Leaders' Decision-Making Lab
Leaders' Decision-Making Lab
  • 652
  • 242 592
The Science Digest | Ep 3: Generative AI Agents Simulates Human Behavior in Interactive Environments
Source: Park, J. S., O’Brien, J. C., Cai, C. J., Morris, M. R., Liang, P., & Bernstein, M. S. (2023). Generative agents: Interactive simulacra of human behavior. Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST ’23), October 29-November 1, 2023, San Francisco, CA, USA. doi.org/10.1145/3586183.3606763
Audio generated by NotebookLM.
#ScienceDiget #leadershipmatters #generativeai
Переглядів: 11

Відео

The Science Digest | Ep 2: Bullshit Jobs, Counterproductive Work Behavior (CWB) & Work Ethic
Переглядів 54 години тому
Source: Riester, J., & Keller, J. (2024). Considering the dark side of work: Bullshit job perceptions, deviant work behavior, and the moderating role of work ethic. Journal of Business Ethics. doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05821-w Audio generated by NotebookLM. #ScienceDiget #leadershipmatters #BullshitJobs
$10-million school negligence in supervision | This Week in Education Law #43
Переглядів 89 годин тому
In this episode of This Week in Education Law, I introduce a case that introduce A.H. v. Tamalpais Union High School, a case about the liability of school districts in instances of teacher sexual abuse. We'll learn the district's duty to protect students, the ramifications of negligent supervision, and the financial impacts of negligent supervision and retention. We'll also learn the legal conc...
The Science Digest | Ep 1: Election Night & Testosterone: The Hormonal Response to Wining and Losing
Переглядів 716 годин тому
Source: Stanton, S. J., Beehner, J. C., Saini, E. K., Kuhn, C. M., & LaBar, K. S. (2009). Dominance, politics, and physiology: Voters’ testosterone changes on the night of the 2008 United States Presidential Election. PLoS ONE, 4(10), e7543. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007543 Audio generated by NotebookLM. #ScienceDiget #leadershipmatters #physiology
Signaling Theory | Game of Theories Ep. 48
Переглядів 1821 годину тому
[Game of theories #48] In Episode 48 of Game of Theories, I introduce signaling theory, a theory that explains how information is credibly communicated between parties with asymmetric information. Learn about the theory’s historical roots, its development by economist Michael Spence, and its application in organizational, leadership, and market settings. Discover how observable actions serve as...
Retaliation for Exposing Racial Segregation | This Week in Education Law #42
Переглядів 9День тому
In This Week in Education Law: Educational Administrators' Guide, episode 42, I’ll introduce a recent court case Bloomberg v. N.Y.C. Department of Education (2024). A NYC principal, Jill Bloomberg, faced retaliation after calling out racially segregated sports teams in her school. Learn how to protect yourself when standing up against inequality and discrimination in federally funded programs. ...
Social Comparison Theory | Game of Theories Ep. 47
Переглядів 2421 день тому
[Game of theories #47] In Episode 47 of Game of Theories, I introduce social comparison theory, a theory introduced by Leon Festinger in 1954. This theory explains how individuals evaluate themselves by comparing to others, with significant implications for organizational behavior, employee motivation, and organizational performance. Learn how leaders can leverage this theory to drive productiv...
Information Seeking & Avoidance in Organizations | Instrumental, Hedonic & Cognitive Utility
Переглядів 11Місяць тому
In today's fast-paced world, we're bombarded with information from every direction. But why do we seek out certain information while avoiding others? In this video, we'll explore the key motives behind information seeking and avoidance in organizations-instrumental, hedonic, and cognitive utility. Explore decision making in organizations and learn strategies for optimizing information flow to e...
Hostile Work Environment: Retaliation in Schools | This Week in Education Law #41
Переглядів 28Місяць тому
In This Week in Education Law: Educational Administrators' Guide, episode 41, I’ll introduce a recent court case Rae v. Woburn Public Schools (2024). A school nurse, Amy Rae, faced alleged retaliation from educational administrators after advocating for students with disabilities. We explore the background, timeline of events, legal arguments, and ultimate court decision, offering insights into...
Zombie idea of leadership #7: Group consensus is a sign of a healthy team.
Переглядів 282 місяці тому
In this video, I introduce zombie idea #:7 our team or board always votes in the same way. Group consensus is a sign of a healthy team. Learn why constant agreement could signal deeper issues like groupthink, and explore the critical conditions for achieving the true wisdom of the crowd: diversity of thought, independent opinions, and decentralized decision making. Condorcet jury theorem: group...
Sins & Redemptions of Leadership Research | Sin #5: Lack of Falsification
Переглядів 82 місяці тому
In this video, I discuss Sin #5 of leadership research: Lack of falsification. We explore the principle of falsifiability as proposed by philosopher Karl Popper and discuss its importance in refining leadership theories. You'll learn why falsifiable theories are crucial for developing reliable and actionable insights, and how a lack of falsifiability can lead to unchallenged and potentially har...
Zombie idea of leadership #6: Leadership is better evaluated by supervisors than subordinates.
Переглядів 112 місяці тому
In this video, I discuss zombie idea #6: the belief that leadership is better evaluated by supervisors than subordinates. Despite evidence to the contrary, this idea persists, overshadowing the valuable insights that subordinates have about a leader's day-to-day performance. Why do subordinates provide better leadership evaluations? We explore how top-down evaluations can lead to failing upward...
Obsidian tutorial 2: Automated To-Read Lists, Glossary, and Quotebook with DataView Plugin
Переглядів 4882 місяці тому
In this tutorial, learn how to use Obsidian to optimize your note-taking and research process by creating an automated to-read list, glossary, and quote book using the DataView plugin. Follow step-by-step instructions to install and enable the plugin, tag your notes, and write simple code blocks to auto-generate and update lists and tables. Additionally, discover how to switch to a dark screen ...
Obsidian Tutorial: Note-Taking, Organizing Your Thoughts & Facilitating Cognitive Processes
Переглядів 1,6 тис.2 місяці тому
In this video, learn how to use Obsidian, a free markdown-based note-taking tool, to organize your research notes efficiently. Discover how to create and manage vaults, link ideas, and visualize connections through graph views. Follow a detailed walkthrough on setting up notes, making connections, and using templates, ensuring you're ready to keep your academic thoughts organized and accessible...
Define Constructs: What Are Theoretical Definitions & Operational Definitions of a Construct?
Переглядів 872 місяці тому
What are theoretical and operational definitions in research? Theoretical definitions provide an abstract explanation of constructs, while operational definitions translate these constructs into measurable variables. How to critically analyze literature and emphasizes the significance of aligning theoretical and operational definitions to ensure valid and reliable research findings? #Leadership...
Carson v. Makin (2022) Oral argument | U.S. Supreme Court | Public Funding for Religious Schools?
Переглядів 763 місяці тому
Carson v. Makin (2022) Oral argument | U.S. Supreme Court | Public Funding for Religious Schools?
Dr. Grace J. Liang: Qualitative Research in Educational Leadership
Переглядів 743 місяці тому
Dr. Grace J. Liang: Qualitative Research in Educational Leadership
Zombie idea of leadership #5: Leaders can NOT be data-driven & empathic at the same time.
Переглядів 263 місяці тому
Zombie idea of leadership #5: Leaders can NOT be data-driven & empathic at the same time.
Prospect Theory: How We Make Decisions Under Risk | Game of Theories #46
Переглядів 1083 місяці тому
Prospect Theory: How We Make Decisions Under Risk | Game of Theories #46
Zombie idea of leadership #4: Data don't lie.
Переглядів 243 місяці тому
Zombie idea of leadership #4: Data don't lie.
Kennedy v. Bremerton School District (2022) Oral argument at the U.S. Supreme Court | School prayers
Переглядів 453 місяці тому
Kennedy v. Bremerton School District (2022) Oral argument at the U.S. Supreme Court | School prayers
Diffusion of Innovations: How New Ideas Spread | Game of Theories #45
Переглядів 383 місяці тому
Diffusion of Innovations: How New Ideas Spread | Game of Theories #45
LGBTQ Storybooks and Parental Rights in Schools | This Week in Education Law #40
Переглядів 344 місяці тому
LGBTQ Storybooks and Parental Rights in Schools | This Week in Education Law #40
Sins & Redemptions of Leadership Research | Sin #4: Lack of Problematization
Переглядів 394 місяці тому
Sins & Redemptions of Leadership Research | Sin #4: Lack of Problematization
Teacher Fired Over Pronoun Use? Vlaming v. West Point School Board (2023) | This Week in Ed Law #39
Переглядів 544 місяці тому
Teacher Fired Over Pronoun Use? Vlaming v. West Point School Board (2023) | This Week in Ed Law #39
The Science of Cooperation: How Social Networks Shape Cooperation
Переглядів 644 місяці тому
The Science of Cooperation: How Social Networks Shape Cooperation
Does Missing Information in a Teacher's Contract Void Its Validity? | This Week in Education Law #38
Переглядів 304 місяці тому
Does Missing Information in a Teacher's Contract Void Its Validity? | This Week in Education Law #38
Bottom-line Mentality: How it Creates Zero-Sum Thinking and Ethical Neglect | Game of Theories #44
Переглядів 544 місяці тому
Bottom-line Mentality: How it Creates Zero-Sum Thinking and Ethical Neglect | Game of Theories #44
School District Retaliates Against Vocal Critic | This Week in Education Law #37
Переглядів 104 місяці тому
School District Retaliates Against Vocal Critic | This Week in Education Law #37
How Does Power Influence Our Memory & Decision-making
Переглядів 315 місяців тому
How Does Power Influence Our Memory & Decision-making

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @OptimalOpinion
    @OptimalOpinion 13 днів тому

    example would be a GREAT help

  • @OptimalOpinion
    @OptimalOpinion 13 днів тому

    Y do SIMPING exists - because it works

  • @OptimalOpinion
    @OptimalOpinion 13 днів тому

    I slaved for a cesspool where the management where the MOST inept and stupid ppl I never meet in life. IMO

  • @saramalekinejad9546
    @saramalekinejad9546 Місяць тому

    Thank you for explaining this well🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼

  • @leizelmeriales8575
    @leizelmeriales8575 Місяць тому

    Thank you for this ❤. Very helpful for PhD students.

  • @leelu3512
    @leelu3512 2 місяці тому

    Excellent lecture with relevant examples! Thanks!

  • @RobertScott-d6b
    @RobertScott-d6b 2 місяці тому

    Thank you. Excellent coverage of this interesting subject. Decision-making is a major activity in everyone's lives and it pays to understand how these come about, particularly when the decisions can have major consequences.

  • @EiziEizz
    @EiziEizz 2 місяці тому

    Very good videothank you

  • @hyperduality2838
    @hyperduality2838 2 місяці тому

    Making predictions to track targets, goals and objectives is a syntropic process, teleological. Your brain/mind has the purpose, function, goal or target of creating or synthesizing reality -- a syntropic process, teleological. Problem, reaction, solution -- the time dependent Hegelian dialectic. Thesis (problem) is dual to anti-thesis (reaction) creates the converging or syntropic thesis, synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic. Building, creating or synthesizing models of reality is a syntropic process consistent with the Hegelian dialectic! Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non teleological physics (entropy). Objective information (syntax) is dual to subjective information (semantics) -- information is dual. Syntax is dual to semantics -- languages, communication or information. Biological cells (neurons) are continually communicating with each other via messages hence they are using duality as form or syntax is dual to content or semantics. Models of reality are predictions of reality. Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Converting information into mutual or co-information is a syntropic process, teleological. "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Mind (syntropy, free energy or synergy) is dual to matter (entropy, energy) -- Descartes or Plato's divided line.

  • @thebadjer8249
    @thebadjer8249 2 місяці тому

    Fabulous video! One of the few videos that I have seen about the DataView plug in that makes the plug in easy to understand & the value it can add

  • @LuisLopez-ww5xy
    @LuisLopez-ww5xy 2 місяці тому

    Thanks. Any guidance about how to collect data from Instagram or facebook?

  • @henlohenlo689
    @henlohenlo689 2 місяці тому

    i use google docs for more extensive notes. and google keep for more on the fly temporary stuff. however both of those are limited. still lacking fully what i need. google docs lacks organization feature or ability to easily download the file. need google drive but still this is problematic. its my google drive file system usually dont match my home pc file system which leaves me disorganized.

  • @henlohenlo689
    @henlohenlo689 2 місяці тому

    but what about parties with conflicting interest. everyone on same party can agree on anything but outside parties with conflicting interests may disagree. example: ups may agree among themselves to price gouge customers, block competition from enter market, and dont do job creation. this is decision only people within ups would agree. but 98 percent of the rest of society would be harmed. it may even violate antitrust law and cartwright act etc.

  • @WithMariam911
    @WithMariam911 2 місяці тому

    very informative keep going

  • @WithMariam911
    @WithMariam911 2 місяці тому

    make a video on how team bottom-line mentality hinder team creative self efficacy with suitable example

  • @dramit4635
    @dramit4635 2 місяці тому

    Extremely important video which was beautifully explained. I had a prediction error watching it😅

  • @monzurhossain3413
    @monzurhossain3413 2 місяці тому

    Madam, how i can calculate which one is scale free network or which is not?? Any R code...please, show how to calculate scale free network. Please

  • @pujeetjha8265
    @pujeetjha8265 2 місяці тому

    This absolutely amazing, I have so much respect for you to organize your research like this!

  • @trading8
    @trading8 2 місяці тому

    With the balls examples, in the case of option B, and option C, can we still calculate the probability mathematically if the distribution of the black and yellow balls are unknown? I would say if the yellows and blacks are truly unknown, and there are 100 balls, out of which 70 are yellow or black, drawing a black is 35% chance, because out of 70, there is a 50% chance it’s going to be black. Is this calculation correct? If yes, there is no ambiguity, because we know the risk, know the probabilities. So, it’s just a question of whether the player understands the game. Whether it’s ambiguous or not will depend on the player. So the term “ambiguity” cannot be used to define the game, it defines the player. Am I getting it wrong? I still don’t get what ambiguity is in this case.

    • @moorabinda
      @moorabinda 2 місяці тому

      There are 90 balls. You don't know the ratio of yellow to black balls. It could be 0-60 yellow balls and vice versa of black balls. That is the abiguity.

    • @trading8
      @trading8 2 місяці тому

      @@moorabinda Oh, sorry, I got it wrong. What I still don’t understand though is if the probabilities can be calculated, then it’s just another kind of risk. What is the very thing or characteristic that makes us call a certain kind of risk ambiguity rather than just risk? The fact that it’s “unknown”? Okay, but whether we draw a red ball or not (even if the ratios were known) is also “unknown”. But we don’t call that ambiguity. Why?

    • @moorabinda
      @moorabinda 2 місяці тому

      The probabilities can’t be calculated because they have a range from 0 to 60. Therefore ambiguity. There is a known 30 red balls. So probability is also known. Channel owner can correct me but I think that’s your answer.

    • @trading8
      @trading8 2 місяці тому

      @@moorabinda Hmm, probabilities can’t be calculated? That might be right, but I’m not convinced about it. In the second example, she says our odds for winning are higher with option C, which means we must have some information regarding the probabilities of drawing a yellow ball with a red one. Which in turn means we must know something about the probabilities of drawing a yellow ball. But she also says in the first example that the probabilities for option B are unknown. And in the second example, she calls both probabilities unknown, yet we still know our odds are higher with option C? So, I don’t understand. Either I don’t understand the definition of what a probability is, or I don’t understand why the probability cannot be calculated. If something is unknown, it’s just 50-50 from an outcome point of view (in case of 2 possible outcomes).

  • @beginningclever3390
    @beginningclever3390 2 місяці тому

    Allah bless you ❤in time😂I just finished my test and want to be organized ❤😊

  • @panaderito
    @panaderito 3 місяці тому

    very useful. thanks a lot!

  • @sampassey6964
    @sampassey6964 3 місяці тому

    This is one of the philosophers greatest challenges. Lao tzu abandoned his society Copernicus and Descartes hid from society Christ and Socrates challenge and died from society. Best we got might be being nice with light challenge.

  • @wtan1851
    @wtan1851 3 місяці тому

    Firms don't converge to the same structures. Empirically, institutional theory is false.

  • @Nickster7
    @Nickster7 4 місяці тому

    Wow, this is such a simple to understand video on Institutional Theory. Thank you so much!

  • @RedwihteGame
    @RedwihteGame 4 місяці тому

    You are amazing. Thank you. Thank you thank you thank you! You made my mind spin correctly, now I know what to write. Best of this world to you!😊

  • @trevor244
    @trevor244 4 місяці тому

    Very good thank you for sharing.

  • @MorganBradley-no4eg
    @MorganBradley-no4eg 5 місяців тому

    Super helpful! Thank you!

  • @julianacarvalho195
    @julianacarvalho195 5 місяців тому

    Congratulations for this great video!

  • @tyranakok
    @tyranakok 5 місяців тому

    Thank YOU!

  • @katekate7622
    @katekate7622 6 місяців тому

    Your voice is interesting to listen to

  • @katekate7622
    @katekate7622 6 місяців тому

    Your voice is interesting to listen to

  • @salonichaudhary9330
    @salonichaudhary9330 6 місяців тому

    Hey could you please tell me how you created the node and edge file for co-authorship analysis? Because, I am not able to import raw data files downloaded from the Web of Science or Scopus database. Even when I am trying to select and create a node/edge file, I am not able to do that. So, if anyone could help me with this issue... it would be create help

  • @lonardoalgear6690
    @lonardoalgear6690 6 місяців тому

    Thank you very much 🥀

  • @EshaClabil
    @EshaClabil 6 місяців тому

    This is a brilliant course! Thank you for sharing this!

  • @bandaragunarathna4340
    @bandaragunarathna4340 6 місяців тому

    Extremely good!

  • @zahoorulhaq1559
    @zahoorulhaq1559 6 місяців тому

    Thanks for sharing

  • @SiyabongaMaseko-u1x
    @SiyabongaMaseko-u1x 6 місяців тому

    This is great,

  • @doxoforo420
    @doxoforo420 6 місяців тому

    for being a pretty unknown video is very good and with a lot of useful information, thank you

  • @ToS-wp2zw
    @ToS-wp2zw 6 місяців тому

    Thank you 😊

  • @ToS-wp2zw
    @ToS-wp2zw 6 місяців тому

    Great thanks

  • @forjanen
    @forjanen 7 місяців тому

    Thank you for this very informative video

  • @stephenz.7507
    @stephenz.7507 7 місяців тому

    Very concise and nice explanation on the QAP correlation and regression. Thanks a lot!

  • @rebecaalvarado5023
    @rebecaalvarado5023 7 місяців тому

    These video series have been sooooo helpful! Thank you very much

  • @alhajijawara340
    @alhajijawara340 8 місяців тому

    Communication skills are we explicit in theoretical theory of foundation.

  • @stephanep.rousseau7728
    @stephanep.rousseau7728 8 місяців тому

    Thank you. This is nice piece of knowledge shared. Much appreciated. I like that you present the theory and its criticism in the same footage. Nice work!

  • @mmallagennie4947
    @mmallagennie4947 8 місяців тому

    thank you!!!

  • @haoyizhao595
    @haoyizhao595 8 місяців тому

    very informative! Could you do Rohr's book "To run a constitution"? I feel like it's hard to comprehend when he was explaining his theories of Constitution.

    • @leadersdecisionmakinglab
      @leadersdecisionmakinglab 8 місяців тому

      Good suggestion! That's an intriguing book. I'll need to finish my current projects first.

  • @rsantos15
    @rsantos15 9 місяців тому

    Awesome video, you explained complex topics clearly.👍

  • @심성순-y8i
    @심성순-y8i 9 місяців тому

    Thanks you so much!

  • @zahoorulhaq1559
    @zahoorulhaq1559 9 місяців тому

    Very well explained