- 687
- 259 305
Leaders' Decision-Making Lab
United States
Приєднався 7 сер 2020
My channel aims to teach leaders to make better decisions. If you are a leader or aspire to be one, you'll learn practical, actionable strategies you can use in your decision making. The channel is updated weekly.
Series:
Neuroscience & Leaders' Decision-making
This Week in Education Law: Educational Administrators' Guide
Game of Theories: Explore Theories of Management, Administration, Leadership, Organizational Behavior, and Team Dynamics
Social Network Analysis
Series:
Neuroscience & Leaders' Decision-making
This Week in Education Law: Educational Administrators' Guide
Game of Theories: Explore Theories of Management, Administration, Leadership, Organizational Behavior, and Team Dynamics
Social Network Analysis
Science Digest | Ep 33 How Genetics Shapes Neural Circuits and Behavior
Source: Saez, I., Set, E., & Hsu, M. (2014). From genes to behavior: Placing cognitive models in the context of biological pathways. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8(336). doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00336
Audio generated by NotebookLM.
#ScienceDigest #leadershipmatters #genetics
Audio generated by NotebookLM.
#ScienceDigest #leadershipmatters #genetics
Переглядів: 4
Відео
Science Digest | Ep 32 How Fear of Missing Out (FoMO) Shapes Moral Decisions
Переглядів 117 годин тому
Source: McKee, P. C., Senthilnathan, I., Budnick, C. J., Bind, M.-A., Antonios, I., & Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2024). Fear of Missing Out’s (FoMO) relationship with moral judgment and behavior. PLOS ONE, 19(11), e0312724. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312724 Audio generated by NotebookLM. #ScienceDigest #leadershipmatters #moraldecision
Science Digest | Ep 31 Simplifying Decisions with Smart Heuristics
Переглядів 59 годин тому
Source: Gigerenzer, G., Reb, J., & Luan, S. (2022). Smart heuristics for individuals, teams, and organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 9(1), 171-198. doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-090506 Audio generated by NotebookLM. #ScienceDigest #leadershipmatters #heuristics
Science Digest | Ep 30 Evolutionary Leadership: From Genes to Cultures
Переглядів 412 годин тому
Source: Van Vugt, M., & von Rueden, C. R. (2020). From genes to minds to cultures: Evolutionary approaches to leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(101404). doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101404 Audio generated by NotebookLM. #ScienceDigest #leadershipmatters #neuroscienceleadership
Science Digest | Ep 29 Rationality Wars: Logical Rationality, Heuristics & Ecological Rationality
Переглядів 1314 годин тому
Source: Gigerenzer, G. (2024). The rationality wars: A personal reflection. Behavioural Public Policy, 1(21). doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2024.51 Audio generated by NotebookLM. #ScienceDigest #leadershipmatters #rationality
Science Digest | Ep 28 Moral Judgment Under Uncertainty: A Bayesian Approach
Переглядів 1216 годин тому
Source: Bogdan, P. C., Dolcos, S., & Dolcos, F. (2024). How likely is it that I would act the same way? Modeling moral judgment during uncertainty. Cognitive Science, 48(11), Article e70010. doi.org/10.1111/cogs.70010 Audio generated by NotebookLM. #ScienceDigest #leadershipmatters #moraldecision
The Science Digest | Ep 27 Why Social Rejection Hurts: The Neuroscience of Rejection
Переглядів 2121 годину тому
Source: Babür, B. G., Leong, Y. C., Pan, C. X., & Hackel, L. M. (2024). Neural responses to social rejection reflect dissociable learning about relational value and reward. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(49), Article e2400022121. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2400022121 Audio generated by NotebookLM. #ScienceDigest #leadershipmatters #SocialRejection
The Science Digest | Ep 26 The Neuroscience of Emotion Regulation: A Transdiagnostic Framework
Переглядів 34День тому
Source: Morawetz, C., Hemetsberger, F. J., Laird, A. R., & Kohn, N. (2025). Emotion regulation: From neural circuits to a transdiagnostic perspective. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 168, 105960. doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105960 Audio generated by NotebookLM. #ScienceDigest #leadershipmatters #emotionregulation
The Science Digest | Ep 25 How Mood and Confidence Shape Decision-Making Under Uncertainty
Переглядів 11День тому
Source: Lavín, C., García, R., & Fuentes, M. (2024). Navigating uncertainty: The role of mood and confidence in decision-making flexibility and performance. Behavioral Sciences, 14(1144). doi.org/10.3390/bs14121144 Audio generated by NotebookLM. #ScienceDigest #leadershipmatters #decisionmaking
The Science Digest | Ep 24 Why Do Simple Explanations Feel Satisfying?
Переглядів 7День тому
Source: Sehl, C. G., Denison, S., & Friedman, O. (2024). Doing things efficiently: Testing an account of why simple explanations are satisfying. Cognitive Psychology, 154, Article 101692. doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2024.101692 Audio generated by NotebookLM. #ScienceDigest #leadershipmatters #GoalDirectedBehavior
The Science Digest | Ep 23 How Do Brains Exercise Cognitive Control? Dynamic Neural Stability
Переглядів 21День тому
Source: Xu, M., Hosokawa, T., Tsutsui, K.-I., & Aihara, K. (2024). Dynamic tuning of neural stability for cognitive control. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(49), e2409487121. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2409487121 Audio generated by NotebookLM. #ScienceDigest #leadershipmatters #CognitiveControl
The Science Digest | Ep 22 Decluttering the Social Skills Literature: From 26 to 15 Key Concepts
Переглядів 514 днів тому
Source: Ross, R. L., Toth, A. A., Heggestad, E. D., & Banks, G. C. (2024). Trimming the fat: Identifying 15 underlying concepts from 26 in the social skills domain. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 45(1), Article e2846. doi.org/10.1002/job.2846 Audio generated by NotebookLM. #ScienceDigest #leadershipmatters #socialskills
The Science Digest | Ep 21 Styles of Curiosity: Hunter, Busybody, and Dancer
Переглядів 3714 днів тому
Source: Zhou, D., Patankar, S., Lydon-Staley, D. M., Zurn, P., Gerlach, M., & Bassett, D. S. (2024). Architectural styles of curiosity in global Wikipedia mobile app readership. Science Advances, 10(eadn3268). doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adn3268 Audio generated by NotebookLM. #ScienceDigest #leadershipmatters #curiosity
The Science Digest | Ep 20 Competitive Winning and Its Impact on Cheating Behavior
Переглядів 614 днів тому
Source: Colman, A. M., Pulford, B. D., Frosch, C. A., Mangiarulo, M., & Miles, J. N. V. (2022). Does competitive winning increase subsequent cheating? Royal Society Open Science, 9(202197). doi.org/10.1098/rsos.202197 Audio generated by NotebookLM. #ScienceDigest #leadershipmatters #cheating
The Science Digest | Ep 19 Quantification Fixation: Why Numbers Dominate Decision-Making
Переглядів 614 днів тому
Source: Chang, L. W., Kirgios, E. L., Mullainathan, S., & Milkman, K. L. (2024). Does counting change what counts? Quantification fixation biases decision-making. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(46), Article e2400215121. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2400215121 Audio generated by NotebookLM. #ScienceDigest #leadershipmatters #quantification
The Science Digest | Ep 18 How Task Absorption Shapes Decision-Making
Переглядів 5521 день тому
The Science Digest | Ep 18 How Task Absorption Shapes Decision-Making
The Science Digest | Ep 17 The Causal Illusion in Positive Leadership Style Research
Переглядів 13421 день тому
The Science Digest | Ep 17 The Causal Illusion in Positive Leadership Style Research
The Science Digest | Ep 16 How Beliefs Change: Analogies in Modeling Belief Dynamics
Переглядів 821 день тому
The Science Digest | Ep 16 How Beliefs Change: Analogies in Modeling Belief Dynamics
The Science Digest | Ep 15 How Hierarchical Cognitive Control Shapes Decision-Making
Переглядів 1021 день тому
The Science Digest | Ep 15 How Hierarchical Cognitive Control Shapes Decision-Making
Organizational Norms | Descriptive & Injunctive Norms | Leaders' Role in Shaping Norm Salience (New)
Переглядів 2721 день тому
Organizational Norms | Descriptive & Injunctive Norms | Leaders' Role in Shaping Norm Salience (New)
The Science Digest | Ep 14 Human vs. AI: Who Holds Epistemic Authority?
Переглядів 1121 день тому
The Science Digest | Ep 14 Human vs. AI: Who Holds Epistemic Authority?
Hormones & Implicit Power Motive: How Hormones Drive Our Unconscious Desire for Influence & Control
Переглядів 1328 днів тому
Hormones & Implicit Power Motive: How Hormones Drive Our Unconscious Desire for Influence & Control
Organizational Commitment [Game of Theories #40] Updated
Переглядів 35Місяць тому
Organizational Commitment [Game of Theories #40] Updated
The Science Digest | Ep 13 Algorithmic Decisions in Education Governance
Переглядів 5Місяць тому
The Science Digest | Ep 13 Algorithmic Decisions in Education Governance
The Science Digest | Ep 12 How Biological Constraints Shape Rationality, Preferences, and Emotions
Переглядів 26Місяць тому
The Science Digest | Ep 12 How Biological Constraints Shape Rationality, Preferences, and Emotions
The Science Digest | Ep 11 The Ethics of Generative AI
Переглядів 14Місяць тому
The Science Digest | Ep 11 The Ethics of Generative AI
The Science Digest | Ep 10 How Brain Science Explains Managerial Decisions
Переглядів 23Місяць тому
The Science Digest | Ep 10 How Brain Science Explains Managerial Decisions
Sins & Redemptions of Leadership Research | Sin #6 Unsubstantiated Causal Claims
Переглядів 5Місяць тому
Sins & Redemptions of Leadership Research | Sin #6 Unsubstantiated Causal Claims
The Science Digest | Ep 9 Can We Trust AI? Agency Costs in Algorithmic Decision-Making
Переглядів 9Місяць тому
The Science Digest | Ep 9 Can We Trust AI? Agency Costs in Algorithmic Decision-Making
The Science Digest | Ep 8: How Genes and Environment Shape Leadership in the Workplace
Переглядів 4Місяць тому
The Science Digest | Ep 8: How Genes and Environment Shape Leadership in the Workplace
You are doing a great job! Can you help me with something unrelated? I have a SafePal wallet with TRC20 USDT in it and I have my recovery phrase: {pride pole obtain together second when future mask review nature potato bulb}. How do I transfer them to Binance?
The video content is very interesting! I am a little confused: someone sent me a TRC20 USDT and I have the recovery phrase: 「pride pole obtain together second when future mask review nature potato bulb」 How do I extract them?
This sounded AI generated. I learnt nothing.
Hi
Fascinating! For me it tied up a bunch of loose ends. Dynamic stability sounds like a chaotic attractor that might model default/executive/salience mode switching.
Very cool use of notebooklm!
Thank you
This is brilliant, thank wondered how many board members know this
Great article review.
... would work if the ties were neither strong nor weak, but with a focus on moving towards an eco-sustainable global community .... understand this ... understand this ... there are not 'ties' outside of clean air, water, soil, food, plants, animals, rivers, oceans, mountains .... none ... because those are the 'ties' that make us ... head to toe ... nail to eye ... not the reverse ...
Great video. Thank you very much. It was very helpful for me. I still have one question... If I have a matrix about cooperation and an attribute variable about perceptions with 5 categories, and I want to test if perceptions have any influence on the cooperation network. How can I transform the perceptions variable into a matrix, so I can apply QAP?
Wow. A video for humans written by LLMs comprising LLMs talking to each other like humans about LLMs acting like humans. Is this the Singularity, or just the most dystopian thing I have seen all week?
Insanity, he even tried using her new name, but imagine in rimance languages how ur male and female changes so many words. Insanity
more consistent and less biased = less fair? hmm....
example would be a GREAT help
Y do SIMPING exists - because it works
I slaved for a cesspool where the management where the MOST inept and stupid ppl I never meet in life. IMO
Thank you for explaining this well🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼
Thank you for this ❤. Very helpful for PhD students.
Excellent lecture with relevant examples! Thanks!
Thank you. Excellent coverage of this interesting subject. Decision-making is a major activity in everyone's lives and it pays to understand how these come about, particularly when the decisions can have major consequences.
Very good videothank you
Making predictions to track targets, goals and objectives is a syntropic process, teleological. Your brain/mind has the purpose, function, goal or target of creating or synthesizing reality -- a syntropic process, teleological. Problem, reaction, solution -- the time dependent Hegelian dialectic. Thesis (problem) is dual to anti-thesis (reaction) creates the converging or syntropic thesis, synthesis -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic. Building, creating or synthesizing models of reality is a syntropic process consistent with the Hegelian dialectic! Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non teleological physics (entropy). Objective information (syntax) is dual to subjective information (semantics) -- information is dual. Syntax is dual to semantics -- languages, communication or information. Biological cells (neurons) are continually communicating with each other via messages hence they are using duality as form or syntax is dual to content or semantics. Models of reality are predictions of reality. Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Converting information into mutual or co-information is a syntropic process, teleological. "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Mind (syntropy, free energy or synergy) is dual to matter (entropy, energy) -- Descartes or Plato's divided line.
Fabulous video! One of the few videos that I have seen about the DataView plug in that makes the plug in easy to understand & the value it can add
Thanks. Any guidance about how to collect data from Instagram or facebook?
i use google docs for more extensive notes. and google keep for more on the fly temporary stuff. however both of those are limited. still lacking fully what i need. google docs lacks organization feature or ability to easily download the file. need google drive but still this is problematic. its my google drive file system usually dont match my home pc file system which leaves me disorganized.
but what about parties with conflicting interest. everyone on same party can agree on anything but outside parties with conflicting interests may disagree. example: ups may agree among themselves to price gouge customers, block competition from enter market, and dont do job creation. this is decision only people within ups would agree. but 98 percent of the rest of society would be harmed. it may even violate antitrust law and cartwright act etc.
very informative keep going
make a video on how team bottom-line mentality hinder team creative self efficacy with suitable example
Extremely important video which was beautifully explained. I had a prediction error watching it😅
Madam, how i can calculate which one is scale free network or which is not?? Any R code...please, show how to calculate scale free network. Please
This absolutely amazing, I have so much respect for you to organize your research like this!
With the balls examples, in the case of option B, and option C, can we still calculate the probability mathematically if the distribution of the black and yellow balls are unknown? I would say if the yellows and blacks are truly unknown, and there are 100 balls, out of which 70 are yellow or black, drawing a black is 35% chance, because out of 70, there is a 50% chance it’s going to be black. Is this calculation correct? If yes, there is no ambiguity, because we know the risk, know the probabilities. So, it’s just a question of whether the player understands the game. Whether it’s ambiguous or not will depend on the player. So the term “ambiguity” cannot be used to define the game, it defines the player. Am I getting it wrong? I still don’t get what ambiguity is in this case.
There are 90 balls. You don't know the ratio of yellow to black balls. It could be 0-60 yellow balls and vice versa of black balls. That is the abiguity.
@@moorabinda Oh, sorry, I got it wrong. What I still don’t understand though is if the probabilities can be calculated, then it’s just another kind of risk. What is the very thing or characteristic that makes us call a certain kind of risk ambiguity rather than just risk? The fact that it’s “unknown”? Okay, but whether we draw a red ball or not (even if the ratios were known) is also “unknown”. But we don’t call that ambiguity. Why?
The probabilities can’t be calculated because they have a range from 0 to 60. Therefore ambiguity. There is a known 30 red balls. So probability is also known. Channel owner can correct me but I think that’s your answer.
@@moorabinda Hmm, probabilities can’t be calculated? That might be right, but I’m not convinced about it. In the second example, she says our odds for winning are higher with option C, which means we must have some information regarding the probabilities of drawing a yellow ball with a red one. Which in turn means we must know something about the probabilities of drawing a yellow ball. But she also says in the first example that the probabilities for option B are unknown. And in the second example, she calls both probabilities unknown, yet we still know our odds are higher with option C? So, I don’t understand. Either I don’t understand the definition of what a probability is, or I don’t understand why the probability cannot be calculated. If something is unknown, it’s just 50-50 from an outcome point of view (in case of 2 possible outcomes).
Allah bless you ❤in time😂I just finished my test and want to be organized ❤😊
very useful. thanks a lot!
This is one of the philosophers greatest challenges. Lao tzu abandoned his society Copernicus and Descartes hid from society Christ and Socrates challenge and died from society. Best we got might be being nice with light challenge.
Firms don't converge to the same structures. Empirically, institutional theory is false.
Wow, this is such a simple to understand video on Institutional Theory. Thank you so much!
You are amazing. Thank you. Thank you thank you thank you! You made my mind spin correctly, now I know what to write. Best of this world to you!😊
Very good thank you for sharing.
Super helpful! Thank you!
Congratulations for this great video!
Thank YOU!
Your voice is interesting to listen to
Your voice is interesting to listen to
Hey could you please tell me how you created the node and edge file for co-authorship analysis? Because, I am not able to import raw data files downloaded from the Web of Science or Scopus database. Even when I am trying to select and create a node/edge file, I am not able to do that. So, if anyone could help me with this issue... it would be create help
Thank you very much 🥀
This is a brilliant course! Thank you for sharing this!
Extremely good!
Thanks for sharing