- 4
- 32 601
Vigilante Performance
Приєднався 6 лют 2022
Ford Racing Z304DA vs AFR 185 comparison with Flow numbers, watch before you buy!
Pros and Cons on Ford Racing Z304 SBF heads. Additional info-88% throat and SSR speed is 312FPS Z304 vs 90% throat and 350FPS AFR 185.
Переглядів: 9 051
Відео
Installing wire locks on aftermarket pistons the easy way.
Переглядів 2785 місяців тому
We have many customers that struggle with wire locks, this video shows how easy it can be done with a handy dandy screwdriver!
Grinding a crank with the engine still in the vehicle!
Переглядів 4622 роки тому
Can’t say we have ever done this but Don Scinto Automotive says they have been doing this for decades for certain applications.
Aluminum Cleveland 2V heads from Promaxx, will they work for your small block Ford?
Переглядів 23 тис.2 роки тому
Specs and flow numbers on Promaxx Cleveland SBF heads.
$3400 and you still have to buy a specific rocker set? man that AFR way outperforms for way less $$$! I'm really surprised the raised exhaust port on the Z304 didn't perform better, then when you compared with the AFR 220 to the Z304 the ford intake port is not raised as high, the ford looks like the port was extended toward the bottom where you don't want the port bigger!
@@vrm86gt The exhaust did a but better after hand blending it, results shown on our Vigilante Performance Instagram page. $3400 and yes, you need special/expensive rockers.
Great info!
Ford did it again big bucks for a second rate head! Too bad they didn't get someone to make their heads that knows what they are doing.
My Z304s cost $1800 for the pair and had them ported By Duane Busch, they now flow 340in/272ex with a 2.08 valve, there is still a good bit left in them ,
How does the ford 6049-Z2 head compare? 271 CFM at 0.5
All old data was lost, would have to flow on and actually see the runners, short turn, bowl, etc. To give an educated opinion. As we said in the video, there are ways to make heads flow on the bench but does not mean they will make power.
I don't know for sure I'm not an expert by any means just a guy who sees things and thinks but I would think a raised port on a street car would be kinda a waste of time and money, my theory is with an under chassis header the straighter shot gained from the raised port is somewhat diminished by the added angle on the primary tube... And with the header fitment hassle would make it not worth it. I may be way off and its still better flowing even with under chassis headers? With race car chassis where the header doesn't have as many routing constrictions the raised runner may pay dividends...?
While the exhaust port would be more efficient, yes, header fitment can be an issue. The other issue is the valve cover rail is a bit higher so on FOX style EFI intakes, the intake might hight the valve covers or require a spacer.
🖐 Saludos Gabi Laviosa.. Edgar Contreras Eguita.. desde San Francisco Zulia Venezuela 🇻🇪
How about the 185 AFR vs 170 11R ?
If 11R’s come in, we will be glad to make a flow plate and test them.
I've always been a FORD guy... But when I built my 8.2" deck 363, I chose AFR 195 Renegade cylinder heads. Ford's Z304 just didn't compare to the AFR 195s.
Ford = JUNK
The camera is a little frustrating
For you and us LOL, done after a 12 hour day, will prevent that in the future.
The old Canfield heads would flow in the 330's with a little work. The Z heads should easily get there as well but I agree....over priced. Typically "porters" castings are cheaper to allow cylinder head shops to finish them and make a little profit. The AFR Enforcer castings are imported. Their US castings are slowly coming more available now but they took a big hit when Edelbrock shut down their casting plant in California. TrickFlow High-ports are still my favorite. The ProFiler and Brodix ST heads for more budget oriented builds and have plenty of room for porting down the road as the build progresses....as they always do. Cool video! Lots of good info and video angles to see the pertinent details!! Thanks for that!
Yes, the Canfields can flow a lot more with work and same with the Z304 which now the customers wants to do some blending to. Video was just to show how overpriced the Z304 heads are for the brand loyal enthusiast.
Where or when do you think I can buy a trickflow box intake? Trickflow took them off the market over a year ago due to alleged foundry issues. You can’t find the damn intake manifold anywhere for a 351w. Been looking used for a long time too. They just got the upper part only back online within the past month but without the bottom I can’t use the intake. Curious of your thoughts
@@timweb1510I've got no good answer for you. I'd suggest you look at other lowers and see if any of them use the same gasket for the upper....or if they are close enough that a little porting will solve any port alignment issues. I'm not familiar with that intake in particular. The only box-type intakes i ever used we made from blown-up intakes...like from a nitrous backfire. We'd take the upper and bandsaw the bottom runners and throttle body flange off and weld our own box together. That way we could put nitrous bungs and vacuum ports where we wanted them as well.
@@timweb1510 Kind of hard to say, Ebay would be the first choice or maybe run an EFI single plane with an elbow. Been running that set up for over 20 years.
All heads are overpriced
Glad I got a pair before the price hike
I have never heard of this in my life. How would you clean all the metal shaving that just went flying into the engine?
Wow! Ford is proud of those heads. Who makes them for ford? They kinda look like tfs high ports. Another 2 to 3 grand and you probably would have some good preforming heads. Ha. Considering port work machine work special rockers headers ect. Your getting into CHI money.
Look up the old Ford Canfield heads, looks like they might be using that tooling.
@vigilanteperformance8318 I actually had a set of those. They where real good heads back in the day. Champion racing heads ported them for me. 1993 I think.
M-6049-Z304DA7 Model Fits 302/351 Windsor engines "Z-HEAD" ALUMINUM - ASSEMBLED 63CC WITH 7MM VALVE Both heads do use offset intake rocker arms.
AFRs dont use offset rocker arms. at least not the 185. they just use a regular scorpion rocker arm they sell on their website what you need is 2 piece pushrod guide plates and that's why AFR and most aftermarket ford heads use them. so you can align them correctly
The Z304 heads do need the offset for the Intake and the 7mm casting helps with valvetrain stability for sure but still overpriced in our opinion.
Who' casting the heads for ford now? Buddy bar?
Look like a Buddy Bar but no idea, AFR had to get their Renegades castings in China because of the delays with BB.
Hey good video! I always thought those Ford heads were asking a lot for the money. We know that Trickflow Twisted Wedges and Hi Ports are near that price and will outflow the Z304 heads by far. The AFR's do the same as also. You look like the guy from Coast High Performance. Not sure if that's you. Anyways would like to see more of these SBF and LS and LT testing if you have time.
Yes sir, TFA and AFR for the win! LOL, that is me, I left CHP years ago and Vigilante Performance is my company. Might do more testing in the future, now focus is on our cylinder head and engine builds.
Z304 is a much better engineered head
And TF 11Rs are even better for 600.00 less than a factory HP head like the z304 for the same CC or larger
@@KingJT80 thats an 11 degree valve angle head z304 and afr are stock sbf 20 degree valve angle. So if you wanna go there lets go with Ford Racing D3's
@@erikalston4496 you cant even compare a D3 to a 11r if thats the case id buy a TF high port 225/240 over a D3 any day of the week (hell, even a AFR renegade 220) and come out ahead with everything machined. D3s dont even have rocker stud holes machined
@@KingJT80 D3 flows 100cfm more than a afr 220/high ports. You shouldn't have compared an 11° head with rotated valves to heads with stock angles and alignment.
@@erikalston4496 I compared a street head to another street head out the box. Shouldn't matter the angle. The d3 is anything but a street head. The z304s are over priced for the same or less power and speed that's why no one buys them much unless they came on a crate engines and everyone runs TF or AFR heads on Windsors
So for a stock 302 in a street truck. The AFR 185 would be good to go with cam, Intake and exhaust. Or would i need to go 306 for the heads to work well.
185 is like a 6500+ RPM head a 302 in a truck id be using the 165s so the valves clear depending on what cam you use. TF 170s would also work
@KingJT80 Yea I saw the 165s once I looked on website.
Something people forget is that intake runner affects torque/RPM range. A 165 AFR is proven on 302’s. 185 will also work with the right cam.
@@vigilanteperformance8318i might do the 185 myself on a 302 but its not in a truck, its in my zephyr but we'll see...
Very informative video. A steady camera would really make this excellent.
The Ford head needs work in the bowl and short turns... do some work and flow again, see what the numbers are... they will probably pick up big numbers...many guys like genuine factory parts...
Correct, they would pick up a good amount but for what they cost, we believe that should have been done by Ford Racing.
@@vigilanteperformance8318 You never get much out of Ford.... They are alll about mega profit...
@@vigilanteperformance8318 Accountants only write checks, they don't finish parts........
I'm still very happy with my CPR 331/Afr 195 combo that you built for me 5-6 years ago. Glad to see you making videos
Glad to hear that, no matter what shop, I have always done the best possible for my customers.
I think you have to Flow that Promaxx head, get all lift figures...i reckon those figures are for a CNC ported head...
Valve stem size
When will they be available again? ?
Excellent presentation
So great when people have charts on a pause-able video and feel a need to go line by line by line and tell us what we can plainly see.
Have you guys tested the 4V Cleveland heads Promaxx offers?
Chevy are cheaper to make horse power
Are those 225cc number the un-ported numbers
I have a Set of TFS Street Heat Cast Iron Small Block Heads I Need Ported . Were Can I Get them Ported . Thanks
what was th ebore plate used vs ProMaxx? they might have used a 4.125 plate?
Absolutely awesome explanation of what defines theses difference's
Where is the casting done ?
Good question
interesting! probably more for tractors, big rigs and such?
The Chevy guys are gonna take one look at those things and ask for at least 4 bulbs!!! And they can't hold a light to true Yates heads!!
What is the calculated cross section and port volume ?
Where can you get those at?
Where are the Pro Max head's made and is the quality there ? Any information that You can provide will be appreciated Thank You . 🇺🇲🇵🇷🦊👍
The price structure of the Promaxx heads seem to say they were made in China.
I would love to work with this mechanic.
See flowtest on the Promax 4V/3V heads in the replies section below on "Stock flow #'s on LS3 heads"? They're noticeably less than the 2V's in this test, OTB.
Is this Terry ?
And more content!
When say, "high lift" and you refer to TFS or AFR cylinder head being the better choice...could you elaborate?
Great content! The quality has improved since the beginning. I just subscribed. Keep up the great work.
So what you are saying is the CHI 185 and 208 head will make more power, my guess it at least 70 on the TQ and 50 on the HP. Why would you run an outdated 2V head in aluminum.
It depends on your application. And budget. The 2V heads are comapable with genuine parts. Intakes, exhaust manifolds etc. The 185 3V are better,, a friend has 500 real wheel HP on a 377 Clevo. But then you need the matching intake. I was very surprised by the driveability of them on the 377 BUT that has a 3.7 diff and a 5 speed Tremec. On my 400 Galaxie cruiser with 3.00 they would be useless,, the 2V version a lot better. Though it will stay with 2V 302 heads as they do the job ok. Those CHI 2V heads will sharpen up any mild Clevo. As will most better aftermarket heads. And they are a third of the weight.
@@ldnwholesale8552 So then you are telling me that a 2v head with a larger port and less air flow , will have better drivability then the 185 CHI head with more flow thru a smaller port.
How about testing the 4V heads?
Check out Promax 4V/3V flow test in the replies section... " Stock flow figures of LS3 heads" by Mike Eagle.
Looking to rebuild my 351 Cleveland. Nothing extreme just something a bit more torque than stock. it is in a semi-daily driver F100. The previous owner put 351M heads on the Cleveland block. My question is would these heads be to hot for my application?
Should be fine
From the facts presented in this Promaxx video, I think these heads would be a good choice for your application. The biggest advantage would be the modern combustion chamber design with smaller volume. The compression increase would provide a very noticeable increase in torque and horsepower while still using pump gasoline. The 351M heads would require a lot of work and expense to flow as well as these alloy heads. The reduced weight of aluminum has obvious benefits as well. The exhaust ports being in the stock location will allow more choices for the exhaust system. Too hot for your application ? No way 🏁.
I'd love to see a dyno run with these on an otherwise stock 400. Being able to actually run some timing without turning the engine into a grenade would be nice.
Me too. I'd like to see a closed chamber 2V head with raised exhaust ports on a 400. Something that would raise the compression ratio by a point and a half. Watching this article, I do not understand WHY somebody would go to all the trouble to cast an aluminum Cleveland head and not raise the exhaust ports. Keey the port design so as to be compatible with stock headers, but put it around 3/4" higher. The acknowledged shortcoming with Clevelands is their crappy exhaust ports. But why make some new heads but not solve the exhaust port problem.
Will they fit a 400? I have one.
@@steveharper9964 yes they will.
@@bobkonradi1027 raising the ports on a low buck head makes no sense as it would eliminate using them on a stock shock tower car like a mustang or cougar without expensive headers. Using those headers eliminate any advantage of the raised ports as you simply exchange the port flow issue to a header flow issue due to the shape transition required.
@@Ares-jx4ep if they are raised and your using them on a 302 just order the headers for a Cleveland and should be really close
Stock flow numbers for LS3 heads. Lmao 😂
LS engine is a copy of a Ford engine design so who cares. Notice how the new GM 1000hp crate engine has FORD designed even spaced intake runners for the heads and intake 🤔
@@nova467spanker wrong
@@mikeeagle2653 wrong about what? How about you be more specific... The architecture and design of the LS block is from a Ford FE and the bore spacing is only .02" difference than a SBF. I personally put my stepdads 5.7 LS heads on a Cleveland block just to prove this point - just for fun though and to piss him off chevy made a Ford engine. And yup he new gm 1000hp crate engine has equal length FORD intake runners on heads and intake. ua-cam.com/video/wgSoHlSU3WI/v-deo.html
LS has been beaten to death. They're not interesting or cool anymore. Just an engine that is plentiful in junkyards.
@@Francis_Castiglione lmao 😂 that’s common line from haters. Still winning more races then everything else for less money
Sweet