- 11
- 33 861
Basileus
United States
Приєднався 21 жов 2017
Technology, Finance, Philosophy or anything else. Curiosity. Follow the journey.
Your Life Expectancy Is Already 100+
X - x.com/BasileusBas (very nice)
Hell yeah. Look, what is said in this video is non-debatable (the 90-95 life expectancy). The study on life expectancy extension is observational and has 123,219 participants, so it's a fact that healthy living increases your life expectancy by 12.2 years for men and 14 for women. So if your current life expectancy is 79-81 and you decide to follow these habits, then you'll have one of 91-93 (for men). And of course, I'm taking as an example someone who is average-not a guy who smoked for the last 30 years or was a heavy alcoholic-so in actuality most people can achieve it, but not everyone. If you add technology on top of that... well, then we'll see, but my guess is that we're underestimating progress, so be prepared to see crazy things happening.
All the music is either classical (I love classical) or non copyright music.
12.2 years life extension study: www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032047
Hell yeah. Look, what is said in this video is non-debatable (the 90-95 life expectancy). The study on life expectancy extension is observational and has 123,219 participants, so it's a fact that healthy living increases your life expectancy by 12.2 years for men and 14 for women. So if your current life expectancy is 79-81 and you decide to follow these habits, then you'll have one of 91-93 (for men). And of course, I'm taking as an example someone who is average-not a guy who smoked for the last 30 years or was a heavy alcoholic-so in actuality most people can achieve it, but not everyone. If you add technology on top of that... well, then we'll see, but my guess is that we're underestimating progress, so be prepared to see crazy things happening.
All the music is either classical (I love classical) or non copyright music.
12.2 years life extension study: www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032047
Переглядів: 3
Відео
The Inevitable Population Collapse NOBODY Sees coming.
Переглядів 17 тис.14 днів тому
X - x.com/basileusbas?s=21 Think we’re in an overpopulation crisis? Think again. This video dives into the real data behind global demographics, exposing the population collapse myth and its shocking consequences. From debunking 1970s overpopulation fears to exploring today’s plummeting birth rates, here’s what the world isn’t telling you-and why it matters.
X Is Now Worth More Than Twitter Ever Was.
Переглядів 2,5 тис.28 днів тому
Two years after Elon Musk’s controversial $44 billion acquisition of Twitter, the platform-now rebranded as X-has seen its valuation plummet to just $9.8 billion, despite hitting all-time highs in user growth and engagement. What caused this drastic decline? From inflated purchase prices and bot scandals to an advertiser boycott, the story is anything but straightforward. But there’s a twist: X...
Saving Earth OR Space Colonization: The false Dilemma
Переглядів 1,1 тис.Місяць тому
Is it really “space vs. Earth”? In this video, we tackle the popular claim that every dollar spent on space exploration is one not spent on saving our planet. We’ll break down key budgets from NASA, ESA, and the global space industry, show how they compare to the trillions needed for climate solutions, and explain why this debate is a classic example of a false dichotomy. Discover how space mis...
I knew Tesla would be worth $20Trillion in 2024, this video is the proof.
Переглядів 1,1 тис.Місяць тому
I know it sounds crazy... a $20 trillion dollar valuation when the biggest company today is around $3 trillion dollars in valuation. But hear me out-if everything goes well, it could actually happen. The biggest companies in the world revolutionized one or two industries: Apple with electronics, Nvidia with processing power, etc. But something like Optimus, at scale, revolutionizes nearly all i...
Why Nuclear was always the Solution.
Переглядів 4752 місяці тому
In this video, we delve into why nuclear energy has always been the solution to many of the world’s energy and environmental challenges. Using Germany’s “Energiewende” as a case study, we explore how a country with ambitious green goals ended up increasing its carbon emissions, facing soaring energy costs, and becoming one of Europe’s largest polluters. We address common misconceptions about nu...
How Starlink will Finance Mars Colonization
Переглядів 5332 місяці тому
What’s truly holding us back from reaching Mars? Money. But SpaceX and Starlink are rewriting the rules, creating a financial lifeline for turning Mars colonization into reality. With over 7,000 satellites in orbit and a projected $6.6 billion in revenue for 2024, Starlink’s potential is reaching for the stars. In this video, we’ll explore Starlink’s financial power and how it could revolutioni...
At some point if there are too many old people, retirement payments won't be able to be guaranteed anymore. Eventually people will have more children again if that is the only way to ensure retirement.
If all babies are girls, the replacement rate is 1.05. Problem solved?
Every problem of human society was and is caused by the rich elites... including the "over population", the population collaps too!
The real problem is white people becoming extinct, it is white people that have pushed every innovation. Asians are naturally isolationist and have little natural inventiveness but do have the ability to improve existing products. Africans have no real history or ability to contribute anything but will take from others that do . The Islamic lands bring only regression so no improvement there either. America and Europeans who built such exceptional nations where boundaries were always being exceeded are being flooded with immigrants lowering iq , causing deracination and effectively replacing white people in their own homelands. DEI is pushed despite the way it lowers standards, white men are excluded from careers where they would contribute to the world’s progression. Africa with western aid and medicine is set to double its population as is India while white countries half theirs. Please tell me because this is so obviously planned and cannot just be happening, what do they think replacing white people with these will achieve other than sending the human race back to the Stone Age ?
Maybe more people would have kids if they could afford them.
This is nonsense directly contradicted by observation. Low IQ populations do not show significant fertility decline except in times of resource scarcity. There is no reason to suggest population increase will stall until the world economy is overwhelmed by excessive numbers of low IQ people. Then populations will collapse to the carrying capacity of the locations they inhabit. It’s happened before and will happen again.
You are wrong. We will have a terrible time trying to take care of old people. But more people is the biggest danger to the environment.
You do realize that this is an entirely human-made (the pun and double meaning are intended - here I refer to both: Made from humans, and made by humans) problem, right? And that it will take at the absolute worst 1 week to get global birthrates back to at least 6, if not more, should the people in charge actually want it, right? Just change a couple of laws, and voilà, we are back on the tried and true path to having way too many people... And although diving into the specifics is a sure way to get banned, I can hint that the laws in question are luxuries that many people think are necessities...
Letting ya’ll know that Paul Ehrlich was part of the “tribe” Pattern recognition strikes again
I think these people who are credentialed are extremely hive minded. I believe the majority of the so called intellectual university educated people are brainwashed and mindlessly repeat what some other more persuasive "educated" person has said ,just so they can appear intelligent. In those circles it doesn't pay to go against "established doctrine" and they all spout crap like little clones. In my opinion the average farmer has more smarts, from life experience, than 99.5% of university credentialed people. One cannot fail to see what the polititians, bureaucrats, doctors and so called professional pillars of society have done in the last 5 years with covid and also backing the military industrial complex. 99.5% of sickeningly spouted the official narrative. All schools at every level push institutionalised state propaganda, from the tiniest of preschoolers all the way to the last year of university. Its feeds on itself to the point that these people believe their own bullshit.
Bill Gates: We are overpopulated and this is bad! Also Bill Gates: Has three children and does nothing productive to reduce African birth rates, instead feeding people who multiply like madmen Seems like a trustworthy fellow
The problem is not over population, but under population. This is going to be the real problem. And Malthus was naive in his writings, or, acted on bad faith. Sure there are enough for everyone, but, we must stop having a 1% that gets 90% of the resources and 99% that have to battle for the 10% that is left.
“Sex without condoms feels better” - Norm MacDonald
You are not a very bright individual. Less consciosness= less suffering. More consciousness=more suffering. It's as if you were a sadomazochist of sorts..
Sad answer If consciousness = suffering for you. I hope you find your way man.
@Basileus.s Hunger=suffering Thirst=suffering Horniness=suffering Cold=suffering Disease=suffering Discomfort=suffering These are all due to consciosness. Should i continue the list or are you conceding?
Consciousness isn’t just what makes hunger sting-it’s what lets us transform adversity into insight, turn desire into creativity, and find joy in the face of discomfort. Reducing “consciousness” to suffering is like calling a symphony nothing but noise: the claim itself demonstrates a shallow grasp of the complexity and potential of a conscious mind. If that’s the best you can do, you’re essentially proving your own point about limited awareness.
@Basileus.s This is just a senseless word salad. So you like to push people into the icy ocean cause then they'll have the opportunity to find a way out which is ohh soo rewarding. This is called psychopathy in better places.. And likening this place to a symphony...i really have no idea what movie you are watching...
"Iife is suffering" end of argument
Population collapse is just around the corner. But whats important to anticipate is that in this upcoming New World... Africa, India and China will account for near 2/3 of the Global population.
That super rich hypocrite Soros while having so many children himself calls others to not have any children lol))))). Disgusting
The only people that care are corporations because their business plan is based on population expansion. Hard to make more money each year if your customer base is not growing.
The great mouse utopia experiments...
Maybe Mother Nature is telling us something? People aren't having children because their quality of life and standard of living is so s****y! Not just in the underdeveloped countries in the Southern Hemisphere, but in those developed countries that have embraced hyper-capitalism in which one percent of the one percent own more than half of all the wealth of that country ( We're looking at you, USA ). "The average living conditions of the middle class today are better than those of kings in medieval times." Yeah, that's about 17% of the world's population. The other 83% live in poverty, with less than 1% being wealthy. Malthus wasn't wrong, it's just that the numbers weren't extended out far enough. We've only delayed what Ehrlich predicted would happen by increasing food production but that increase is not sustainable in the face of a population of 20, 30, 40 or 50 billion. This planet could never produce enough food for that many people and if it could, it would mostly be seaweed.
Twitter is now over 70% bots
Depopulation is done with vegetarian food 😊 , vegtables make men sterile, meat make men viril 😊
7:19 Why is it sad and why should we be growing and expanding? If we want to maintain capitalism, maybe. But capitalism itself is unsustainable and will likely be replaced with something else in the future. Furthermore, I think that the reproduction rate is a function of the population as well. Not just the level of development of the country. As population declines, the birth rate will increase, as there will be less people competing for the same amount of resources and thus each person will have a bigger share and it will be easier to thrive. If the economic system is to redistribute the resources fairly, that is... If capitalism remains and the top 1% have 40% of the resources, then yeah... population may keep shrinking.
Population not gonna crash out to that extent, mabye 3billion at least
if we have 3 kids - omg overpopulation if we have 1 kid - omg population collapse
Lol! So true.
I'm like adhd but this captured my attention..nice editing interesting stuff
Good. Too many people nowadays
Too many evil rich people causing all the problems
So will a collapsing population be more or less concerned about global warming?
This video lend's the theory it is applying to evidence too much credit to be in good faith. Its more likely to be painted as propaganda meant to drive old voters insane rather than an actual contribution to discourse.
I don’t really care if it was in good faith, the result today is that most people believe them.
@Basileus.s That's rather interesting, how such a radical break from conventional intellectual respect in political discourse is rejected and supported by such an articulate interest. Anti-intellectual is a rather loaded word.
What do you mean nobody? The Limits to Growth.
They need just enough slaves to keep the societal pyramid scheme running. Once robots are feasible, they'll switch to that, but I doubt they'll have as much fun without an underclass to torment.
less people is a good thing because less competition
It’s a double edged sword. Good for the environment bad for us.
Here are things that can allow us to survive in the future. Gravity driven free energy using the Power Multiplier Device, vertical housing/greenhouses called Grow-Live Towers, Increasing arctic ice. The Power Multiplier Device: Open sourced, gravity driven, free energy generator: Functions as follows: There are two large sprockets, one on the roof of the building, the other at ground level. A chain connects both so that when one side of the chain is pulled down it turns both sprockets. On the axle of the lower sprocket there is another sprocket that connects to a transmission that is connected to a generator. When the same side of the chain is pulled down it turns the lower sprocket and the second sprocket which turns the generator to produce energy. This requires a downward pull of 2,000 pounds to produce sufficient energy. On the inside of the chain that is pulled down there is a small drive sprocket that is kept in place by two heavy plates, one of each side of the small sprocket, having the axle of the small sprocket going through each weight. On the outside of the chain there are two idler wheels above and below where the small sprocket is on the other side to keep the chain on the small sprocket. Two more idler wheels at the top of each weight to keep it attached to the chain. Each axle of the idler sprocket has threads for a machine nut so they stay in place as connectors. The axle of the small sprocket goes through the weights on both sides and extends out. A large bicycle-type wheel is placed on this axle and has a diameter of 7 feet. At the top of the weight on the side of this bicycle-type wheel is a small motor that has a chain around its drive sprocket that goes around the circumference of the bicycle-type wheel. Small motor draws energy from the battery to turn a large bicycle-type wheel clockwise, turning the drive sprocket clockwise also because both share the same axle. This has the drive sprocket climb the chain, taking the whole assembly with its 2,000 pounds of weights. Three things now happen: 1) The motor takes the assembly to the top of the chain with its 400 pound pull, taking 1 hour to do so, requiring the energy amount from the battery. Energy Expended going up. EE/up= 1 hour pull of 400 pounds from the battery. 2) As the assembly is climbing the chain, it's heavy weight (2,000 lbs.) is still hanging/pulling on the chain, pulling the chain down which turns the transmission/generator, producing a full charge of energy going back into the battery. Energy generated going up, EG/Up = 1 hour of a 2,000 pound pull by the heavy mechanism. 3) When the assembly reaches the top the small motor shuts off and the assembly's weight slowly begins to descend, pulling the chain down with it. Since it climbed the chain faster than it pulled the chain down, its descent will take longer than 1 hour for its energy generated down charge into the battery. EG/Down = 1+ hour of a 2,000 pound pull charging into the battery. EE/Up 1 hour of a 400 pound pull < EG/UP (1 hour of a 2,000 pound pull charge into the battery) + EG/Down (1+ hours of the 2,000 pound pull charge into the battery) = FE, EE/up < (EG/UP + EG/Down) = FE. With a heavier weight: 1) The motor takes the assembly to the top of the chain, taking 3 minutes to do so, requiring the energy amount from the battery that is represented by the expression 1N. Energy expended going up. EE/up=1N. 2) As the assembly is climbing the chain, it's heavy weight is still hanging/pulling on the chain, pulling the chain down which turns the transmission/generator, producing a full charge of energy going back into the battery. Energy generated going up, EG/up=.4N. 3) When the assembly reaches the top, the small motor shuts off and the assembly's weight slowly begins to descend, pulling the chain down with it. This descent takes 10 times longer than the ascent due to the heavy weight of the assembly, and the low gearing of the transmission, it 'creeps' down. Connecting another PMD with five times the weight, to the first one, having the lower sprocket be the small motor for the second one's larger bicycle-type wheel, will produce more energy. The sketch of the Power Multiplier Device can be seen at: mechanical-engineering.com/forums/mechanical design news and events Stern Wheeler Power: Take the engine out of a sternwheeler boat (Steam Ship-Paddle Wheel Boat). Replace it with a transmission and a generator. Connect the paddle wheel's chain to the transmission. Anchor the vessel in the current of any river that can accommodate it and let the current turn the wheel and generate free energy. Below Ground River Generator Power: Along the length of a river dig a deep tunnel/trench that parallels the river. At the beginning of the trench there is a large open section excavated that houses a water wheel that has large tanks around it instead of the regular slats. The water wheel in the below ground open section is connected to a generator. The river water is channeled through a gate that allows it to run over the water wheel filling its tanks, turning the wheel, and generating energy. The base of the water wheel is level with the tunnel/trench so that the water from the tanks dumping their loads flows into the tunnel/trench. Down along the river there are water wheels at the surface that are turning by the river's current. Their axles extend over the tunnel/trench's location and are connected to a water pumping mechanism located in the tunnel/trench, pumping the water in the tunnel/trench back out into the river. These water wheels will continue down the river until there are enough of them to remove all the water in the tunnel/trench. Gravity brings in the water from the river, turns the wheel, produces the energy, moves the discharged water down the tunnel/trench, and pumps it back out to the river. Solar air conditioning. Build a 'hot box' on a roof. A hot box is a metal box 1 foot high, five feet wide, and ten feet long. Paint it flat black and affix it to the roof so that the long side is vertical. At the bottom of the box run a vent pipe/tube into the roof of the houses to the highest ceiling inside the house so that it vents into/out of that room. At the top of the box is a covered vent that exhausts the hot air the sun produced within the hot box. This venting draws air up the hot air and pulls in the air from the room that has the vent pipe/tube in its ceiling. The rooms in the rest of the house have vents above the doorways to allow the warm air in those rooms to be pulled into the vent as well. This cools the house using the sun and not an air conditioner running off the grid. Close all windows except the ones on the shade side of the house and you draw in the cooler air. The hot box can be replaced with a box that has a plexiglass window at the top, and has a thick metal grid material on its floor. All painted flat black to absorb the heat from the sun. The Grow-Live Tower, which is a cylindrical structure with a central support column, periphery support columns around the circumference, and suspension cables connecting the two to support the floor levels. This tower provides the food for the people that live in the lower 20 levels by growing it in the upper 60 levels. These Tower/generators, if embraced by the world, would end world hunger, homelessness, cut global disease by 85% due to improved living conditions, increase water conservation by 10,000%, end the poisoning of the world's water by petroleum and mono culture's 'one crop' farming, shrink mankind's footprint by 60%, and end global poverty by employing the World Zero/New Money economic system. Power Multiplier Devices would provide the energy for the tower by climbing up and down the outside of the periphery columns. Restoring Arctic Ice. The water temperature at the bottom of the sea is colder than at the top, so simply pump up the cold water at the edge of the ice flow to slow the warming/melting process. This can be done by hanging 30' diameter tubes, by floating vertically from the surface down close to the bottom. Each segment has floats to alleviate the weight. A solar powered pump at the top would need to just pump out 4' of water before the capillary effect would automatically begin bringing up the colder water to the surface. If 10,000 of these were placed close to the ice edge it would effectively lower the temperature of the water that is contacting the ice flow, slowing the melt during summer, increasing the ice build up in winter, and lowering the mean temperature of the region. Possible slowing the Greenland ice melt as well. One would do nothing, 10,000 would bring change. This could also be the key to cooling large sections of the entire ocean. Bringing up to the surface the colder water beneath to cool the surface, somehow. Thousands of ships are travelling the ocean at any time. If each had some sort of mechanism that pumps up some of the colder water, this could be cooling, cumulatively, hundreds of square miles of ocean everyday/hour. This might not help a lot, but it would help some. What do we have to lose?
enjoy your little lives while you can
The precious utopia series revelation: ua-cam.com/video/wjfKBDxf0yg/v-deo.html
The reindeers, will save us... Warning: very sarcastic video:
The video: ua-cam.com/video/F3Sv5RfeHYI/v-deo.html
"Child free" movement terrifies the rich 1%. - Less poor, desperate, exploitable labor - Less cannon fodder for never ending wars.
Putin won't be happy abou this
The rich will be fine, they might lose a bit of money but they can still live and die in relative comfort. The poor though? They'll have to work longer into their age, with no children or grandchildren to care for or support them and fewer overall independents workers to support retirees, leading to less pensions and social security support for the old
It will be good time for me. I will buy a big house, raise my family, start a new community. Most people die out, but my will of life will live
Well,be ready for the new immigrants from Africa and Middle East your government will import from those country to keep you "company".
Those who sacrifice to have children will inherit the earth. Which is the issue with the modern world. Everyone sees hardship and tries to avoid it. They see hardship as unfair. But those who embrace it and struggle through will win tomorrow. I am glad there is someone look long term here.
@worndown8280 no. I just dont agree with you. I see my how failure my parent are when they build their family. Everybody see Messi suffer and they praise him. But i see my parent suffer, i disapointed. They suffer from avarage mindset. When you start a family, you raise your kid with the best effort, help them become the best human as they can be. not raise the kid for mere reproduction, and i will not have a kid if i know my kid will become a tech slave for Elon Musk. My plan will wait for old people die out, house price reduce, grinding for money, pursuit my dream, live dangerously, and hopefully. 5 to 7 years later, i will have enough money to start my own family.
Tge population will crash but we will not go extinct. There are stable and fertile cultures like the mormons for example who will have children no matter what and increasing their portion of the population while the majority of the world won't. We are basically gifting the future to highly religious groups.
Those people will die without modern tech.
@kareemdurrant139 You might be thinking about the amish. Theirblifes aren't very comfortable but they do kinda get by. Mormons or similar groups do have people who are well educated in modern technology and would be able to use them in smaller dimensions.
Maybe people who are fine with bare survival think that we are not in overpopulation crisis but for many others we are indeed in a overpopulation crisis. People are being asked to fly less, eat less meat, drive less, drive smaller cars instead of larger SUVs, do not fly in private jets, do not go for international vacations frequently, do not buy a 150 sq yards house for single or 2 person household, too much competition for both low skilled and high skilled jobs, etc. Why? Life is not just about bare survival
babies are born from women ...
Yes and?
un commentaire
If you look into the "universe 25" experiment, were mirroring those mice. The only ones concerned about population decline are the ones who want a surplus of manpower for cheap, the rest of us are fighting for fucking scraps. We fuckin NEED exponential decay!
YOU VILL EAT ZE BUGS YOU VILL LIVE IN ZE POD
Klaus Schwab ? Is that you ?
Just came to laugh at the title because literally the one of the most well-known richest persons in the world; Elon Musk; has talked about this for years.
Yet go ask your friends and family, who is aware ? Not a lot of people. Look at the polls and data.
The problem can be very quickly fixed by just making housing affordable for everyday people. The cost of housing is simply impossible for most people to keep up with let alone having 2-3 kids. In the United States for example, the birth rate fluctuating between 2-3 children per woman until the 2008 financial crisis at which point the growth rate would just decline constantly. The Soviet union tells a similar story, their growth rate was also healthy and stable until the oligarch coop that stole all industry and put into the hands of about 100 newly minted billionaires, ofc the birth rate instantly collapsed as a result. It's not women being educated or women in the workforce, that stuff is what causes decreases from 5+ to 2-3, what causes the extreme low birth rate is capitalists squeezing people dry. The problem is caused by affordability, you fix that problem, the problem literally disappears.
im your 607th subscriber
Elderly people abound in Ireland now, the young people are emigrating in droves. Large families used to be the norm, but now the only ones with lots of kids seem to be the Travellers
Well I hope Bill Gates' Zero Population Growth movement is happy now. No really, a few decades ago the "crisis" was overpopulation. Now apparently the "scientific consensus" can't decide whether it's global warming or global cooling that's the problem so it's called "climate change" instead.