Відео

Plz upload the link of the product ❤

Nice

Fake channel

❤❤❤❤

इसके वीडियो में कोई कमेंट नहीं कर रही है बहुत बहुत म****** लड़का

❤❤❤

Just like that

😊😊 it's 😊nice

Mindblowing ❤

Nice watch

wow

very nice

Wow very nice 👍

👍👍

Citizen watch is awesome

❤❤

Good

1. The watch is a Sub-Ma-Rin-er, not a bloody Submareener. It’s a divers watch, named after a mariner aka a diver; not a bloody Submarine. 2. There’s no such thing as a watch beezell, it’s pronounced “beh-zul” 🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️

An Exclusive Underated Watch..I Got The SKX003 GMT Batman..Which Is Simply Perfect,,In Aesthetic,Functionality And Style..Its Also GADA And Currently My Grail..As I Grow The Collection ..

Absolutely worst video I have seen on the skx, only showing other watches, stupid.

Nice info ❤

5is slave. Mark

Nice machine 😊

Yes. It is. It does have some historical prestige, I think generally considered a good-looking watch by many enthusiasts, obviously it's going to be very accurate, and the price point is quite reasonable all things considered. I do wish it was more like a 40 or 41 mm watch though...

👍

Not interested and Account holder fake promise them subscribe

Fake

👍

👍

good luck with your channel! success!!!

I’ve had this timepiece for over a year. It’s absolutely a very underrated Swiss timepiece. I have classic blue dial with the ceramic bezel insert. It’s not a COSC but it’s been spot on at [+] [-] 5-7 secs per day. Oh and 41mm. Beautiful, well built. I only wish it came with a no date dial.

Glass base vs. metal lid Even if I give in to the nostalgic arguments in favor of a mechanical watch, I also want to be able to see the “magic of mechanics”. A look through the glass base provides an insight into the inner workings - with subtle to open-hearted clock designs. One of the most beautiful moments for watch enthusiasts is to look at the clockwork at work through the display back. It is all the more surprising that manufacturers like Rolex install a tasteless metal lid instead of a display back. To this day, the Rolex Group “defends” itself vehemently against the use of glass backs: there is (almost) no model at Rolex or its subsidiary Tudor that has more than a plain steel back. There is a lot of manual work behind the timepieces and it's just a shame if watch enthusiasts never get to see these little works of art. This is perhaps because the Rolex calibers are not among the most beautiful in the watch market and Rolex does not want to invest anything in beautifying its calibers. A steel floor is cheaper to produce because a viewing window requires a significant increase in precision in production, for example for the seals and the glass. Just the idea of ​​knowing that a mechanical caliber is built in isn't enough for me personally, I want to be able to see it at work. Without a visible back, it doesn't matter to me which caliber is installed, I can't see it! I praise the display backs of my Omega Planet Ocean GMT 600M or my Breitling Navitimer B01, it's always a feast for the eyes to watch the caliber at work.

Time only watch? This watch has a date 😂😂😂😂

I get why people love Rolex, but a lot of microbrands are amazing. Everyone can get a fantastic watch now, but not everyone can get a rolex

There are so many wrong features told. This video is useless.