Відео

Thank you! People often tend to be a bit aggressive when commenting on something they don't like and usually aren't very constructive in their initial approach. However, I try to respond in a constructive manner, and the tone of the conversation usually shifts to something more constructive, which is actually great for improving the quality of the channel and clarifying doubts for people who don't have the courage to approach things the way some do. In the end, I enjoy these interactions because, regardless of how the comment is made, there's always something to gain from that.

@@ScribeChanges I would say sometimes it is a waste of time to respond, but then again if this is your approach and you are also getting an algorhythm boost, why not :D? Cheers for the response, I wish you a lot of luck as there are a lot of transcription channels nowadays. You seem to know what you are doing and why :>!

When i export the xml to edit in musescore the stems go crazy. I didn't fix all of them but i'll will fix them in the next one

I don't use key signatures because it becomes easier (at least for me) to analyze a scale, arpeggio, etc., without relying on the key signature. It might even make it easier for beginners or those with little musical training to quickly understand what's happening in a certain passage. Also, I changed some chords based on the reharmonization that was done in this take and omitted that fact, which completely slipped my mind. I'll correct it soon.

I see your point… It just seems easier in the long run to read a lot of music when there is a key signature especially since basically all music is ultimately tonal. Also. Key signatures or at least how to hear changes in relation to a given key center are exactly the kinds of things that beginners need to learn, especially if they ever want to play like Mike Moreno . I know it’s silly to argue about this since the sound is right there in the recording… And thank you for a transcribing, I was unaware of mike’s substitutions on this tune… They are nice though he would probably call them substitutions and not a reharmonization.

​@@ragingbullfrogsThank you for your comment and you are right. I’ll be adding key signatures for standards and pieces that have a clear, defined tonality, as they usually do. Thanks for pointing that out!"

@@ScribeChanges Thank you for your work. I think it's better not to add a key signature for this kind of tune. Here are a lot of different keys involved. A key signature would make reading harder. On the other side I would write a note like the C# in bar 9 as a Db, because of the chord Bbm. Also in bar 13 your Eb could be written as a D# because of C#m, F#7.

@@joaoalves9039 Hope you like it!

Thank you!

Thank you!

I will definitely look into that. Thank you so much!

XD

Maybe thanks to you I saw this masterpiece now. This man is a beast.

Thank you for your input. The transcription is in concert to try to include all instruments. Regarding the division of sections, I think you are absolutely right, and this is something I will take into account in future videos and will start to include in the PDFs."

For sure I got an A+ last semester

Hopefully they Never will.😅

Yes 😞

@@ScribeChanges great transcription! Thank you.

@@timcummiskey1178 Thank you!

What do you mean? xd

@@ScribeChanges Joking...Henderson's solos are so refreshing in the ocean of chops these days.

@@RayFerretti Someday i''ll do another :)