Відео

So pretty, you explained it perfectly, thank you 💗

❤

Yay Leo!!!!

I am completely stunned at why these producers put such loud distracting background music on videosI. It makes it difficult to hear or concentrate on what is being said. This is exactly counterproductive. Do these producers have ANY clue at all?

Thank you so much, this was a great video and helped me make my over skirt for the renaissance fair!

Art is subjective, what one might consider art others might consider garbage. Generative AI is a tool just like a pencil is, so obviously, if someone thinks an image made using this tool is art, the artist is whomever used the tool, and if someone don't think the image is art, then there is no artist.

Thank you, Christina Wainright and all fellow dancers/ Cathy's. You are all special!

This talk should have been titled "I think an image I generated through button clicks is comparable to Velzaquez and Bacon: I don't understand how AI works and shouldn't be giving a talk " There have been some redeeming moments and insights listening to this but I can't tune out how this is basically a talk from a man striving for relevance, ingenuity, and fame culminating in justification of using AI and calling himself an artist.

This what quite disapointing as a lecture. Joe Nalven just showed how he interacts with AI, which is not uninteresting per se, but gives no answer to the initial question. He kept telling that he did "create" this or that with AI, while obviously he was mostly a "patron" and not an artist in his interactions with AI. To my opinion, he failed to address this difference and to bring convincing arguments. For the rest, he just stuck to the arguments we usually get from tech bros, like "humanity's tools have always evolved, there is nothing new, etc.". He didn't address the link between AI and the "capitalistication" of art and human intellectual work, neither.

The ones, whose creative material was used to train the models. Will they all rest in peace

Such a beautiful experience! Thank you Christina and PB Library and all Wuthering people! 😍

There are way more non-artists now, 10million/1, that can claim artistry... so, that is that. Free heroine for the masses.

"Well, there's nothing special about a paint brush." 37:00 Um........... Yes, there is. It doesn't have a finite range of "programs" to run, a stable of ideas. It's infinite, and CAN FAIL. The cognitive dissonance of the surrogacy is palpable. The feeding frenzy is done with blinders...willful self-deception, like a cult of opportunists claiming merit... and 50 million people silently screaming a lie, is deafening. Reminds me of the Larry Flint Porn explosion in the late 70s.... which raped all women at once in the same blind surrogate selfish gratification. ... "I'll gladly pay you on Tuesday, for some dopamine today." - The Interneters. ... "Click, click, click-click" As a real owl you never see actually lands in real moonlight on the real barn's real peak. "Click, click, click-click"

Reading this book for a college assignment, and I am glad to have found a video to help me read along!

Omg that was my 5th grader teacher!

Yes, Ai Weiwei is a artist.

We believe that the forces of Geneva, Switzerland + those who were dismissed suddenly = Ai

So that's why he wasn't a President 🙅🏾‍♂️🤦🏼‍♂️ Vikings mm AI right again

Tracing paper beat AI a long time ago.

If anything, I would say the Algorithms are "simulating" a human artist. Kinda there. But also kinda not. There is no human element in the creation involved as the Large Language Models creating photos, images, text or music are simply creating everything trough propbability. But that's not how a human artist works. That is not the creative-process. Even for those that create something trough randomness. So I would not say there is so much as an "artist" with those algorithms. Neither those that type the prompts and neither the algorithm itself. The artist are the millions of people which provided the training data those algorithms use(d). If you're ordering food at McDonalds you're not suddenly becoming a Chef either. It doesn't matter if the Burger was made by a human or a machine at that point. Just because I chose my own topings, if it should come with a double meat patty and without pickles doesn't mean I "made" it.

Every computer on earth is programmed using the backward propagation of data so humans are the artist. That is why there is a dozen godfathers of A.I an no fathers of A.I because it's only a concept that is nowhere near replicating human thought. We didn't actually invent A.I yet so just shows how thick you are.

There is no artist or creativity in ai. Ai generate an algorithm, that is why everything it generates looks the same. Art of any kind is more than just 1 and 0's. There is a process and a journey that starts long before the final work. The ai gen and pros takes being an artist to easily. Like there is nothing to it. You can compare it with the attitude where many people think that they can act and then goes and "act" in a movie. But they stink. Then we have the ai companies who are losing money. Because even if the internet is hyping it up, it's more a sign of desperation. People are reconnecting with true art again. Switching their digital tools out with pens, pencils, colour, analogue cameras and sculpturing. Human artists should press up their prices. Ai generated content has no value, it has the same value as NFT's. It is scientific proven that learning and creating art is good for our brain and phycology. Like when you learn to play the guitar or cello. When you learn to draw or paint. Even when you learn how to act in theatre schools. "Ai" is not that. Not even content creation. Because content is a part of social media. Scientists in Denmark have recently published a study that took years. It shows that children who haven't been on social media got less stressed and gain more happiness and self-esteem. Again, "ai" is not that.

There’s hope for humanity after all?

So much fun! Thank you SDPL!

Hello, I am Angel Martinez and want to interview Nancy Alvarado. I’m interviewing graduates, professors and retirees of their life as undergrads from various campuses and/or trade schools

Great video, thanks

Such an inspiring young Sister. The youth needs to pay attention like she is. Nuff said.

Oh! Love! Wonder if video has been forwarded to Ms. Bush, and, if not, there's always 2024.

I LOVE staff recommendations, there are so many gems I wouldn't find otherwise. Can't wait to read this!

Hello, thanks for sharing. How shugar that's is not disolf hurts water kefir?Thanks

There’s going to be a lot of dumping of the zines if these two librarians get fired etx

Thanks for the great instructions!

THE MUSIC IS BLOCKING OUT ALMOST ALL OF HER VOICE! Music is so annoying! I’m here to learn how to make something NOT to be annoyed by music. I’ll find instructions elsewhere. 👋👋👋👋

Ahi andaba también el buen Adolfo Guzman, en los Taco shops.

What is a policity? I'm all for diversity, but it would be best if a native English speaker with great speaking skills narrated this video. I can barely understand what he's saying here.

I would love to join you all this year!!

No!

THANK YOU.

Speed it up. Too long.

Rad lecture! Thanks Keith!!

Wow! Nice video! Thank you so much Kathy putting this together. I learned so much about the beautiful Gold Medallion trees.

Amazing!

Looks great!

Fantastic!!! Thanks for sharing your knowledge ;)

Kathy that's a real informative video. Nice job! Very well done!

amazing video!! 🤩

Awesome job Thanks for the info.

"promo sm" 😣

Looks yummy! I have an old recipe as well and wanted to see how this was made. Now that I see your video and read my recipe as well as your Betty Croccker link, it calls for two 3x12 strips. Did yours cook properly. Two strips probably would have been easier to form and look neater. Glad I saw this vid, I probaly would have done the same thing with mine. Thanks for the information. gives me more conficence now that I see how it is done.