SWAP MEET DRAMA: Buyer FIGHT Caught on Camera!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 лют 2025
  • Get ready for a wild ride at the swap meet! I find myself in a heated showdown with a competitive buyer over some... Watch as tensions rise and tempers flare in the world of reselling! This encounter not only showcases the thrill of the hunt but also offers valuable insights on how to navigate confrontations and protect your profits.
    🎥 Unlock Behind the Scenes Content: / @dannyflippingdeals
    💖 Support the Channel:
    Your support helps me create more content!
    PayPal Donations: www.paypal.com...
    Super Thanks: Click the “Super Thanks” button to make a donation.
    Buy Me A Coffee: buymeacoffee.c...
    📱 Connect & Explore:
    🔗 Linktree: linktr.ee/dann...
    📧 Advertising and partnership inquiries email dannyflippingdeals@outlook.com
    Follow me on Whatnot and get $15 for FREE - whatnot.com/in...
    Hashtags:
    #ResellerLife, #ResellCommunity, #SideHustle, #swapmeetfinds

КОМЕНТАРІ • 83

  • @DannyFlippingDeals
    @DannyFlippingDeals  18 днів тому +4

    I had no idea who's add I copied because the facebook profile was discreet with a random profile photo. The add was amazing so I copied what works.. Would you remove or keep the add up after being approached this way?

    • @potentpudz9311
      @potentpudz9311 17 днів тому +2

      As if you had no idea who it was . You started the video with everything you knew about the guys as if you didn't know his name on Facebook....
      Copyright laws dictate that whoever took the photo owns the photo. Even if you're simply using it on your Instagram, Facebook the person who took the photo has the right to sue you if they wish. Therefore, explicit permission is required to avoid any issues.
      You can't download and use images you find on Facebook without the permission of the photographer (or other copyright owner).
      If i was you id pull the video down before he takes legal action also slander .
      If he is a millionaire i would be worried you are in a world of shit hey 🤔

    • @ltando54
      @ltando54 17 днів тому +1

      @DannyFlippingDeals I have a full understanding of your perspective. He sounds like real stand up citizen helping the elderly with downsizing. All he asks is for a discount. Might aswell steal it. Right.
      Danny deals you are good at stirring him. If he's aggressive about it you won't back down and apologise 50 times.
      Little c@nt I bet.

    • @DannyFlippingDeals
      @DannyFlippingDeals  16 днів тому

      I copied an add that many resellers are using. Had no idea it was his til he approached me. His Facebook profile photo doesn’t show who he is so ‘potential buyers’ won’t know when responding to his add either. Took me back with his approach because if he’d actually explained the situation I’d have removed it because I’ve known him for 20 years. Wouldn’t have even copied it if I knew it was his because of knowing him. It is what it is now 😎

  • @jptiger773
    @jptiger773 16 днів тому +6

    I used to be a fan but stealing his ad is a real dog move. And the defamation of the guy in this video, I hope he sues your ass. Your true colours are on show for everyone to see here

  • @Countrypicker87
    @Countrypicker87 15 днів тому +2

    Gotta pick your battles danny 😂

  • @MBail-g7d
    @MBail-g7d 18 днів тому +22

    Normally like ur videos but I dont agree with you here. Make ur own add, im sure u could. And he approached u ok, it was when u got smart with the public domain crap he got angry. Sorry mate

    • @neilwoodbridge8232
      @neilwoodbridge8232 16 днів тому +1

      I agree as soon as you said public it was like you had a right to his photos/ad which brings out the arrogance considering he probably didn't know he was being recorded so therefor making you less credible in a sense and you bang on about community

  • @stevecowell1152
    @stevecowell1152 17 днів тому +2

    Great work Danny, great to see the honesty behind the scenes, would have loved to see the true colours of sellers like this in Queensland, and proud of your boy sticking up for you also

    • @DannyFlippingDeals
      @DannyFlippingDeals  17 днів тому

      If I had a dollar for every lie I was told or heard other dealers use in Qld I’d be a rich man!

  • @glenjamin8
    @glenjamin8 17 днів тому +5

    Being on the internet makes things easy to access but you can’t take them. If I saw a Nike ad I can’t just download and say it’s my own because it’s on the internet

    • @DannyFlippingDeals
      @DannyFlippingDeals  16 днів тому

      As far as I knew the photos were from google images. Multiple wanted to buy adds are using them. The first I heard of them being someones personal pics was in this video.. I just copied the add because it was good.

  • @gregrobertson2168
    @gregrobertson2168 12 днів тому +1

    So you can't use other people's intellectual property for commercial gain. If he took the pics or made the ad, thrn he owns the pics/ad. Has the right to lawyer up. I wouldn't recommend his approach, but the first step is to request them taken off. No need for the nastiness, but maybe that does show his frustration of the theft of his property (photos/ad). The stealer of the pics/ad has also indicated much revenue due to the theft (not very clever). The person has commited and admitted to copyright infringement. However, there's no need to line lawyer pockets as everyone loses except lawyers... do better, be better and create your own.

  • @petergracemeguide1280
    @petergracemeguide1280 17 днів тому +2

    Thankyou for showing Hahndorf swapmeet. I was considering going ,but that stupid bike race and the heat ruined my other plans . As a regular swap meeter I like to leave meat on the bone , it's good business as it supports the event and the business contacts and friends moving forward are essential. Some of the hungry dealers are just rude arrogant tools. My prices go up if they don't network with me or mates. It's not that hard to be courteous it usually leads to better deals.
    One thing that spun me out was I used to sell lots of heat shrink $2 /m it helped my manufacturing keeping turn over volumes and product fresh , so I sold it $1 over cost. It was a good barometer of economy of a swap meet they all had a $2 bargin . It also said nearly time to pack up. After a few yrs selling many other regular sellers became copy cats selling alibaba heat shrink. I just laughed until amonth ago I had to pay retail for 2 little pks .
    Will have to catch up at a future swap, might do Murray Bridge

    • @DannyFlippingDeals
      @DannyFlippingDeals  17 днів тому +2

      You didn’t miss anything. Only half the amount of sellers as usual.

  • @PeterGingell-nd3bm
    @PeterGingell-nd3bm 16 днів тому +2

    Your swap meet videos are great. This one was the best. We have a couple of leeches like that bloke where we live too.
    Good work and thanks for the entertainment 😅

    • @DannyFlippingDeals
      @DannyFlippingDeals  16 днів тому +2

      Only thing that’s worse is a rich leech. A poor leech you can understand.. A poor leech struggles from necessity; a rich leech chooses greed as a lifestyle!

  • @billymitchell7852
    @billymitchell7852 18 днів тому +6

    Hey mate, I wheel and deal here In perth wa, and I agree to work with other resellers. However people are naturally greedy unfortunately. I believe there is so much to go around, and its fun when you win with another person and share the reward. My business is all about relationships and my reputation. I enjoy your channel and I am also learning alot thankyou.

  • @field5556
    @field5556 14 днів тому +1

    Sorry Danny but under intellectual copy right you can’t do what you did. Regardless of if it is in the public domain or not. He has the copyright. As with photos unless they are 100 years old they remain copyrighted to the person who took them.

  • @favotti
    @favotti 9 днів тому +1

    Old mate Colin Jones

  • @ALLSORTS_NZ
    @ALLSORTS_NZ 16 днів тому +1

    Just a few more of these brother instant viral 😂🔥✌️😭

  • @rhysgriffiths9675
    @rhysgriffiths9675 17 днів тому +4

    I can see why he might be frustrated, but you don't achieve anything by starting a conversation with yelling and swearing. If he approached you differently he might have been able to reach a peaceful resolution.

    • @DannyFlippingDeals
      @DannyFlippingDeals  17 днів тому +1

      💯

    • @RandomBradCreator
      @RandomBradCreator 17 днів тому +1

      Yep , thats it 👍

    • @Gemma371
      @Gemma371 7 днів тому

      @rhysgriffiths9675 he did ask politely to begin with, and Danny wound him up for views. Not nice, and he doesn't know what he is talking about. He says he didn't know who that ad belongs to, and clearly, if hes that good, just make his own ad.

  • @Tj6794linc
    @Tj6794linc 15 днів тому

    Okay so where do find this ad? I'm intrigued, surely it's not the gold this guy is making out it is?

  • @PaulJamesMuldoonGYST
    @PaulJamesMuldoonGYST 17 днів тому +2

    There's no honor among thieves hey Dan.
    The grabbing hands always grab what they can.

  • @friendlyneighbourhoodlinguist
    @friendlyneighbourhoodlinguist 17 днів тому +3

    Just because something's publically available doesn't mean you can take it and claim it as your own. That's plagiarism. I'm sure you could have taken your own photos and adapted the text to make it yours, but if it's a straight up cut and paste job of the original ad then the other guy has a fair point.
    He certainly doesn't seem like the nicest person based on what you've said and some of his behaviour in the video, but that doesn't justify plagiarism either.

    • @DannyFlippingDeals
      @DannyFlippingDeals  17 днів тому +1

      @@friendlyneighbourhoodlinguist Until the confrontation, I genuinely didn’t know where the photos originated, as I’ve seen them used by multiple dealers across Facebook, Gumtree ads, and various groups. A well-crafted ad has the potential to generate life-changing finds, which is why these images circulate so widely.

  • @colemoses-jones3721
    @colemoses-jones3721 17 днів тому +3

    mate you do a whole lot of complaining when you have clearly taken someone else’s ad and using it as your own to promote yourself, he’s asked you to stop using it and you get all smart 🤣 grow up man and make your own ad so you don’t have the problem easy as that

  • @sjk988
    @sjk988 17 днів тому +2

    Love how your son backs you. I have 4 boys I hope when they grow they do the same. ❤️

  • @jonchan.meaningful
    @jonchan.meaningful 17 днів тому +2

    Resellers behaving like they have secrets and that what they do is novel is bizarre. The whole industry is built upon rinsing and repeating. Unless his face was in the photos, if they are just items photographed a particular way or words arranged in a particular order, there's no protection. But he said it best "it's not fair". There is no fairness in reselling, but there is courtesy and if he had asked nicely I'd have considered making changes to the ad.

    • @DannyFlippingDeals
      @DannyFlippingDeals  17 днів тому

      Copying someone is flattery..

    • @RandomBradCreator
      @RandomBradCreator 17 днів тому +1

      Yeah Agree , the guys Attitude sucked , I'd leave the add up as well after being spoken to like that

  • @Cjnchef
    @Cjnchef 17 днів тому +2

    The millionaire next door. Personally knew quite a few in my life.

  • @starquant
    @starquant 17 днів тому +3

    You made it fairly clear right out of the gate that you had no intention of taking it down, how did you expect him to react?.

    • @DannyFlippingDeals
      @DannyFlippingDeals  16 днів тому

      A different approach would have led to a different outcome!

    • @starquant
      @starquant 15 днів тому +2

      @@DannyFlippingDeals There was nothing wrong with his approach. That is simply not true. You said that as far as you were concerned it was public domain (which is basically telling him to get stuffed). You had no intention of taking it down and you're simply blame shifting. You take zero accountability for your actions and are trying to make out that you're simply a victim, which is also not true.
      By your reasoning (and I paraphrase), "I can steal anything I see on the internet and claim it as mine". (Which a lot of people do). The reason why many people refrain from that behaviour is that 1/ It's not Ethical. 2/ You lose credibility when people find out 3/ It shows that you lack common decency and respect for others.
      He simply reacted to what you said. He also went on to say that he had lost most of his business because of what you had done and you laughed in his face boasting how much trade it had afforded you. Which is ironic because you said "there's plenty of trade going around" for everyone. If that's the case, why do you find it necessary to steal his advertisement? He did ask you nicely to remove it and you gave him a smart a$$ reply. I would have used the "c" word on you myself.

    • @matilda9954
      @matilda9954 9 днів тому +2

      @starquant I agree wholeheartedly. I used to love your content Danny till now. You are in the wrong and he asked you politely to stop your illegal behaviour and you refused. He had every right to react emotionally. You had the opportunity to be a gentleman and you refused to back down. Your true colours showing here - all you care about is going viral it seems. It's very obvious. Poor form. Do better if you are really here for the betterment of the reselling community.

  • @mrdbooks7285
    @mrdbooks7285 17 днів тому +1

    Bugger, I was just here for the Beef, but I got sucked in with all the other stuff.

  • @ColinJones-i6n
    @ColinJones-i6n 18 днів тому +2

    Lol hahahha that's killer

  • @Sir_Flibble
    @Sir_Flibble 17 днів тому +2

    You're in the wrong. It's the guys photo's it's their copyright. If you're using them in an ad, he can sue you for damages.

    • @DannyFlippingDeals
      @DannyFlippingDeals  17 днів тому

      @@Sir_Flibble he claims they’re his images. But who’s to say he didn’t get the images from somewhere else?

    • @69fredwilson
      @69fredwilson 17 днів тому

      @@DannyFlippingDealsthat’s not up to you though. You in this video stated clearly you stole his ad.

  • @alistairmarshall6775
    @alistairmarshall6775 16 днів тому +1

    His photos, his copyright. You need to take your own photos. You are in the wrong here.

    • @DannyFlippingDeals
      @DannyFlippingDeals  16 днів тому

      That’s what he claims.. Multiple adds in the wanted to buy section are using the same photos..

  • @LuketheDuke-j8l
    @LuketheDuke-j8l 18 днів тому +1

    I might use his add where I live. 😂
    Dog eat Dog. 🤷‍♂️

    • @DannyFlippingDeals
      @DannyFlippingDeals  18 днів тому +2

      I’ve literally seen at least 3 different people using the same add 🤷🏻‍♂️

    • @LuketheDuke-j8l
      @LuketheDuke-j8l 18 днів тому +2

      @ you put him in his place. 💪🫶

  • @potentpudz9311
    @potentpudz9311 18 днів тому +6

    Breathing a bit Heavey there mate did the old fella get you worked up . But scared there bro ?
    People in glass houses shouldn't throw rocks .I bet there's a book full of stories about u at Carara markets hey .
    Facebook marketplace photos are not public domain actually so are actually wrong in using those pictures 🤦🤦

    • @RandomBradCreator
      @RandomBradCreator 17 днів тому +1

      I Highly Doubt Danny was anywhere near fazed Lmao , the Other guys Very Lucky he hasnt been picked up and dropped on his head trying to Resolve something like that , You Troll 😘

    • @potentpudz9311
      @potentpudz9311 16 днів тому

      @RandomBradCreator not being a troll just calling you out for what you did you asked the question to your community.
      If you can't handle the answers don't ask the fkn questions hey .

    • @RandomBradCreator
      @RandomBradCreator 16 днів тому

      @@potentpudz9311

  • @stevencronan8124
    @stevencronan8124 18 днів тому +2

    Grt Drama Stuff Danny . I'm sure Gramps had no copywrite marks on it . Hence open game . I'm sure you have a winner here M8 :)

    • @DannyFlippingDeals
      @DannyFlippingDeals  18 днів тому +1

      At least now I know whose add it was. Amazing photos worth hundreds of thousands.

    • @stevencronan8124
      @stevencronan8124 18 днів тому

      @@bradaxe2641 Cool I try to stay away from legal firms . But feel free to consult a legal team and find out for a few thousand .

    • @stevencronan8124
      @stevencronan8124 18 днів тому +1

      @@DannyFlippingDeals I was thinking Danny the with publicity/hits this is going to bring . Gramps is going to need to confront a lot of people who are going to find the FB ad to use hehe .

    • @Alberturkey54
      @Alberturkey54 18 днів тому +6

      That's incorrect. Due to Section 32 of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) copyright automatically applies to original literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work. The argument that there's no copyright protection if there's no copyright notice is incorrect. Section 10 of the above Act explicitly includes photographs within the definition of 'artistic work'.

    • @resellexcel
      @resellexcel 17 днів тому +2

      ​@@Alberturkey54absolutely correct.

  • @Alberturkey54
    @Alberturkey54 18 днів тому +1

    You might need to be careful Danny. Unauthorised reproduction of his creative work may be infringement of his copyright under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). You wouldn't want him to sue you.

    • @DannyFlippingDeals
      @DannyFlippingDeals  18 днів тому +1

      Not even sure it’s his add? Multiple Facebook accounts are using the same wanted to buy add photos because it’s that good..

    • @PatDees
      @PatDees 17 днів тому

      @@DannyFlippingDeals just change your around a little - different font and colors .

  • @Mk2Brett
    @Mk2Brett 15 днів тому

    Mate you're in the wrong on this one. Don't steal others content.

    • @Matt_Wilson01
      @Matt_Wilson01 15 днів тому

      @@Mk2Brett public domain Dbag, you post something online it no longer belongs to you, this is why people watermark photos, still dont own them once its in the public domain

    • @Mk2Brett
      @Mk2Brett 15 днів тому

      @@Matt_Wilson01
      First of all, Public domain refers to works that are no longer protected by copyright, eg the time period has expired so that statement is already wrong.
      Under australian law, the original creator of a photo owns the copyright to it. posting it online does not waive these rights.
      Commercial use, as is what has happened here is a copyright infringement.
      If you dont understand what you're talking about, please refrain from commenting.

  • @RubyGreaves-c4q
    @RubyGreaves-c4q 17 днів тому +2

    I agree with you, it’s the internet 🤷‍♀️ you snooze you loose

  • @Saintgoten
    @Saintgoten 17 днів тому +1

    woof woof