Bhaktivedanta Institute for Higher Studies
Bhaktivedanta Institute for Higher Studies
  • 145
  • 39 316

Відео

TOVP Chandelier (Prem Gauranga & Panesvara)
Переглядів 104Місяць тому
#tovp #tovpchandelier
The Science Museum of the Vedic Planetarium (Michael Cremo)
Переглядів 66Місяць тому
#Archeologythesciencemuseumofthevedicplanetarium #tovp #vedicmuseum is the study of human history and prehistory by analysis of physical remains. For those approaching archeology from a Vedic perspective, this talk presents the main topics of interest: the cultural identity of the Indus Valley Civilization, evidence for Vedic culture outside India, an indigenous archeological tradition in India...
Overview of Research and Outreach programs at the Institute of Science & Philosophy
Переглядів 26Місяць тому
(Jyotiranjan Beuria) #instituteofscienceandphilosophy
The BI in Russia (Natalia Antanova)
Переглядів 43Місяць тому
#thebiinrussia
Cosmogenesis (Doug Watson & Laura Domenech)
Переглядів 102Місяць тому
#cosmogenesis #cosmology #vediccosmology
A Conscious-based Universe (Giridhari Das)
Переглядів 107Місяць тому
#consciousbaseduniverse #astronomy #cosmology
Krishna and the Quark (Mauricio Garrido)
Переглядів 98Місяць тому
#krishnaandthequark #quark
Vedic Archeology and Opportunities ( Michael Cremo)
Переглядів 1602 місяці тому
#vedicarcheology #antropology #vedicastronomy
Indic Archeology: A Paradigm Shift (Rita Jeney)
Переглядів 842 місяці тому
#indicarcheology #paradigmshifts An important paradigm shift in Indian Archaeology occurred in 1924, exactly 100 years ago. It was only in 1924 when archaeologists were able to date the Indus or Harappan civilization to the 3rd millennium BC. Before 1924 the true age of ancient India was unknown. The presentation tells the story of this important discovery and emphasizes the results of a centur...
Natural and Artificial Intelligence and Modeling the Mind (Guruprasad Raghavan)
Переглядів 452 місяці тому
#naturalintelligence #artificialintelligence #modelingthemind
Research on Chanting Mahamantra (Venugopal Damerla & Uma Pallavi)
Переглядів 1692 місяці тому
#Themahamantra #researchonchantingmahamantra #mahamantrabenefits presentation discusses the science of heart-centered meditation, focusing on possible benefits of audible repetition of spiritually connected sound, such as the Hare Krishna Mantra, to create mental, emotional, and physical coherence. This practice is seen as a spiritual "password" that can interrupt stress responses and reduce ch...
Consciousness-based Life and Speciation (Akhandadhi Das)
Переглядів 1112 місяці тому
#consciousnessbasedlife #speciation
"The Map is Not the Territory": Mapping Hermeneutic Approaches to the Bhagavatam's Cosmologies
Переглядів 752 місяці тому
"The Map is Not the Territory": Mapping Hermeneutic Approaches to the Bhagavatam's Cosmologies
Panel Discussion Developing a Rigorous Presentation of Gaudiya Vaishnava Philosophy for Scholars
Переглядів 1012 місяці тому
Panel Discussion Developing a Rigorous Presentation of Gaudiya Vaishnava Philosophy for Scholars
Two Ways of Presenting KC
Переглядів 1272 місяці тому
Two Ways of Presenting KC
Resolving the Siddhantic and Puranic Universes (Sthitadhi Muni Das)
Переглядів 862 місяці тому
Resolving the Siddhantic and Puranic Universes (Sthitadhi Muni Das)
The Foundations of Knowledge (HD Goswami)
Переглядів 1863 місяці тому
The Foundations of Knowledge (HD Goswami)
Reincarnation &Subtle body research (Kunal Mooley & Shrestha Sinha-Ray)
Переглядів 883 місяці тому
Reincarnation &Subtle body research (Kunal Mooley & Shrestha Sinha-Ray)
Why Consciousness is a Big Deal for Science and How Gaudiya Vaishnava Vedanta can contribute
Переглядів 1703 місяці тому
Why Consciousness is a Big Deal for Science and How Gaudiya Vaishnava Vedanta can contribute
Overview of the BI in Today's ISKCON: Projects, network and resources (Bob Cohen)
Переглядів 1053 місяці тому
Overview of the BI in Today's ISKCON: Projects, network and resources (Bob Cohen)
Bi Summer School Session 4
Переглядів 3434 місяці тому
Bi Summer School Session 4
BI Summer School Session 3
Переглядів 2384 місяці тому
BI Summer School Session 3
Human Devolution w/ Michael Cremo
Переглядів 8164 місяці тому
Human Devolution w/ Michael Cremo
Human Devolution w/ Michael Cremo
Переглядів 4854 місяці тому
Human Devolution w/ Michael Cremo
Human Devolution
Переглядів 1304 місяці тому
Human Devolution
Human Devolution w/ Michael Cremo
Переглядів 3214 місяці тому
Human Devolution w/ Michael Cremo
Human Devolution Chapter 11
Переглядів 1094 місяці тому
Human Devolution Chapter 11
Bhaktivedanta Institute Summer School- July 2024- Register- It is a free event!
Переглядів 4724 місяці тому
Bhaktivedanta Institute Summer School- July 2024- Register- It is a free event!
Human Devolution Chapters 6 & 7
Переглядів 2486 місяців тому
Human Devolution Chapters 6 & 7

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @n9537
    @n9537 Місяць тому

    Ok... so many slides just to declare that iskcon has officially rejected the puranic bhumandala in favor of the earth globe😅 Nice, iskcon should officially register itself as a branch of NASA.

  • @Labommelkreet
    @Labommelkreet Місяць тому

    Regarding Bhakti-Vijnana Gosvami and his attempt to align KC with a scientific approach for finding the truth: nice try, but I'd say that all those teachings, starting from Krishna's words in the Bhagavad-Gita (if you don't follow you are lost to damned) down to Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, are heavily resting on the "religious approach". This is also day-to-day practice in the movement. This life-comes-from-life research that can be found in the Bhaktivedanta Institute, is not more than a nice dressing on the cake. What to speak of searching for truth, asking questions aloud will easily get you expelled from the movement, no? 😉

  • @charlesprabakar
    @charlesprabakar 2 місяці тому

    Good to hear a “Puranic consciousness model based framework with a emergent spacetime” in alignment one such view of ours - and so, how about I present one such POV of ours using a philosophy neutral model of ours (aka sovereignty/cosmic-karma/Al-Malik model) to see if it might open some collaboration possibilities? Before getting into the philosophical POV, first to your question of how spacetime emerges from consciousness ( aka quantum reality) under our theory This is where we have extended the holographic principle governed AdS/CFT toy model correspondence with a much larger Langlands style EPR=ER correspondence, existing between α governed Quantum universe and Φ governed classical universe, using our Riemann hypothesis meta proof aka CPT(α,Φ) function, that has been framed as the foundational cornerstone of our much larger superset i-TOE/SOE/ESG program, with a mission to integrate the dualities existing among all disciplines including Langlands program of mathematics. Speaking of which, if I may start my POV by explaining how classical reality emerges or gets birthed from quantum reality using our theory Simply put -- Our CPT(α,Φ) function( aka RH meta proof) is the measurement scale used by the universe to regulate/correlate the DUALITY existing between the “α governed quantum universe“ and “Φ governed classical universe”, by birthing the space-time of latter from the former again & again, using 5 HIGH-BARS, set by Wightman-Osterwalder-Schrader (the ultimate golden yardstick, see below and visual exhibit). One of the best ways to understand this is by integrating the foundational DUALITY existing between quantum and classical universes using the dualities of Langlands program. This is where, we have used this insight to build a "Langlands program style explanation for our i-TOE “, with a hope that it will inspire the experts of your calibers to collaborate with us to form it as a superset program, by incorporating Langlands program and other such programs within it(lnkd.in/gyx9yRXf). Stated otherwise, our integrated i-TOE (lnkd.in/gyx9yRXf) is a generalized version of Langlands program with a mission to bridge all such duality correspondences existing among everything under the universe, using our CPT(α,Φ) as the bridging function. In other words, our CPT(α,Φ) function proof of Riemann hypothesis is the foundational cornerstone of our multi T$ valuable i-TOE/SOE/ESG program as it not only has helped us to integrate the dualities of all disciplines but also has helped us to solve all $5MM problems of Clay institute as well. While I have summarized all the CI proofs (below), how about I start first with 5 Riemann hypothesis proofs, as our whole TOE is anchored on these 5 proofs only First, a quick summary of first 4 proofs, as the fifth proof is an integration of first 4 proofs 1. Proved it by “Gödel completing” Sir Michael Atiyah’s Todd function proof by reframing it with an additional physical dipole insight based CPT(α,Φ) function, acting as the correlation function of our i-TOE(see exhibit) 2. Proved it by limiting the exponential infinite series function of e by “α“ (lnkd.in/gy7XnNvs) 3. Proved it by limiting e and π simultaneously by α in such way that the famous inequality ("e^ π > π ^e") gets transformed as an equality ("e^ π >= π ^e") using our α=Maxwell daemon logic based proof(lnkd.in/gPr--sMg) 4. Proved by limiting e, π and Φ by α simultaneously , continuously, fractionally, individually & collectively”-- meaning -- simul-limiting their individual infinite continued fraction formulas using α, in such a way that their “collective α limited infinite continued fraction formula” can emerge as a perfect confluence of the 3 rescaled values of e, π and Φ (lnkd.in/gea7d26t). This brings us to our 5th proof in 5 steps 1. First, by proving the primary mission/motivation of Langlands program i.e. how the modularity of ζp(X;T) emerges from the lattice rings formed by two co-primes (say 4,5) corresponding to the discriminants of two foundational quadratic ratios of p<->Np <-> ζp(X;T) = P(T)/Q(T)= Π ζp(X;p^-s) i.e. using x^2 =1 with Δ=-4 as the basis & x^2 -x -1= 0 with Δ=5 as Q(T) to generate the higher order P(T)). In other words, the idea here is to factor these 2 co-primes using their respective unique Gaussian integers - (say m=5 = (2+i) (2-i) & n=4 =(2+0i) (2-0i))- in such a way that their respective square roots forming 8 and 4 lattice pointed rings on the upper half plane (H) with a representation of SL2Z with a determinant 5x1-1x4 = 1, satisfying the modularity condition f(τ+1) = f(τ) <--> x^2 =1 & f(-1/τ) = τ^k f(τ) <--> x^2 -x -1= 0 aka f(5τ+1/4τ+1)= (4τ+1)^k f(τ) - thus generating the periodicity and reciprocity of RH and all modular forms using Gauss’s reciprocity theorem (i.e. square root of any number on a clock with p hands is decided by where p lands on a mod 4 clock). The implication is that periodicity of all modular forms stem from this ratio only, as evident from the fact that Eigenvalues of RH including all modular forms follow the periodicity of the golden roots of x^2 -x -1= 0. For example, the generalized Riemann zeta function (aka Dirichlet L series) emerges with one such relationship with ζ(s) as well i.e. as the sum of reciprocal powers of integers that are primed to the power of mod Δ (5 in this case) by repeating with a periodicity of 4 with a pattern of plus sign for the two golden ratio solutions (1,4 mod 5) and minus sign for no solutions (2,3 mod 5). ζ(x^2 -x -1 ; s) = ζ(s) x { (1-1/2^s - 1/3^s+1/4^s) + (1/6^s - 1/7^s -1/8^s + 1/9^s) + (1/11^s - 1/12^s+1/13^s+ 1/14^s) …..} 2. Then, by proving how its Hecke operator starts operating on these lattice points with a lattice formula (τ(m) τ(n) = τ(m,n)), in such a way that the Eigenvalue of the τ(n)th position of its corresponding Ramanujan Δ(τ)=q-series is equal to the the τ(n)th coefficient value of q. This brings us to the generating series of modular forms ζ(X;s) = ζ(s) x Σ an n^-s with a generating series F(q) = Σan q^n = q (1-q^n) (1-q^Δn) = F(e^2πiz) - thus creating the periodicity of modular forms Now, when we analyze this series using the Δ function of Ramanujan by expressing hecke operators as a sum of lattices, we see Δ is an Eigenfunction of all Tn. In other words, the Eigenvalue of Tn on Δ is the value of τ(n)th coefficient in the following order Δ(τ) = τ(1)+ τ(2)+ τ(3)+ τ(4)+ τ(5)….. (with a lattice formula τ(m) τ(n) = τ(mn) whenever m and n are co primes) 3. Then, by proving how their Eigenvalues converge on the unit circle with a correspondence to the zeros of RH and the Eigenvalues of the random matrices of Montgomery-Dyson conjecture (including the periodicity of modular forms), by simultaneously fine-tuning the values e, π and Φ (as per our second, third and fourth proofs) - before birthing the Leibniz formula of π, as visualized in this clip(lnkd.in/g4557Vh4) 4. Similarly, by proving how these 8 lattice points (within the context of of i-TOE) manifest as classical quadruple particles birth hodge algebraic cycles (by collapsing with their 4 conjugates before squeezing themselves as 4 ellipsoid lattice slices (per α=r/R logic) as symplectic/asymmetric taurusized hodge lattices in the projected plane, so that gauge gravity can emerge by orbiting smoothly like the frames of Muybridge’s Horse in Motion. 5. And last but not least, by proving how these “Higgs wrapped ellipsoid slices” explain the “mass gaps” existing in the Yang-Mills equations using CP-Yang-Mills-Koide-Descartes-Kocik formulas" (lnkd.in/dxnNs_Xf). Simply put This strategy of proving the mission/motivation of Langlands program using the power of SL2Z modular groups (formed by the lattice rings of these two co-primes) serving as the action generator of the Eigenvalues of the zeros of RH(including all modular forms), by simultaneously fine-tuning the values e, π and Φ (as per our second, third and fourth proofs), is equivalent to proving our CPT(α,Φ) function as the physical action generator/correlation function of our i-TOE(1st proof), in an alternate manner(fifth proof). Now that we have explained the foundation part, this precisely is why we have used this CPT function strategy to solve/strike all CI problems (plus a few more) using one proofing stone called CPT(α,Φ) as it serendipitously ends up proving all CI problems using a symbiotic symmetrical/fractal causality existing among themselves -- that is capped by our ULTIMATE i-TOE itself -- and so, how about I summarize it here? The quantum spectrum of our Universe (modeled by Riemann zeta function by imagining it as the Riemann sphere) gets renormalized with the value of α (n-> α or 137), in such a way that the zeros of zeta function(including their moments) end up following the eigenvalue statistical gaps of gaussian/hermitian random matrices. This eigen-valued gaussian path(after a random time) is what ends up branching into two independent Brownian motion paths with an exponential Gaussian distribution of FHK Conjecture (by converging with an universality/gaussian decay), before branching again like the Ramanujan graphs with knots of algebraic L-functions whose coefficients of harmonic q series function of modular forms (adhering elliptic curve reciprocity), reflecting the periodicity of the GR-Eigen-valued actions of our TOE, using 10+ meta dualities as explained below

    • @charlesprabakar
      @charlesprabakar 2 місяці тому

      And one of the best ways to understand this insight is by understanding our UNIVERSALITY META-PROOF strategy of Riemann Hypothesis - which brings us to our firm’s “Gödel completed constructive meta-proof strategy of Riemann hypothesis (in pre print) that not only solves Riemann hypothesis but also all $5MM+ Clay institute unsolved problems, including our TOE. Simply put - Our UNIVERSALITY META-PROOF strategy has been developed by “ Gödel completing” Sir Michael Atiyah Riemann hypothesis proof with a new physical insight driven CPT(α,Φ) function proof, by additionally framing FSC(α) as an Omniscient AoC chooser of Banach-Tarski and Russell paradox/Hidden Variable/Maxwell daemon of our TOE, with a symbiotic symmetrical fractal causality to 10+C-old unsolved problems of TOE including Clay Institute problems as explained in this post f(lnkd.in/drGQ44Mt) and (lnkd.in/geUGrFuB). (Note : While Poincaré conjecture is already solved using Ricci flow approach, our meta proof also solves it in a complementary way using our Maxwell daemon logic, as explained below) What do I mean by that? Let us start from our Riemann hypothesis proof as it is one of the foundations not only to answer this question but also for our TOE as well For example We imagine our Universe as the Riemann Zeta function governed LMFDB universe (that is a motivic/metamorphic/Galois representation based SU 2/SU3/SU4 symmetrical engine. In other words, Z(1) is the fundamental frequency of this Universe’s TOE engine that is QVF/ZPE sourced, FSC(α)-Einstein-Bohr-HV-Maxwell Daemon governed frequency of Riemann's zeta function Ζ(S) with a singularity of S=1+0i, that is made up of his harmonic oscillating zeros(S=1/2+it stacked on his 1/2 critical line, before being transformed as a 137 frequency-spin momentum matched dipole, using our FSC(α)-GR-PLA+5 AITGE origin formulas(see exhibit) In other words, our TOE/SOE engine is the one that is transforming the Riemann's zeros into an artistic unit charge SU2 dipole(see visual), by contracting/expanding its electric flux as the center of mass (as r = αR), before rotating its magnetic flux by 90 in such a way that it can be extended into the left plane as a paired unit charge, using the "only possible analytical continuation of Zeta". Sure enough, this engine function is nothing but universe's wave function only, transforming itself from position/time space into frequency/momentum space, using the Fourier transform operator -- ψ(k) = ∫ ψ(t) e^-iwt dt - This brings us to our next point about CPT function This "one & only allowed analytically continued/functional equation allowed symmetrical dipole" is what limits/constrains the ∞ pole of Riemann sphere to a value of 137 cycles( per Laurent/Cauchy residue including the α=r/R,=fe/fp=we/wp logic of our CP function as explained in my post and attached one page exhibit for details lim t→ ∞ CPT(1/2 + ti) = 1/α cycles of dipole In other words, this CPT function proof(lnkd.in/drGQ44Mt) for Riemann hypothesis is a polynomial in the convex region of the Riemann Sphere only (thanks to the "one and only allowed analytical continuation logic of dipole & its 137 cycle ratio logic"), limiting/constraining the ∞ pole of Riemann sphere to the convex region - which brings us to scale logic of our TOE below 👇 Now that we have explained Riemann hypothesis proof let us dive deeper into rest of the Shakespearean/Keatsian play/ poetry narrative, using 5 such HIGH-BARS, set by Wightman-Osterwalder-Schrader ( the ultimate golden high bars of CFT correspondence) below Wightman-Osterwalder-Schrader HIgh-bar 1 Must have a scale-limiting correlation function to limit the “non Gaussian random field” into a "Gaussian free field with a Haag compliant Hilbert space" by re-scaling it automatically. Exposition 1: We've exceeded this high-bar, as we've used nature's one such “symmetry generating correlation function called CPT(α,Φ) function (aka Riemann hypothesis meta-proof solving all $5MM+ CI problems) to limit/scale the “non Gaussian random field of QVF within the Banach space” as a “Gaussian free field with a Haag complaint Hilbert space”, in such a way to rescale the periodicity of lattices by re-birthing them dynamically again and again(68 MP+68 AMP+Higgs w/2 spinors of Dirac eqn). Wightman-Osterwalder-Schrader HIgh-bar 2: Must discretize spacetime by renormalizing the RG flow with an action formula with a time-like holographic interpretation. Rising Action 2: Again, we have exceeded this high-bar, as we've used the very same CPT(α,Φ) function to break chiral symmetry with both ABJ anomaly & FQH state for both QED & QCD scenarios, by limiting the ∞-raised pole of Riemann sphere to a compact P-region, while simultaneously renormalizing the ∞ values of e with α, so that its position can be rotated as e^i137nπ S-F matched cycles unitarily. Wightman-Osterwalder-Schrader HIgh-bar 3: Must have a rescaling parameter for periodic action using a Wilson action or other similar Fourier type actions Climax 3: We've exceeded this high- bar as well, as we've used the very same CPT(α,Φ) function, to sustain the “α fine-tuned e and π driven Fourier action”, so that the coefficients & roots of their algebraic L-functions can model the periodicity of their GR-Eigen-valued F-actions. Wightman-Osterwalder-Schrader HIgh-bar 4: Must model the curvature of spacetime in proportion to both fluctuations & inflations in such a way that gauge-gravity can emerge from it Falling Action 4: We've exceeded this high-bar using our “Dice-rolling CPT(α,Φ) function”, by slicing/squeezing the infinite slices in the form of one or four ellipsoid lattice slices (per α=r/R ) into a symplectic/asymmetric taurusized hodge lattices(aka Hilbert’s countable ∞ hotel/Banach-Tarski/Russell's paradox) so that gauge gravity can emerge by orbiting smoothly like the frames of Muybridge’s Horse in Motion. Wightman-Osterwalder-Schrader HIgh-bar 5: Must have a QM system whose Hilbert space must be Haag compliant with string-gauge-holographic dualities. Resolution 5: We've exceeded this high-bar, as we've used the very same CPT(α,Φ) function, whose Hilbert space is not only Haag complaint but also string-gauge-holographic principle duality complaint via Lie-group with 10+ meta dualities (see exhibit). This precisely why, we have also scaled 5 AITGE origins of our TOE (i.e. RH sourced the Action generator of the Lie group as Action, Inertia, Time. Gravity and Entropy) with these 5 ingredients of CPT(α,Φ) function scaler in such a way to solve all CI problems (plus few more as well) as summarized below and here ( lnkd.in/geUGrFuB) ) Turns out, this is what also makes our TOE as the best candidate (compared to all other TOEs), as we visibly see the signatures of FSC and golden ratio throughout nature (link) Simply put - Ours is the only TOE that is anchored on this FSC/golden ratio governed CPT(α,Φ) function mechanism! In other words, for any TOE path to become a final TOE, it must be anchored on this FSC/golden ratio governed CPT(α,Φ) function mechanism end to end (in one form or the other)! Similarly, how about I expand its scope to the productivity challenge in the business dimension that has been developed by the very same TOE principles(& synthesized as 1 sentence below and in exhibit) -- Every Maslow’s holacracial(1) economic need is a direct/indirect manifestation of QE caused Scripture/Griffith’s human condition/depravity model problem(2) only -- that is solved using the Principle of least action & its new insight(3) driven Fine-structure-constant(FSC) caused Attention factor (4) driven FSC/GT/Nash Equilibrium(5) based reality accurate S-economics model(6) caused Friedman’s Attention-Pluck(7) -- that is followed by an Solow’s TFP-expansion( 8 ), before it being executed by “sovereign-to-choose with collaboration without coercion(9)” motto, driven Next-Gen capitalism called Sovereign/Conscious Sustainalism(10). as explainer in this summary (www.linkedin.com/pulse/summary-our-firms-10yrs-toe-work-wa-request-world-form-prabakar-k25sc/?trackingId=3oeFnfoaRT61kGCCQ7VNNQ%3D%3D) Similarly I had explained the philosophy neutral POV in this multi part comment (facebook.com/share/p/9wJYYNz1pdEv5jRo/?) Likewise, here is the Judaic Christian worldview specific explanations (facebook.com/share/p/GarnT1qGBokzKHoS/?) Welcome complementary POVs

  • @allembrace
    @allembrace 2 місяці тому

    SAMSKRITAM ( & PROTO) is the oldest language known to humanity- 95% in the world languages are derived from SAMSKRITAM. OLDEST written Vedas in the world & many other books are in SMSKRITAM . It is estimated that at least 5 to 10 million manuscripts in SAMSKRITAM are yet to be translated or deciphered to know what is in there . SAMSKRITAM alone produced literature which is more than that of all other languages combiningly produced in the world today. RAMAYANA ,MAHABHARATA, SRIMADHBHAGAVATAM are greatest epics of this world . Dance Music - have origins in VEDAS - In fact all forms of God, devatas are have their own music instruments !! NATYA SHASTRA . Ayurveda - medicine oldest available health care science . Martial arts have their descrition in Shastras. In science - ZERO, numerals, decimal numbering system, are all originated in INDIA .Astronomy , philosophy, astrology have all originated in INDIA - surya siddantha ( must see the work of Neelesh neelkanth OZHA - on internet). Without language , ther eis no human civilization. In 1492, two sea farers sponsered by Queen Isabella of spain, & portugal king wanted to reach INDIA for trade& commerce ( why only India ?)- COLUMBUS & Vasco DE GAMA . But the tragedy was that Both ISLAM & Christianity - invaded, conquered , colonized, turned INDIA into a slave country for nearly 1000 yrs. No other country, no other people, no other race has underwent such cataclysmic events for such long time.. Under ISLAMIC rule of 7 to 800 yrs, 80 millions hindus were slaughtered & 30000 temples razed, masjids built on many of them.

  • @lvdbijl
    @lvdbijl 2 місяці тому

    potential connections to Tononi et al's Integrated Information Theory ...

  • @FollowersOfPrabhupada
    @FollowersOfPrabhupada 2 місяці тому

    Great points. All Glories to Prabhupada

  • @aryangoswami7512
    @aryangoswami7512 2 місяці тому

    Hare Krishna

  • @krishnahare3638
    @krishnahare3638 2 місяці тому

    Great reminder of very special people use to walked on this earth along Prabhupada's mission. Books of him are evidence of it...Thank You!.

  • @tattvamasmi
    @tattvamasmi 2 місяці тому

    There is a good book "The Seven Great Untenables" (Sapta-Vidha Anupapatti). All questions, raised in this video by the presenter against main positions of advaita-vedanta are described in this book. Author of this book John A. Grimes in a very very respectful way discusses both positions: Ramanuja's (and some other's) objections and proper answers from advaita philosophers. In introduction and conclusion he pays great respect to Ramanuja and other teachers. However, i noticed in many vaishnava lectures, whenever they try to prove advaita wrong, they pour objections, but never try to give at least a minute of observation how advaita itself responds to these objections. It is a one-way street case. People often put their own rightness above the Truth. It seems that the goal of the author of this video was not to find the Truth, but to do what Vaishnavas have been doing for centuries - to humiliate Advaita Vedanta. Disagree on many points. What a regret... We are in a 21st century when people get more and more united, but vaishnavas keep their 'own' way...

  • @krishnadasa108
    @krishnadasa108 2 місяці тому

    You ONLY get a self-evident starting point by having a perfect God who reveals Himself and all the axiomatic truths needed to have a functional epistemology. Without God as the ultimate epistemic starting point you can't justify knowledge, because you're then stuck with sense perception and reasoning, and these are not pramanas in themselves. They need sabda to function as epistemic tools.

    • @Mayadanava
      @Mayadanava 3 дні тому

      In our tradition sense perception and reasoning are pramanas. We just know that reason and sense perception are of limited scope for accessing truth. One can access all the way to Brahman through the material intelligence, but not past it. Even in western philosophy the limits of reason is understood by good philosophers. The various schools of Indian thought including gaudia Vaishnavism declare which shabda and pramana in which hierarchy is followed. We need to find a way to show that our pramanas is the best. Which requires knowing how the west ended up where it is. And making powerful arguments as to why we have a better one.

    • @krishnadasa108
      @krishnadasa108 2 дні тому

      @@Mayadanava In Gaudiya Vaisnavism the reliability of sense perception and reason must first be established by sabda-pramana - knowledge revealed in scripture. Without sabda validating them, reasoning and perception lack epistemic authority. “Logic and mental speculation are inconclusive and unreliable sources of knowledge. They may be compared to the forest fire on top of a hill which has just been extinguished by showers of rain, and thus yields no light, but only a great quantity of smoke. Intelligent persons do not therefore consider logic and sensory perception to be independent and infallible sources of knowledge, but rather they are dependent assistants to the principal source of knowledge: the Vedic revelation.” (Prameya Ratnavali, Prameya Nine, Srila Baladeva Vidyabhusana) We cannot use human reasoning (anumana) to evaluate God’s existence without first justifying why reason itself is reliable. Without sabda, we have no way to validate our cognitive faculties or the assumptions they rest on. Imagine a world without God - how would you justify the epistemic validity of sense perception and reasoning? You couldn't. You would end in universal skepticism. Only if God communicates to you that, despite their limitations, sense perception and reasoning are, overall, epistemic tools, can they be trusted as such.

  • @yadurajdas532
    @yadurajdas532 2 місяці тому

    All glories to Shrila Acarya Dev 🙏 Our obeisances to the devotees who made this lectures accessible to us Hare Krishna

  • @prabhatmishra5667
    @prabhatmishra5667 3 місяці тому

    Thanks

  • @FlorisV82
    @FlorisV82 3 місяці тому

    Thank you!

  • @nix9409
    @nix9409 3 місяці тому

    Macoupin County skeleton.

  • @agnieszkastrolia1098
    @agnieszkastrolia1098 3 місяці тому

    I think it's good to look for more convincing way of preaching, but the same time have respect for everyone who is trying to serve in Lord Caitanya movement and trying to do their best..sometimes what's simple is more convincing because it comes from the heart. And what is too scientific becomes dry and only connected to ego.. we have to be very humble in every case.. humble pranamas.. 🙏

  • @agnieszkastrolia1098
    @agnieszkastrolia1098 3 місяці тому

    I had a break from being active because of lack of scientific approaches in Iskcon. Now I love what is happening with this mature & scientific approach. 🙏

  • @cvdevol
    @cvdevol 3 місяці тому

    If, as the fellow said, science can only say what something is like and what it does, but not what it is, then science cannot study consciousness, because no one can say what consciousness is like. Other than attaching various synonyms to it, it is unique, and isn't like anything else.

  • @brendawilliams8062
    @brendawilliams8062 3 місяці тому

    Ramanujan math

  • @brendawilliams8062
    @brendawilliams8062 3 місяці тому

    Thankyou

  • @srivthak
    @srivthak 3 місяці тому

    00:00 Inicio 24:46 Niaya Philosofy and the infinit regress

  • @jefflaporte913
    @jefflaporte913 4 місяці тому

    Good talk, but errs during description of AdS/CFT, saying anti-de Sitter space is the space we live in. We live in de Sitter space, not anti-de Sitter space. 6:44

    • @HzPjtvHYom4991
      @HzPjtvHYom4991 2 місяці тому

      He's using AdS/CFT as an analogy. The reference is subtle but the implication is that AdS/CFT correspondence is better suited to describe structures like the amplituhedron, and is preferred over de Sitter for a variety of reasons.

  • @abhinanda33
    @abhinanda33 4 місяці тому

    It's substantial, that Drutakarma prabhu reminded that he was actively involved in BI, Russia. He has done a few tours, the loigest was from Vladivostok to Saint Petersburg. That was fantastic. Actually, Drutakrama prabhu is a very potent and sara grahi speaker. I agree, that Vedic Planetarium is, mostly, a heritage project. As well as ideological.

  • @JAM-pn2dt
    @JAM-pn2dt 4 місяці тому

    Prabhupāda: Yes. So you quote that. Then it is perfect. You don't require to make research. Your research is no good because your senses are imperfect. I have no proper vision. If the light is stopped, I cannot see. This is the position of my eyes. So what is the use of my seeing? It is conditional. So one who is conditional, how he can give perfect knowledge? One who is not conditional, he can give perfect knowledge. Therefore we have to approach somebody who is not conditioned. Then we get perfect knowledge.

  • @jagannadhviswasurya3000
    @jagannadhviswasurya3000 4 місяці тому

    Thank you for uploading. Hare Krishna ❤

  • @abhinanda33
    @abhinanda33 4 місяці тому

    BI Florida dynamically generates the content. This session was not only about natural sciences. There was a lot, what HDG puts as "using humanities to enhance ISKCON" BVG has pointed out the problem of "dogmatization of ISKCON and the need to maintain a scientific approach to practice within ISKCON... We present KC to everyone as a science outside, but preach dogma inside" This undogmatic KC, that makes a deliberate use of the knowledge of Indology, Religion Study, History of Religion, Sociology of Religion, Phenomenology of Religion - that is what ISKCON Communications magazine used to do, conferences in Radhadesh. Sociolody of Religion, for example, is crucial, since ISKCON looses what was labeled as international (americanization = macdonaldization of ISKCON). Practically that meant that any ISKCON center would follow the same standarts, share the same values. Whereas now you feel home (ISKCON) often only in certain places, you follow only certain kirtaniyas, you identify with only certain lecturers. That means that localization of ISKCON is an important trend that we have to accept

  • @krsnalokavibes8903
    @krsnalokavibes8903 4 місяці тому

    Historical event thank you 🙏

  • @aslandenarnia6406
    @aslandenarnia6406 4 місяці тому

    Everything we know about Krishna is through texts like the Bhagavata Purana which ARE NOT HISTORICAL. They are mythological, fantastic, speculative texts. The Dwarka described in the BhP (10.69.1-6) is NOT the archaeological Dwarka. Krishna did NOT exist, he is just a literary character. There are no temples, monuments or inscriptions dedicated to Krishna that predate Buddha.

    • @abhinanda33
      @abhinanda33 4 місяці тому

      that makes the figure of Narayana (Krishna), and different movements of pancaratriks, santas, bhagavatas, gaudiyas, etc, even more emerging and mystical

  • @Daud438
    @Daud438 4 місяці тому

    You get more out of reading one book that’s great five times, than [you do] out of reading five mediocre books.” -Alex Hormozi

  • @vilasaraja
    @vilasaraja 4 місяці тому

    Hare Krsna ❤Jay Acaryadeva 🙏

  • @tonyhaslam
    @tonyhaslam 4 місяці тому

    Excellent work by all concerned. Thankyou so much for sharing this important link between science, philosophy, vedic studies and spiritual wellness. I look forward to the next session later today.

    • @bihstudies
      @bihstudies 3 місяці тому

      Thank you so much, we really appreciate your feedback

  • @yadurajdas532
    @yadurajdas532 4 місяці тому

    Hare Krishna 🙏 Pranam the whole board. Some us are not able to participate on live as we live in different times zones. Would the sessions be recorded on the channel for later reference ? Hare Krishna

  • @aakashgq
    @aakashgq 4 місяці тому

    Hare Krishna Thank you for this wonderful series. Just want to know what is Vedic understanding on Homo Erectus, Homo Habilis, Australopithecus etc. Do we accept that they existed? If yes, are they like extinct species now?

  • @chzhao
    @chzhao 4 місяці тому

    It actually covers chapters 5 and 6.

  • @cvdevol
    @cvdevol 4 місяці тому

    Sadaputa did not make a mistake in describing prapti siddhi. He was just quoting from the Bhagavatam translations. This should clear up the matter: "Through the perfection of prapti one acquires whatever one desires" SB 11.15.4 "Fixing his mind completely in Me within the element of false ego generated from the mode of goodness, the yogi obtains the power of mystic acquisition, by which he becomes the proprietor of the senses of all living entities. He obtains such perfection because his mind is absorbed in Me." SB 11.15.13 (note the word praptim occurs here in the Sanskrit)

  • @gauranga1008
    @gauranga1008 4 місяці тому

    Atheism is a big problem nowadays.

  • @chzhao
    @chzhao 5 місяців тому

    It actually covers Chapters 2, 3 and 4.

  • @aakashgq
    @aakashgq 5 місяців тому

    Is there any WhatsApp or telegram group to connect with the BIHS team here?

  • @chzhao
    @chzhao 5 місяців тому

    It actually covers Introduction and Chapter 1.

  • @abhinanda33
    @abhinanda33 5 місяців тому

    Fantastic! BIHS have uploaded finally this super cosmic event! This conference is a major milestone!

  • @douglaswatson6783
    @douglaswatson6783 6 місяців тому

    excellent. thank you.

  • @yadurajdas532
    @yadurajdas532 6 місяців тому

    What is wrong with the book ?

  • @vikramsoondur6891
    @vikramsoondur6891 6 місяців тому

    One of the worst books I've read in my life. Simply not of the same standard as Sadaputa dasaji's writings.

  • @krishnadharma_author
    @krishnadharma_author 6 місяців тому

    The difficulties I perceive with this thesis, that earth is Jambudvipa with various continents corresponding to the varshas, are the descriptions such as found in SB 5.17.11-12: There are also descriptions of personalities such as Hanuman, Prahlada, Vaivasvata Manu, etc living in these varshas. Text 11: Among the nine varṣas, the tract of land known as Bhārata-varṣa is understood to be the field of fruitive activities. Learned scholars and saintly persons declare the other eight varṣas to be meant for very highly elevated pious persons. After returning from the heavenly planets, they enjoy the remaining results of their pious activities in these eight earthly varṣas. Text 12: In these eight varṣas, or tracts of land, human beings live ten thousand years according to earthly calculations. All the inhabitants are almost like demigods. They have the bodily strength of ten thousand elephants. Indeed, their bodies are as sturdy as thunderbolts. The youthful duration of their lives is very pleasing, and both men and women enjoy sexual union with great pleasure for a long time. After years of sensual pleasure - when a balance of one year of life remains - the wife conceives a child. Thus the standard of pleasure for the residents of these heavenly regions is exactly like that of the human beings who lived during Tretā-yuga.

  • @Das.Selbst
    @Das.Selbst 6 місяців тому

    The Gita has all the answers to questions of the universe that we need to return to Krishna.

  • @krishnadharma_author
    @krishnadharma_author 6 місяців тому

    Who is speaking?

  • @Dharrmic
    @Dharrmic 7 місяців тому

    Jumped straight into the 10th canto as a sample method huh. HH Wilson would be pleased.

  • @jaisacinandanakrsnadasa1597
    @jaisacinandanakrsnadasa1597 7 місяців тому

    The cyclicality is not puranic. It is Upanishadic and as well as Smrtis lend support to it.

  • @subedichandri3113
    @subedichandri3113 7 місяців тому

    Does Gita has all the answers about the universe we have?i don't think so!

  • @ishankisto549
    @ishankisto549 7 місяців тому

    All Glories to Srila Prabhupada

  • @silberlinie
    @silberlinie 7 місяців тому

    It is painful to listen to him