Can he prove God's existence in 1 minute?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 67

  • @josephklein261
    @josephklein261 2 місяці тому +13

    Jesus is our only hope!

    • @walterdaems57
      @walterdaems57 2 місяці тому

      A mediocre prophet who claimed to be the only son of a non existent entity; great source of hope :)

  • @gordo191
    @gordo191 2 місяці тому +3

    Happy and Blessed Sabbath from Australia everyone ❤ ❤

  • @nils9477
    @nils9477 2 місяці тому +1

    Awesome work.

  • @kristiereed6701
    @kristiereed6701 2 місяці тому

    I feel as though if I'm not constantly working when I'm at work, then I'm stealing. I can listen to videos and still work, but if I look at my phone for a few minutes, I feel like I'm stealing. I don't know how to reconcile this. My boss even said as long as I'm not doing it a lot, it's fine, but I still can't help but feel the way that I feel. I'm also pretty sure that everyone does this, and I know that I'm not a robot.

  • @hanshafei9858
    @hanshafei9858 2 місяці тому

    Welcome home

  • @sheebajohnson1146
    @sheebajohnson1146 2 місяці тому

    👏👏🙏✝️❤️

  • @Farmhouselivingroom
    @Farmhouselivingroom 2 місяці тому +1

    Jesus! Less than a second😊

  • @walterdaems57
    @walterdaems57 2 місяці тому

    The amount of censorship on this site is a great indicator of the weakness of religions. Atheists don’t back down, or weasel out :)

  • @the_alchemy_method
    @the_alchemy_method 2 місяці тому

    Idk why and i might be wrong but i sense that somehow ray comfort has been called to do this good person test and God has given him the anointed him to do it that’s why he does it so effectively

  • @NoahCook-qw6pj
    @NoahCook-qw6pj 2 місяці тому +2

    Ray Comfort without the New Zealand accent.

    • @mountkeen8701
      @mountkeen8701 2 місяці тому

      @@NoahCook-qw6pj If he’s been conned by Ray Comfort, he’s joined a lot of other credulous and gullible people. If he’s conning the credulous and gullible on Comforts behalf then he’s really plumbing the depths.

    • @mirandahotspring4019
      @mirandahotspring4019 2 місяці тому +1

      Different accent, but the same nonsense.

    • @the_alchemy_method
      @the_alchemy_method 2 місяці тому

      @@mirandahotspring4019sounds like an absolute truth claim… how did you reach that conclusion?

    • @mirandahotspring4019
      @mirandahotspring4019 2 місяці тому

      @@the_alchemy_method If you can't tell nonsense when your hear it, your religion is probably in the way.

  • @MrsPin1954
    @MrsPin1954 2 місяці тому +1

    The truth because the Church has failed in general.
    This..... is how you know you WILL go to Heaven and NOT HELL
    Man is destined to die once.... and then face judgement.... Hebrews 5 v 27
    John 14 v 6
    Jesus said 'I am the Way, the Truth and the Life. No man can come to the Father EXCEPT THROUGH ME.
    HOW!!!
    Romans 10 v 9
    If you declare with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, You WILL Be Saved.
    AND
    You are saved FOREVER.
    1 Ephesians 1 v 13
    WHEN you believed, you were MARKED with a seal, by the Holy Spirit, GUARANTEEING your Inheritance until the day of redemption.
    Romans 8 v 38
    Neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons, neither the PRESENT NOR THE FUTURE, nor any powers, neither height nor depth, nor ANYTHING else in all creation will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord.

  • @anthonycrumb5753
    @anthonycrumb5753 2 місяці тому

    The old trope about a building and a builder is only another rehash of Rev William Palley's 'Blind Watchmaker' argument, come on Christy boys can't you do better than that ?

  • @marjo6779
    @marjo6779 2 місяці тому

    The evangelist must have liked the man's name. I lost count but 30 times at least.

  • @walterdaems57
    @walterdaems57 2 місяці тому

    So let me get this crystal clear:
    We have this God who created us with a brain, capable of questioning his existence on the grounds of very, very good, strong arguments and on top of that, a free will to do so. But if I actually deny his existence, as a result of my productive, God given brain and because I choose to exercise my free will, I'm doomed for eternity in the worst case scenario or excluded from his eternal friendship in paradise, the least frightening option. The least one would expect when the stakes are so high is a proper introduction. Instead we have to trust his demand to believe and have faith in him. Coincidentally, the exact first phrases spoken by every conman on the planet. In other words, we have to behave extremely naive and gullible to earn his friendship. Think I’ll pass on such a joker if you don’t mind.

  • @LogCabin-h2l
    @LogCabin-h2l 2 місяці тому

    Living Waters, how can this man violate the 3rd commandment ("Do not misuse the name of your God"), when his God is NOT the God revealed by Moses, and his ancestors were not a party to the covenant at Sinai? And, where do the scriptures authorize you to reapply this commandment to gentiles who use a title of God as a cuss word? Think about it.

  • @MichaelW
    @MichaelW 2 місяці тому +1

    I believe in God, but this is misleading title, doesn't prove God's existence.

  • @walterdaems57
    @walterdaems57 2 місяці тому

    Spoiler: he can’t not in a minute, not in a million years.

  • @LogicReason432
    @LogicReason432 2 місяці тому +3

    Im sorry, i missed the evidence for God, could someone tell me why they never presented it?

    • @mountkeen8701
      @mountkeen8701 2 місяці тому

      Indeed! Ten minutes of evidence-free gobbledygook. Apparently John Harris is the director of Living Waters Europe. You’d think being shackled to that doofus Ray Comfort would make you reluctant to appear in public but he’s clearly not the sharpest tool in the shed.

    • @oldmanonamission8055
      @oldmanonamission8055 2 місяці тому

      If I told you that a house was always there and no one built it, you'd say "don't talk stupid" everything has a creator, nothing came about by chance.
      What came first, the chicken or the egg?
      Having a name like "LogicReason" makes me laugh and you have no logic or reasoning.

    • @LogicReason432
      @LogicReason432 2 місяці тому +2

      @@oldmanonamission8055 does a cave have a creator or does it form through the natural process of soil erosion?
      The egg came first, the oldest dinosaur egg found is 195 million years old. The chicken evolved from the Red jungle fowl in south east asia

    • @oldmanonamission8055
      @oldmanonamission8055 2 місяці тому

      @@LogicReason432 For a cave to be there then there must have been something there to turn into a cave.
      Where did the Egg come from? Takes a male and a female for life to form. There is no point in even responding to you, you clearly have the mind of a 2 year old. When you become an adult, get back to us.

    • @NoahCook-qw6pj
      @NoahCook-qw6pj 2 місяці тому

      @@LogicReason432 How do you know how old dinosaur eggs are? How do you know that the chicken evolved from a different bird?
      Do you think random chance is smarter than we are? Because you have to in order to believe that quadrillions of cells, which are perfectly designed to preform their functions, were made by random chance.

  • @georg7120
    @georg7120 2 місяці тому +3

    Why does this clip take more than ten minutes then?
    Where is the proof?

    • @mirandahotspring4019
      @mirandahotspring4019 2 місяці тому

      I'm still waiting too. Someone built that building therefore god? These clowns are hopeless.

    • @Ragdoll-n7t
      @Ragdoll-n7t 2 місяці тому

      @@georg7120 use your eyes and see the birds in the Sky, you can’t make 1 bird, God is the Creator.

    • @georg7120
      @georg7120 2 місяці тому

      @@Ragdoll-n7t I can't, evolution did.

    • @georg7120
      @georg7120 2 місяці тому

      @@dt6949 Of course you can't prove evolution, every scientist knows that, but there is a lot of evidence for evolution, whereas there is no evidence for creation.

  • @LogCabin-h2l
    @LogCabin-h2l 2 місяці тому

    LWE, you love the 10 commandments thing, but here again you are using the law of Moses to test someone NOT UNDER THE LAW OF MOSES. Where is that authorized in scripture? And no, Galatians 3:24 is not a green light for using MOSES to test those not actually under MOSES. Jesus and his apostles showed us how to witness. The 10 commandments apply only to unbelieving Jews under the law. For ex: How can the guy violate the 3rd commandment, when that only applies to someone who has agreed to take God's name upon himself (i.e., "Do not misuse the name of Yehovah ")? You have zeal, but not according to knowledge. By such confusion, is God pleased, and are souls brought into the Kingdom?

  • @anthonycrumb5753
    @anthonycrumb5753 2 місяці тому

    The 9th Commandment obviously does not apply to Christian appologists when they 'lie for Jesus' - Ray Comfort on Evolution is a perfect example. This BS proves the existance of absolutely nothing never mind a 'God'.

  • @walterdaems57
    @walterdaems57 2 місяці тому

    If god existed there would be no need to prove his existence

    • @walterdaems57
      @walterdaems57 2 місяці тому

      @@summerhouse8205 Thanks for your comment. It’s ironclad evidence that there was no ‘intelligent’ creation :)

    • @walterdaems57
      @walterdaems57 2 місяці тому

      @@summerhouse8205 Because it stands to logic and reason that a celestial wizard shook the universe out of his sleeve :)

    • @walterdaems57
      @walterdaems57 2 місяці тому

      @@summerhouse8205 Wow! Brother! I’m sorry. Of course god does exist. Undoubtedly; under the roof of your skull where he resides and should be protected by all means because once he ascends from these extremely narrow surroundings he’s bound to dissolve in thin air :)

    • @walterdaems57
      @walterdaems57 2 місяці тому

      @@summerhouse8205 I start to like you so I will let you in on a secret of mine.
      I have come up with a way to immediately assess whether people are in balance with themselves. I can deduce that from the extent to which they take themselves seriously. The more they take themselves seriously, the more out of balance they are. Stumbling over my use of the word 'brother' instantly reveals that you're 30% out of balance, nothing to worry about but definitely something to work on :)
      Oké, let's get serious:
      I can't rule out the possibility of some all inclusive entity who's responsible for everything that was, is and will be, imaginable and unimaginable. Probably: no, plausible: no no. Possible: yes.
      Denying the fact (no longer the theory for some time now) of evolution however to add some plates to the barbell of your arguments, instantly devaluates them to false weights.
      But let's continue, walking hand in hand sharing a belief in such a as for mentioned version of a all and mighty entity. We're good until you will try to convince me that such a being looses sleep over the position of my hands; above or below the sheets or with whom I care to share my sheets with. To name just one tiny example of absolute ridicule. From that moment on I will tear myself loose and run away as fast and as far as I can and our marriage will be no longer on the table :)

    • @walterdaems57
      @walterdaems57 2 місяці тому

      @@summerhouse8205 I start to like you so I will let you in on a secret of mine.
      I have come up with a way to immediately assess whether people are in balance with themselves. I can deduce that from the extent to which they take themselves seriously. The more they take themselves seriously, the more out of balance they are. Stumbling over my use of the word 'brother' instantly reveals that you're 30% out of balance, nothing to worry about but definitely something to work on :)
      Oké, let's get serious:
      I can't rule out the possibility of some all inclusive entity who's responsible for everything that was, is and will be, imaginable and unimaginable. Probably: no, plausible: no no. Possible: yes.
      Denying the fact (no longer the theory for some time now) of evolution however to add some plates to the barbell of your arguments, instantly devaluates them to false weights.
      But let's continue, walking hand in hand sharing a belief in such a as for mentioned version of a all and mighty entity. We're good until you will try to convince me that such a being looses sleep over the position of my hands; above or below the sheets or with whom I care to share my sheets with. To name just one tiny example of absolute ridicule. From that moment on I will tear myself loose and run away as fast and as far as I can and our marriage will be no longer on the table :)

  • @davidstone9786
    @davidstone9786 2 місяці тому +2

    One can't prove the existence of that which doesn't exist!

    • @davidstone9786
      @davidstone9786 2 місяці тому

      @@summerhouse8205 I don't understand your point.

    • @davidstone9786
      @davidstone9786 2 місяці тому +1

      @@summerhouse8205 Because of your atrocious grammar.

    • @davidstone9786
      @davidstone9786 2 місяці тому +1

      @@summerhouse8205 I understand English perfectly well when it is framed correctly. Yours is not.

    • @marthaarnold6763
      @marthaarnold6763 2 місяці тому +1

      David ask God to show you and He will manifest to you. He is the only one alive.🙏🏼 God loves you.🙏🏼

    • @davidstone9786
      @davidstone9786 2 місяці тому

      @@marthaarnold6763 God doesn't exist. Only in the minds of impressionable people.

  • @mirandahotspring4019
    @mirandahotspring4019 2 місяці тому

    Proved nothing! Just recycled Ray Comfort nonsense. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    I haven't heard anyone use god's name in vain. "God damn it!" Is not using his name in vain, god isn't his name, it's his job description!