Відео

Hello! I saw your videos and was impressed by the quality of your content. However, after analysis, I noticed there needs to be improvement for getting more views and subscribers. You are working hard but the main motive to reach an exact audience is not fulfilled. You are working for your audience if the video can't reach them. That's a waste of your energy and time also. I will show the problem in your video and share how to fix it. Only say ‘yes’ if you want to grow your channel.

get out you filthy communist

go back to Pakistan you filthy communist

Who do you think is eating at those fancy restaurants, shopping in luxury stores, and driving the amazing cars that inhabit central London? And who do you think is paying the 20% VAT on everything they buy, plus on the fees for their financial advice, legal advice, estate planning advice, etc? They also pay tax on the money they earn in the UK, and the money they earn outside the UK is taxed in the countries where it's earned. This video makes it sound like non-doms are parasites who don't pay their way, when nothing could be further from the truth. If the UK doesn't want them, there are plenty of other places that do - Italy, Spain, and the UAE, for example, are falling over themselves to attract rich foreigners.

What's the advantage of NOT claming non-dom?

The "problem" with Non Dom is that a lot of people see it as "unfair" and that these people don't pay tax "but they have to". Nothing could be futrther form the truth, as OF COURSE these people pay tax. As they pay tax on their UK income, and they in almost evry case pay tax on their foreign income IN THE COUNTRY THAT THE INCOME IS GENERATED.. So even if the Non DOm status is removed they will probably not pay any more tax into the UK as the tax they pay in foreing countries will of course be offset. The only result of this will be that these rich people will probably leave, a lot of them anyway, and hardly any rich people form other countries will no longer immigrate to the UK. As these people of course don't want the extra hassle with HMRC asking loads of questions. Other countries have experienced that rich people leave if the tax regime is too harsch. For example the last 5-6 years in Norway lots and lots of rich people has just left, mainly to Switzerland. Reason is not to do with non dom but to do with the very high wealth tax Norwegians has to pay. For example a Norwegians with a rather modest income of £100k will have to pay a marginal tax of around 46%, about the same as many European countries, but if they own assets, for example a company worth £200 million they would in addition have to pay £2 million in wealth tax, something that a foreign owner of a similar company in Norway does NOT have to pay, therefore creating a situation that is deeply unfair. Still the socialist Norwegian government just sit back and look at this, at the same time as the Norwegian currency is on the way down the toilet and the state is getting larger and larger strangling private investment. I predict the UK socialist government will manage to do the same in the UK...

Next time use a capable sound engineer. It was nice but the sound was atrocious. That said, I sat through most of it, till 32 minutes in...

WTF why Indian map is wrong l, why you f people do this nonsence

In a nutshell: to be a wealth person you must not pay taxes. Therefore taxes are bad

Syria chemical weapons playlist m.ua-cam.com/play/PLpmwWuIh57wa92M6fRGpgRYaSREyyDk3v.html

Lets hope the wealthy people actually have the courage to leave and take their money with them, thus hastening the collapse of the British Occupying Power. Recall the English Parliament. Repeal the 1707 Act of Union. Expel the British from England.

Lord Rothermere owner Daily Mail and very powerful in the UK media industry, Royals, Governmental influence is still reported as being a Non-Dom paying his tax to France. Says it all really.

Shouldn't that deficit of women continue to the upper age group?

I'm from a course teaching how evolutionary ecology shaped human behaviour, this is an insightful video.

"... not least Asia". But now it turns out that China supports Russia in the war on Ukraine so the whole plan to trade more with China has gone out the window.

This channel blows .

Great videos, what you need to pay attention to is psychological complacency in a society ("cortical arousal") It explains why societies are struggling to develop, in comparison to societies which have focus, intensity and high sense of urgency ("high cortical arousal") see for instance ua-cam.com/video/7AuOucrgK-U/v-deo.html

Most of your videos are racists. But then you are Warwick 😂 What else to expect ?

CCP? Com’On.

Mark Harrison says that American promises not to let NATO expand to the East were never written down. This is true if he means a written protocol or treaty. It is quite false if he means there is no written documentation of these promises which were clearly set down in the minutes of the meetings held at that time. It is probably not helpful, as Mark Harrison does, to look at the neo-Nazi movement in Ukraine in terms of success at the polls. Surely the disturbing thing is how mainstream support for Stepan Bandera and the OUN has become, with statues of Bandera all over Ukraine, and torchlit parades (yes, torchlit parades!) on his birthday on January 1st. This is something a democratic, civilized country should be reacting against on its own. It shouldn't need Russia to be censoring them for it. Also, there are the extreme right-wing battalions, of whom the Azov battalion is only one, which really have no counterpart in the UK or other countries in Western Europe. What is the Hungarian or Polish equivalent to the Azov battalion? There is none.

p͓̽r͓̽o͓̽m͓̽o͓̽s͓̽m͓̽

Interesting conjectures & the paper suffers from a Mesopotamian-cradle bias. Rice is a super cereal in terms of cultivating complexity & the extremely high number of varieties that exist especially in India & to a lesser extent SE Asia & China/Japan/Korea.. A better picture can be gleaned if some focus can be spared here.. do not be afraid that this may break your sacred models which have become smug edifices of preserving domination instead of liberation.

From their paper (Mayshar, Moav and Pascali, 2022): 'Consider a farming society that subsists on a cereal grain that has to be harvested within a short period and then stored for year-round consumption. A tax collector could confiscate part of the stored grain and transport it for consumption by distant elite and other non-food producers, even if there is no food surplus. One might worry that ongoing confiscation would lead to a shrinking population and eventually eliminate the source of income for the elite. However, because of diminishing average product of labor, *the smaller population would produce higher output per farmer* This would result in an equilibrium with a stable population in which total output exceeds the farming population’s subsistence needs, with the surplus confiscated by the nonfarming elite.' Note that this is just a thought experiment and not based on historical evidence - the authors are not claiming that the average tax collector in Neolithic societies routinely confiscated cereals even in the event of, say, a famine. But even accepting the hypothetical situation posed, their deduction that this expropriation of non-surplus crop to feed 'a distant elite' would not only be *politically* sustainable but would yield 'higher output per farmer' makes no sense. This would only happen if the population of private farmers decreased as a result of this policy - i.e. through expropriation of low-output farmland or collectivisation - and even then history has shown that expropriation and collectivisation might result by some measures in "higher output per farmer'" but not in greater agricultural productivity or in stable complex societies (e.g. the Holodomor in Soviet Ukraine).

Seems a little complacent. There are many plausible explanations for the correlation between cereal-oligoculture societies and complex society formation - e.g. nutrition. In the West for decades, most children are taught that "breakfast" is the most important meal of the day - and that breakfast is typically cereal (fortified with vitamins like folic acid) with milk(which also provides nutrients which promote healthy development). As historically and currently complex states are well-integrated into the global economy (e.g. China, Taiwan, U.S., European and MENA) these countries have access to a great diversity of crop types. It's telling that most children across these developing and developed nations do not start the day with a yam or sweet potato, but instead with dairy products and cereals (e.g. eggs with toast, "cereals" with milk)

so taxation effectively increases infant mortality rates?

Very insightful. Appreciate the hardwork. 👏

Hi loved this, some changes here Crucita Ecuador. For sale/rent fibre internet included. start 3am - 9am UK afternoons off Beach House ua-cam.com/video/6r09EE2uuqI/v-deo.html 2 bed Apartment ua-cam.com/video/sD24xrKz2_g/v-deo.html The big house ua-cam.com/video/1RZX2jA5S_w/v-deo.html

Great Video!

I am a research scholar, and I want to do a PhD on Happiness. Please help me. What kind of variable I have to take for this

crazy old bat.

Weally love her Lithp

nice content

Summary: buy XRP

Who are the people who dislike courts the most? Criminals. What does that say about the people who want to leave the ECJ?

The problem with the EU laws is that they apply to companies who do not trade with the EU which is stupid. Why when your not a member of this club why would you allow there laws to apply to you when you have your own laws.

she seems like she likes the sound of her own voice

Tom Samson - sadly a worthless contribution. He's compared incomparables. You cannot compare an agreement reached to increase trade with an agreement reached to reduce trade trade.Both have exchange rate implications which affect global trade volumes - but in the opposite direction!!!! Without an analysis of this the study is meaningless and the conclusions which are suggested cannot possibly be drawn.

Filmed at NIESR’s UK After Brexit Conference. Prof Tridimas (King’s College London) argues that the challenge for the government is to find a new dispute resolution mechanism for future trade with the rest of the EU.

Filmed at NIESR’s UK After Brexit Conference. Prof Portes (King’s College London and UK in a changing Europe) warns that the first problem in any decision on the fate of the 3 million EU citizens estimated to be in the UK is that in the absence of a register we do not know who they are and where they are.

Filmed at NIESR’s UK After Brexit Conference. Allie Renison (Head of Europe and Trade Policy at the Institute of Directors) argues that the UK stands a good chance of negotiating a good deal with the US, provided we take time to set out our priorities.

Filmed at NIESR’s Uk After Brexit Conference. Prof Bernard (Trinity College, Cambridge and UK in a Changing Europe) on the positive role played by the European Court of Justice in ensuring all EU member states played by the rules. Who will uphold the rules of the game in any future trade deal signed by the UK?

Filmed at NIESR’s UK After Brexit Conference. Dr Hestermeyer (King’s College London) on the pros and cons of withdrawing from the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice: what are the trade-offs between sovereignty and the ability of enforce our trade agreements?

Filmed at NIESR’s UK After Brexit Conference. Prof Craft (Warwick University and CAGE) on the challenge of replacing the old ‘state aid’ regime after Brexit.