Відео

Very helpful video. Well explained & unobscure . Thank you

Wouldn't be better to say 'Kantian ethics is about what I ought to do?" Whereas, what we should do is a hypothetical imperative.

Hi guys is PERFECT 😂😂😂

I am currently writing my thesis on cultural appropriation and I needed to use the Lacanian theory in my theoretical framework. I was almost freaking out because I didn’t understand it and every website or video I saw was so complicated…apart from yours!!! Now I get everything and can continue with my thesis

Thank you so much!

Oh, boy... it's really unhelpful. And since when Lacan would care about the "character"? Even the subjective structure is of very little importance. Useless labels for real clinical work.

Concise and complete, this video is much appreciated.

very nice

Can I follow your facebook to read more knowlegde?. Will you make a vid to complaine death drive, Thank you.

Thank you very much much much. I am Vietnamese. Lacan isn't popular in my country. I try study his theory than 1.5 years. He is so difficult, and after listening your vid. Finally, I can understand a little bit What is Real, Symbolic and Imaginary.

Man, that word “imaginary” is kind of a stumbling block. It has a different sense in English. Like, the English sense is there in the sense of, like, a mirage, a superficial glean on it. But it means “image-based”. It doesn’t mean “not real” (once again, not in the Lacanian sense). We might say, in a more conventional sense, “You don’t have to be afraid of the dark, monsters are imaginary.” In the Lacanian sense, it’s the register we experience the particulars of nominalist philosophy and where most psychoanalysis (of the American/British Object Relations and Ego Psychology sort) erroneously takes place. The ego is one’s imaginary double, connected to the subject via the symbolic. So long as therapy is focused on the image of the psychoanalyst’s body, relations are ego-to-ego, and thus imaginary. Yes, meaning is created in the “gap” between symbolic and imaginary, the metaphorical point de capiton or quilting point, but the English sense of “imaginary” is preserved in the structuralist notion of a signified. The idea of an actual, graspable signified is what’s imaginary in the conventional sense.

My current partner has this swallowing tick. He's 55 y.o. but still: Whenever he wants to portray himself as a good, eloquent, correct person, whenever he feels he's in the public eye, he swallows in vain. It feels to me that the school-age boy (13-14 years old) is trying to speak in front of the class and he emphasizes swallowing so that everyone else could see that he's doing a biological task, thus the silence becomes more acceptable somehow. Feels as if he needs an excuse to be silent for a moment while arranging his thoughts. I think it's cute so I let it be and encourage him on other sides. Hey, I'm not perfect, I'm worse!! I yawn in vain, like a fake yawn. I don't know what it is but it certainly gives the impression that I'm bored which is not so. To help myself, I did find Jordan B. Peterson, in one of his lives, he speaks about how to speak in públic and he emphasizes on the importance of "thinking together" / "digesting thought together" instead of robotically imprinting a message onto another. Also, taking your time, gives you importance as you do not have to "run" / "be quick" in order for others to listen to you. This, I'd say, goes hand in hand with being ok to take up territory and space. The "good" people SHOULD be loud, heard, seen, given time to and allowed space. I am an advocate of honorable people making noise. I much prefer good people speak up firmly than others who are not "good" influencers. And this too, I'd attach it to a childhood period when your territory was invaded in the "wrong" way. I sense you don't want to take space because someone had done that with you and you didn't like it so you're trying to avoid taking space so that you will not become as the person who invaded your space. The difference is you're a good person with a good intention and a good purpose. I encourage you to take all of your time and all of the space you'd like for yourself. I am peacefully watching and I respect what you have to say. I'll see all of your videos today coz you're the only one that made sense to me regarding Lacan. Thank you so much for all of your work and for being here!!

You're very shy in presenting it but very, very accurate, brief and to the point. Just out of my own passion, I'm looking into this but the seminars Lacan left are tooo long. So I appreciate this a lot! Thanks!

Ja stands for what? Autre means other in French.. What is the j?

Thank you for this!

Regarding the last formula 'there's no such thing as a sexual relationship', this is due to the difference in the symbolic orders of two subjects? What can be further linked to how fantasy affects their symbolic orders? I'm not sure if I get it. Thank you for these wonderful videos. I'm trying to learn more about the subject. Keep it up!

Thank you for the videos! Out of curiosity, why Lacan? There are so many different approaches and views on the unconscious what specifically about Lacan's conception makes you believe that it is the most accurate way of looking at the unconscious?

You did something no one could do, you made me understand Lacan's theories lol

thanks for sharing

Thank you so much! Great explanation! I'm working on an interdisciplinary artwork and this video helped me to understand more of these concepts.❤️❤️❤️

The explanation was good! And you are cute! 😁❤️

Are you murmuring? I can barely understand. You sound not confident enough.

can you explain four discourses? thanks a lot!

This is all great stuff. Ignore if you want, but how old are you my dude?

this is brilliant. Thank you so much

Thx for this. The description of each realm and then of their overlaps was really useful. I'll be checking out your other videos.