag soldiers, why would the medical profession be interested in tagging you?
2.3K
169
Philip Michel
1 second ago
This guy contradicts himself over n over.
If to much of anything can be bad for you, then how did you come to the conclusion that big pharma and the CDC aren't responsible for the SPIKE in autism AFTER rolling together vaccines into ONE large dose.
The CDC was sued AND LOST that case for lying and NOT sharing all those studies they the CDC never had.
But the CDC did hire a third-party to study if they're in the right; turns out the the third-party stated in federal court that "given the heavy metals in the American diet as well as a large dose of multiple vaccines; it's HIGHLY LIKELY that it vary well COULD push children and some adults over the threshold, but further testing would be needed."
This guy is an influencer and there are MANY people IN THIS FEILD of whom have studied further then this self proclaimed professor that holds a bachelors degree in chemistry. And these many people in this medical business that he made a UA-cam topic, have come forward expressing GREAT CONCERN.
A smart person would look at all sources, listen to all points, dismiss immediately anyone who trys to shame, categories, or name calls people into believing them such as the above big pharma influencer.
Its dangerous not allowing people to make decisions for themselves and their families on matters of THEIR OWN HEALTH.
I recommend standing up for our people and discontinue any notification from this guy and just lose all his videos for what he's pushing without being objective, for categorizing folks, name calling (anti-vaxers, etc..), and misinforming as well as telling people to ridicule others for their thoughts and concerns.
Why not dig in and discuss the whistle blowers, the THOUSANDS of professionals whom have "great concern" the peer reviewed studies that have numbers like "1 in 800"?!
Does anyone here know what that means?
Are you reliant on this asshole for your do diligence?
Can you really stand by as the athletes drop and tell yourself and YOUR LOVED ONES .. nothing unusual here take another jab.. ...?
He's not a good person
There are not enough professor Daves in the world.
Ty for this. Especially the mrna part.
Prof Dave, is it possible for you to add timestamps/chapters to this video?
Always been pro vax, but seeing how you presented the mRNA vaccine is definitely changing my mind because I was skeptical about the vaccine. I also notice the error I had on the virus and the mask. Not realizing that it’s main transmission was via water droplets (which now I remember seeing but my anti establishment bias probably got in the way of that). What I also didn’t know was how much red tape was removed and now I understand why the vaccine came out so fast. I guess once could argue that the red tape was removed so they can inject microchips in us much faster but even I think that’s a silly argument. One thing I don’t understand is why we need a second dose?
One dose isn't producing enough immunity. So they tried two doses and results were that it gave stronger immunity. It's essentially like what a booster does but it's a primary
We need a second dose because of waning immunity, your body doesn’t hold on to every pathogen it comes across if it only comes across it once, so getting a booster is like your body saying “oh, this happened again, alright I’ll take this seriously”
@@natethegreatest1000 great way to describe it
@@dvmas thanks!!
most shots require extra doses
My wife just got her 2nd vaccine. I am still on a waiting list. Hope all will be back to normal soon.
Hope so
The world is about to go to war. The world is never going back normal my friend.
@@davevaval9876 Your comment aged well.
And now we are being threatened with nukes. That's scary
Thank you for making this video. I definitely had concerns that this alleviated.
7:59
My brother almost died of appendicitis, and I would LOVE to have that man look my brother in the eye and try to tell him that he was just constipated.
As soon as you mentioned toxicity and amounts, my first thought was "water". I remember it was used to torture and kill people that way before.
@@deletedchannel9945 please cite your sources, or, let me guess, it's just something you read on facebook? Jackass.
@@deletedchannel9945 nope, there's a reason your account doesn't exist anymore. I'll give you a hint, it's not because you were in the right.
@@deletedchannel9945 "all the science proved it" lol what a moron.
Settle down, Neo. You must conserve your body's finite energy.
@@deletedchannel9945 what doctor gives a child more then 50 vaccines at one appointment? That’s the only way you could be poisoned by vaccines. And that’s the minimum amount.
Thank you so much for yet another awesome video Professor Dave! Can you please, please enable additional subtitles so I can translate and share it with some people who don't speak English?
Unfortunately UA-cam got rid of that function, but if you email me a word doc I'll upload it manually.
@@ProfessorDaveExplains Thank you so much, I should be able to give it to you by the end of the week
@@guff9567 sorry, but you can't play Fallout irl :/
Very, I mean very good compression of the vaxing case. Thanx a lot. Learned a lot and got a little tool now for discussion at home.
hey Dave could you make videos about the science of nutrition? there is plenty of misinformation about nutrition on the internet. i wanna learn what the science says. what is the healthiest diet?
There will be an entire nutrition series at some point!
Unprocessed plant based is best. Just make sure you hit all of your caloric needs and essential nutrient scores. A simple step in the right direction would be to switch out dairy milk with an unsweetened plant based. Experiment. See which ones you like.
@@joeylafrond2472 i ate whole-food plant-based for 2.5 years, following dr Greger's daily dozen. at first i felt good but by the end of it i developed severe burning sensations to the head and neck, as well as tinnitus. i did supplement with b12, as Greger recommends. The symptoms i mentioned gradually went away as i reintroduced animal products into my diet.
@@HakuCell Check out Mikaela Peterson's Lion Diet debate at Oxford from a few weeks ago. In a nutshell she sums up how an all meat diet cured her of all the ailments that haunted her throughout her life, as she had many autoimmune and mental health disorders. She claims they tested it on a larger population and apparently there was huge benefits, like people with type 2 diabetes getting off their insulin. Meat is the only form of sustenance that you can survive on solely, is another claim. I personally don't know much about it.
If nothing else it's fascinating, and personally I want to try it and see if there's an impact on my ADHD focusing issues, depression, and anxiety. Besto luck.
I also suggest eating no more than 2000 calories a day to stay healthy. Although if your health is seriously in a bad shape go to 1500 to 1000 calories
I have a sister who got Guillain Barre syndrome back in 2015. My mother and I had very different views on vaccines from that point on, she was a firm believer in “Vaccines bad!” while I was “Vaccines are very helpful but every medication has side effects!” I feel very sorry for my sister as the disease will effect her until she’s 52 and that’s only if she gets treatment every 3 weeks. I just want to say, Thank you Dave. I can’t show this to my mother as I don’t want to be disowned from my family but this video has probably helped so many and I have more knowledge than ever before on this subject.
he may have also helped many to become injured , disabled or dead , just check out VAERS for the numbers its horrific .
@@pdevine999 Mate, do you think I don’t know that? Of course those things happen! I have a family member who that happened to! But you must remember, if we didn’t have vaccines a lot of our planet would still be plagued by diseases we could easily die from because of our lack of immunity to them. Those people who are affected badly by vaccines, they are a small minority. Of course I feel so sorry for those people but just because some are affected badly doesn’t mean we shouldn’t vaccinate at all. Well some vegetables contain chemical compounds that increase chance of kidney stones, so I guess we should just stop eating vegetables! How about soda or fast food? They cause obesity. So I guess we should just ban them.
Yeah if my family member was injured there’s no way I wouldn’t believe them
@@pdevine999 VAERS numbers are horrific? Glad you live in the current century.
imagine being disowned because you were right
This was great (just like your other videos). I just ordered your book and can not wait to read it! Hurry up March 30th.
The shout-out to Yugoslavia was a welcome one.
Dave how much time do you spend reading and replying to comments? It's quite fascinating 😅
absolute chad
If you are looking for ideas on more videos, maybe explaining the AZ and J&J vaccines and pauses for blood clots?
As always, your work is educational, thanks!
The most common comment I hear is...
You don’t know the long term effects!
What would the response to this be?
is it as bad as death? Then don't worry.
Is there any good reason to think there will be long term effects?
They deny the dangers of COVID-19 ("It only attacks the elders and people with preexisting conditions!"). The vaccine will be made of just _parts_ of COVID (eg RNA of COVID), since according to them COVID-19 isn't dangerous, neither is the vaccine.
The long term effects of what? The mRNA vaccine? The mRNA degrades and is eliminated by the body after a few days. We can check for this. Everything else in the vaccine has been used in other vaccines for decades. The only long term effects we don't know about are how long it will be effective for combating Covid-19, and the vanishingly small chance that the vaccine will provoke an immune response to non-covid organisms that use a similar spike protein. This would only be a problem if the non-covid organisms were beneficial to humans, but this is why they have clinical trials. To weed out such issues. Since the immune response only takes at most a couple weeks to completely destroy an organism in the body, any major effects from accidentally killing beneficial bacteria would have been discovered by phase 3 trials at the latest. I just got the moderna shot, and the only thing negative effect so far has been a sore arm for a couple days. I've heard some people develop a low grade fever and other flu like symptoms. These are intentional. They are the vaccine provoking an immune response.
Ask them to name one vaccine that we administer today that has ever caused widespread, long term effects. Imma give you a hint, there aren’t any. However the long term effects from covid-19 are very real and have been proven to exist
Thanks!
Great video. Any chance you have the time to explore if people who have been sick and recovered from covid need to be vaccinated? Or should they just be last in line to get the vaccines? What's the current preponderance of the evidence on that question?
If you get the covid, you’ll still have to be vaccinated later. Since the immune system doesn’t keep the antibodies’ « blueprints » against covid forever
This guy contradicts himself over n over.
If to much of anything can be bad for you, then how did you come to the conclusion that big pharma and the CDC aren't responsible for the SPIKE in autism AFTER rolling together vaccines into ONE large dose.
The CDC was sued AND LOST that case for lying and NOT sharing all those studies they the CDC never had.
But the CDC did hire a third-party to study if they're in the right; turns out the the third-party stated in federal court that "given the heavy metals in the American diet as well as a large dose of multiple vaccines; it's HIGHLY LIKELY that it vary well COULD push children and some adults over the threshold, but further testing would be needed."
This guy is an influencer and there are MANY people IN THIS FEILD of whom have studied further then this self proclaimed professor that holds a bachelors degree in chemistry. And these many people in this medical business that he made a UA-cam topic, have come forward expressing GREAT CONCERN.
A smart person would look at all sources, listen to all points, dismiss immediately anyone who trys to shame, categories, or name calls people into believing them such as the above big pharma influencer.
Its dangerous not allowing people to make decisions for themselves and their families on matters of THEIR OWN HEALTH.
I recommend standing up for our people and discontinue any notification from this guy and just lose all his videos for what he's pushing without being objective, for categorizing folks, name calling (anti-vaxers, etc..), and misinforming as well as telling people to ridicule others for their thoughts and concerns.
He's not a good person.
Read more
1
2
Show more replies
Anthony Conigliaro
1 year ago
As a retired soldier, if we could tag our soldiers with microscopic chips to find them, we would have done it. If we can't tag soldiers, why would the medical profession be interested in tagging you?
2.3K
169
Philip Michel
1 second ago
This guy contradicts himself over n over.
If to much of anything can be bad for you, then how did you come to the conclusion that big pharma and the CDC aren't responsible for the SPIKE in autism AFTER rolling together vaccines into ONE large dose.
The CDC was sued AND LOST that case for lying and NOT sharing all those studies they the CDC never had.
But the CDC did hire a third-party to study if they're in the right; turns out the the third-party stated in federal court that "given the heavy metals in the American diet as well as a large dose of multiple vaccines; it's HIGHLY LIKELY that it vary well COULD push children and some adults over the threshold, but further testing would be needed."
This guy is an influencer and there are MANY people IN THIS FEILD of whom have studied further then this self proclaimed professor that holds a bachelors degree in chemistry. And these many people in this medical business that he made a UA-cam topic, have come forward expressing GREAT CONCERN.
A smart person would look at all sources, listen to all points, dismiss immediately anyone who trys to shame, categories, or name calls people into believing them such as the above big pharma influencer.
Its dangerous not allowing people to make decisions for themselves and their families on matters of THEIR OWN HEALTH.
I recommend standing up for our people and discontinue any notification from this guy and just lose all his videos for what he's pushing without being objective, for categorizing folks, name calling (anti-vaxers, etc..), and misinforming as well as telling people to ridicule others for their thoughts and concerns.
Why not dig in and discuss the whistle blowers, the THOUSANDS of professionals whom have "great concern" the peer reviewed studies that have numbers like "1 in 800"?!
Does anyone here know what that means?
Are you reliant on this asshole for your do diligence?
Can you really stand by as the athletes drop and tell yourself and YOUR LOVED ONES .. nothing unusual here take another jab.. ...?
He's not a good person
Wakefield also horribly abused the children during the study, subjecting them to incredibly invasive and traumatic tests, including colonoscopies, which are not recommended for children due to the risk of perforation of the intestinal walls. One kid had *TWELVE PERFORATIONS* by the end. Many of the nurses and doctors working with him were horrified at what he was doing.
Also, Wakefield shot himself in the foot by challenging the lawsuit, because he had to present all relevant evidence. It led to further discrediting his findings and study. 😆
Hbomberguy made an EXCELLENT video thoroughly examining everything that Andrew Wakefield has ever said and done in regards to vaccines.
Although it seems like you've already seen it. 😅
If not, here it is: ua-cam.com/video/8BIcAZxFfrc/v-deo.html