Відео

Kung makapaghulog po kayo ng at least 120 monthly contributions at 60 years old na kayo, monthly po ang pension nyo. Kapag walang 120 contributions, lump sum.

Kung may 120 monthly contributions po kayong naihulog, monthly ang pension nyo. Kung walang 120, lump sum.

Paul said "those who were with me..." while Luke wrote "the men who journeyed with him..." No verse says "some heard, others did not". But you are right in concluding that there are really errors in the New Testament, the writers not being first hand witnesses of the events. Unfortunately, many Christians believe that everything in the NT is inerrant and infallible. If we can find errors in a book, how can we really on it for salvation?

@@BerB-w9bIf you compare the Acts 9:7 account with the Acts 22:7 account there are a number of slight differences. These differences are not significant enough to make any meaningful difference. Luke was setting out to write a historical account of the events of the early church in his "Acts of the Apostles". Luke wasn't a 1st hand witness to of all of the events he writes of in Acts or his Gospel of Luke, he went around & interveiwed 1st & 2nd hand witnesses like a newspaper journalist would. The words he writes cannot always be expected to be verbatim nor the events perfectly described. 2nd hand witnesses can be accurate & if first hand witnesses arnet remembering correctly, or some remember differently from others this is common with all historical accounts including biblical 1's. To modern ears the words inerrant & infallable mean "absolutely perfect" that standard isnt applied to any other historical works of antiquity. Find out what the standards are that are applied to those works & apply those. I dont contend that the scriptures are inerrant & infallable, I say they are trustworthy, reliable & historically accurate based on reasonable, common sense standards not absolute perfection - that dosent exist. I believe its a mistake for believers to use the words inerrant & infallable it gives a wrong impression.

With many errors, contradictions and unfounded claims of messianic prophecies allegedly from the Old Testament which were actually just taken out of context, plus the fact that the first book was written 50 years after the purported events, with others 100 years later, and not even by eyewitnesses, how can the New Testament be said to be reliable and trustworthy? Obviously, it is not a compilation of the words of the Creator but merely of men.

@@johnnyharry4859 Yes, I am 100% sure. I suggest you do your research with open mind for your own sake and maybe our family's sake also. Watch the videos of Michael Skobac, Tovia Singer and others who discuss those unfounded messianic prophecies, mistranslations and other errors. You know, I've been a Christian for decades, studied in Christian schools, jumped from one Christian denomination to another, wrote a local book (regretably) testifying to the "divinity of Jesus", searched the Almighty by studying other religions. The greatest story ever told is actually the greatest lie. That is for sure. You just have to listen to the reasons of those who reject the New Testament objectively and with unbiased mind. That is, if you really are a truth seeker. Anyway, Paul commanded it in 2 Timothy 2:15.

@@johnnyharry4859 Yes, I am 100% sure. I suggest you do your research with open mind for your own sake and maybe your family's sake also. Watch the videos of Michael Skobac, Tovia Singer and others who discuss those unfounded messianic prophecies, mistranslations and other errors, which would not have happened if those are really "inspired" or "holy" words. You know, I've been a Christian for decades, studied in Christian schools, jumped from one Christian denomination to another, wrote a local book (regretably) about the "divinity of Jesus", searched the Almighty by studying other religions. The so-called "greatest story ever told" is actually the greatest "lie". That is for sure. You just have to listen to the reasons of those who reject the New Testament with unbiased mind. That is, if you are really a truth seeker. Anyway, Paul commanded it in 2 Timothy 2:15.

I'm glad my videos helped you understand the lessons. All the best in your exam. You can do it!

@ActCountAnt.AccountingTutorial thankkssss alottt, because of ur content, i managed to study and finished my worksheet just in time!!! Keep the content like this, short yet direct to the point, very helpful. Ill make sure to pass my finalss :"D

Exactly

Hello. That is actually one of the topics of the video. Please watch it for a strong foundation. Accounting is about understanding the logic behind the principles, not memorizing the accounting treatment.

Ganun ang pag-aaral. Para madaling maunawaan at tandaan, kailangan samahan ng joke. Learning is not incompatible with having fun. You will learn more while having fun.

Okay

@ActCountAnt.AccountingTutorial thank you po😊.

@rcdv1703There are so many reasons one can think of. Unang una, an increase in cash does not really mean that the business is operating profitably because there could many other reasons why cash increased (which we can see by interpreting the cash flow statement). Pangalawa, there is always room for improvement kaya kahit nag increase ang cash due to profitability, dapat pa din maghanap ng ways to keep on improving in all areas of the business.

@@ActCountAnt.AccountingTutorial ah i see nga po, thank you po sir

Pwede po kung government o gov't agency ang employer pero iba ang contribution rates ng GSIS.

No. Net earnings is the same as net income.

noted po! salamuch sir!​@@ActCountAnt.AccountingTutorial

uhm, follow up question po. is it correct po ba if yung percent is 491.14%?

since 14265 - 2474 = 12151 ÷ 2474 then × 100?

Mali yung subtraction mo

The adjusting entry is debit office supplies and credit supplies expense. The debit to office supplies INCREASED the ASSET office supplies. Therefore, the adjusting entry may be reversed.

Of course, journalize and post.

ua-cam.com/video/7nqcSpZxvFQ/v-deo.html

Yung kinakaltas sa employees ay liability ng employer. Ireremit nila yun kasama ang employer's. Yung employer's share ay expense ng company kaya nirerecord as expense and additional liability. Kapag niremit na sa govt agency, mababawasan na yung liability acct na yun.

Hello. Nasa last few seconds ng video ang explanation about that.

What do you mean by "expenses na galing din sa merchandise inventory"? Can you give me examples of those expenses na tinutukoy mo? And what do you mean by "contra account"? Ang contra account ay yung mga binabawas sa isa pang account sa FS to show the net amount. Halimbawa, yung Acc. Dep. ay contra account ng specific PPE o yung All. for Doubtful Accounts na binabawas sa Accounts Receivable.

@@ActCountAnt.AccountingTutorial Sir example po, kumuha si tindera ng item sa paninda nya as an office supplies expenses, san po dapad i credit yung office supplies expenses?

Kung paninda nya yung supplies na kinuha para gamitin, nabawasan ang asset na merchandise inventory kaya merchandise inventory ang dapat icredit

Thank you very much po and God bless po sa inyo!

I get it , you are from the Philippines

Yes, I am. Thanks for your appreciation.

Binanggit ko sa Part 2 kung paano hindi dapat imemorize ang formulas ng mga ratios kundi unawain. Kaya gusto ko pagmasdan mo ang numerator sa formula in relation sa denominator and then ikaw ang sumagot sa tanong mo. Let me know your answer and the reason for your answer then I will tell you kung tama. That is the way to learn kaya I don't want to give you the answer right away. Try to answer it yourself first. 🙂

Madami na tagalog videos para sa mga pinoy. 🙂 Target ko kasi foreigners. Pero may ibang videos ako na may taglish version.

Ibabawas sa next month's remittance nila yung excess.

Hindi po taxable ang separation pay.

May computation po ng taxable income sa video kong "tax refund".