![Dan Walther](/img/default-banner.jpg)
- 6
- 10 921
Dan Walther
Приєднався 12 лис 2018
Jesus the Mushroom
The sacred mushroom and the cross
This is just a meme. the theory is thoroughly debunked
This is just a meme. the theory is thoroughly debunked
Переглядів: 33
Відео
"Maybe fiction is true like numbers are true"-Jordan Peterson; Biblical Series
Переглядів 1913 роки тому
Original Lecture: ua-cam.com/video/f-wWBGo6a2w/v-deo.html Introducing Petersons implicit Platonism...
"Inerrancy is a firmly modernist paradigm" John Walton & Erin Darby
Переглядів 3 тис.5 років тому
Excerpt from: ua-cam.com/video/6RDAbu0KDwM/v-deo.html
John MacArthur's "scientific reading" of Job 26:7
Переглядів 7 тис.5 років тому
Excerpt of: ua-cam.com/video/F-ofKxfYqGw/v-deo.html He mistakes Job for Isaiah though. And Again he is not able to recognize the modern lens through which he is looking at scripture.
John Walton on Job 26:7 "He spreads out the northern sky..."
Переглядів 6015 років тому
Part of this Series on Job: ua-cam.com/video/cZpf9s4NaQQ/v-deo.html Hint: The Earth is not flat. And the ancient writers thought in other categories than we do. However the Assumption that the Bible teaches anything closely resembling modern science is just misguided.
Putting dish liquid into a water kettle/German chatter
Переглядів 855 років тому
Putting dish liquid into a water kettle/German chatter
Inerrancy is, as Walton pointed out, a response to the liberal theology taking over seminaries in the West (especially the US) and teaching that the Bible was a solely human myth😮 1979 Chicago statement of faith sought to engage the false leaders and teachers infecting the church. Just like we are engaging the DEI/social justice crowd for misrepresenting the scriptural view of justice today😮 So they both get had the incoherent nature of inerrancy being found only in the autograph and only in what the actual true interpretation states😮 But wait, how do we know what interpretation is correct? So we have 5 views on sanctification, 4 views on salvation, 4 views on divine providence, 4 views on eternal security, 4 views on hell, etc. 😮😮😮😮😮 400,000 different variants in the early copies of the NT. We do have a very reliable book to be sure and I recommend that everyone read, FF Bruce, or Dan Wallace or Josh McDowell for a more approachable book on reliability. But inerrancy and infallibility are rubrics that are not valuable or true of any other human knowledge and unless you are a Mormon, no view on the Bible holds that God dictated it to humans who then just copied it😮 It is a divine/human book and God knew it would be enough revelation to those who are looking for it to allow them to follow him and live their lives the way he designed them to live😊 Counterpoint had a whole book on this subject that is worth the read: www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00BW2J4NO?ref_=dbs_m_mng_wim_calw_tkin_21&storeType=ebooks
Darby’s pontification in not inerrant. She probably also believes that aliens built the pyramids.
Well -- I am glad these two arm wavers have it all figured out.
Way to appeal to mockery…you utterly destroyed their points without an alternative or any explanation of the data or anything. Do you have a pay site where anyone can go to learn from you😊
🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation: 00:52 📜 *Inerrancy, when discussed, is often qualified to refer to the original documents, not the copies that exist today, and it focuses on affirmations rather than every detail.* 03:22 🕰️ *Inerrancy became a significant topic in response to skepticism and criticism that challenged the historical events and figures mentioned in the Bible.* 05:54 🤔 *Inerrancy asserts that if the Bible claims something, and it truly makes that claim, then believers accept it as truth, affirming the kind of God revealed in the Bible.* 08:38 🧪 *Erin Darby views inerrancy as a firmly modernist paradigm rooted in Enlightenment thinking, particularly when tied to historical accuracy, which she finds uncomfortable.* 09:34 🌍 *Darby highlights discomfort with inerrancy tied to historical accuracy, citing the lack of archaeological evidence for certain biblical events and emphasizing the modern approach to textual interpretation.* 10:46 💬 *Darby suggests considering a distinction between big "T" Truth and little "t" truth, allowing for flexibility in interpreting historical details while focusing on the theological significance conveyed by the text.* 12:23 🖼️ *The analogy of art, such as Picasso's paintings, is used to illustrate the different ways one can approach truth, emphasizing that historical accuracy doesn't necessarily diminish the meaningful truth conveyed by the biblical text.* Made with HARPA AI
In 2 Timothy 3:16 the Bible declares scripture to be "God breathed". Some of the religious politicians like to change the wording that confuses people so they can teach what they want. Just teach what the Bible declares. That was done awhile back when someone started saying Christians were Christ followers. Just use the words scripture uses and teach that.
"God breathed" is a phrase that only otherwise occurs when referring to God breathing life into Adam. So one could simply argue that God breathes life into the text, regardless of any flaws it contains. Just as God breathes life into us, even though we are flawed.
Theopneustos was always used to mean "life-giving" before the third century. Translating it as "inspired " is a recent choice.
@@joshuapjung long before most of scripture was written it was read to others with a voice that contains all the elements of voice and not like reading flat. Imagine someone reading music vs it being interpreted and then played. There is a big difference in listening to scripture read well and it being read flat.
This woman makes me think that american universities will give a phd to anyone
She is clear, and right. He beats about the bush.
To beautiful men to which I adore, admire and look up to both. Yes,,, I understand they have different belief.
The 'hiddeness of God' puzzles. God is revealed through Our Lord (John 14:9). and the fruit of God - Creation (Psalm 19:1, Romans 1:20). The number of brain synapses is 500 quadrillions; so is the number of stars in the universe. What hiddeness?
This is the nonsense coming out of Wheaton College???
Darby does not teach at Wheaton College. Walton does, and as someone who has been a student in his class I can say that he is a terrific professor and strongly believes Scripture.
They are responding to the nonsense coming out of Wheaton 40 years earlier😮 Read Inerrancy by Norm Geisler and you will see that the two claims Walton mentioned are in fact incoherent! What is the mathematical formula for measuring the circumference of a round square? In the US Census how many married bachelors are there rounded to the nearest 10,000? How does one test the truth value if a book that no longer exists? Since interpretations per se are not inerrant but all theology is based on interpretations then how much theology is inerrant? So what do we have left, names, places, events, conversations. 😅 Do we really want to use the enlightenment to frame how we measure the Bible?😮
What about that there are some scriptures in the KJV that is not in the original text. How do one deal with that?
the original text is lost
God I'm suffering terminal illness. I've lost faith please forgive Me and restore faith and hope
We should start a protest requesting a very friendly debate on Isaiah 53 between these two.?
Great clip, great interview altogether. If you get the chance to watch the whole thing, do it, but there isn't a word spoken about the scientific reading of Job in this clip.
Darby seems like a weirdo.
If the events described in the Bible didn't happen, you don't retain "meaning". You make the God involved in those events into nothing more than a figment of man's imagination.
Right!
“If the events described in [Jesus’ parables] didn’t happen, you don’t retain ‘meaning’. You make the God [and His eternal truths revealed] in those [story] events into nothing more than a figment of [Jesus’] imagination.”
Erin Darby is wrong when she says there's no evidence for the exodus and conquest narrative in Exodus and the book of Joshua
Yep. All these intellectuals are indoctrinated with the lies of the world. Its where they start.
Correct …in fact there are entire book-length treatments on the findings and also documentaries😮
His books completely changed my view about the Bible. Awesome.
Really? Really? Exodus 21 says you can beat your slave with a rod as long as he/she isn’t bedridden for more than two days. OK, he just said Hindus believe the world is on the back of a turtle. The OT authors thought the earth was flat and the sky is blue bc water is in the heavens and held up by a firmament. I challenge believers to read the entire Bible and remain a believer.
Very well put! I fortunately have begun my studies as well and hope to reach an understanding such as this one day to try and gain the tools to spread the gospel as much as possible
The Bible is it’s own defense. Wow I love that line! So impactful it blew me away. Love God ❤️
The title of this clip should be replaced, I guess.
Hugh ross has good scientific arguments for the bible also. I'm actually reading his book the hidden treasures of Job. It's pretty interesting.