Відео

I doubt very much that this ‘data’ is worthy for a master thesis !

Is there really a 6th sampling coming?

i like the slo mo at the end, it had me at the edge of my seat, i was like, wait did he pause it or is he moving??? niceee in all seriousness tho, thanks so much for your amazing work!

Thanks so much for posting these up! Much appreciated. This is really important work.

This was really good - subtle and thoughtful and clear. Thanks for posting it all!

Michael Pollan! That's big for DES

The deeper implications are profound..if you can imagine that.

I love reading along with your annotated PDF. It's a meditation on the most direct retelling of experience. It's HARD to nail down

So your catching the thoughts just before the beep? Because I would have lots of thoughts about the beeps if I had to write down what I was thinking it would be “oh, your beeping again” “hello friend you beeping again” “how do I turn you off” So you would have to get the thoughts going on prior to the beep entering and altering your mind. Correct?

You are a miracle person.... I'm forever grateful to see you speak in a video. Thank you. Your conclusion has changed my worldview and where I am. Thank you.

I have absolutely no idea what’s going on but as another fellow Gabriel H I feel fascinated to know what else we get up to in our spare time

This video needs to blow up like Ryans video did

Thank you for posting each of your DES interview series to youtube. These have been helpful in learning about myself

Thank you for this research! (It is a touch unfortunate to hear the planes and grind through the misc./setup/cheduling talk, but so glad to see the video!)

Thank you for this!

I have to get in on this experiment 🙏🏾

Wow, what an interestingly alluring series. I would love to do this with Russ and Alec. I respect this vocation greatly and am inspired by their look into the human experience.

I'm glad that you are studying inner experience this deep way. Me and my wife had disagreement about emotional burden and if she is shifting it to me. The only way for me was making her feel the same way as I was (very bad). Maybe your study will help avoid this 🙂

very nice explanation

[̲̅p][̲̅r][̲̅o][̲̅m][̲̅o][̲̅s][̲̅m]

So happy I found this channel. Gonna binge watch allll of these interviews in the next few days. This is extremely interesting.

Thank you for these videos.

How do I get to do this? I’ve always been told I think “different” the older I get the more I understand people don’t think the same way I do and have gotten better at communicating my ideas. Things and certain ways I can think are so hard to explain. I’d love to get a more understanding of it and if it’s normal but I just suck at communicating my ideas or people just don’t just don’t think that way.

≋p≋r≋o≋m≋o≋s≋m

Here’s an exercise for the reader: Is there any difference between (a) “What I have noted down is ‘general unspecified thought slash visualization of my own child being upset’.” and (b) “What I have noted down is ‘general unspecified thought slash visualization of Aspasia being upset’.” __________ My response would be: the experience is os Aspasia, as in Olivia experiments Aspasia as Aspasia, not "as her own child". When she thinks about her, I don't think she is thinking "my own child", she thinks of her as Aspasia, and she being her child is just a fact of the Universe that she knows already.

Hey! Olivia is left-handed! I noticed she moves her left hand to say "I have a pencil and I'm writing" (and later in the video she says she is left-handed. I wonder if in the following interviews we'll discover if she experiences words in a different way?

Thank you very much for continue to share this videos as well as the transcripts for the interviews! Please, continue to do so! I've watched everything that is available and still can't get enough of how different inner experience can be. I've actually read Professor Hulburt's "Investigating Pristine Inner Experience" and I'm waiting (impatiently) for "Sampling Inner Experience in Disturbed Affect" but unfortunately it is not available in this moment . Learning about others' pristine inner experience and the DES method has been so enlightening for me. It opens so many questions to possibilites. Possibilities and facts that have always been there, but we never notice. Somehow we are blind to our own experiences. If we consider that one little pristine experience plus another little pristine experience make up a bunch of inner experiences and that ends up being the way a human uniquely experiences life -and therefore uniquely interacts, reacts, changes, learns, believes, feels..... I've come to think that this method and these studies might someday change the way we understand ourselves, others, and the practice of modern Psycology and Psychiatry. I wonder if there's a way to volunteer for one of these studies?

this is getting very philosophical, I didn't expect haha

I'm amazed more people haven't come to see how this works.

Very interesting topic and thank you for sharing and letting us in to see a glimpse of how you investigate what is going on in a persons mind. 🙏

There are many aspects of this interview that are very interesting like just hearing the difference in thought to myself... but the most interesting things is hearing that most people are not presently and consciously aware of what their conscious experience. I am quite often aware of my own experience. Like my own conscious acts as the beeper to bring my awareness to my present internal experience. I can't say i've always done this because i simply don't look back often enough to remember, and i didn't know it was any abnormal thing that i should realize i'm doing. And i am more future focused in my mindset. But i do know i've been doing it for at least 5 to 10 years.. i'm 28

30:17 Would you say that the meta awareness is a result of anxiety inducing experiences or that people with meta awareness are more prone to anxiety? Meaning, which one comes first?

Fascinating to see the process. I'm not aware of you describing this rectification process in your writing (for example different types of thinking/nothing). Have you always analyzed samples like this? Is it something you started to do recently?

Way too few people saw these videos :(

She mentions imagining people with a translucence, I have the same experience when I impose, overlay objects/people into situations or imagine what is behind the people or objects with my eyes open. My eyes closed experience I can imagine richer colors and solid objects/people/scenes.

There was this teen girl that ended up transitioning her gender to male, and then decided it was a mistake so transitioned back to female. She said that one of her major issues was when she started testosterone, her voice dropped and body changed so she sounded and looked a sounded male... But when she heard her voice in her head for her inner monolog, it was still her old female voice. And when she pictured herself in her head or had dreams, she still saw her pre-transition appearance. So she said she felt like she was living a lie or a double life and the mismatch caused a real identity crisis feeling. But I suspect that after a few years, both would have adapted. (Except for maybe occasional dreams).

I'd seriously pay a million dollars to stop hearing myself talk in my head. I never shut the hell up lol And I hear on 2 simultaneous levels at once... So as my inner monolog is going on, I frequently hear music behind it. Drives me INSANEEE!! Brains are so interesting. I love that this research is being done =)

Thanks for sharing these with us... God I wish I could do this! It's amazing when you find out how vastly different people's thoughts and experiences are~

Very interesting. Love this stuff! I may have complete aphantasia... But you guys would be *terrified* if you could HEAR what's going on in my head 😂 I hear _crystal_ clear; both sounds and my voice on 2-3 overlapping levels, 24/7! 😵 Neuroscience is so awesome~

59:28 Seems like they would be more in-tune to actual sensory experience and the present moment??

59:28 Any archived DES transcripts or papers for those not reporting inner experience??

This is so interesting!! Thanks for sharing this with us :)

it is like "letting your guard down" ? the ability to not focus on having to jump up and respond to anything. The ability to let all your muscles "cease functioning" thus letting you "sink into the couch." So many things going on in the head, at times... It takes sooo long to verbalize the actions in my head to others, in my experience. Maybe like my mind being a race car and my verbalization being like a go cart. It is interesting to hear others explain who they also experience some of the same things I do.

Based on the videos I've watched since finding out people have internal monologues (I do not), it seems like the people who do have a more difficult time describing their thought processes and occurrences than I do. Is this common? This may be because they are in a study and their thoughts are being interrupted, but for me, I can pull my thoughts (words and concepts) back to the forefront very quickly and easily. I can mentally open the compartment and pull those words back to the forefront without much difficulty at all. Also, is their a link between recall rates and or percentage of recall (on a spectrum of having a photographic memory or having memory issues) and people who have inner monologues versus those who do not?

Maybe that projection machine is not so out of reach: ua-cam.com/video/bqkUbiUkR5k/v-deo.html

Ad. second sample and the word "wondering": I checked occurrence of the word "zastanawiać się" (wondering) in Polish corpus. The usage clearly indicate that it means some kind of asking. So when Lena refers to her wondering she uses words "what life was like [...]". Verbalisation of the part "life was like for the people who lived..." was redundant, not economic, since - she had a representation of this content in the form of visualisation... but the word "what" and the feeling attached to it (curiosity) could be in her experience. I think it would be useful to ask in such cases, whether the question word was experienced (in the form of inner speech).

In first experience sampling seem to be (1) inner seeing (of outside scene of UNLV), (2) inner speaking ("graduate students interested in neuroscience), (3) intention ("just to see possibilities about UNLV"), (4) getting the meaning. Is it fair to say, that It's quite clear how (1) and (2) was present in mind, but it's not clear how intention was experienced and the meaning?

1st Beep: 5:26 Before this is a discussion of the length of the beep.

This was awesome!

It's interesting that her visualizations are wavey and delayed. Mine are clear.