Відео

Awesome topic, terrible presentation

How did they stopped it in lab

Source, Sabine Hossenfelder (first experiment evidence for process that might create the Universe)

your understanding of light is incorrect.

Amazing breakdown and presentation! Loved having the opportunity to listen to this!

Hi, I'm a lay person, like to know if that experiment prove that the Big bang it's a fase transicion?

I'm spinning around Move out of my way I know you're feelin' me 'cuz you like it like this I'm breakin' it down I'm not the same I know you're feelin' me 'cuz you like it like this

Excellent presentation. Well explained too. You're looking at the future inventions, and applications, in Your work, especially with that dual gravity model. Suggest You keep thinking outside the box and see what's there. It's there!

How many pairs of Poles does a bar magnet have? And is rotation an intrinsic property of a vortex? To call a smaller scale of it as "irrotational" is downright deranged.... sure they spin really fast and it's extremely difficult to measure the rpm using modern tech but please... abstraction is only justified when you aren't omitting foundational phenomena like Spin and Rotation.

If "they" proved Planck's Quanta interpretation by demonstrating that Angular Momentum is indeed quantised then why do also say that it has Spin with no classical analogue? Kinda weird that the mainstream phenomenology is that of the planetary model rather than helmholtz or taits models...

At the end the edge modes perhaps to do with chiral chern Simons theory as it relevant in other cases

'Promo sm' 💯

Nice

This is awesome

Thanks for the wonderfully relevant suggestions youtube haha this all sure sounds interesting though

Spoiler: It's neutrinos after all, ejected from black holes (and possibly heavy enough neutron stars to hold onto relativistic neutrinos) with local, extreme densities resulting from millions and billions of years of accumulation of them in those places. The streams of these comparatively cold, electromagnetism ignoring, friction-less and hence obviously super-fluid neutrinos that are the only known kind of particle (with their 3 types, tauon neutrino, muon neutrino, electron neutrino) besides photons that are (due to their low mass and relativistic speeds) capable to be spread across inter-galactic space while at the same time being captured by massive black holes where they transfer their impulse from 1 galaxy to a nearby one develop into differently compact, expanded swarms, though they also act as dark energy by obtaining a gravitational-assist-like swing-by motion since the gravitational lensing effect doesn't only apply to light but such neutrinos in their extremely high abundances throughout the cosmos, too, by which they also pull onto galaxies in direction away from the galaxy they came from, explaining the dark energy phenomenon, too. It really wasn't all that complicated (e.g. compared to figuring out glitches in video games) for if only physicists hadn't been so fixated on the logically and observationally contradictory existence of event horizons (that neither Einstein nor Hawking believed in) to imply nonsensical causal 1-way streets at the non-existent boundary towards black holes. And so instead of focusing on the invention of new particles to explain dynamical possibilities that are explainable without them for if one had been more thorough, exhaustive in the analysis of possibilities with the particle set that was already known to exist, before ruling them out, this could and should have been figured out a lot sooner. Good luck on further research during which you then might find out that such by black holes ejected neutrino swarms can in some cases be in a labile to each other bound state that can be disturbed by close encounters of massive objects pulling on 1 side of them stronger than the other, which can disrupt such neutrino swarms, leading to the dissolving of them, explaining suddenly disappearing "black holes", and that those impossibly huge and particle density lacking super puff gas planets are just neutrino swarms that gather interstellar gas and other material as they move through space (which is also how they can be slowed down especially near stars with proto-planetary material discs to form binary systems of the loosest to each other bound type with orbital periods in the millions of years), and that these neutrino swarms, since they are invisible and hence possible to be confused with a black look of them that could be interpreted as black hole, can mimic black holes with for black holes impossibly low total masses and dormant behaviors nearby stars in binary star systems. The situation at Tabby's star should be explainable this way, too, and likely the planet 9 mystery as well (and more).

hello, how to get on the e-mail list for this webinar series?

Am i the only one who thinks the energy cascade is linked to extra dimensions of string theory? So that they are virtual.

Fabulous

Hi, Can anyone explain why there is a Bohr radius term in the interaction ?

And when more people watch the video, the amount of "views" don't change. What it means, after all?

Somebody is deleating "likes". A one hour ago there were 7 likes, now only four.