Відео

I tuned out when the presenter said "original King James." "Original" is a very misleading way to describe the KJB.

I use the newer one. I really enjoy it.

How to purchase it? I only have the King James, but I also believe the LXX would be the better source for the OT.

I have a james moffatt translation ive been reading it lately with my daily devotionals fyi it inspired the living bible and other paraphrased bibles.

I wasn't always a good reader but when my pastor gave a copy of the good news for modern man, I love how it was worded and it help me to grow in my walk with the Lord, but today I read the NKJV but there's times I find myself going back and reading the good news for modern man

As a long time born again believer ....age 69.... I was raised using KJV born again at young age....went to churches that used KJV and NASB and LSB. I have recently started reading and studying from the 2011 NIV and love the translation. Another to keep our eye is the CSB.

Apart from the Authorised Version, all American 😞

It's time for an accurate translation of the bible.

You see how the only allotted the KJB to 1 page? Gave all the false bibles pages to showcase but the true Bible is stuck in the middle on 1 page.. shameful.

In old English the letter 's' is written like an 'f'. Confusing I know, but that's the way it was. And there wasn't any uniformity in spelling, with there being several different spellings of the same word throughout any written work from that period.

One jot or title - better be careful touching God's Word Catholic, Mormon and JW'S are the worst

I have 5 different Bibles to get a much deeper study. Look up Chuck Missler"s teachings

My wife sends a big thank you! This would be great for some of our friends who have dyslexia and learning disabilities. It's nice to have an good option now!

King James was a homosexual who burned the people who followed the Geneva Bible. He changed the Bible to reflect the power of the earthly monarchy instead of the authority we have in Christ. All other versions came from the corrupted KJV.

I been blessed by it, a truly underrated translation

Thanks for your video. I've done a lot of research in textual variations and modern translations. But I confess I had never heard of this translation before. I'll have to check it out.

Thanks mate for the explanations and clarifying the position of the translation on the scale. I believe its well past the NIV personally. Gods Speed Andrew Nz

The Bible is a Jehovah book (Isaiah 43:10-12)

I would like to purchase a 1560 complete Bible. Which do you recommend? Which publisher?

God's name is Yahweh, and it should be used in the OT. There is a lot of trinitarian interpretation used in the NT by bible translators. They should just translate from Greek to English.

Wife saw online that it is hard to find. Something to keep a look out for, worth checking out. Thanks again for all the great information!

Thank you!

I have the 1560 Geneva Bible published by Hendrickson, Peabody, Massachusetts. It isn't modern English, it is a facsimile production of an old Bible from owned by the University of Wisconsin. The English, similar to the 1611 Authorized Version, is Elizabethan English, Shakespeare's English. It's an archaic language, but not really as foreign as one might think. With a little practice, reading the Geneva Bible or the 1611 KJV/AV becomes a joy. The notes in the Hendrickson publication can be hard to read without a magnifying glass, probably because the facsimile copy isn't the same size as the original.

The king James has better footnote the explain that return of Jesus.

NO, STAY AWAY!

Don't a lot of the modern translations change the meaning of repent to "repent from sin" instead of "changing your mind about what you believe" though? In other words, aren't the modern translations completely changing the message of The Gospel by either front or back-loading works? The original King James seems to be the most consistent when it comes to how one is saved and who Jesus is, which are really the most important things for a believer to understand.

But is it derived from the Textus Receptus or critical text?

I've read the whole GW translation and enjoyed it. In fact, my church ordered a couple boxea of them to give to new Christians who need to become Biblically literate. I plan on reading it again in the future for devotional reading, but for serious study, I would choose a word-for-word translation.

KJV is one of the worst. It is a poor translation and it is full of errors and trinitarian theolgy.

Where I can buy amplified bible classic 1987 edition? God bless everyone!

The picture shown is Scofield

This one that translates the word sperms=fruits and seeds not legumes.That was that Daniel asked, uncooked food for human made from the Creator.There's no cooking in nature.

Much thanks!

I was recently told I should stop reading the kjv Bible because it was written by a homosexual, james slept with so many men

NASB2020 is not gender accurate. It is gender ignorant. Ish in Hebrew and aner in Greek mean a male man, not "person" or "one." NASB2020 and other modernist Bibles deliberarely mistranslate Psalm 1:1. "The man" refered to in the Psalm is Jesus Christ.

With all these different versions of the Bible it is no wonder there are so many denominations, and no wonder each denomination thinks they are the only ones who have got it correct. Meanwhile christianity has morphed into a right-wing political movement, while those alienated by the process are becoming atheist.

The Ethiopian Bible

Yes I got one. I like it. It’s interesting. I am curious as to the exact translation he determined that in Jonah was a vessel and not a fish. Did he read that in Hebrew OR did he assume that after reading it? I’d like to know how he came to that conclusion. ? Maybe it was just his own gut feeling. ? I don’t know. But I would like to know exactly where he got that information.

Pick proof texts with theological implications, like Genesis, John 3: 16, and those that talk about the divinity of Christ. The ones you used have little value with respect to Christian belief.

This translation and Young's is worth looking into. Many thanks for the video.

NIV satans bible

another hell bound "bible corrector"

I don’t think I like it … I won’t be looking at it further than this video .. thank you for sharing ❤️🙏🏻

Why would anyone want to deviate from the Pure and Preserved word of Almighty God after over 400 years of truth ? Deuteronomy 4 : 2 , Proverbs 30 : 5-6 , Matthew 24 : 35 , Revelation 22 : 18-19 et al. King James Bible. Only lost people mess about with the words of Almighty God.

His translation is also available in the "The Interlinear Bible / Hebrew-Greek-English" published by Sovereign Grace Publishers, of which he is also the general editor and translator.

No. The King James is about 11 years older than the textus receptus.

Why they replaced the geneva bible with that king james bible???

looks like they are following the Protestants.

I have Septuagint for Old Testament. I read New Testament from Douay Rheims.

I just discovered that the verse I John 5:7 in the King James version is missing in many others: "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one." Now I am suspicious of versions that omit this critical truth.