Відео

@@TechFpvindia. the skyzone cobra S would win in my book. Although you wouldn’t see too much of a difference in performance, you would definitely prefer the quality of the skyzone goggles. Thanks for watching! Hello India! 🇮🇳

@@Witty_FPVdrones thanks, where are you from

You have Instagram account for contact you ?

@@TechFpvindia. America! 🇺🇸

That’s crazy!!!

@@Witty_FPVdrones It's pretty legit. But to clarify why I don't like them it's cause of the lenses. They are the SKY04O's but I should have got the 04X's. Mine have cheap plastic crap looking lenses but otherwise they are legit goggles that offer DVR and all the inputs/outputs etc. The nifty thing about them is that they came with a standard 5.8g diversity module that also receives audio. So I was able to buy the "Steadyview X" module that has a narrower bandwidth filter (but no audio) and combine them together to get pretty good video AND audio. The Rush Tank Max Solo VTX is 2.5W capable but also has a real audio input so you can add your own AGC mic. I always recommend that vtx.

It is pretty good. I just have no experience with it.

Yes I agree with your point! Usually you’ll only find a “max” omni antenna of 2.8-3dBi made for fpv.

Ah yes. Speedybee is so good for the hobby with how well priced it is. Only thing I’d be concerned about is how long it would last before breaking but I’ve had nothing but good experiences with Speedybee. I think they made a bad rep for themselves with the whole randomly exploding ESC issue they had.

@@Witty_FPVdrones yeah and actually that esc issue is fixed. But i got it day one and theres no degredation in signal like tbs sometimes has in there vtx, and i highly recommend lookin at thw comparison on this module and a rapidfire. Its absolutly insane how close they are, hell i flew a tinywhoop (400 mw) from my couch inside my house through the backyard of the neighbor 2 houses up and still had perfect video, it makes NO sense

💀💀💀 people still use analog dawg

Ah yes found the dji pilot🤣🤣 around 50 percent probably more are on analog still bro. Analog has better latency, audio support, is cheaper, aswell as king on 1 s whoops (please try to freestyle a hd whoop and tell me its better than a analog whoop (from a performance side)

@@parkourguy5903 THANK YOU ❤️❤️ I’m not the only one thinking analog is still useful 😭😭😭

@@parkourguy5903also analog is the heart and soul of all freestyle fpv. If you break an analog camera or vtx it’s only $30 to fix and if you break a dji air unit it’s gonna be $120 to $300 to fix. With freestyle where you’re bashing your drone all the time you want analog

@@Witty_FPVdrones fr tho. Not everything has to be some perfect picture in your goggles to have a great time, and with how far analog has come like with the phoenix 2 cam and that you just use an action cam if you want hd video, analog is KING. But hey ill gladly buy up the old fatsharks because of people selling analog (got dominator hd2s for $125)

Do you do one straight up and one sideways or both straight up? I’ve heard good things about dual omni so maybe I’ll try it and do a review between: patch+omni, crosshair+omni, dual patch, and dual omni. We can find out what yields the best range!

@@Witty_FPVdrones the double AXII is straight up and the tbs Omni is sideways

@@babyzeefpv9887 that’s awesome!! Thanks!

Oh yeah lumenier makes unbelievable products!!

Double AXII 2 for receiver and TrueRC Matchstick on tx. Both amazing antennas.

My bad I misspoke. Patch antennas do a great job at picking up in the direction they face. The crosshair is similar to a patch but has better penetration and a smaller field of reception. Thanks!

Oh yes I didn’t even realize that receiver was a thing!

Yes that's what I use, its top notch 😅

Oh... That comment at the end.. Digital isn't care free. Yes the avata may save itself when you have breakup. But when you fly o3. And you get breakup... You better disarm. With analog you mostly get slowly degrading signal. Most of the time you can punch out and signal will be better when you get high.

This comment is lowkey fire

Thanks for the kind words and for checking my vids out!!

It can be both but that is the bigger issue. I have a friend who was seeing lines and soft mounting the vtx fixed that issue.

Yeah. I’ve found that lower dBi with a long stem is the best way to go

Yeah I was about comment exactly the same, glad I found your channel as I hadn't heard a lot of the points mentioned here :)

Please email my business email: wittyfpv@gmail.com

@@Witty_FPVdrones will do. :)

Glad I could help you find it!!

Of course!

Yes that’s very true! Thanks for bringing that up!

I’ve got insane range out of crappy vtx camera combos so it’s probably one of these issues: 1. You’re running too low mW on the vtx. 2. You’re on a close channel to the actual channel so it will pick up but only for a few meters Let me know if either of those suggestions fix the issue! I’ll be happy to help troubleshoot.

I've been playing around with tons of various analog stuff in the background for a while now trying to figure it out.. I use it all on RC cars so I've needed to try to find what works the best as far as penetration. If you're getting crap results with decent antennas it's time for a decent VTX. 1.2G is really the way to go but that might not be for everyone for various reasons. 5.8G is a good alternative given the bandwidth and product availability but you're almost wasting your time without a good vtx and rx. The reality is most of these antennas out there by reputable companies are very comparable. You can buy a complete crap antenna from a no name company and notice a large difference between it and something from TrueRC or Lumenier for example.. but for the most part we're not talking about gigantic improvements between what those companies have to offer. It all starts with a good VTX and ends with a good RX. The receiver needs to have high sensitivity. That sensitivity is going to make most of the difference. That's largely why those goggles modules work so much better than the cheapo stuff. They are running closer to -95dbm+ as opposed to like -85dbm tops. IMO that is going to explain the vast improvement over any antennas you choose. So if you are only getting a few meters of range, literally, then it doesn't really matter what antenna you're using. You should be exceeding that with no receiver antenna at all. Your VTX is probably trashed or something is just not right with how it's setup.

@@Magneticitist well as it turns out, the manufacturer has the wrong vtx tables on their site (betafpv cetus M04) and once I got the proper channels (and power levels) I now get nearly 1/2 mile on 25mw! (And also the vtx isn't burning my hands after 1 minute of being turned on) Improper Configuration seems to be the biggest range killer here. Barring that, have you found any antennas or rx modules that are slightly better than average?

@@CamdenWallraff IMO any popular goggles module is going to be fine. I use Skyzone modules in some goggles where it's basically 2 modules and 4 antennas all at once. If you use any of the cheap receivers out there they are not going to have the sensitivity to push really good range unless you have ideal conditions and clear LOS. My favorites are the TrueRC Matchstick antenna on the VTX and Lumenier double AXII 2's on the receivers + Lumenier patches as well.

Yeah my friend recently got this and it’s so beautiful. My friends constantly see him out and ask me “why does he just ride his bike ALL THE TIME” and I said “if I had a bike as nice as that, I’d just be riding all day all night”

I wouldn’t say the hobby died. I have such an amazing group of people that I enjoy talking to and flying with specifically through this hobby. Now it has evolved and is incredibly different from what it was when it first started but it is still very relevant.

@@Witty_FPVdrones Rattle off all the girl pilots you know? Not me, I left for AI, which was more fun. Zoe's camper broke and she's out. LilStellaFox got a shlt treatment from RR and left for RC cars. MaiOnline left to fly flying cars. I haven't seen anything new or notable for a flight from L1L1THlUm, stabby, blueowl, stephfpv, nerdbird, radgirl, bunny, drea, Elevatefpv, or anyone else in a long, long time. I haven't seen a good flight from a guy since well... the TBS days before 2015 when they use to do push long range by doing Alps flights. The only people left in this hobby are Johnny Come Latelys Newbs that Bardwell and Stu flooded into the hobby who have no skillz, and Ukranian Level Mode pilots using Mavic quadcopters to drop grenades on Russian foot soldiers and Turtle tanks.

but great video

Yeah. Wouldn’t be my first choice in receiver. The TBS fusion and rapid fire are the best for fatshark honestly (btw I haven’t done much research into skyzone goggles, can you add an external receiver to them??) thanks for watching!

@@Witty_FPVdrones yep, in cobra you can replace built-in, and 04 has two slots. (you can't replace reciver on 02). skyzone has quadversity mode for 04 goggles btw

@@Witty_FPVdrones and ukrainian company called stingbee has some crazy quadversity vrx single module (not fatshark compatible) i think i can cover some crazy areas with it. (10 km (6.2 miles) is everyday flight for me)

@@user-pz3oj7ql1f that’s awesome! Good to know.

Hey! Glad I could help!! The song is “addicted” by the chainsmokers. Thanks for watching!

@@Witty_FPVdrones thanks for your reply. Hope you have a great weekend. Im about to go find out what other tracks I have missed by the chainsmokers, and reminice in the 1's I remember. Thank you. 😀👍

I watched the FlowState documentary and yes. I did take a lot of similar ideas into consideration from it but at the same time that documentary was over an hour and a half long. This is a super condensed 5min video of my experience with FPV. I do appreciate the fact that you think I can replicate something so good. Thanks for watching!

@@Witty_FPVdrones 👍

Haha yeah. Usually with videos I don’t go off a script but since this was a college application passion project I wanted to make sure that everything I wrote ended up being said. Even if there wasn’t as much emotion it would make some stuff clearer for whoever reviewed my project. Thanks for watching and for the feedback!!

Which book? How is it?

It’s almost incredible the views you can get!!