John Paul Minda
John Paul Minda
  • 160
  • 78 905

Відео

Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 10.1 Problem Solving
Переглядів 2253 місяці тому
Lecture recording for Dr. Minda's "Psychology of Thinking" course at Western University. This is the winter term, 2024 class.
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 10.2 Creativity
Переглядів 1753 місяці тому
Lecture recording for Dr. Minda's "Psychology of Thinking" course at Western University. This is the winter term, 2024 class.
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 9.2: Prospect Theory and Decision Making
Переглядів 2014 місяці тому
Lecture recording for Dr. Minda's "Psychology of Thinking" course at Western University. This is the winter term, 2024 class.
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 9.1: Probability and Decision Making
Переглядів 1504 місяці тому
Lecture recording for Dr. Minda's "Psychology of Thinking" course at Western University. This is the winter term, 2024 class.
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 8.1: Context effects on thinking
Переглядів 2034 місяці тому
Lecture recording for Dr. Minda's "Psychology of Thinking" course at Western University. This is the winter term, 2024 class.
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 8.2: Mood effects on thinking
Переглядів 1504 місяці тому
Lecture recording for Dr. Minda's "Psychology of Thinking" course at Western University. This is the winter term, 2024 class.
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 7.1: Causal Reasoning and Deduction
Переглядів 1864 місяці тому
Lecture recording for Dr. Minda's "Psychology of Thinking" course at Western University. This is the winter term, 2024 class.
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 7.2: Categorical and Conditional Logic
Переглядів 1394 місяці тому
Lecture recording for Dr. Minda's "Psychology of Thinking" course at Western University. This is the winter term, 2024 class.
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 6.2: Categorical Induction?
Переглядів 1694 місяці тому
Lecture recording for Dr. Minda's "Psychology of Thinking" course at Western University. This is the winter term, 2024 class.
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 6.1: What is Induction?
Переглядів 2834 місяці тому
Lecture recording for Dr. Minda's "Psychology of Thinking" course at Western University. This is the winter term, 2024 class.
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 5.1: Language And Thought
Переглядів 3395 місяців тому
Lecture recording for Dr. Minda's "Psychology of Thinking" course at Western University. This is the winter term, 2024 class.
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 5.2: Linguistic Determinism
Переглядів 2445 місяців тому
Lecture recording for Dr. Minda's "Psychology of Thinking" course at Western University. This is the winter term, 2024 class.
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 4.2:Concept Theories
Переглядів 2095 місяців тому
Lecture recording for Dr. Minda's "Psychology of Thinking" course at Western University. This is the winter term, 2024 class.
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 4.1:Concepts
Переглядів 1755 місяців тому
Lecture recording for Dr. Minda's "Psychology of Thinking" course at Western University. This is the winter term, 2024 class.
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 3.2: MemoryTheory
Переглядів 1936 місяців тому
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 3.2: MemoryTheory
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 3.1: MemoryAndThinking
Переглядів 2046 місяців тому
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 3.1: MemoryAndThinking
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 2.2: TheoriesOfSimilarity
Переглядів 2256 місяців тому
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 2.2: TheoriesOfSimilarity
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 2.1: Defining Similarity
Переглядів 2046 місяців тому
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 2.1: Defining Similarity
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 1.2: Challenges to Thinking
Переглядів 2826 місяців тому
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 1.2: Challenges to Thinking
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 1.1: Introduction
Переглядів 3026 місяців тому
Psychology of Thinking 2024, Lecture 1.1: Introduction
Cognitive Psychology (2135A), 2023 Lecture 22: Review
Переглядів 2647 місяців тому
Cognitive Psychology (2135A), 2023 Lecture 22: Review
Cognitive Psychology (2135A), 2023 Lecture 22: Consciousness
Переглядів 3197 місяців тому
Cognitive Psychology (2135A), 2023 Lecture 22: Consciousness
Cognitive Psychology (2135A), 2023 Lecture 20: Creativity, Expertise, and Intellegence
Переглядів 3617 місяців тому
Cognitive Psychology (2135A), 2023 Lecture 20: Creativity, Expertise, and Intellegence
Cognitive Psychology (2135A), 2023 Lecture 19: Problem Solving
Переглядів 5687 місяців тому
Cognitive Psychology (2135A), 2023 Lecture 19: Problem Solving
Cognitive Psychology (2135A), 2023 Lecture 18: Reasoning
Переглядів 3898 місяців тому
Cognitive Psychology (2135A), 2023 Lecture 18: Reasoning
Cognitive Psychology (2135A), 2023 Lecture 16: Decision Making and Probability
Переглядів 3548 місяців тому
Cognitive Psychology (2135A), 2023 Lecture 16: Decision Making and Probability
Cognitive Psychology (2135A), 2023 Lecture 17: Decision Making
Переглядів 8458 місяців тому
Cognitive Psychology (2135A), 2023 Lecture 17: Decision Making
Cognitive Psychology (2135A), 2023 Lecture 15: Visual Imagery
Переглядів 1,4 тис.8 місяців тому
Cognitive Psychology (2135A), 2023 Lecture 15: Visual Imagery
Cognitive Psychology (2135A), 2023 Lecture 14: Language Part 2
Переглядів 2678 місяців тому
Cognitive Psychology (2135A), 2023 Lecture 14: Language Part 2

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @soniaali9265
    @soniaali9265 4 дні тому

    Please describe short

  • @soniaali9265
    @soniaali9265 4 дні тому

    Leacter is tooo long

  • @luckysingh-lh4hf
    @luckysingh-lh4hf 2 місяці тому

    wuw u sir

  • @luckysingh-lh4hf
    @luckysingh-lh4hf 2 місяці тому

    Love u prof. Thank you for this.

  • @sismaganda7550
    @sismaganda7550 2 місяці тому

    Thank you Professor Paul for your informative lecture.

  • @sismaganda7550
    @sismaganda7550 3 місяці тому

    Thank you Sir for this beneficial class.

  • @LinJohnson-kj7ng
    @LinJohnson-kj7ng 3 місяці тому

    very helpful lectures:)

  • @sismaganda7550
    @sismaganda7550 3 місяці тому

    Sir John Paul Minda, your book is what we use for the course Psychology of Thinking. I am going to take this course in the Spring semester. Thank you so much for uploading your lectures. This is gold! Super grateful.

    • @PaulMinda
      @PaulMinda 3 місяці тому

      Fantastic, I am glad these lectures are helpful to you!

  • @Dragonscat-2
    @Dragonscat-2 3 місяці тому

    Thank you so much!

  • @Dragonscat-2
    @Dragonscat-2 3 місяці тому

    Hi Paul, in this lecture you mentioned a textbook, is it available for non-students? Where/how? Would be happy to read it along with your amazing lecture. Thank you!

    • @PaulMinda
      @PaulMinda 3 місяці тому

      Hi, glad you are enjoying these! Yes, I'm using a textbook called "The Psychology of Thinking, 2nd edition" (I'm also the author, btw), us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/the-psychology-of-thinking/book269688/ . You can probably find "unauthorized" PDFs around for free. There are also free copies in many college and university libraries. My other book ("How To Think", www.amazon.com/How-To-Think/dp/1472143035/) is close in content, and significantly less expensive because it is not a textbook

  • @paulinemeghansntg2837
    @paulinemeghansntg2837 5 місяців тому

    Thanks for sharing

  • @paulinemeghansntg2837
    @paulinemeghansntg2837 5 місяців тому

    When is the next lecture please, Dr.am one of your students from uganda

  • @paulinemeghansntg2837
    @paulinemeghansntg2837 5 місяців тому

    Am just enjoying the lecture, thanks alot

  • @h.goodwin5682
    @h.goodwin5682 6 місяців тому

    Comedic gold at 4:26

  • @raghu_yadav_yt
    @raghu_yadav_yt 6 місяців тому

    Interesting studies!

  • @bruno_pecly
    @bruno_pecly 6 місяців тому

    Great class. Thanks for sharing

  • @shalinikg9970
    @shalinikg9970 6 місяців тому

    42:07

  • @shalinikg9970
    @shalinikg9970 6 місяців тому

    When we are thinking about life events and emotions come up, is it focused or unfocused?

  • @jiminhassan88
    @jiminhassan88 9 місяців тому

    When you will upload next lecture i am wating teacher ? Thank you

  • @jiminhassan88
    @jiminhassan88 9 місяців тому

    Thank you so much for your efforts ❤

  • @bruno_pecly
    @bruno_pecly 10 місяців тому

    I really enjoy all the classes. Thank you for uploading all the series of classes.

  • @ExistenceUniversity
    @ExistenceUniversity 10 місяців тому

    49:00 No, and neither has my dog. Even my dog knows that a big dog and a tiny dog are dogs from a mile away and without smelling. This theory is dead wrong, so no, I don't struggle with seeing some dogs as dogs because the concept of dog is not held by a prototype image.

  • @ExistenceUniversity
    @ExistenceUniversity 10 місяців тому

    44:50 Defining Game: First, what is a definition? "A definition is a statement that identifies the nature of the units subsumed under a concept. It is often said that definitions state the meaning of words. This is true, but it is not exact. A word is merely a visual-auditory symbol used to represent a concept; a word has no meaning other than that of the concept it symbolizes, and the meaning of a concept consists of its units. It is not words, but concepts that man defines-by specifying their referents. The purpose of a definition is to distinguish a concept from all other concepts and thus to keep its units differentiated from all other existents. Since the definition of a concept is formulated in terms of other concepts, it enables man, not only to identify and retain a concept, but also to establish the relationships, the hierarchy, the integration of all his concepts and thus the integration of his knowledge. Definitions preserve, not the chronological order in which a given man may have learned concepts, but the logical order of their hierarchical interdependence. With certain significant exceptions, every concept can be defined and communicated in terms of other concepts. The exceptions are concepts referring to sensations, and metaphysical axioms... "The rules of correct definition are derived from the process of concept-formation. The units of a concept were differentiated-by means of a distinguishing characteristic(s)-from other existents possessing a commensurable characteristic, a Conceptual Common Denominator. A definition follows the same principle: it specifies the distinguishing characteristic(s) of the units, and indicates the category of existents from which they were differentiated. The distinguishing characteristic(s) of the units becomes the differentia of the concept’s definition; the existents possessing a Conceptual Common Denominator become the genus. Thus a definition complies with the two essential functions of consciousness: differentiation and integration. The differentia isolates the units of a concept from all other existents; the genus indicates their connection to a wider group of existents. For instance, in the definition of table (“An item of furniture, consisting of a flat, level surface and supports, intended to support other, smaller objects”), the specified shape is the differentia, which distinguishes tables from the other entities belonging to the same genus: furniture. In the definition of man (“A rational animal”), “rational” is the differentia, “animal” is the genus... "A definition must identify the nature of the units, i.e., the essential characteristics without which the units would not be the kind of existents they are." Ayn Rand, Definitions, Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology, 40-43 Game: : a (man-made) physical or mental competition conducted according to rules with the participants in direct opposition to each other. Essential genus: a man-made physical or mental activity. Essential differentia: competition What makes a soccer game and a trivia game both games? They are activities which involve competition, i.e., a game. Game is really really easy to define if you hold that man perceives entities and has the ability to abstract by means of measurement omission

  • @ExistenceUniversity
    @ExistenceUniversity 10 місяців тому

    41:30 There is no actual concept which is based only on a definition (except for magically words like God). Even and Odd numbers are perceptual. A even number of things is one in which you can divide the objects into groups and no loner is remaining, an odd number is when grouping leaves an odd man out. We made those words to talk about this thing we see.

    • @ExistenceUniversity
      @ExistenceUniversity 10 місяців тому

      42:00 The study actually only found that most people suck at math and picked the numbers they are more familiar will and less likely to be incorrect and to avoid looking silly they went with 4. Note that 2 wasn't even a option, yet it is the prototypical.

  • @ExistenceUniversity
    @ExistenceUniversity 10 місяців тому

    Calling entities "basic" is silly. Perception perceives entities, and those entities are where we get abstractions which can be used to find genus and differentia. Philosophically this lecture is lacking

    • @ExistenceUniversity
      @ExistenceUniversity 10 місяців тому

      26:41 Oh god it only gets worse as it goes. The basic level is not "Abstract," they are the given, there are the objects that you see when you let your eyes move over the world. If Rosch thinks these are abstraction, what could she possible believe is the given?

    • @ExistenceUniversity
      @ExistenceUniversity 10 місяців тому

      29:40 Yep, it only gets worse. "A typical package-deal, used by professors of philosophy, runs as follows: to prove the assertion that there is no such thing as “necessity” in the universe, a professor declares that just as this country did not have to have fifty states, there could have been forty-eight or fifty-two-so the solar system did not have to have nine planets, there could have been seven or eleven. It is not sufficient, he declares, to prove that something is, one must also prove that it had to be-and since nothing had to be, nothing is certain and anything goes. The technique of undercutting man’s mind consists in palming off the man-made as if it were the metaphysically given, then ascribing to nature the concepts that refer only to men’s lack of knowledge, such as “chance” or “contingency,” then reversing the two elements of the package-deal. From the assertion: “Man is unpredictable, therefore nature is unpredictable,” the argument goes to: “Nature possesses volition, man does not-nature is free, man is ruled by unknowable forces-nature is not to be conquered, man is.”" “The Metaphysical Versus the Man-Made,” Philosophy: Who Needs It, 28 "As far as metaphysical reality is concerned (omitting human actions from consideration, for the moment), there are no “facts which happen to be but could have been otherwise” as against “facts which must be.” There are only: facts which are. . . . Since things are what they are, since everything that exists possesses a specific identity, nothing in reality can occur causelessly or by chance. The nature of an entity determines what it can do and, in any given set of circumstances, dictates what it will do. The Law of Causality is entailed by the Law of Identity. Entities follow certain laws of action in consequence of their identity, and have no alternative to doing so. Metaphysically, all facts are inherent in the identities of the entities that exist; i.e., all facts are “necessary.” In this sense, to be is to be “necessary.” The concept of “necessity,” in a metaphysical context, is superfluous." Leonard Peikoff, “The Analytic-Synthetic Dichotomy,” Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology, 108-109

    • @ExistenceUniversity
      @ExistenceUniversity 10 місяців тому

      47:00 Absolutely ridiculous theories

  • @guccimane8941
    @guccimane8941 10 місяців тому

    So if cognitive psychology is about head then my girl gave me lot of cognitive psychology at night

  • @lamaduysheeva7752
    @lamaduysheeva7752 Рік тому

    Amazing lecture. Ty sm

  • @keziasejuwal7085
    @keziasejuwal7085 Рік тому

    Best teacher...keep teaching

  • @patterngatherer3223
    @patterngatherer3223 Рік тому

    brilliant, thanks !!!

  • @nesmamaged1770
    @nesmamaged1770 Рік тому

    Thank you!

  • @raghu_yadav_yt
    @raghu_yadav_yt Рік тому

    I was reading papers by Eleanor Rosh recently and being a non-native speaker it was a bit difficult to follow. But your video has brought a lot of clarity. Thank you for that. 👍🙏👍 Unfortunately though, your drawing pen is not visible in the video.

  • @Rastlov
    @Rastlov Рік тому

    Awesome decision-making on avoiding angry geese on the way to the lecture.

  • @raghu_yadav_yt
    @raghu_yadav_yt Рік тому

    Very helpful. 👍👍👍

  • @bruno_pecly
    @bruno_pecly Рік тому

    Thank you for sharing

  • @charlottet7548
    @charlottet7548 Рік тому

    Actual content starts @ 17mins

  • @layane6786
    @layane6786 Рік тому

    Thank you alot

  • @villan821
    @villan821 Рік тому

    12:00

  • @sargamkaur11
    @sargamkaur11 Рік тому

    Thank you for the explanation. It was really helpful. I loved that the presentation slides were plain and simple!

  • @d3term1nation
    @d3term1nation Рік тому

    what a peaceful voice!

  • @BAMBAMBAM495
    @BAMBAMBAM495 2 роки тому

    thank you please keep posting

  • @guimamaximiano
    @guimamaximiano 2 роки тому

    Thanks for posting this lecture

  • @SirEshtri
    @SirEshtri 2 роки тому

    Thank you!!! super helpful to hear the explanations from a different perspective :)

  • @damolailesanmi7619
    @damolailesanmi7619 2 роки тому

    Thank you for posting this here. It really helped me to figure it out.

  • @ritalopez2514
    @ritalopez2514 2 роки тому

    🌸 P r o m o s m!!!

  • @eprohoda
    @eprohoda 2 роки тому

    splendid masterpiece~ see ya!, Paul. 📹

  • @mdbellalkhan5684
    @mdbellalkhan5684 2 роки тому

    I saw your whole video. The video is very beautiful. I like the video very much but in an organic way Like Views Subscribe If You Can Be A Professional How Can You Grow These We Can Talk

  • @lucybraga79
    @lucybraga79 3 роки тому

    Excellent class. I am so happy I found this!! Congratulations on your style of teaching, you obviously have a gift! PS: I am also a runner :)

  • @zyhmdaryhm5425
    @zyhmdaryhm5425 3 роки тому

    First!