Відео

Kindly go through with section 451, there has a little random mistake in the video lecture, so please correct it by urself sec. 451

Pleasure!! 🌼

So far as the acceptor is concerned. He is not bound by the letter of acceptance till it reaches the offeror, the contract remains voidable at the instance of the acceptor... Thus the acceptor is at an advantage if the letter is lost in transit. .. Just supposing lyk A duly posts a letter of acceptance to K. But the letter is lost in transit by the negligence of the Post Office.... So, There is no contract concluded because the proposer had no received the letter. ..

@@LegalSubject there will be valid contract. Refer cases: Kallu ram Kesarwani vs state of MP J k enterprises vs state of MP

@@deepanshulatka9901 Read again para 4 of kallu ram kesarwani case, the general rule is that it is the acceptance of offer by the offeree and intimation of that acceptance to the offeror which results in a contract See Karan Singh Chandan Singh v. Collector Chhatarpur, 1980 MPLJ 231 : (AIR 1980 Madh Pra 89). One of the 𝗲𝘅𝗰𝗲𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 to this general rule is that when by agreement, course of conduct or usage o/ trade, acceptance by post or telegram is auth𝗼rised, the bargain is struck and the contract is complete when the acceptance is put into a course of transmission by the offeree by posting a letter or dispatching a telegram. Bhagwandas v. Girdharilal & Co., AIR 1966 SC 543. 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀, 𝗕𝘂𝘁 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻 𝗶𝗻 𝘀𝘂𝗰𝗵 𝗰𝗮𝘀𝗲, 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗳 𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗲𝗽𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗰𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗼𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗼𝗿 𝗶𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗯𝗲 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘄𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗺 𝗼𝗳 𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗲𝗽𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝗮𝗱𝗱𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗼𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗼𝗿 𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝘄𝗶𝘀𝗲 𝗶𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗻𝗼𝘁, 𝗮𝗹𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗼𝗿 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗽𝗮𝘁𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗱, be said to have been put in a 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘀𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗼 𝗵𝗶𝗺. Ramdas Chakravati v. Official Liguidator Cotton Ginning Co. Ltd., (1887) ILR 9 All 366. # iss general rule ka exception dia h lekin uske liye prove krna jruri hai and court held that the revenue recovery certificate Annexure F-I is quashed. The respondents are restrained from recovering Rs. 25920/- or any part thereof, under the said certificate. The respondents are further directed to refund the earnest money of Rs. 5,000/-, deposited by the petitioner. The petitioner shall be entitled to costs. Counsel fee Rs. 200/-. so here We cannot say ki agr acceptance letter lost in transit ho gya toh bhi wo valid contract hoga. Exceptions are always there and the person/party is need to prove it then only it can or will be a valid contract.

Thanks🌸😊

Thankyou😅🌸

Thanks🌸☺️

Thanks🌸

Thanks🌸

Thanks🌸 and must read description

Thanks😅

Thanks🌼

Thanks🌼

Umm.. revision moslty file krte h aftr order Or appeal aftr final order

Thanks🌸

Thanks🌸

😊

Thankyou🌸😊

😊🌸

Thanks alot 🌸😊

ua-cam.com/video/jOj3-IIFjpY/v-deo.html Plz follow dis link for revision of CPC..

Thankyou Di😊

Thankyou🌸

Thankyou🌸

Thankyou🌸

Thankyou🌸