Business Law Institute
Business Law Institute
  • 40
  • 685 082
Promissory Estoppel: Beer Capitol v Guinness Bass (Case Brief)
Beer Capital Distributing v. Guinness Bass Import Co., decided by the US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit in 2002, is a leading case on the doctrine of promissory estoppel in contract law.
This video provides a case brief or case summary outline.
Check out our courses and and content at buslawinst.thinkific.com/
Переглядів: 2 112

Відео

Conditions of Contract: Concurrent Conditions, Conditions Precedent, Conditions Subsequent
Переглядів 5 тис.3 роки тому
Sometimes performance of a contractual obligation may be contingent upon the occurrence of a condition. Including conditions in contracts or contract law may also help regulate when performance is due. There are distinct types of conditions: - Concurrent conditions, - Conditions precedent - Conditions subsequent Check out our courses and and content at buslawinst.thinkific.com/
Changed Circumstances in Contract Law: Impossibility, Impracticability, and Frustration of Purpose
Переглядів 3,7 тис.3 роки тому
Non-performance by one of the parties to a contract amounts to a breach of the contract. While this is of course true in most cases, there are certain exceptions to the general rule. Namely, it is possible that non-performance is not the fault of a party but rather based on a change in circumstances. This refers to three specific grounds which, if present, may excuse a party’s failure to perfor...
Performance and Breach of Contract: Material Breach, Immaterial Breach, Anticipatory Breach
Переглядів 5 тис.3 роки тому
Normally, parties to a contract are bound by and have certain duties under their agreement. First and foremost, this includes the central duty to perform their obligations in good faith according to the terms of the contract. But if performance is not according to the contractual terms, then there is a breach of contract. In this video, we look at what constitutes breach in contract law and wha...
Defenses in Contract Law • Part III: Fraudulent Misrepresentation (Fraud)
Переглядів 3 тис.3 роки тому
Although a valid contract may have been formed through offer, acceptance and consideration, it would still be possible for one party to raise a contractual defense. If successful, the defense will block enforcement of the contract. It is however up to the parties to raise any defense that they believe apply. If they choose not to raise the defense or neglect to do so, then the contract remains ...
Defenses in Contract Law • Part II: Mistakes (Unilateral and Bilateral)
Переглядів 2,8 тис.3 роки тому
Although a valid contract may have been formed through offer, acceptance and consideration, it would still be possible for one party to raise a contractual defense. If successful, the defense will block enforcement of the contract. It is however up to the parties to raise any defense that they believe apply. If they choose not to raise the defense or neglect to do so, then the contract remains ...
Defenses in Contract Law • Part I: Overview of Contractual Defenses
Переглядів 2,3 тис.3 роки тому
Although a valid contract may have been formed through offer, acceptance and consideration, it would still be possible for one party to raise a contractual defense. If successful, the defense will block enforcement of the contract. It is however up to the parties to raise any defense that they believe apply. If they choose not to raise the defense or neglect to do so, then the contract remains ...
Illegality in Contract Law • Void or Illegal Contracts and Their Consequences
Переглядів 15 тис.3 роки тому
Based on public policy considerations, only legal contracts or legal contractual provisions can be enforced. There is no remedy to enforce illegal contractual agreements. Here, we look at what makes a contract illegal or void, and what the consequences are in these cases. Check out our courses and and content at buslawinst.thinkific.com/
Legal Capacity in Contract Law • Can Minors Enter Into Contracts?
Переглядів 18 тис.3 роки тому
The basic presumption in contract law is that anybody can enter into a contract. However, certain individuals may not have the ability to fully understand the nature of their obligations that flow from a contract. Therefore, the law protects certain societal groups by avoiding situations where they become bound by contract. This is the issue of legal capacity. Check out our courses and and cont...
Hamer v Sidway Case Brief (Outline Summary)
Переглядів 3,4 тис.3 роки тому
The case of Hamer v. Sidway nicely illustrates the contract law concept of consideration. It involves a conversation between an uncle and his nephew, with the uncle promising to give his nephew $5,000 if the nephew would abstain from drinking alcohol, using tobacco, swearing, and playing cards or billiards for money until he reached 21 years of age. The issue for the court to decide was whether...
Leonard v PepsiCo Case Brief (Outline Summary) - Featured on Netflix!
Переглядів 18 тис.3 роки тому
Leonard v. Pepsico - now featured on Netflix - is also known as the Pepsi Points Case. It is a case tried in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in 1999. It is an entertaining, and somewhat curious, illustration of certain aspects of the rules surrounding contractual offers. Check out our courses and and content at buslawinst.thinkific.com/
Consideration in Contract Law Explained
Переглядів 28 тис.3 роки тому
A core requirement for the formation of a contract in the US, UK, and other common law jurisdictions is the concept of ‘consideration’. Consideration is provided if something of legal value is bargained for and exchanged between the parties. That is, each side to a contract needs to provide consideration. Consideration is one of the key concepts of contract law. It is an essential element neede...
Formal Requirements for Valid Contracts • Statute of Frauds • Parol Evidence Rule
Переглядів 3,3 тис.3 роки тому
The video discussed selected formal requirements for contracts, including the statute of frauds (requiring written contracts) and the parol evidence rule (concerning oral statements made by parties to a contract). Check out our courses and and content at buslawinst.thinkific.com/
Offer, Acceptance, and Agreement in Contract Law Explained - Part III: The Acceptance
Переглядів 3,1 тис.3 роки тому
The existence of an agreement is an essential basis and precondition of a contract. We examine in this video the individual elements of “agreement”, focusing on the element of acceptance, including the mailbox rule and the mirror image rule of contract law doctrine. Check out our courses and and content at buslawinst.thinkific.com/
Offer, Acceptance, and Agreement in Contract Law Explained - Part II: Offer Duration
Переглядів 2,6 тис.3 роки тому
The existence of an agreement is an essential basis and precondition of a contract. We examine in this video the individual elements of “agreement”, focusing on the offer duration. Check out our courses and and content at buslawinst.thinkific.com/
Offer, Acceptance, and Agreement in Contract Law Explained - Part I: The Offer
Переглядів 8 тис.3 роки тому
Offer, Acceptance, and Agreement in Contract Law Explained - Part I: The Offer
Lucy v Zehmer • Case Brief Summary (Outline)
Переглядів 10 тис.3 роки тому
Lucy v Zehmer • Case Brief Summary (Outline)
Contract Interpretation: The Objective Theory or Objective Test of Contracts
Переглядів 6 тис.3 роки тому
Contract Interpretation: The Objective Theory or Objective Test of Contracts
Hoffman v Red Owl Stores, Inc. • Case Brief Summary (Outline)
Переглядів 2,2 тис.3 роки тому
Hoffman v Red Owl Stores, Inc. • Case Brief Summary (Outline)
Sources of Contract Law
Переглядів 3,1 тис.3 роки тому
Sources of Contract Law
What is a Contract and Why Do We Need Contract Law?
Переглядів 6 тис.3 роки тому
What is a Contract and Why Do We Need Contract Law?
Contract Law Remedies for Breach: Damages (Compensatory, Incidental, Consequential)
Переглядів 20 тис.3 роки тому
Contract Law Remedies for Breach: Damages (Compensatory, Incidental, Consequential)
Contract Law Remedies for Breach: Equitable Remedies
Переглядів 7 тис.3 роки тому
Contract Law Remedies for Breach: Equitable Remedies
Types of Contracts • Different Contracts Explained
Переглядів 37 тис.3 роки тому
Types of Contracts • Different Contracts Explained
Defenses in Contract Law • Part IV: Undue Influence and Duress
Переглядів 3,1 тис.3 роки тому
Defenses in Contract Law • Part IV: Undue Influence and Duress
Unfair Terms in Contract Law | Unfair Contract Terms
Переглядів 6 тис.3 роки тому
Unfair Terms in Contract Law | Unfair Contract Terms
Federal vs State Jurisdiction in the US
Переглядів 15 тис.3 роки тому
Federal vs State Jurisdiction in the US
Court Jurisdiction in the United States
Переглядів 18 тис.3 роки тому
Court Jurisdiction in the United States
Legal Terms and Terminology
Переглядів 100 тис.3 роки тому
Legal Terms and Terminology
The UK Court System Explained | How the UK Court System Works
Переглядів 76 тис.3 роки тому
The UK Court System Explained | How the UK Court System Works

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @MadisonHodgson-i6k
    @MadisonHodgson-i6k Рік тому

    It was very interesting

  • @Rudrakxh
    @Rudrakxh Рік тому

    What is Law? Baby don't hurt me don't hurt me no more.

  • @malejoseph6509
    @malejoseph6509 Рік тому

    Thank u so much dia

  • @kheyapar8199
    @kheyapar8199 Рік тому

    Good

  • @Igaveyoumyfakename
    @Igaveyoumyfakename Рік тому

    They should have given that idiot the Jet and then watched him go broke trying to maintain it.

  • @TheCardboardB_andit33
    @TheCardboardB_andit33 Рік тому

    Thanks! This is really useful

  • @craig0077
    @craig0077 Рік тому

    I not longer will purchase a Pepsi-cola or Pepsi product of any kind.....F U Pepsi

  • @Szhihihihihihi
    @Szhihihihihihi Рік тому

    Thanks !

  • @Mr_expert_gameplay
    @Mr_expert_gameplay Рік тому

    Thank you 🙂

  • @sergiolopez-uz9gw
    @sergiolopez-uz9gw Рік тому

    Ok 👌

  • @LuvLeighAn_
    @LuvLeighAn_ Рік тому

    Not once does she say how to write a brief, she only says what is in a brief.

  • @darkstatehk
    @darkstatehk Рік тому

    To summarize: Not united. *adjective* _joined together politically, for a common purpose, or by common feelings._

  • @normanpearson8753
    @normanpearson8753 2 роки тому

    Isn't this making things more complicated than needs be ? Why not just " Courts" , with specialist judges ?

  • @timothy2817
    @timothy2817 2 роки тому

    🧚🏻‍♂️❣️🗽🌏🌌🌈

  • @johnsuperhist5219
    @johnsuperhist5219 2 роки тому

    How do you make that in 1k words?

  • @scottfinney4750
    @scottfinney4750 2 роки тому

    It's $500 or more, not $5,000 for UCC

  • @victormelendez4669
    @victormelendez4669 2 роки тому

    I will Never buy Pepsi products

  • @mohdrizam3636
    @mohdrizam3636 2 роки тому

    Wanna know something? KFC in Malaysia was serving their set with Pepsi previously..but recently, they kick pepsi off and change it to coke..imagine that.

  • @ThatColorado
    @ThatColorado 2 роки тому

    Umm so i see a jet every episode behind john.. but it didnt say if he eventually got it by pepsi or wth was it behind him. Soo?? I have questions still lol??!! But This documentary was so good, that Philippines story was wild I couldn't believe that happened. And the BS u can clearly see Pepsi trying to pull with the harrier jet issue . It's clear when you watch this. That's Definitely messed up on Pepsi part. That's F up. Good thing I don't drink soda anymore so it doesn't matter which drink Company I support

    • @joshs7160
      @joshs7160 2 роки тому

      Then you did not finish the show, he did not win, the case was dismissed. The jet behind him was just background trickery.

  • @akotoprosperdyon5197
    @akotoprosperdyon5197 2 роки тому

    Good

  • @michelleochoa3790
    @michelleochoa3790 2 роки тому

    Great explanation. Thanks.

  • @BARILAWASSOCIATES
    @BARILAWASSOCIATES 2 роки тому

    Excellent

  • @sunmayatamang5929
    @sunmayatamang5929 2 роки тому

    So good 👍 I

  • @rissa9771
    @rissa9771 2 роки тому

    Thank you! this was super helpful!

  • @dominickmontano4410
    @dominickmontano4410 2 роки тому

    Never thought so much people would watch at the same time

  • @lamacroavecsacha
    @lamacroavecsacha 2 роки тому

    Great video ! Thank you !

  • @marksavoia3687
    @marksavoia3687 2 роки тому

    Jurisdiction is 5 parts.....1)Natures Maker, 2)Nature, 3) The concept of the Rule of Law, 4)Constitutions, 5)Governments

  • @Philip0209
    @Philip0209 2 роки тому

    But these contacts are between legal entities or living men?

  • @andyMSH700
    @andyMSH700 2 роки тому

    I think if the legal teams and judges actually followed the law then we would not have as much corruption in the system. Unfortunately they rely on cronyism and white collar crime is rewarded.....oh well...delighted this was never my job. Imagine convicting someone to a life in prison when you know they are not guilty...scary stuff but yet it does happen these days. The legal system punishes the poorly educated and rewards many of them with prison.

  • @ouahibaaff4414
    @ouahibaaff4414 2 роки тому

    thanks it has been usefull for me

  • @toolazytostudy2316
    @toolazytostudy2316 2 роки тому

    THANKS 4 THIS

  • @seandoesgaming1866
    @seandoesgaming1866 2 роки тому

    This is Natural Unit law

  • @tomabecketolasa7654
    @tomabecketolasa7654 2 роки тому

    Can one specialize in more than one area eg can one be a civil and corporate lawyer?

  • @shaungorham1871
    @shaungorham1871 2 роки тому

    Cool, New Jersey.

  • @kohtay7470
    @kohtay7470 2 роки тому

    knowledgeable about the case law

  • @shaungorham4993
    @shaungorham4993 2 роки тому

    Excellent, Connecticut.

  • @amrankmaulana7203
    @amrankmaulana7203 2 роки тому

    「コンテンツを調整する必要があります」、

  • @shaungorham5479
    @shaungorham5479 2 роки тому

    Awesome, Kentucky.

  • @jeanveljean9446
    @jeanveljean9446 2 роки тому

    oOMG WAHT IS THAT GUY IN THE PICTURE CURLY ONE SO TERRIFIYING

  • @vcfaster9591
    @vcfaster9591 2 роки тому

    Thank youu

  • @sazzadhossain7639
    @sazzadhossain7639 2 роки тому

    Is objective theory and objective test same?

  • @Cris-hk4cn
    @Cris-hk4cn 2 роки тому

    You did an excellent job in explaining the type of contract. Thanks you, your presentation was very helpful.

  • @Mosi2423
    @Mosi2423 2 роки тому

    This is very useful, thank you🙏🏾

  • @SajjadKhan-eu3nz
    @SajjadKhan-eu3nz 3 роки тому

    Excellent lecture