Відео

If the train were moving away from the tree, would it be elongated instead of being contracted?

So I guess they found out that light travels at the same speed no matter which direction they were looking at, despite the earth clearly not standing still?

Matrices in this case is absolutely evil, it needs a lot of efforts to obscure such a simple idea from 0:56 to 3:00 Thanks for great video

7:50 'say we have a neuron i connected to every neuron k in the following layer': proceeds to calculate dL/dyi ??? How does the output yi depend on the next weights ??? A few minutes before with the first example, you calculated dL/dyj ?

I have a doubt. At 5:30 of this video, will the light ray path change by 90 degrees or less than 90 degrees (as shown in the diagram)? If it changes by 90 deg. then the length remains L.

YOLO to this video!, great explanation.

Thanks for the clear step-by-step explanation!

That was awesome, extremely helpful. Thank you!

That is extraordinary and clear! This video and another one of yours I saw recently have really clarified special relativity for me. Thank you! I'm going to save these so I can watch them again later. Hopefully at some point it will stick.

4:42 also at 18:10 - Small correction: Not N(0, I), but N (0,1). This is a multivariate unit Gaussian: Center at the 0-vector and unit standard variation of 1, not capital I.

Absolutely amazing video! Honestly, perfect explanation!

What would happen if Jack were going fast enough to make the ladder shorter than the barn, and once he's inside, the barn doors shut, and jack instantly stops?

This makes a lot of sense.

Thank you! You did such a great job explaining this! I've finally understood how all these terms and concepts come together. <3

Unduly complicated. Uses the stupid third twin

If we consider mu meson from upper atmosphere, they shower on earth from all sides. In a way we can compare it to go and return journey of one single meson. There is no reversal acceleration, yet there is time dilation in both directions. This meson would see 16th generation of meson in earth's lab. So time dilation must be due to absolute motion and not relativistic. In multidimensional astronomical motion with comparable speeds it is difficult to say which one is faster in absolute sense but a mu meson with 99.8 % speed of light is faster compared to celestial bodies in whatever direction we consider. This would answer twin's paradox I hope.

Chad

one of the best explanations of VAE..👌

perfect

Can w be considered as vector that represents all adjustable parameters? I.e., not just weights of one linear transformation matrix from input to hidden layer but all of them + bias values. So when you compute gradient of L with respect to w, you compute a vector for which each entry is a the partial derivative of L with respect to w_i?

Pleasure to watch

Nice, will revisit this because the maths is overwhelming right now

From where to study Probability for Deep Learning ? Specifically the one used in here? I have studied probability but not this much. If anyone can give resources it will be very helpful

Your videos are amazing to understand the subject of relativity! Unfortunately, I have no background in physics and mathematics so I often struggle to understand a few things. One question I have from the video is: I can grasp that the Michelson e Morley’s experiment proved that there is no special medium in relation to which light would be propagating. But, how does it also prove that light’s speed is constant in relation to all other things including that which emitted it? Did the experiment also move the light source in relation to the detector? If the frequency of the interference remained the same even when the emitter and the detector were in movement with relation to each other, I think it would be a more straightforward way to guarantee the the fact that light’s speed remain constant regardless of relative velocity. Sorry if that’s a stupid question, but I’d really like to understand the subject.

At 8:46 why is joint probability tractable? Why are others not tractable?

The video is woow

Excellent analysis

My brother, please, can you create a course to learn the manim library for beginners? ☺️🤍🤍

One question. Why max{ \int_x {f(x) dx} } is the same thing as max{ f(x) }?

Always expect the earliest video from your channel

Well, i can’t miss your video

Well done! Very thoroughly explained.

Fantastic explanation. Small erratum: the variable 𝜖 is epsilon, not eta (η) ua-cam.com/video/HBYQvKlaE0A/v-deo.htmlsi=k6EBUeCbMUl4JYWw&t=970

You know neutrinos are 65 billion solar neutrinos, per second per square centimeter and they didn't detect that interaction either. The Ether is likely even smaller. Discounting the existence of an Aether using stone knives and bear skins. What a joke. This is why you don't discount anything, and try to evolve your experiments.

Great video. A good balance of professional, modern and unique style with in-depth technical description.

confusing there must be a simpler derivation

thanks

I’m here because of Lord Jamar. His interview on the Godfrey Comedy channel was very interesting….

Williams John Young Gary Clark Jessica

Очень классные ролики, очень интересно и понятно смотреть Только переводить не легко бывает, привет из России ❤

You're the best explanation out there in my opinion. I appreciate you!!

Why wouldn’t going against the aether be the opposite of going with it. They should cancel out.

predicted Ci is calculated with IoU if the cell have object, then how to calculate predicted Ci if the cell doesnt have object?

Ortiz Mountains

Beautiful video. Thank you

Your error is at ua-cam.com/video/FvqutkaPmas/v-deo.html If the spherical wave is centred and expanding from K origin, it cant also be expanding from a different center at location K prime's origin which is also in motion. Your whole explanation has failed at this point.

Thank you so much for this, really cleared up how VAEs work

Thank you so much for these videos

the is all BS. For jack, his ladder doesn't shrink, because he can say the barn is doing the moving, so the barn is not as big as it was before. So the ladder certainly cant fit. Now that we know it doesn't fit for two reasons, its not going to fit if you invent a third option. Your error is in your stupid simultaneity example. make up your mind, it cant be two things that light does. The centre of an expanding sphere of light cant have two different origins, one not moving and the other moving. That is where you make the error of simple logic and simple physics.

Martin Jessica Moore Carol Taylor Dorothy