Derek Hook
Derek Hook
  • 176
  • 477 308
(4) Fanon, Lacan, and the Decolonial: Gaztambide interview - Clinical ethics and political ethics
We consider the topics of scansion and punctuation and consider 'subjectivizing' temporality in clinical treatments, especially in relation to the tactic of 'running out the clock'. Daniel discusses Fanon's idea that 'action upon reality is integrative'. Crucial also is the question of agency in the Lacanian/Fanonian clinic. Given the prioritization that Fanon gives to 'combined action' (mis-remembered by Derek as 'dual action') we also consider the distinction between political and clinical ethics and Fanon's 'psychoanalytic ear'.
Переглядів: 246

Відео

(3) Fanon, Lacan, Decolonial: Interview Gaztambide: Scansion, active technique, action upon reality
Переглядів 3092 місяці тому
Continuing our discussion of clinical technique, Daniel speaks about the extimacy of speech, the significance of remixing words, and the importance of thinking beyond the psychoanalytic dyad. We ask: Does Lacan have enough of a sociogeny? Daniel builds a bridge between Fanon’s idea that ‘action upon reality is integrating’ and Lacan’s technique of scansion as an active intervention.
(2) Fanon, Lacan, Decolonial: Interview Daniel Gaztambide :Real, zone of nonbeing, transformation
Переглядів 4932 місяці тому
In keeping with his focus on first person accounts of psychoanalysis with Lacan, Daniel discusses Betty Milan’s book Analysed by Lacan. He considers unexpected parallels between Lacan and Ferenczi and then, via a discussion of ‘re-encountering the real’, speaks about the clinical and political implications for transformation contained within Fanon’s idea of the zone of nonbeing.
Channel Trailer
Переглядів 5343 місяці тому
Channel Trailer
(1) Fanon, Lacan, and the Decolonial: Derek interview Daniel Gaztambide: Technique via Fanon & Lacan
Переглядів 9213 місяці тому
Daniel describes how Fanon’s work is located on a Möbius strip linking his conceptualizations to those of Freud, Ferenczi and Lacan. We discuss the role of speech, the trans-subjective dimension of language, the critique of relational logic, and Daniel’s thoughts on “transference work as a decolonial act”. Daniel highlights the role of the analyst as offering themselves as an object of interpre...
(2) 'Reading Fanon with Lacan': Derek Hook interviews Sinan Richards : Limits of Psychoanalysis
Переглядів 3915 місяців тому
Sinan notes that there are limits to how Fanon is willing to use psychoanalysis ("You cannot use psychoanalysis to pathologize the Black man"), noting Fanon's famous critique of Octave Mannoni. We discuss how psychoanalysis is a praxis of treatment, more appropriate to dealing with (colonial) pathologies than for the utopian task of conceptualizing a revolutionary future (hence Fanon's referenc...
(3) 'Reading Fanon with Lacan': Derek Hook interviews Sinan Richards : Breaking the colonial world
Переглядів 2195 місяців тому
Sinan addresses the famous opening essay in The Wretched of the Earth as a means of thinking about the challenge of breaking out of the colonial world. We note Fanon's references to the 'the end of the world' (p. 96 and p. 216 in the Markmann trans of BSWM) and related conceptualizations (such as the zone of nonbeing). Sinan discusses how Fanon uses Lacan's idea of "the fertile moments of delir...
(1) Reading Fanon with Lacan: Derek Hook interviews Sinan Richards : Mirror stage in Lacan & Fanon
Переглядів 8075 місяців тому
Sinan sets out a careful chronology of dates pertaining to Lacan's theorization of the mirror stage before turning to Fanon's discussion of this theory in a famous footnote in his 'Black Skin White Masks'. We discuss how 'the Fanonian mirror stage' is linked to questions of desire (and the desire of the Other) in the colonial context and note also the relevance of Kenneth and Mamie Clark's doll...
Lacan and Phenomenology (5): More on Lacan, Merleau-Ponty and the Gaze...
Переглядів 67311 місяців тому
We continue our discussion of how Lacan both separates himself and yet utilizes ideas from Merleau-Ponty's 'The Visible and the Invisible' stressing how his influential notion of the gaze is fundamentally psychoanalytic and distinct from other conceptualizations drawing on the idea of an all-seeing position on the world. Having stressed that for Lacan the gaze is on the side of the object as op...
Lacan and Phenomenology (4): Lacan, Merleau-Ponty, the Gaze
Переглядів 1,3 тис.11 місяців тому
We continue our exploration of Lacan's use of phenomenology by turning to his comments on his friend Maurice Merleau-Ponty's posthumously published 'The Visible and the Invisible'. While Lacan clearly opposed any reading of the Mirror Stage that reduced it to phenomenological experience, and any phenomenological attempts to re-conceptualize the Freudian unconscious as merely 'an other side' of ...
Lacan and Phenomenology (3): The Lacanian twist
Переглядів 81511 місяців тому
Jacques-Alain Miller helps us appreciate the various phenomenological and existential ideas that Lacan is indebted to. These include Heidegger's critique of interiority and his notion of ex-sistence. Equally important is Sartre's conceptualization of consciousness as nothingness, which informed Lacan's idea of subject as lack (or "want-to-be", 'manque-a-etre'). Lacan's ideas of logic time show ...
Lacan and Phenomenology (2): Against 'the relation of understanding'
Переглядів 83311 місяців тому
We spend a little time noting Lacan's critique of phenomenological psychiatry in Seminar III - more specifically, the notion Karl Jaspers has of 'the relation of understanding' as a means of diagnosis - before turning to Jaques-Alain Miller's remarks on how Lacan's early work - from the 1930's until 'Function and Field' - still drew very significantly on phenomenological ideas. Miller argues, i...
Lacan and Phenomenology (1): Lacan as "phenomenologically oriented"?
Переглядів 2,3 тис.11 місяців тому
While by the time of Seminar III, Lacan had declared his opposition to phenomenology (via an attack on "the myth of immediate experience"), it turns out that he is perhaps more indebted to phenomenological philosophical ideas than may have initially been expected. We cite Alain Badiou's account of Lacan's break from phenomenology, while also stressing how certain phenomenological ideas (the not...
Klein alongside Lacan (2)
Переглядів 1,1 тис.11 місяців тому
We continue to differentiate the meta-psychologies of Klein and Freud/Lacan with reference to Juliet Mitchell's introduction to Klein's work. The topic of the unconscious proves central here. Whereas Klein's notion of the unconscious is full of contents, Lacan's unconscious is decidedly not, especially considering that it is 'structured like a language' and - as in Freud's work - it is a system...
Klein Alongside Lacan (1)
Переглядів 2,2 тис.11 місяців тому
Lacanians are often dismissive toward Kleinian theory...and yet there is much to be learned from a considered comparison of the 'metapsychological' foundations of Lacanian and Kleinian psychoanalysis. In this first discussion of the differences - and unexpected convergences - between Lacan and Klein we draw on Juliet Mitchell's introduction to her edited volume 'The Selected Melanie Klein'. We ...
Lacan before Lacan, or: Lacan as Avant-Garde Psychiatrist - Derek Hook lecture, London, 8 June, 2023
Переглядів 1,2 тис.Рік тому
Lacan before Lacan, or: Lacan as Avant-Garde Psychiatrist - Derek Hook lecture, London, 8 June, 2023
Lacan and Psychological Assessment - Daniel Garcia (28 Oct, 2022)
Переглядів 762Рік тому
Lacan and Psychological Assessment - Daniel Garcia (28 Oct, 2022)
Lacan's seminar on "The Purloined Letter' - Introductory remarks: Derek Hook
Переглядів 2,4 тис.Рік тому
Lacan's seminar on "The Purloined Letter' - Introductory remarks: Derek Hook
The clinic of psychoanalysis in times of capitalism - Stijn Vanheule (May 7th 2023)
Переглядів 3,1 тис.Рік тому
The clinic of psychoanalysis in times of capitalism - Stijn Vanheule (May 7th 2023)
Jamieson Webster keynote presentation: Masturbation Fantasies Redux
Переглядів 4 тис.Рік тому
Jamieson Webster keynote presentation: Masturbation Fantasies Redux
Richard Boothby : 'Yes! Nothing IS Sacred! Toward a Lacanian Theory of Religion'
Переглядів 2,1 тис.Рік тому
Richard Boothby : 'Yes! Nothing IS Sacred! Toward a Lacanian Theory of Religion'
Adrian Johnston: “‘You have nothing to lose’: Pascal, Lacan, and the Risks of Desire” (Keynote talk)
Переглядів 2,6 тис.Рік тому
Adrian Johnston: “‘You have nothing to lose’: Pascal, Lacan, and the Risks of Desire” (Keynote talk)
A Lacanian Approach to Perversion
Переглядів 8 тис.Рік тому
A Lacanian Approach to Perversion
Louis Sass lecture on 'Lacan and Phenomenology' (with response by Rick Boothby), 14 October 2022.
Переглядів 1,7 тис.Рік тому
Louis Sass lecture on 'Lacan and Phenomenology' (with response by Rick Boothby), 14 October 2022.
Feeling the Misrepresentation of Feeling: Lacan and Unconscious Affect' - Adrian Johnston
Переглядів 2,5 тис.Рік тому
Feeling the Misrepresentation of Feeling: Lacan and Unconscious Affect' - Adrian Johnston
'What is sex?' - talk by Darian Leader (17th September 2022)
Переглядів 7 тис.Рік тому
'What is sex?' - talk by Darian Leader (17th September 2022)
Lacan on Perversion (2/3) : Derek Hook interviews Meera Lee : The Law and Perversion
Переглядів 2,2 тис.Рік тому
Lacan on Perversion (2/3) : Derek Hook interviews Meera Lee : The Law and Perversion
Lacan on Perversion (3/3) : Derek Hook interviews Meera Lee: Jouissance? Disavowal. Père-version
Переглядів 2,1 тис.Рік тому
Lacan on Perversion (3/3) : Derek Hook interviews Meera Lee: Jouissance? Disavowal. Père-version
Lacan on Perversion (1/3) : Derek Hook interviews Meera Lee - Perversion from Freud to Lacan
Переглядів 5 тис.Рік тому
Lacan on Perversion (1/3) : Derek Hook interviews Meera Lee - Perversion from Freud to Lacan
Lacan: Clinic and Culture conference (14-16 October, 2022)
Переглядів 1 тис.Рік тому
Lacan: Clinic and Culture conference (14-16 October, 2022)

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @Yourdailythought
    @Yourdailythought 10 днів тому

    Thank you!

  • @richardkeys6680
    @richardkeys6680 13 днів тому

    Hi Derek, love your lectures - a very pithy (and witty) exposition of Lacan! Wonderful resources to which I find myself often referring people to. Would you be so kind as to share the source of the Rodriguez quote? It strikes me as a very elegant account of the analytic work.

  • @rinakiable
    @rinakiable 14 днів тому

    thank you very much!

  • @trentmora8094
    @trentmora8094 16 днів тому

    Sharp young man :)

  • @jacoblui
    @jacoblui 23 дні тому

    Thanks for this series of videos, I found them very useful

  • @BetterNYou22
    @BetterNYou22 26 днів тому

    Peter Hook moment omg

  • @rohamedalatian6146
    @rohamedalatian6146 28 днів тому

    Love the way you explain things it actually helps a lot in terms of understanding these kind of subjects

  • @stevecink
    @stevecink Місяць тому

    Great video! I’ve become very interested in Lacan through my reading of Deleuze and Guattaris Anti-Oedipus and didn’t want to box myself into one perspective on psychoanalysis(as D&Gs perspective is that of harsh critique). I was wondering if you had given any time to the work of Anti-Oedipus or Deleuze and Guattari more generally? Thanks!

    • @derekhookonlacan
      @derekhookonlacan Місяць тому

      Yes I find their use of the concept of desire very interesting even though it is obviously very different from Lacan’s. They provide a fascinating conceptual vocabulary. One of the many differences between Lacan and D&G of course concerns Lacan’s intent on extending Freud’s clinical legacy but some fascinating parallels could be noted as in respect of their conceptualisation’s of desire.

  • @jessbod1
    @jessbod1 Місяць тому

    what about the idea of moving between structures/positions (as in Kleinian thought?) Does Lacan have this?

  • @garima_saxena
    @garima_saxena Місяць тому

    I agree that all the investigations are coming to melancholia from different vantage points. Grigg's overbearing presence of the traumatic object results in the loss of a beloved (perhaps empty) space (i.e. Freud's lost object)-- an empty space that was used to define a part of one's existential experience. Desiring that one remains unlocated on a symbolic plane by not receiving, detaching, being off grid, is the claiming of this space within the twilight scenes. Thank you for posting your lines of thought here. It resonates with me very much personally.

  • @sidharthm11
    @sidharthm11 Місяць тому

    You remind me of Ted Kaczynski.

  • @paparatzz7531
    @paparatzz7531 Місяць тому

    the last argument is actually really good

  • @paparatzz7531
    @paparatzz7531 Місяць тому

    I think a lot of these teachings are not very scientific and should be moved to religious studies

  • @Whats_in_a_name_1
    @Whats_in_a_name_1 Місяць тому

    Hello Sir, Is the sinthome a pre-psychotic or post-psychotic logic? What is Lacan's structure for after the rings have fallen apart? Is it also the sinthome? Thank you in advance.

  • @RichInk
    @RichInk Місяць тому

    Thank you.

  • @ivastipetic5211
    @ivastipetic5211 Місяць тому

    Immensely valuable and rarelly applied by medical professionals

  • @raiaan123
    @raiaan123 Місяць тому

    I’m learning about Lacanian thought through your lectures for the first time. So apologies if this is addressed later on. But where does psychopathy fall within the tripartite structural model? Your point about diagnosis being rendered by patient suffering more so than divergence from the norm may suggest that psychopaths may be abnormal yet not pathologic in that they do not affectively or at least in any conscious guilt ridden way suffer the consequences of their symptoms. Unless we understand the legal repercussions and ostracization to be the suffering in this case…thanks for any input!

  • @kushwahaananya
    @kushwahaananya Місяць тому

    Amazing!

  • @sauraveazaad5999
    @sauraveazaad5999 2 місяці тому

    watched it for the third time.... things are a bit clear now.. though it is not about any "thing"😀

  • @user-jl8sv6di8s
    @user-jl8sv6di8s 2 місяці тому

    Enjoyed

  • @pauljung3623
    @pauljung3623 2 місяці тому

    Thank you for sharing Gaztambide’s insightful work!

  • @sauraveazaad5999
    @sauraveazaad5999 2 місяці тому

    i was loooking in the comment for some interactive discussion on some key points that have been discussed above..... unfortunately didn't find one

    • @derekhookonlacan
      @derekhookonlacan 2 місяці тому

      Hi Saurave, this is Derek’s partner. I monitor the comments that come in and you are always welcome to add your own thoughts on the videos. Unfortunately, the UA-cam channel is not Derek’s paid job and when he has time he would rather make new free video content rather than respond to the many comments that are posted. But I do pass on interesting questions to him as this may inform what future videos he publishes online. Best wishes

    • @sauraveazaad5999
      @sauraveazaad5999 2 місяці тому

      @@derekhookonlacan thanks for responding to the comment.. and his videos are really helpful in understanding some of the key concepts discussed by Lacan in his work..... but since the area of lacan is so vast and he writes in a sort of interlocutor manner so i was hoping for something more....Thanks anyway..

  • @pgqneto
    @pgqneto 2 місяці тому

    what is the connection between psychosis and homossexualism? there's a video where a guy says that the psychotic has to comfront their own homossexuality.

  • @garretbarnwell8099
    @garretbarnwell8099 2 місяці тому

    Great question, as you say, a kind of tension, about "does Lacan have enough of a sociogeny" in his work.

  • @fosterch11
    @fosterch11 2 місяці тому

    Thank you - one of the best Lacanian videos I’ve seen

  • @nickwood1330
    @nickwood1330 2 місяці тому

    Isn’t it clear that superego and jouissance are kind of part of each other in the sense that the guilt you talked about experiencing when you enjoy is actually a part of the jouisssance itself - it’s what makes it jouissance rather than simple enjoyment - and then that guilt reinforces the superego .. jouissance has to push up against the superego to sustain itself, which then feeds into a strengthening of the superego. Does this make sense or not?! So then I guess there’s the question of the superego experiencing jouissance at our suffering, or something! This is bending my mind slightly.

  • @Retrogamer71
    @Retrogamer71 2 місяці тому

    This is fascinating because the big other appears in other settings such in my case as a professional in my own work field.

  • @Retrogamer71
    @Retrogamer71 2 місяці тому

    5:00 book reference. 9:00 diagnosis thru speech

  • @Retrogamer71
    @Retrogamer71 2 місяці тому

    When I have an inkling about irrational reactions of self othering in the workplace these ideas are now giving structural formula to the apparent obstacle in the others self defense in everyday relations. The question is how to do so outside the clinic effect better outcomes and relationships.

  • @nickwood1330
    @nickwood1330 2 місяці тому

    “5 moments .. “ .. wanting to make reference to your own book perhaps!

  • @user-si1rw5db5q
    @user-si1rw5db5q 2 місяці тому

    Thank you 😍

  • @user-si1rw5db5q
    @user-si1rw5db5q 2 місяці тому

    Thanks Derek. Can't wait to watch this!

  • @lacanian_lifter
    @lacanian_lifter 3 місяці тому

    Is there anything in psychoanalysis that could be read as a tacit endorsement of colonialism? Genuine question. Edit: question was perhaps answered at about the half-way point of the video.

  • @vygotsky17
    @vygotsky17 3 місяці тому

    Mikhael Bakhtin's Superaddressee.

  • @garretbarnwell8099
    @garretbarnwell8099 3 місяці тому

    Great interview

  • @fetishmagic2419
    @fetishmagic2419 3 місяці тому

    he a lil baddie highkey 🌶

  • @afs4185
    @afs4185 3 місяці тому

    Thank you . great presentation /lecture

  • @mariaesterreismartins422
    @mariaesterreismartins422 3 місяці тому

    Thank you so much for this lecture! I had to read Lacan's seminar for my research, and your explanation helped me a lot!

    • @user-tl5dp3th9l
      @user-tl5dp3th9l 3 місяці тому

      I understood nothing😢 can u give me some notes

  • @joshuacohen5245
    @joshuacohen5245 3 місяці тому

    This is really fantastic.

  • @stoneneils
    @stoneneils 3 місяці тому

    I feel Lacan didn't go far enough. The unconscious isn't just structured like a language..it is language. It talks to itself using our mother tongue but inaudible to our inner ear. Psychosis is that inner language's volume being raised, which is why audio hallucinations are much more common than visual. I base this on meth psychosis..as the psychosis comes on i can hear the inner unconscious language slowly creep up in volume from zero..like a radio. At peak psychosis the voice is LOUD. As the psychosis fades the volume fades. But the quality of the voice never changes. Its alwaystalking non-stop in very clear syllables without any emotion like a robot, like god or like a computer. I think that voice is always talking to me but I just can't hear it...and that's my unconscious...literally speaking in English, not jus structured like a language. It is language!! Any thoughts Derek!!?? Have you ever had psychosis from stimulants? Its very revealing into the working of the human mind. Even more than lsd, dmt etc which don't reveal anything scientific perse.

    • @anonymousfigure37
      @anonymousfigure37 3 місяці тому

      What would make Lacan revolutionary is precisely his notion that the unconscious is not an "inner" thing at all, but outside and between individuals. (But that was not his revolution to make, instead it was Marx's.) Lacan does offer an explanation as to why the unconscious may appear to be "inner", though.

    • @stoneneils
      @stoneneils 3 місяці тому

      @@anonymousfigure37 That's already been stated...our unconscious is simply a collection of other people's speech.

  • @alexanderberyozkin
    @alexanderberyozkin 3 місяці тому

    It is an interesting discussion that reminds me of Jean Laplanche’s critic writing about some of Freud’s ideas. Does it reflect some postmodern attitudes towards the deconstruction of our fascination with meta-narratives and authorities in classical psychoanalysis? Is it our desire to re-configure our identity and society in different ways?

  • @Peter-ew5bq
    @Peter-ew5bq 3 місяці тому

    Your videos are exceptionally lucidly argued and well-presented, bringing Lacan's brilliant formulations of the unconscious and 'psychopathology' (which I prefer to call "the differing forms of universal human suffering'" ) to light with exemplary clarity. Thanks you for your ongoing work - I'm sure many others appreciate it as much as I do.

  • @1300marie
    @1300marie 3 місяці тому

    Fabulous lecture, Derek. Thank you for referencing Ruth Stein in a Lacanian presentation. Her article on the “perverse pact” has been invaluable for me in these encounters.

  • @rivir
    @rivir 3 місяці тому

    Unfortunately this recording is very quiet! Thank you for all of your vids :)))

  • @VladimirTolskiy
    @VladimirTolskiy 3 місяці тому

    I have my own theory about fantasy and law.

  • @scottharrison812
    @scottharrison812 3 місяці тому

    I stumbled upon these lectures by accident. I am making notes. This resonated so much and explained so much about the way I have been most of my life. Thank you.

  • @ReginaFlanji4386
    @ReginaFlanji4386 3 місяці тому

    amazing job professor thanks for making such useful content for us

  • @aso5171
    @aso5171 3 місяці тому

    I suggest you educate yourself way more about phenomenology if you think it naively assumes immediate access to the world. There's an entire genetic phenomenology.

  • @totonow6955
    @totonow6955 3 місяці тому

    8:15😁

  • @ayan849
    @ayan849 3 місяці тому

    My mother passed away on 7th November 2023. She gave birth to me on 4th November 1987. I will be celebrating both birth and death around that date from now on. This reminds of Buddha who was very sad remembering the death of a neighbour boy the same night when his son Rahula was born. I discovered Lacan during the very last year of the life of my mother. She died of CKD (critical Kidney Disease). I was already reading Buddha’s teachings on suffering, it’s origin in our mind etc. They say similar things. To passify myself or my mother I am not sure. She wanted to live more. I was the center of her world. She wanted to see me with the job of a professor. I remember few scenes vaguely from my teenage, 2003..2005 those years. Summer nights in West Bengal suburbs, a mosquito net. And hands touching me. I was lying between my mother and father. My father’s body aroused me. I was a teenager. I lived in a joint family. My cousin, three years older than me, would often come down from upstairs, he would make a light knock on the door where I would be pretending to sleep in between my parents. Then I would respond to the knocks, I arise and go out. Then I would make sex with my cousin in the next room. Around those years, some night or a few nights I would discover my mother’s hands touching me. I wouldn’t like it, as I see in retrospect as a homosexual man, that I was already aroused by the body of my father by then. You probably see where I am speaking from.