Jessica McConnell
Jessica McConnell
  • 79
  • 178 851
Graspable polynomials1
Graspable polynomials1
Переглядів: 111

Відео

Synthetic Division (Polynomials)
Переглядів 684 роки тому
Synthetic Division (Polynomials)
Polynomial Long Division
Переглядів 554 роки тому
Polynomial Long Division
Long Division (review with simple numbers and with polynomials)
Переглядів 794 роки тому
Introduction to polynomial division
Simplifying Radical Expressions
Переглядів 464 роки тому
Simplifying Radicals with variables
Algebraic Manipulation 1
Переглядів 4254 роки тому
Intro to algebraic manipulation
Algebraic Manipulation 2
Переглядів 504 роки тому
Algebraic Manipulation 2
Algebraic Manipulation 4
Переглядів 234 роки тому
Algebraic Manipulation 4
Algebraic Manipulation 3
Переглядів 394 роки тому
Algebraic Manipulation 3
How to Sew a Fabric Mask
Переглядів 194 роки тому
Sewing a non-medical, personal protective mask (using quilting cotton). This design includes a filter pocket for extra protection if needed.
Solving a Fractional Equation 2
Переглядів 284 роки тому
Solving a Fractional Equation 2
Algebraic Equation: Visual Proof w/ Fraction Bars
Переглядів 294 роки тому
Algebraic equation proof using mathematical modelling
Subtracting Fractions (unlike denominators)
Переглядів 254 роки тому
Using fraction bars to model fraction subtraction
Adding Fractions (Mathematical Modelling)
Переглядів 354 роки тому
Using fraction bars to model fraction addition (unlike denominators)
Solving More Systems of Equations (2 x 3 table)
Переглядів 924 роки тому
Using a table to solve a system of linear equations
Solving a System of Equations (with a table)
Переглядів 2,6 тис.4 роки тому
Solving a System of Equations (with a table)
Egyptian Lattice Multiplication (+ Polynomials)
Переглядів 1364 роки тому
Egyptian Lattice Multiplication ( Polynomials)
Long Division (British vs French Methods)
Переглядів 6 тис.4 роки тому
Long Division (British vs French Methods)
Polynomial Division (French Method)
Переглядів 1 тис.4 роки тому
Polynomial Division (French Method)
Long Division (French Method)
Переглядів 11 тис.4 роки тому
Long Division (French Method)
Solving Quadratics (New Method)
Переглядів 2224 роки тому
Solving Quadratics (New Method)
Solving Quadratics 2.0
Переглядів 114 роки тому
Solving Quadratics 2.0
Solving Quadratics 3.0 (Radical Solutions)
Переглядів 224 роки тому
Solving Quadratics 3.0 (Radical Solutions)
Completing the Square 2 (Visual Model)
Переглядів 164 роки тому
Completing the Square 2 (Visual Model)
Completing the Square (Visual Model)
Переглядів 754 роки тому
Completing the Square (Visual Model)
Factoring Polynomials on a Grid (Visual Models 3)
Переглядів 1194 роки тому
Factoring Polynomials on a Grid (Visual Models 3)
Factor polynomials with a negative constant (Visual Models 2)
Переглядів 404 роки тому
Factor polynomials with a negative constant (Visual Models 2)
Factoring Polynomials on a Grid
Переглядів 554 роки тому
Factoring Polynomials on a Grid
Factoring Polynomials with Visual Models (1)
Переглядів 4814 роки тому
Factoring Polynomials with Visual Models (1)
Difference of Squares (Number Sense Problem of the Week)
Переглядів 134 роки тому
Difference of Squares (Number Sense Problem of the Week)

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @Swasti21
    @Swasti21 Місяць тому

    This is my homework

  • @Unnatithapa1786
    @Unnatithapa1786 Місяць тому

    Thanks lol ;⁠) ^⁠_⁠^

  • @TheLex20874
    @TheLex20874 2 місяці тому

    How weird, I grew up in France and we didn't use any of the French methods shown here.... I guess there are even more methods....how confusing!

  • @info212011
    @info212011 3 місяці тому

    THANK YOU SO MUCH!!

  • @preetisingh7306
    @preetisingh7306 5 місяців тому

    Ive been always using the British method as in india all the students use this method only but the french method is very difficult for me like its tough and also very confusing

    • @weavingwonder
      @weavingwonder 5 місяців тому

      @@preetisingh7306 familiarity makes things seem easier. The more you practice something new, the more familiar it becomes and the easier it will be.

  • @eamonnquinn9585
    @eamonnquinn9585 5 місяців тому

    helped me understand my son's French maths homework and provide support of his learning, big thanks for your concise and clear explanation

  • @shreyash006yt
    @shreyash006yt 5 місяців тому

    My also 😢😢

  • @alealicja1
    @alealicja1 6 місяців тому

    Wow, jesteś bardzo pracowita. Swietne pomysły. Wszystkiego dobrego.

  • @lyndahearn6159
    @lyndahearn6159 6 місяців тому

    My brade never is completely two ribbons.

    • @weavingwonder
      @weavingwonder Місяць тому

      You would need to start with outer dimensions that are both divisible by 2 to get two separate ribbons.

  • @preetgrewal4048
    @preetgrewal4048 6 місяців тому

    This is my holiday homework 😅

  • @viktoriyastadnyk5795
    @viktoriyastadnyk5795 8 місяців тому

    Thank you so much this helped me in class

  • @firasazeezhasanarab3598
    @firasazeezhasanarab3598 9 місяців тому

    Thank you

  • @LarryjB53
    @LarryjB53 9 місяців тому

    Lighting...Lighting....Lighting.

  • @Shirley-p2z
    @Shirley-p2z 9 місяців тому

    Thank u‼️‼️

  • @deejoe7564
    @deejoe7564 9 місяців тому

    Thank you so much for making this vid Jessica. I've been watching videos on how to do this and yours is by far the most simplest and with detailed instructions. Again, thank a bunch❤

  • @drstone2358
    @drstone2358 10 місяців тому

    Simple and effective

  • @luzbioletarojasroca708
    @luzbioletarojasroca708 11 місяців тому

    Precioso💜💜💜💜💜💜

  • @WitmanClan
    @WitmanClan Рік тому

    Thank you ❤ 🌈 🎨

  • @germanlozano3765
    @germanlozano3765 Рік тому

    this is my homework😭😭😭

  • @freeatleast
    @freeatleast Рік тому

    Very nice but it’s a little dark and hard to see exactly what your doing.

  • @yasminmartins2299
    @yasminmartins2299 Рік тому

    In Brazil we learn something similar to the French method but with some differences

    • @j-yjyh8521
      @j-yjyh8521 Рік тому

      Yes, you were probably taught the real thing and not this completely misunderstood version.

  • @GamingWithAyan1
    @GamingWithAyan1 Рік тому

    This was in my homework

  • @ayazdani88
    @ayazdani88 Рік тому

    What is a introduced here as the French method is a generalization of the actual French method as another person has also mentioned in the comments. Otherwise, the French method is exactly the same as the English algorithm, but the way it is illustrated is more intuitive (left to right, corresponding to numerator to denominator). In the French system, there cannot be any confusion as to what goes where.

  • @mattwhitaker3979
    @mattwhitaker3979 Рік тому

    OutSTANDING. Far easier than that clunky British nonsense.

  • @Mhiz_lareet
    @Mhiz_lareet Рік тому

    ❤😊

  • @muhannadayoubi1433
    @muhannadayoubi1433 Рік тому

    Genuine question: Is this the actual French method, or a useful generalisation of it? Because I've always had the impression that the French and English methods are identical except for the organisation of the numbers (I studied in Lebanon where both methods are used depending on the language of instruction). The method here is still applicable to the English organisation, providing you forego place-value considerations, and in fact it is very similar to what English speakers call “area model division”. So is it really the “French method” or a completely different method?

    • @weavingwonder
      @weavingwonder Рік тому

      I learned the standard “English “ algorithm as a child in a Western Canadian context. I was introduced to the “French” algorithm while at school in France. I see some similarities between the method taught in France and what is commonly referred to as Egyptian multiplication. It wouldn’t surprise me at all to learn that it was acquired/adopted from elsewhere. Today it is the standard algorithm in France and parts of Canada for teaching children to divide multi-digit numbers.

  • @samakolBanbol
    @samakolBanbol Рік тому

    I grew up doing it the French way and can never learn to doo it the other way!

    • @weavingwonder
      @weavingwonder Рік тому

      Check out my video on Egyptian lattice multiplication! ua-cam.com/video/fB88fuTj7Bw/v-deo.html

  • @ZS-gl8rr
    @ZS-gl8rr Рік тому

    Thanks I needed for the assignment 😜

  • @Ichilimin
    @Ichilimin Рік тому

    tysm

  • @Padraigcoelfir
    @Padraigcoelfir 2 роки тому

    When you wind up with a remainder you multiply it by 10 and you start a period for decimal numbers. 17÷4 = 4.25 because the remainder can be divided so how many times does 4 goes in 1 = 0 in order to continue you multiply 1 by 10 which is 10. Now the quotient as a period attached to it 0. So how many times 4 goes in 10? 2 times with a value of 8. 10-8 =2 So far we have 0.4 but there is still a 2 remaining that we multiply by 10 and we now have 20. how many times does 4 goes in 20 = 4 times. So the complete answer is 4.25

    • @weavingwonder
      @weavingwonder Рік тому

      While your comment is true, the process of multiplying by ten to continue dividing is not helpful when the result is a periodic or repeating decimal. Students who are reliant on procedural reasoning but who do not have solid number sense can end up dividing over and over again until they realize that there is a pattern.

    • @Padraigcoelfir
      @Padraigcoelfir Рік тому

      @@weavingwonder when you wind up with a periodic it can be written as a fraction. 1/3 = 0.33... So, in decimal you can write it as so. When the periodic occurs later and this can happen, you just add a vinculum like so. 0.⎺ but with a 3 underneath.

  • @heartzzforGod
    @heartzzforGod 2 роки тому

    thank you so much!! i needed this for an assignment lol! <3

  • @dhirajphadera9919
    @dhirajphadera9919 2 роки тому

    so creative man i am proud of you

  • @pbizarra
    @pbizarra 2 роки тому

    Muito bonito. Obrigado.

  • @romthummeunnoi8496
    @romthummeunnoi8496 2 роки тому

    I use British method and the french one is strange to me but somehow very understandable and manageable.

  • @chrisray9653
    @chrisray9653 2 роки тому

    Do they divide polynomials this way too?

    • @weavingwonder
      @weavingwonder 2 роки тому

      It is definitely doable. Try it!

    • @Christian_Martel
      @Christian_Martel Рік тому

      Yes indeed. Actually, you can think of numbers as polynomials of powers of 10. 492 = 4*10^2 + 9*10 + 2

  • @misoompa88
    @misoompa88 2 роки тому

    How to use this with decimals like "1.206 ÷ 0.3"?

    • @weavingwonder
      @weavingwonder 2 роки тому

      Multiply both values by 10 to change the divisor to 3. 12.06 /3 is quite easy to do after that.

  • @wandererstraining
    @wandererstraining 2 роки тому

    The British method is so strange to me... I grew up in Quebec, Canada, so we did the French method, and when I saw someone doing the British method, I got super confused because I had no idea what number was the dividend, divisor or quotient.

    • @ayazdani88
      @ayazdani88 Рік тому

      True. The French method is consistent with the order of the operands in the operation and therefore leaves no ambiguity to as what is what.

    • @weavingwonder
      @weavingwonder Рік тому

      Check out my video on Egyptian Lattice Multiplication! ua-cam.com/video/fB88fuTj7Bw/v-deo.html

  • @merveilmeok2416
    @merveilmeok2416 2 роки тому

    Thanks Jessica for your video (I was just curious to compare the process). I am joking: "maybe the English and the French had a war about long division." (I grew up in a Francophone a country.)

  • @apolinariojunamae3680
    @apolinariojunamae3680 2 роки тому

    Thank you so much. You're so creative! ❤️

  • @noahjbarr
    @noahjbarr 2 роки тому

    thanks

  • @claurabell4237
    @claurabell4237 2 роки тому

    Thankyou sm

  • @chocolateangel8743
    @chocolateangel8743 2 роки тому

    I've never seen someone use the approach you did. They also divide by/factor out the leading coefficient. Your approach is much easier and still makes sense!

  • @madrasulagam
    @madrasulagam 2 роки тому

    super

  • @sophiahutchings4433
    @sophiahutchings4433 3 роки тому

    is this tessalation by just rotation?

  • @cocoghena9485
    @cocoghena9485 3 роки тому

    This helped with my assesment ty

    • @AC3S_007
      @AC3S_007 3 роки тому

      r u from deakin

  • @catmoon2009
    @catmoon2009 3 роки тому

    gorgeous and beautiful Done thanks

  • @athanasiaskreta8198
    @athanasiaskreta8198 3 роки тому

    Thank you for the video 🙏 so very helpful ❤️

  • @deepaganapathy
    @deepaganapathy 3 роки тому

    You will see a whole lot of such designs being done to decorate verandahs in South India using white dust. It is a pretty ancient cultural practice in Hindu homes

  • @chocolateangel8743
    @chocolateangel8743 3 роки тому

    I very much prefer the flexibility of the French division/Partial Quotients method.

  • @chocolateangel8743
    @chocolateangel8743 3 роки тому

    So, this is your way of introducing students to Gaussian Elimination and matrix-row operations? Sneaky, sneaky. 😁