Відео

how to motion blur the whitewater particles?

Hope for me will come when more artists realise there’s safety in numbers, we’re better off banding together, forming more independent guilds, collectives, and creator owned businesses

Really interesting comments here. The relationship between value and meaning is something we all took for granted before AI, but it turns out that this is not a simple matter. The common sense view is that if an AI can generate a picture that looks as good as a picture created by a human artist then the two are the same and therefore have the same value. But would those who- in the past- paid human artists hundreds or even thousands of dollars for their work be happy to pay the same amount for an AI generated image? No, they would not. But if you asked them why not, I guess they would say something like 'Well, that AI image took zero effort or skill to come up with, so there's no way I'm paying the same rate I would have paid a Human Artist for the same image' This is quite odd in a way- after all it's the image they are buying, not the effort and skill that went into making it- so why has the price suddenly gone down when they know it's an AI image? This is not an easy question to answer but it seems that the value of an image is bound up with the human effort and skill that went into it's creation- and by eliminating that human input the AI has also eliminated the value of the image itself. But why is that human effort and skill so important when it comes to the value of the Art? I think that what is really at issue here is meaning. The reason that it matters that a human artist made the art is because that art then has meaning- it was the result of a process whereby a sentient mind applied itself to an act of intentional communication. The real problem with AI Art is that we know that the AI had nothing to say to us- when it made that image it did not do so in an effort to express anything, or to communicate anything- it has no mind, no sentience- it's outputs have no meaning because no meaning was intended by the thing that generated them. Perhaps the real issue here is we are sentient beings and we value highly the communication and connections we have with other sentient beings. And it may be that the value we find in the work of human artists is not merely in the quality of their rendering but in the fact that we know that their art is an expression of their sentience, their desire and intent to speak to us through the medium of their Art. AI Art, on the other hand, is the product on non sentient machines that have neither the ability or the desire to communicate with us, and no matter how well rendered their outputs we cannot see those output as having any value because they are meaningless to us, and that which has no meaning has no value to us, because we are sentient beings for whom meaning is the measure of all that we value and care about. That's why you are right to say that if my house was on fire it would be the Dog I would save over any valuable object because as a sentient being I place more value on the simple sentience of that animal than on any dead artefact no matter how much it may be 'worth' in terms of money- and I think most people would agree with this- which is quite an optimistic thought to end with.

Hello, is there a way to parent the domain to the emitter so that I can have my character move across the scene without being limited with the domain?

I don't think the reason AI isn't a threat is because artists are special. We aren't. We don't have some amazing gift. We're just regular old normal flawed people. And that is why AI won't replace them because when people consume art they want to share a human experience. That's why they consume it. You can't get human perspective from a machine. There's room in the world for AI and human art, just like there's room for drum machines and drummers. It doesn't matter how good the machines get, they wont replace you. Some artist will, and have already, used AI as a media for creating really interesting art, just like for decades there have been really creative musicians making new music from nothing but samples. You can't tell me that 'frontier psychiatrist' by the avalanches isn't new and creative, yet there is nothing in that song but pre-recorded bits of previous work. At the same time Jesse Welles is blowin up because people just crave authenticity. It's not black and white, one or the other. Just like how samples and synths in music haven't replaced acoustic instruments, AI will never replace analog art, because people crave the real human experience.

btw there is a button in embergen ( 1.1.2 i think ) that exports a single alembic file

Correct me if Im wrong. Buying respect, instead of earning it - is ok. But create with AI - is not ok? There is something realy wrong with this logic.Dont get me wrong, Im absolutley against creating with help of AI in all forms.

Tell them

Everyone talking, nothing is happening. AI is gonna ruin a segment of this industry

May AI overtake all artists 🙏🙏🙏

While I agree with most points, I look at AI Flicks (the YT account) ,and I see kids and coworkers listening or watching AI made videos. And as time goes by, humans will become harder to find, as there would be so many such videos. I tried to tell these people that they are AI, but they won't listen.

Artists have a great opportunity to leverage the inherent disdain people have towards AI it into a context for the establish the value of human made art by comparison. Simple things like showing process and establishing the value of a work made by a person can leverage AI into an opportunity for artists that didn't exist before.

Great very encouraging take on this! I think most of my questions going forward with AI is how to communicate this difference to clients and people who are easily fooled by AI's "artistic" ability.

great! can i purchase this project file? thanks!

Hi how I can get embergen

Marmaduke’s looking intense and seriously impressive! It’s awesome to get a glimpse behind the scenes, really adds to the anticipation. Excited to see what’s next!

Looking good!

Nice!

We can not render it just for licencen

This is sick!

Damn

you cant do tutorials

doesnt works. you didnt show how to connect a skull to rope. my objet is falling down with a rope

Many thanks!

great video

Cool dude will do this

Great stuff! Keep em coming.

Thanks guys ❤‍🔥

how to export whitewater?

Very cool

Help my life bro

Cool! I did something similar with a skull in Embergen. Created this in Unreal and After Effects. ua-cam.com/video/ZKCjYa6KAog/v-deo.htmlsi=cXAW7cnGVNScNdeN

Thats great!!

Thanks for this update!

some crazy and fun ideas here 💦

That works and is more than fair. Thank you!

Thank you for explaining how to get motion blur from Liquigen to Blender, I couldn't figure it out! Very good tutorial.

I wish it was longer, great job!

👏

Dino's a fantastic artist/filmmaker! Great interview!

You're a godsend, man!!! Thank you so much! Subscribed!!!

awesome !! i downloaded your PF but my simulation is not hight quality , it's more mud than water lol any one to help me to fix that ?

Thanks!

I did one nuclear explosion on embergen, and was the first try, when I render it in VDB, it came out over a 300GB just for one explosion, is there another way to make any fire/explosion in embergen, and export to blender, without being that heavy??

Nice Tutorial but sir how to disconnect this hang object in other place, like helicopter are moving with object and drop the somewhere road like so can make tutorials sir

You talked to much kind'a ruined the reaction😐😮‍💨

I have no idea what the first thing your talking about. Beginner? Assuming I know quite a lot already. Wow what a bad demo!!👎

I use Arnold in c4d and I don`t know what to do(

Wow,Thank you for showing this.

Your tutorials are really nice! It would be awesome to see if liquigen can handle large scale sims and make them nice and detailed. That would be a real test to see if it competes with the big guys. Thanks!