Відео

I wish I could get a more modern version of this. I want to be able to do this in Blender 4.0 and Godot 4.

it works, and the exact versions of the software are stated : awesome !!!!!! (tested on blender 2.93 +godot 3.5, not the animation part)

So we're just ignoring the group stealth option in the book? If half of the party succeeds the whole party succeeds.

WOW! You shocked me twice in the first five minutes of the video, firstly, you treated the default cube with respect and secondly, you know what lavender is! Amazing!

Works like magic, thank you :D

Awesome video and perfect explanation and demonstration. Thanks a lot for this!

I'd argue the very premise of your argument is flawed from the start! It is not whether I'm hidden it's whether or not my attacked revealed my location in the first place! If I'm hiding and the party gets surprise on a group or I am just attacking from the shadows, when its my turn I fire my crossbow off how pray tell do you now divine my location? Were you looking in my direction?, Did you see the arrow? Can you see an arrow coming straight at you? Can you see an arrow from its profile? Which scenario has greatest chance of detecting arrow? When I missed and the arrow goes flying by your head can you perceive the direction it came from? ( Test it out face away from someone and have them shoot a air soft gun and try and figure out which direction its coming from. Directly behind, from the left, the right maybe above or perhaps below and to the right? The only fact you can articulate is behind is that enough?) When the arrow strikes you were you able to see where it came from? If we're in a poorly lit dungeon and I'm wearing all black when I dart out and attack striking your back and fade back into the shadows how are you seeing me? To counter this your evil mage casts daylight removing all shadow. On my turn I cast wall of light & combined with an already brightly lit room you have a brightly lit wall where I fire arrows from behind, even if you make your save to avoid being blinded How are you seeing me with all the cacophony of light? I trust I make my point clearly. I come at this from having played air soft and paintball. Knowing the enemy is in the vicinity is not enough it does not come close. Been in a situation where the other team "failed their stealth check so to speak young kids talking to loud and we were able to surprise the young kids only to be completely caught by surprise by the two snipers that took us out! Seems the snipers couldn't get the kids to remain quite so the just rolled with it! Had Scenario we're are sneaking up to a contested area.Three of us go undetected one to the left and two on the right however, two are making more noise than a herd of elephants coming from the rear of us. According to D&D logic the two members of the group should have denied the whole party "SURPRISE" because they got detected. In actuality while our team mates "died" they also led the enemy to their deaths because they moved up closer to take out our team mates and were totally and absolutely surprised when we attacked and took them out! This makes no sense logically, it makes no sense in reality it's absolute unmitigated garbage. The shear stupidity is mind boggling. If members of the party successfully made their checks they are hidden just as we remained hidden on the airsoft field! Your aware of drew your attention this doesn't translate into the whole party being discovered! ( This is why we never ever use rules as written for surprise as it makes no sense whatsoever!) These are all relevant facts because having a paintball or air soft round flying past your head alerts you that someone is near but, rarely ever has it revealed the hidden snipers location on the first "round of combat"! ( For the record airsoft BB's travel around same speed as most arrows around 300 FPS.) Understand I'm not saying that it can't happen or won't happen its possible that it could and it's possible that it don't. Now how does this all relate to D&D? Well not to be blunt but, you might want to scrutinize the very rules your quoting very clearly! Rules as written: PLAYERS HANDBOOK EXCERPT BEGIN ************************************* "The DM decides when circumstances are appropriate for hiding. When you try to hide, make a Dexterity (Stealth) check. UNTIL YOU ARE DISCOVERED or YOU STOP HIDING, that check’s total is contested by the Wisdom (Perception) check of any creature that ACTIVELY searches for signs of your presence. You can’t hide from a creature that CAN SEE YOU CLEARLY, and you give away your position IF YOU: Make noise, such as shouting a warning or knocking over a vase. An invisible creature can always try to hide. Signs of its passage might still be noticed, and it does have to stay quiet. In combat, most creatures stay alert for signs of danger all around, so if you come out of hiding and approach a creature, it USUALLY sees you. However, under certain circumstances, the DM MIGHT ALLOW you to stay hidden as you approach a creature that is distracted, allowing you to gain advantage on an attack roll before you are seen. PLAYERS HANDBOOK EXCERPT END *********************************** These ARE the rules as written. This might not have been what they intended however, it is what they wrote though! You'll notice that in the first two paragraphs clearly establish the following facts: Fact 1: You're considered hidden until you are discovered. Fact 2: There are only two things that can break your stealth they are: A:) if a creature can see you clearly B:) A loud noise. Those are the facts for the rules as written. This then gives us two true/false tests. Could the player have been seen when he attacked & did he make a loud noise. Thusly, if a player or player(s) should decide to attack in such a manner as to always render a false on both tests then by default they are not discovered. That is what the rules say. Couple of examples enchanting a bow that emits a sound of the rustling of leaves or a rat squeaking when its fired or your warlock casts minor illusion with the sounds of twenty arrows echoing from the area around you. Perhaps having a wizard cast darkness and a cleric cast silence on the arrows to be fired. These are steps players may take via magic what about mundane attacks? Is it possible to attack in a way to avoid being seen clearly or fire off your arrow timed to a loud sound in the distance? Consider, If i tell my DM I wish to fire my crossbow when the guard is faced away from me than there's no possible way for him to "see you clearly" thus this test is inevitably false they did not see me clearly, hell they could not see me. As to the arrow, whether hit or miss its whizzing by or toward the subject does NOT rise to the level of shouting a warning or knocking over a vase so this too can only be false. Understand, they did not specify ANY NOISE! They write "and you give away your position if you make noise, such as shouting a warning or knocking over a vase." notice the verbiage "such as" which could also have been written as comparatively meaning that if the noise is the equivalent to shouting a warning or knocking over a vase it then breaks your cover. Hence the inevitable conclusion attacking from stealth does not necessarily break your stealth and may not actually result in your position being revealed in the first place. These are the rules as written. They are undeniable. It may or may not have been their intent never the less it is what is written . The most important issue with these facts that arise since the rules as written clearly don't ever specifically state "you're revealed when you attack!" lead us to the undeniable fact that both of our two tests resulted falsely, that is to say. "I was not clearly seen and the noise does not compare to that of shouting a warning or knocking over a vase and thusly, it is an inevitable fact we remain undiscovered thusly we remain hidden! Remember this fact you're considered hidden UNTIL you are discovered. We now need a mechanism to account for these inconsistencies that occur when the player(s) visual state that does not rise to the level of "see you clearly" and also account for the acoustic sounds that don't rise to the level of a "shouting a warning or knocking over a vase." Enter in the Contested Check. This gives the players the actual chance to go undiscovered while still providing a means of them being discovered. Something happened, the guards know stuff is going down they're just not sure what. The DM's can choose to impose penalties to Contested Checks or grant bonuses to players depending how things are playing out. If the rogue is consistently shooting from stealth and remaining in same initial location the DM my deem the fact that he's remaining stationary could very likely mean he'd be detected getting exponentially higher then longer he remains in said location and may grant a bonus to the creatures' Contested Checks. Contrast this with a rogue that fires twice and moves to a new location. Thusly, a DM might depending on whether the attempted stealth relocation went undetected impose penalties to the creatures contested check. This is by far a much better system actually allowing your players if they so choose to attempt a strategic stealth-ed approach. The downside as DM might have more rolls to make on whether or not the rogue is "discovered" or you could just acquiesce just acknowledge the rogues hidden. When we played it was not at all an issue. In my opinion especially with regards to surprise if a member of the party failed and was detected then what needs to occur is an active choice by the DM to actively searches for signs of the rest of the parties presence. If you neglect to do so then the party goes undetected. However, should while your actively looking the party members who were hidden then attack you well your surprised bud just like the guys we ambushed in the airsoft match were! This tracks on par with airsoft and paintball as well. While true a snipers location isn't necessarily revealed initially as more people show and more eye balls are in the area eventually his position will be compromised because its easier to see an objects profile than when its coming straight at you. As more people come into the area the likely hood of seeing the profile goes up exponentially till someone says over there in the trees!

Thanks for the video! I never would've guessed that "Apply Modifiers" was why my shape keys were disappearing. How bizarre... And in case anyone else encounters issues with shape keys in Godot 3.6 and below - try unticking Data > Shape Keys > Optimize Shape Keys > Use Sparse Accessor in Blender's export settings. It was causing all the vertices in my model to scale 2x the base size for some reason.

Comeback my champion

You are explaining the workflow SO GOOD. I wish you were still making videos on UA-cam. I need a tutor like you so much. Please return...

GLTF is realy great it convert all the texture in compressed format, but the new USD format from Pixar is even lighter and work open EXR texture and material X all of this thing are open source , it should be implemented to Godot this way we could use opencolor and ACES color space to use with the new HDR screen, without extra cost.

OMAIGOD MAN

Mr Carry, are you by any chance related to Aron Ra? You sound a lot like him. Anyways, thank you for the tutorial and the in-depth explanations.

man this blender software is just like need for speed shift on the ps3

"I kill you now." <-- this right here got you a new sub from me. I laughed so damned hard.

Luckily Godot has improved this workflow in 4.0

The lerp in a function had one step because you moved it under the "if timer.is_stopped()", not because of timer issue or for missing for-loop.

where in the world do I get me a stein like that? Would lend well to the immersion of my half orc barb!

You can rename your NLA actions by pressing n or clicking the small arrow on the right in the NLA editor. On the Strip tab you can modify the name. Tanks for the helpful tutorial.

sapient pearwood, mimics were in old dungeon crawlers/rpgs since forever.... this idea is ancient, so stealing it would be like stealing an idea to use wheels in your vehicle.... Anyway your mimic looks awesome nonetheless.

This is a fabulous tutorial. Thanks so much! You've got my subscription (and Like), and I can't wait to watch some of your other videos! Next up: shape keys!

You don't even know it but you fixed me a problem that unabled to me to continue some animations in blender for like 4 hours... thx

16:30 your dream came true they add it to godot drag and drop or right click copy

5 months no video. Guess no one gave coffees. Lol

Thanks Barbarian! I've been doing the same banging "Keep on Import"👍🏻

wow, thank you! really helpful tutorial man :)

Really wish you hadn't completely skipped the crucial step of exporting to glTF and importing into Godot. Instead you linked to a 35 minute video that doesn't even demonstrate how to export animations and only says "I don't have any animations so I'll just leave this clicked". I've got two NLA tracks but only one is importing into Godot. This didn't help at all :/

Do not delete start up cube... 👏👏👏

How to split view?

This was awesome! Was definitely not expecting the blender monkey<->Cube at the end. Thank you for this, I was struggling with lerp and now with tween it is so much easier!

Best tutorial for this, thanks for upload

after 24 hours trying to finger out how make blender car work I did with the help from my brother and i will be put link for how to make blender car work in godot

i have blender modal its joined i export gib I tried put my object in to a mesh instance it does work for simple car tutorials I confused

God why is always 5e?

thank for this video, i’ve been watching countless other videos explaining the same thing about using lerp, you actually used it in an understandable way, you’re amazing! keep up the great work!!

Great video, thanks for the effort. I'd like to see more of your work. I think it would be great if you can make a series Blender+Godot, 'cause even though I love both tools (I'm also very much an open source fan), I haven't found a decent tutorial where the process to create a simple 3d game, starting from making the assets in blender (from Jeffrey the Cube) and then moving into Godot, is shown. Please, think about it. Keep up the good work!!!

Just subscribed. I can't believe it took me this long to find your channel as an aspiring Blender Artist who's been looking into Godot. Love your content man!

thank you so much! now I can make cool games in GODOT!

Missed your videos, glad to see you back!

Ｐｒⓞм𝕠𝕤𝐌 💥

And if you allow me to be brutally honest, I think Godot is a scam. Let me present the case that supports it. I've been a developer for a very long time and ever since I started working on stable 3.4.4 version I've noticed bunch of bugs that are extremely trivial to fix. For example, when you import animations from Blender, you have that loop icon for each animation you can set and a FPS number, which defaults to 10. Every time you set those, change them, save project and reopen it, it's all gone. Now I thought it's been fixed in 3.5 RC 5, which was dated 2 days ago, but nope, nothing was fixed. So, in short, nothing was fixed in a year, they're just releasing new builds for people to have impression something's been worked on, maybe trick few of them to put some money into the project. Basically, when people have wasted enough time, some of them might be open to putting few coins just to see those bugs fixed. I deleted it all, don't want to have anything to do with it, it's a waste of time.

Oh money, ahh, yeah maybe later.

Im new here on your channel, hey Enjoying your videos! I know it's hard to find time for hobbies while caring of the family And we really appreciate your efforts and will be waiting as long as needed for another video or stream Hugs from Russia :)

hello. with animations it didnt transpher. can you make a video about it?

If all of you buy me a coffee, I'll do the exact same thing and on top of that would make most awesome video games, kinda like a cream on top of that coffee!😆He he, if life worked that way, it would have been a fairytale. Best you can do for yourself is slap your face and take a nice long cold shower to get back to reality.

I love your godot tutorials. Your explaination makes me understand easier

Finally, you're back, I loved the Blender and Godot contents, I'll be waiting for that.

Can’t wait! Let’s go!

Don't strain yourself! We love your content, but don't feel any pressure to neglect your personal life for us. Wish you the best!

Interesting Ive never heard of Godot I use Unity. Your videos are looking good! Keep up the good work :)