NASA Lands Long-Awaited Asteroid Sample on Earth
Вставка
- Опубліковано 26 вер 2023
- #osirisrex #asteroid #bennu #novapbs
NASA’s OSIRIS-REx spacecraft grabbed a fistful of rocks and dust from asteroid Bennu and returned the sample to Earth, dropping a capsule in Utah. It could contain clues about the origins of our solar system.
Follow on social for more NOVA content!
Twitter: / novapbs
Instagram: / novapbs
TikTok: / novapbs
osiris-rex, asteroid sample, bennu - Наука та технологія
Infinitely more valuable than waving your nuts from orbit and calling yourself an explorer.
Perfectly stated
probably a lot of gold, nickel, diamond and other precious metals..
Nasa needs support
Very interesting
They say this all the time,
This will tell us how it all started.
No scientist has ever said this. Just another piece of the puzzle. “God did it” is ignorant though. Willful ignorance.
Would it not contain the same elements that ate on Earth?
Or something sinister that we've never had to deal with before.
I believe bringing back samples from space and advertising our position in the Galaxy at this stage is irresponsible.
Even Steven Hawkin agreed ..
Curiosity killed the Cat and all that.
@@quontumleeep9430If you believe that then you must think you’re a god who isn’t apart of the universe, or you’re comparing yourself to a rock asteroid.
Look at the cells, elements and actions of what you’re body is made of.
It’s similar to those rocks.
Maybe not the same collection all in one, which is why it’s scientific fact that your biology is WAY cooler and stronger and scarier than ANY rock formation that circles earth that’s ever existed.
Life forms need oxygen, water, carbon etc etc.
That rock cannot hurt you in the same way a bacteria can. There’s no oxygen in space.
This rock with further the protection of humankind.
That's cool 😎 👍
And how much do we know about the ocean floors of our own planet?
@AFloridiaSon - Waaaay more that we know about that asteroid. - Another FloridaSon.
NASA is OAOA, it’s literally a space agency not ocean agency. We already have many scientists that research the ocean. The problem is politicians think it’s a good idea to give the military 80% of our national budget, and 1% to science.
Harder to explore I think, as unfortunate as that is
“Team Science”. Woo hoo
Interesting. 🤔
Why all the interfearance so we cant hear the narrator ?
It even looks like the return capsule from Andromeda Strain. There is nothing green and growing in that thing is there?
Don't open this up or we'll have to call on Rick Grimes to save us! 🤣
Lemme sniff that dust first!
Initial inspection shows that some very unusual contents were returned in the capsule, not simply pebbles. There appears to be material resembling diatomaceous earth. Diatoms! Life!
DIATOMS!! Craaaazzzy
I’m pretty sure you just made that up.
No diatoms are real.
@@jackryan765 - @chilledwalrus lied. Misinformation.
The sample container has not even been opened yet, and won’t be opened for another 10 days. The first report is set for October 10.
The golden fleece award goes to the unwitting taxpayers for a hairbrained scheme
Learn something. Go to school. Then you’d not make such statements
Beenu? Always has been.
I'm paying 8 bucks for a dozen eggs and 5 bucks for a gallon of gas and these fools are spending billions of dollars to collect f'ing rocks!
Yeah you need some education.
@@dukeallen432 You probably should use some sort of punctuation after "Yeah" considering you are starting a sentence with an interjection. Also, I have enough education to question government spending. It's called being a responsible citizen, and not just blindly nodding my head like some mindless sheep. Perhaps you are the one who could use some education.
much blabla no content
One of these days a alien virus will be brought back.
I'm pretty sure they're careful
Smooth brain.🙄
@@FYMASMD better than gunk dear🙄
@pawshands: there are new viruses being discovered because the permafrost is melting!
Let’s worry about those before we add in alien ones !
I mean, it is not like humans are harvesting asteroids yet!
Stay safe, stay sane, stand strong Ukraine 🇺🇦
@@storm2000808 I certainly hope that to be the case. Some thing will never be fool-proof.
If you really want to know, how we came to be,go to Genesis: chap. 1 verse 1 and you will know. Knowledge is power! God created the heavens and the earth.
Okay but even then god had to have materials, or what kind was present when the universe was created
@cowgirlo99 - SPAM!
Are you four years old? Because why else would you believe in that childish fairytale.
And what about the OTHER creation myth in Genesis:
The Bible opens with two different creation stories. The accounts are similar in that they both describe the creation of animals, plants, and humans. But they are distinct in several ways and even contradict each other on key issues.
For example, though the stories describe some of the same events, they order them differently. InGen 1, God creates plants, then animals, and then simultaneously creates man and woman. In Gen 2, God creates a human, plants, then animals, and later he divides the human into female and male. Additionally, the two stories employ different names for the deity. The first account uses the Hebrew word Elohim, meaning “God,” whereas the second uses the tetragrammaton, YHWH (often represented by “Lord”).
The stories are also very different in literary style. The first account appears neatly organized into three days of preparation followed by three days of actual formation. Each day concludes with the formulaic expression “and there was X.” By the seventh day, all creation exists in its proper sphere, and God rests. This orderly pattern suggests an orderly universe. The second story (beginning in the second half of Gen 2:4 and continuing through the end of chapter 3) lacks both the structure and the focus of the first creation account. It is much less formulaic; rather, it is a dramatic narrative in a series of seven scenes.
Because of these and other divergences, it is likely that separate authors with distinct theological views and agendas wrote these myths. The differences in the accounts reflect the unique way each author conceptualizes the deity. In Gen 1, God is distant, creating through speech according to a master plan. This image contrasts with Gen 2, where the author depicts God as a human-like figure who walks in the garden and, like a potter working with clay, has a hands-on, trial-and-error approach to creation. God in this version seems more accessible than the transcendent creator of Gen 1.
www.bibleodyssey.org/passages/related-articles/the-two-creations-in-genesis/
@@kellydalstok8900you seriously need to get a life...
All this for some stones...
@rhomboidman - And they arrived safely! Great planning and teamwork.
Don't forget the sand...;) Maybe there's some dust too..Oooooh...?...In 5-10 years they may actually tell us something about their studies.
Awesome & interesting. Please get Zach Quinto back for your narrator and for more, updated NOVA planets shows 🪐