Відео

@@Bxasd that’s exactly right. I’m glad it’s working out for you man 📈

@@oringemate 📈📈

When you win you still in profit you keep that full risk and whatever you win it’s a win situation people get greedy and want to hit big trades and also people get scared to put it all in when the chance presents itself well get more money in ya pocket work 2 jobs and you won’t have to worry about a 1/3 1/1 that’s 50% and 30% you got 3k from working 3 weeks now put that up in a trading account or betting find probability’s of 99% or 95% negative odds and do it once a or 2 times a month and win back 2k or 1k that’s enough money to make a band bro that’s good enough i promise now you sitting on 6k a month just from that easy play and increase it as time goes on and you gain experience this only works with experience

the leverage on that be insane

@@Juniourk that’s a crazy good win rate bro. Your killing it 📈

@@PtakunDamianShow you got this bruv just keep going

@@nickthegrape I don’t track the pips I track the percentage gained

@@BinhNguyen-gy5me what ratio do you use?

@@overnightforex 3:1 now works best for me than 1:1. I cannot have profit with 1:1 or higher ratio from I know how to trade til then. It's hard to trade consistently when I lose in a row 5 or more trades. The most advantage of neg ratio is mentality not the profit , I think.

@@anthonycasey57 what’s the problem with that? That can be very profitable

@@overnightforex yeah probably just me and not sticking to rules. I need to automate my system.

@@anthonycasey57 I would recommend getting the smallest prop firm account you can get. Maybe a 10k and trying to get funded. Prop firm challenges force you to be extremely consistent and patient with your trading plan. There’s a lot of growth in that

@@anthonycasey57 prop firm challenges force you to be as consistent and patient as possible. It’s a good learning experience

@@WardoguyTube I’ve failed with positive RR too. The biggest problem is I need to be more consistent with my trading plan

@@JowlTalks 100% agree. This is all based on my strategy

@@Sadaqmod the reason a negative RR can potentially work better than a high RR is the win rate is more likely to be consistent. A 1:3 win rate can fluctuate a lot and it’s very hard to maintain at least a 30% win rate month after month With something like a 10:1 or a 20:1 the win rate is easier to maintain consistently. So the account will be more likely to grow consistently month after month

@@merovingianv3462 keep in mind this is only 5 months of data and the 1:1 just in the past couple weeks came out on top. The previous months it’s been behind Also the first 6 months of the year the 1:2 was -2% so

@@merovingianv3462 always

@@BinhNguyen-gy5me you could prolly do very well with that

@@sonandheir13 thank you bro

@@silva_obiriezefx is life man. I need to work on things

@@unpocodetodo6123 nice dude. You passed them all with a negative RR?

@@smolshamer6072 my win rate is pretty sexy huh

@@rodrigoguess 4:1 with a 72% win rate is not be. 80% win rate is be Do you have a solid trading plan? Do you stick to the trading plan to the T? Do you have a good strategy that you’ve Backtested and practiced for a long time?

@@overnightforex not 4:1 , my rr is risk 1 to get 0.4 reward or risk 2.5 to get 1 reward with win rate almost 71.43 , the question how can i with this rr have higher than winrate

@@merovingianv3462 appreciate you bruv 🥊

@@Aylingfx 🥊🥊

@@halleyramos8383 5% to gain 1%

@@halleyramos8383 are you using a negative RR??

@@moonman9823 only when lit

just somethign to think about , im thinking 10:1 needing a 90% winrate at least to not loose seems more atractive to me at this moment

@@merovingianv3462 plot twist 🤣

@@MrQVeeBoo those are the percentage gains from each risk to reward

@@overnightforex but how do you calculate those percentages. I’m not good in math. Thank you.

@@MrQVeeBoo all those trades were based on 1% risk. So combine that with the amount of wins and losses.

i mean could you write the formula on calculating 7% 17% and 20%? This is what I got gain from RR = (win x ratio) - lose i got those numbers. am i correct?

@@MrQVeeBoo yes exactly. The first part of the video where it says 1:1 4/5 -1% That’s because I had 4 wins = +4% 5 losses = -5%. So that’s -1%

I think you can get a very high winrate with that , as long as you enter with a stop order and in specific areas where there is high momentum

@@merovingianv3462 yesss I love 10:1. So far what’s been your win rate and growth on your account?

@@overnightforex i just started today backtesting but so far havent lost, did maybe 20 backtest trades, the 60 trades u did with 20 to 1 how many wins and losses would you have goten with 10:1? I dont know if you do this but I think the key is to set the stop order or limit post a level can be beyond a wick etc, not to enter by yourself but let price break a level and then get the 10 or 20 to 1 as the price already went there, do u know what i mean? that way the market itself validates the direction and is likely to easily keep going, i just check it has enough momentum and is like with a big pivot wherei can put the SL above teh wole thing

the daily candle gives me a good idea of the makret direction, and those levels the candle levels are good to put the Stop order above or below it

@@merovingianv3462 not sure how many it was compared to a 10:1. The Backtesting I did I won 90 trades in a row with a 20:1

mmm i think your analogy is flawed , first its not pennies, 5% or 10% is quite a lot, second it depends on the winrate if its a bulldozer or not

scottwelshstrategies.com/trading-blog/picking-up-pennies-in-front-of-bulldozers/

@@overnightforex great article, perfect response, when i got into trading I knew I had to do the opposite of everyone because humans are almost always completely wrong (in everything), I was trying to think of what is the opposite of what everyone is doing? so it took me 7 years to realize what the opposite was to what they are doing and its the neg rrr , i thought the opposite was higher RRR lmao, i was so brainwashed it took me that long to realize it, my first aha moment was with 1:1s, then .5s then .25 now .1 lmao

@@OfoeNelson I swing trade so I cant trade just one pair. But if that worked for you man that’s great

@@overnightforex I'm not a math major so I might be wrong in the long term. I thought about probability and it's duality and this is how I got to my conclusion. In relation to a coin toss 1:1 can represent a coin that's weighted evenly on both sides. With 1:2 the weight doubles on one side of the coin and so on... So the win rate fluctuates with the increase of weight on this imaginary coin. But I'm sure much much smarter people than me have thought about this and there's some flaw in my logic I don't know.

@@merovingianv3462 appreciate your support bruv 📈

@@mrfootball887 love that bro. Happy for you 📈

@@musicarose5232 nope just like to expierment. I’m still new to negative RR so I’m trying to find the best fit

@@Aylingfx facts bro it’ll always fluctuate no matter what. It’s just the question of how much do the fluctuations affect the long term growth of the account and if we’re able to minimize those win rate fluctuations as much as we can will that RR turn out to compound an account the best 🤷

I think it works better for scalping! Quick entrances and exits. Trading 20:1 on h4 can work, but you have to keep in mind that you will have fewer opportunities day by day, week by week...

@@PtakunDamianShow true I see your point

@@nazarhadi1290 4 losses in a row with a 5:1 is tough to come back from for sure. You probably have to go back and look at your losses and figure out why your losing those trades

Wild

@@gtadone 100% agree

@@PtakunDamianShow 100% win rate?

@@overnightforex yea. Even with 20to1 you hit sl finally some day. Recover 20 trades in my opinion is difficult mentally

@@overnightforex I dont know why but my answer dissapear twice... maybe this time it will works... Yes i mean win rate. So if you losse it will be difficult mentally to recover 20 trader to reach breakeven.

@@PtakunDamianShow I see your point. The question is how many trades can we win without losses with this RR

100% is impossible but 99% is possible

discord.gg/P2btRNpM

let me know if this works

@@overnightforex yup I'm in

I do. I think having a consistent win rate makes it much easier to pass a prop firm challenge. I’d even risk 4.5% if you’re consistently winning already. It’d speed up the process

@@sonandheir13 it definitely does. Let me know how it works out for you 📈

@@overnightforex So far after 23 trades on crypto, I’ve only lost twice turning 4.4k to 7k. (I’ve also back tested this on nq over a 10 day time span in data replay mode on a 50k account and flipped it to 72k). Small sample size but it’s looking somewhat promising. I’ll continue doing this and try it live for the next few weeks and see what happens🔥

@@sonandheir13 nice man. What RR are you using?

@@overnightforex going with anywhere from 1:20, to 1:10. 1:20s almost never gets hit

@@TitoVentura every win is apart of a win streak. It’s a beautiful thing man📈

@@overnightforex Its easy cut your losses if any, by 65-70%, that will boost your profits, do not take full stop outs

im funded with 1 step max, ik it takes long time to pass 😅 since 2% dd rules

@@DanielCarrington-q6l thank you for your input sir. You’ve been full time for a while. Has negative RR helped you make a full time income? If not what’s been the most impactful thing to help you become successful