Відео

@@jeffgreen-v7z hey mate, I think you’ll find that I’m just playing slower in general when I record because I’m trying to explain my thought process on other hands. It’s quite tough to talk and play at the same time. I’m never deliberately tanking 66 on the button! For what it’s worth there is MDA on timing tells preflop and these games are the highest stakes on ignition, so there are going to be some crushers around, so I’d be losing EV if I wasn’t considering timing against regs. Certainly no need to consider my timing vs recreationals though :)

Jamming here also generates fold equity against hands like 77-JJ that the assumed fish can start "value-bluffing" with (=when a fish is not sure if it's bluffing or value betting 😁). By calling here, we lose against random pairs and by minraising we don't generate folds against bigger pocketpairs and weak Kx hands. Recreational players tend to focus on their hand and think less about opponents' ranges. Edit: typos and rewording.

@@gamer-uv2fb if we assume he can be betting the river with middling pairs then the shove starts to make sense. although Jako assumes opp range is either Kx (TP) or nothing

@@T.G.Lautenschlaeger :( there were some high stress spots!

@@JakoPoker try some breathing exercises to lower the intensity that stress has on your body.

He doesn't memorise - he learns and understands concepts/heuristics; then applies. It is always impossible to learn every unique situation/spot you will find. Less so in cash games, but still - he would learn as much as he can and apply his understanding through approximated thresholds and heuristics

@@noodles6175 Really good summary :)

Great analysis thank you! Yes a very close spot overall, but I think it’s a reasonable assumption population will underbluff river with Tx, so folding vs jam makes sense. Does KK fold vs jam in the sim you ran?

Win rates will still mostly come from the recreational on the table, so that’s my focus. But you certainly have to be aware that some players on the table can be bots at any point in time. Not great, but that’s the state of poker in Aus :(

Click the button in the top left that looks like the two cards - this will show you the cards of all players who went to showdown :)

@@JakoPoker thank you!

Yeah I think you need to be in certain countries - Aus and the US are the main player pools I believe

Red line is your non-showdown winnings whereas blue line is you showdown winnings. So basically every time you fold you lose non-showdown and so your red line goes down and everytime you make everyone else fold your red line goes up.

I don't really play any 25z except for this series so I'm not really sure unfortunately. The Z tables in general die during peak Aus times so I mostly just play reg tables

No worries :) The zone pools pretty much all die from 6pm onwards AEST. I think they run from early morning and throughout the day

@@AndyDouglasChannel while the general tendency of being too passive will apply in MTTs, the ranges will be quite different because of antes and the effective stack size. So I would only apply this directly to cash games

@@JakoPoker thank you for the response. Found the video really helpful.

Thanks mate, drivehud2 tracks all of those things for me :)

Mainly Australians and Americans play on Ignition

The button right next to the hand replayer (the button that looks like two cards) will show you what both players had if the hand went to showdown. I think I must have already had it open on my other monitor hence why you didn't see me click on it

@@JakoPoker ahhh thankyou!:) On another note, would coaching sessions do any good for me? Kinda stuck playing .10/.25c on ignition😅 I feel I can play alright against the 9max fish, but always get rekt playing 6max/zone.

yeah absolutely its an issue - hence why I'm pretty careful table selecting and identifying where my winrate on the table is coming from. As long as there are soft spots I think I have a positive winrate even if some of that is being taken up by colluders

@@stilesmwhite6625 are you talking me personally? Or for yourself? There’s definitely plenty of room for me to get stronger theoretically and/or learn some more MDA exploits. These are the highest stakes on ignition, so it’s more that further coaching would help solidify my winrate

@@andrewcampbell9695 Running at about 9bb/100 on the year, but I don’t expect that to last long term

@@JakoPoker cool keep it going!

@@T.G.Lautenschlaeger thank you :). Yeah it’s a funky hand - glad it worked out!

@@JakoPoker The A2o hand where you checked the stats and recent agression was <1.0 dont you prefer to bet the flop if villian is barely probing the turn?

@@T.G.Lautenschlaeger sorry can you give me a timestamp?

@@JakoPoker 20:43

@@T.G.Lautenschlaeger Since we 3b a super polarised range from bb we have a lot of trash hands in our range which are doing really bad on this board, so we need to implement lots of checks. GTO is mixing 60% check here with range. So A2o is going to be a nice candidate check back where there isn't too much EV to be gained by betting for value whereas we can protect our checking range and gain EV by bluff catching turns and rivers. Our hand isn't worth 3 streets of value so no need to start betting flop even if we think villain is passive on turns.

You’re not wrong, I tread carefully most of the time

@@KevinWu-js2qz thank you mate :) I use drivehud2 which is allowed. I don’t know what autoHotkey is so can’t speak for that

@@harrychan6814 they are allowed and not against ToS to my knowledge. But obviously being an anonymous site ignition limits a HUD from tracking people over time across multiple tables, so they’re significantly less effective

Ahh cool thanks mate, what time of day do you find is the best to multi-table cash games in AEST? I’m only doing 4 tables of 50NL but just wondering if you had any insight

Hahaha had the arvo off. Dealing with downswings is easiest with a strong mental game - so making sure that is in good order would be my recommendation. Check out the 'Mental game of poker' by Jared Tendler if you haven't come across it.

@@JakoPoker yeah I started reading it, I should finish it actually lol. I've been trying out a few moves of yours in my low limit online games, my favourite is overbet cbet sb v bb, that seems to work like a charm, thanks for that!

Nope! You'll only find me on this channel :)

Thank you mate! GTO Wizard will be the easiest/most accessible tool to use - it's free to make an account, so worth checking it out if you're not across it :)

Well i'll know who it is now when I start running into the nuts in this spot :P. Thanks for watching :)

The bad press at high stakes is certainly warranted. However if you're playing at micro/low/mid stakes it really shouldn't be much of an issue.

I agree hahaha, I don't like it when watching it back either. It's an indication i'm deep in thought! But I will try an minimise it when recording because it is quite distracting.

@@JakoPoker thank you very much.

My sessions are generally just dependent on how good the tables are - ranging typically from 1-4 hours. I think having self awareness as to how well you're playing from a mental game standpoint is important - I suggest try to identify what mental leaks creep in when you've been playing too long, and then as soon as you notice those leaks creeping in you should take a break or end your session. For example one leak might be getting distracted too easily and scrolling on your phone in between hands.

@@JakoPoker Yes, good point. Basically I deviate from my A game after I exhaust the number of good folds I can make, then bunder (injustice tilt I believe). It is biggest inhibitor to winrate. On another note, I really liked seeing those massive pots at 200nl yesterday. Keep up the great work (and play).

We certainly have more EV when we have the backdoor flush - but that's not really asking the right question. Ultimately we just want to identify whether 64 of spades has higher EV by calling compared to when we just fold. Irrespective of the timing tells, continuing 64 spades here is probably marginally +EV - we do have to fold a bunch of turns, but as you identified we also block a significant portion of his value region (66,67,Q6) so we can also choose to hero down if we think he's overbluffing. There are also significant implied odds associated with the 6 in particular.

@@JICM25 yes it is also a bluffcatcher, but I don’t think it has great properties to make it an attractive call - we really want to block his flush combos for example. I also decided that this was an underbluffed sizing structure so I landed on call being the worst of my options