NJFletcherFCA
NJFletcherFCA
  • 49
  • 29 731
Two Colour Technique for Green Day v2
This video explains how the Two Colour Technique can be used to protect students from plagiarism, and help them to express their own authentic critical voice.
When a student wants to express their own critical voice, and can do so without looking at a screen: they should write in a second colour, eg. purple.
When a student needs to look at a screen or has previously looked at a screen, to help them write something: they should write in black and carefully (cite) the source. Students should write in black even if they change, alter, muddle up, paraphrase, alter, or even improve the original text.
This technique renders paraphrasing and patchwriting redundant. When using text from other sources all students need to do is "quote" the text "in inverted commas" and carefully (cite) the source, whilst writing in black.
This combination of purple text, and carefully cited black text, creates a piece of writing that: protects the student from plagiarism, and also helps the student to express their own authentic critical voice.
Our research data has evidence that many students like this approach. The technique has been used successfully with both students writing in English as a first language (L1) and writing in English as a second language (L2).
Переглядів: 100

Відео

What if? Teleological ethics.
Переглядів 1483 роки тому
What if we have got our measurements wrong with teleological ethics? There is a technical mistake in this video, see if you can spot it. However, I am arguing the potential benefit of putting this video up outweighs the small mistake included included in it.
What if? Existential ethics.
Переглядів 653 роки тому
What if there was a man who understood our lived experience, had handled power relationships beautifully, and whose deconstruction might become reconstruction for all who believe in him?
What if Jesus fulfils deontological, teleological, and existential ethics.
Переглядів 933 роки тому
This video concludes my short series of ethical "what if" questions. Why not read more about Jesus here: www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John 1&version=HCSB
What if? Deontological ethics.
Переглядів 843 роки тому
What if deontological ethics can lead us to the truth?
Substantial Shareholders
Переглядів 9443 роки тому
How to find out who the substantial shareholders of a large listed company are. These are shareholders who own 3% or more of the company.
Personal ethics and my ethical hero
Переглядів 2693 роки тому
This video supports an undergraduate course that I teach. In it I discuss my ethical hero. The video is also available at my personal twitter account: @NoahAndBrothers
The Annual General Meeting ('AGM') of shareholders.
Переглядів 5443 роки тому
An explanation of The Annual General Meeting ('AGM') of shareholders. This highlights the fact that the board of directors "lead, guide, steer, and control" the company on behalf of the shareholders. Typically, shareholders only get one opportunity to vote each year about issues connected to the company. And you might be surprised what is not voted upon. The AGM highlights the fact that it is t...
Remuneration committee. 5. Remuneration. UK Corporate Governance Code.
Переглядів 1,7 тис.3 роки тому
An introduction to the Remuneration Committee. This is linked to section 4. of the UK Corporate Governance Code called "Remuneration". The video uses the example of Toys at Home plc.
Audit committee. 4. Audit, Risk, and Internal Control. UK Corporate Governance Code.
Переглядів 1,1 тис.3 роки тому
An introduction to the audit committee. This is linked to section 4. of the UK Corporate Governance Code called "Audit, Risk, and Internal Control." The video uses the example of Toys at Home plc.
Nominations committee. 3. [Board] Composition, Succession, and Evaluation. UK Corporate Governance.
Переглядів 9693 роки тому
An explanation about the Nominations Committee. This is linked to section 3. of the UK Corporate Governance Code called "Composition, Succession, and Evaluation". The video uses the example of Toys at Home plc.
The Board of Directors and the UK Corporate Governance Code: an explainer
Переглядів 4,1 тис.3 роки тому
This short video begins to explain some of the key features of a board of directors. It focuses upon section 2 of the UK Corporate Governance Code: Division of Responsibilities, whilst alluding to other sections of the Code. The video uses the example of Toys at Home plc. The three key committees of this board are explored in later videos. Integrity spoiler: there is a technical mistake towards...
Example of critical thinking: how I can critique the last two videos
Переглядів 2163 роки тому
Even though the last two videos were (hopefully) clear and straightforward, there were major weaknesses in their argumentation. I: 1. Ignored the role of regulation in protecting stakeholders 2. Never mentioned the UK Corporate Governance Code 3. Did not explicitly suggest that the best way to create shareholder wealth might be by benefiting stakeholders
Two Major Misconceptions about Corporate Governance
Переглядів 2943 роки тому
Misconception 1: the role of a director is to govern the company in a way that maximises shareholder wealth. NO! A director's duty is to promote the success of a company. Misconception 2: directors should be kind and loving towards stakeholders. OOOPS! At a personal level is good and right to be kind and loving to people. However, the director has a duty at law to promote the success of the com...
Corporate Governance: a 2 minute explainer
Переглядів 1,4 тис.3 роки тому
Corporate Governance seeks to understand how boards of directors lead, guide, and steer the companies that they govern. Furthermore, it critically considers the impact that companies have on shareholders and stakeholders. For more daily updates see my dedicated Twitter account: @EthicsAndGlory. Sheffield Hallam University students: see the module resources on BlackBoard.
Plagiarism: 12 things that students do that are unwise or unfair
Переглядів 5933 роки тому
Plagiarism: 12 things that students do that are unwise or unfair
Two Colour Technique video
Переглядів 6413 роки тому
Two Colour Technique video
Your critical voice
Переглядів 6533 роки тому
Your critical voice
Profit is not the same as cash: an explanation of the Cash Flow statement
Переглядів 2234 роки тому
Profit is not the same as cash: an explanation of the Cash Flow statement
Making a strength judgement about a balance sheet
Переглядів 3754 роки тому
Making a strength judgement about a balance sheet
The difference between financial and narrative reporting
Переглядів 6614 роки тому
The difference between financial and narrative reporting
Basic Content Analysis: a worked example of this powerful qualitative technique
Переглядів 4,4 тис.4 роки тому
Basic Content Analysis: a worked example of this powerful qualitative technique
Coding: a qualitative technique for analysing text
Переглядів 9674 роки тому
Coding: a qualitative technique for analysing text
5 threats that can hinder professional accountants acting ethically
Переглядів 7304 роки тому
5 threats that can hinder professional accountants acting ethically
Why Integrity might not be as straightforward as you thought for accountants
Переглядів 3034 роки тому
Why Integrity might not be as straightforward as you thought for accountants
The 5 key ethical principles that the professional accountant needs to be aware of.
Переглядів 6024 роки тому
The 5 key ethical principles that the professional accountant needs to be aware of.
What does a "professional accountant" do? And, their duty to society.
Переглядів 3274 роки тому
What does a "professional accountant" do? And, their duty to society.
UK Corporate Governance Code. 5. Remuneration
Переглядів 1,2 тис.4 роки тому
UK Corporate Governance Code. 5. Remuneration
UK Corporate Governance Code. 4: Audit, Risk, and Internal Control
Переглядів 8594 роки тому
UK Corporate Governance Code. 4: Audit, Risk, and Internal Control
UK Corporate Governance Code. 3: [Board] Composition, Succession, and Evaluation
Переглядів 8084 роки тому
UK Corporate Governance Code. 3: [Board] Composition, Succession, and Evaluation