Відео

I would appreciate if you would reply to me on how to make muscle video i have mentioned a comment and i was wondering your point of view on it mate

Mate i have watched the whole video because I admire your personality and what you have mentioned in the entire video makes sense becoz if we are not clear why to start the journey its pointless looking at the strategies and my question to you is : what do you think about mike mentzer strategies that we need to train infrequent so that our bodies will have enough time to recover however if we train push pull legs then only 1 day in a week we are resting however as per Menzer and author Jones we only need to train thrice or twice a week what fo you think ????? Waiting for your reply mate 😊

Braden please never stop making these ༼⁠ ⁠つ⁠ ⁠◕⁠‿⁠◕⁠ ⁠༽⁠つ

I hope you're considering sunk-cost fallacy when talking about Sam Altman and Mark Zuckerberg. They're human still, just upon the precipice of human innovation that no one could have ever fathomed for themselves. Their egos should definitely be checked.

why does sort by always hide comments? I think artificial intelligence might be a bit scary. after that Sam Altman clip, I don't feel too good but hopefully someone takes his place. That sometimes happens with CEO's; happened with Twitter and Elon Musk.

*"Addicted, Hah! jokes on you; I humanize the human experience! What do you do, **_doooooom scroll?_** I think you need to not see a therapist, but a mirror."* ~ _My random a_ # *_Part 1: Theory of Everything_** _* Today, I’ve found out that God’s commandment to “love your neighbor as you love yourself” might actually be the meaning of life, though I did say that it really should be framed as “meaning to life”. This revelation was reinforced when the image, not the knowledge, of the Fool archetype was conceived while thinking about ideas for the last entry of a planned story I had, as that final entity who conveys this archetype looks upon the farce of reality, and broods with a mask. The mask, colloquially symbolizing deceit, is a reflection of humanity’s current predicament: subjectivity. As an archetype would, they reflect humanity, and are represented as a whole of the sum, which has its various parts. Yet, it is not deceit that it attempts, it is grand knowledge conveyed in the form that is relatable to many: A performance. The masked entity simply conveys truth buried under what you’d perceive as a lie, a subjective reality. Overtime, you come to terms with the entity, which is conveyed through narrative and story, through writings, as it performs the revelation of a lifetime. This was the highlight of that last entry to the potential series, its purpose being to point to the Christian God, and I’ve always wanted to do that when I was a little kid. When I was young, I believed that reality was subjective somehow, even though I called myself a Christian. The point I might have been trying to make when I was as young as 15-16 was how humanity perceives things in different ways. Did I dismiss the possibility of an objective reality? Not at the time. Then, a few years in college, I discussed what I thought of the maths and sciences, as utilities for describing the framework of reality and how the sums of reality utilize these frameworks. For instance, in Calculus you have differentiation and integration. Though one is a reverse of the other, outside of context they symbolize inspiration and retrospect, and in context they represent forwards and backwards utility. You may think of many things that Calculus symbolizes, but that’s the point. Nihilists, had a point. You can assign meaning to anything and that would have only one thing: utility. Therefore, utility is meaning; utility is only as meaningful as one thinks it is, so relative to the human experience, reality is subjective, and therefore seems to not have an objective nature. But, nihilists may neglect that utility in itself is an objective reality. In other words, the way we think and act is arguably the only subjective thing, while objectivity is, perhaps, utility. Why utility? Continuity of measurements is why. There are paracosms and paracosms of utility that an object can have, in variable circumstances and times, places and to various effectiveness. See, this is why I don’t get why people don’t think school teaches them anything. With school, it’s not that school is bad. We get upset at the way school is, despite the fact that we learn something one way or another. The way you do things is what brings you meaning, since you align yourself with what has the best utility, and depend on that paracosm until the day you die. This is why absurdism and existentialism also have a point. You are not a nihilist, you act as you are one, as you conform to an environment or variable circumstance for a given time, a conformity. *In that regard, labeling one thing as bad and another thing as good is only a problem if you think whatever isn’t good to you has no utility, when they are simply a derivation of the human condition.* It’s tricky. Did I deconstruct Christianity, I don’t think so, because I would again be defeating the point. Another way to think of reality is that everything builds on top of one thing, until you can’t anymore. Humans are limited beings with limitless potential, however, which brings me to my second point. If it is so that we believe in the idea of good and the idea of bad, why can’t we agree on what is good and what is bad? Demiurge theory proposes that our subjective reality is what is truly wrong with each of us. We cannot bring ourselves to unionize because through subjectivity we breed disparity. “Everyone hurts each other,” so to speak, even though the individual believes that what they do is *good for them.* Sometimes, it is not good for the other person, therefore leading to prejudice, but for how long? *I believe that the demiurge is a projection of collective responsibility, as one affects all, and all affects one. In other words, we are the demiurge, and their plaything.* Now please don’t consider this as cognitive dissonance for defending Christianity, for I have also reinforced other ideologies, *derivations* of its ideas. The same applies to all religions. It’s just the antagonizing nature of your brain, focusing on the negatives. But, what is the utility of bad? To build upon what did not work. In terms of embodiment, to protagonize. When fiction is fact, *critical thinking is necessary.* Therefore, why do I still believe in Christianity? So far, I have found contradictions in what others would call good and bad, parsing through scattered virtues, understanding through precedence (retrospections of inspirations, integrations of differentiations). Though, how come when many of us do so, we rarely deter ourselves from cognitive dissonance, fallacies upon fallacies, perverse incentives, and the like. If our nature is to antagonize, it would be proportionate to how we conduct ourselves in the world. Our ideals, our attempts towards protagonization, are riddled in antagonization. *To protagonize through antagonization is what we’ve been doing all along.* In fact, we expend energy antagonizing in the pursuit of protagonization, but towards whom if not our ingroup? It seems that when we attempt to protagonize, the means towards antagonization encompasses the desire to protagonize, in that the goal is endowed with selfish tendency, subjective protagonization. If our nature is to antagonize, antagonizing to protagonize will only lead to unaccounted disparity. If there is no solution in subjectivity, then we must rely on an objective factor of this world. If utility is the only objective factor for this world/realm, then you can’t fundamentally call yourself a loser, for instance, though it has utility. In concept, which also has utility, your humanity bases its enterprises on what is perceived to be of the most utility, thereby diminishing the concreteness of labels, but reinforcing their fluidity and flexibility. What is the interval that promotes this fluidity if not a continuous variable? If what you do is what gives you utility, then labels such as loser and winner must have the same advantage at a certain point. But, through antagonized-riddled protagonization, the execution for exercising these labels tend to be faulty, in that the nature of antagonization precedes the goal of protagonization, wherein hostility, rigidity, conflict, and indifference promote subjectivity at the expense of wholeness. If this disparity-riddled tool is promoted as the forefront for innovation, you accomplish subjective protagonization, which results in protagonization riddled with hostility, rigidity, conflict, and indifference. Where else would the solution lurk if not committing to a growth mindset, which is the proposed, “antagonization at the expense of protagonization.” The essence of these ideas is that humans are naturally flawed. If we were to antagonize at the expense of protagonization, to protagonize in order to antagonize, that would involve judging the merit of what is, and casting away the parts that lack utility. After all, the fail state of our nature is inherent in all of our actions, as the saying loosely goes, “you do this for you”; you antagonize in order to protagonize. Instead, to emphasize protagonization as the criteria for antagonization would be to acknowledge the nature of things as they are, to console the whims of our being and their interplay within the enthrall of subjectivity, in order to come to a decisive point. To humanize by acknowledging our nature, promoting the opposite of our nature, and then following up with protagonist-riddled antagonization, antagonization riddled with optimism, empathy, growth, and championship. All in all, to build upon utility until a maximum is reached is where our efforts should reside, and I believe that maximum is the Christian God. We simply obsess over antagonizing him, not protagonizing him, which I think is an overstep. We commonly express disparagement by expending antagonization in the pursuit of protagonization, which only doubles down on our fail state, making reality for us more subjective and hardened as opposed to unified and harmonious. You are everything in one, or you convey everything in a single, autonomous unit, where the components such as time enable a utility of variable degrees. Though, this utility is limited by time. You are a limited being with limitless potential, whose power is simply the ability to convey limitless endeavor within the finite range of your existence. To convey the Christ, to approximate yourself. ** *‘...to love your neighbor as yourself.’* **

# *Part 2: **_Addiction Pathology_** _* "I’m free now because they will never help me Experience the cold shower of morning 'Every Hour’s a New Day" ~ _Also my random but smart a_ *Abstract* _ I know it seems hopeless for you, probably, I don't know. To preface, it really does take a mindset shift when it comes to getting ahead of the addiction. I used to struggle with this so fricking much, and I relate with you. Though, I wrote a few things down this evening when it came to reflecting on my journey in the past: These theories delve into a few topics that a readily available online book I read touches upon. They're refined contextualizations of what has been said in the book, but the second was sort of a shower thought that I had during the morning, and it stuck with me. All in all, please know that it is possible, just as it was for me! *This is specifically for people who struggle with explicit content, but feel free to read on for all who do not deal with this.* *_Think of it as "Un-brainwashing", which targets subconscious perspectives you might not have realized you held:_* *_1. Abysmal Redline Theory:_* *Every time you compulsively act, the “redline” or “standard” is raised, where there is a tendency to seek "better" material/substance after desensitization, we all know that (right, you know that? Sorry if you don't. Actually, I am sorry if you don't, and I express my condolences.).* In the end, addiction only has one outcome, and that is the satiation of a specific emotional state, so you might as well have stopped after the very first session. Because the red line always ascends, with no other outcome to incentivize the ascension, *you never will satiate “just a peak” because you already have,* which is a good thing. In essence, you might think it's a different thing every time when it clearly will be a same-case-scenario, aesthetically and in circumstance. Please, don't suffer as much as I have just to realize this many months later. *_(Even before the thought of ever wanting to arrives, it's Joever, and acknowledge that. Not in that you failed to quit before you started, but you have literally, already failed the ideal desire before ever committing to it and after doing so)_* *_2. Means-Ends Theory:_* *Why would you continue the compulsive act if you’re defeating the purpose of the compulsive act?* When you achieve a goal, the energy for achieving that goal is being expended, especially if your goal is to achieve an emotion. After compulsively acting, you feel bad even though you want satisfaction. *Aren’t you then expending the energy for feeling satisfied in an attempt to feel satisfied?* _Doesn't make sense, does it?_ In other words, *_you’re actively forcing your body to feel an emotion through physiological mechanisms, which makes this emotion artificial._* To delineate, achieving goals where emotion isn’t the target naturally results in you feeling worthwhile emotions, particularly positive ones. Even with boredom, your objective would narrow down from not wanting to be bored to something actionable. When addicted, compulsion leads to the goal intrinsically being to achieve an emotional state. That's why it's so infuriating when people (addicts) say that the act does in fact, *_give them pleasure._* *The stress is in the guise of pleasure.* Also, why else would people often fall back again after feeling worse off, if the brain associates feelings of post-session guilt with needing one more session? Somehow, your brain associates the guilt with other feelings now, woops. _So even in all that, it doesn't satiate "just a peak"._ In all honesty, why spend your time depleting yourself of the capacity to feel when you could spend your time not doing that, and I know that sounds like too much of an actual paradox, but I'd argue that you felt the same way before coming onto this post. From that logic, you might be able to construct the point that it's more sensible to love the urge than it is to engage and get rid of your entire emotional bank. Why throw the baby out with the bath water? It's so cute! It’s human. It's, familiar. It's... okay. 3. I have nothing to add here, I just like patterns of 3, lol. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Anyways, I am a happy non-user, and I hope you will be, too! And remember, you aren't your thoughts, it's the little monster's. Hopefully, I just took care of the Big Monster for you, the brainwashing. Fear is only the pang, but why fear when you know there is nothing clogging your brain to reinforce the fear? It’s just the little monster starting to starve and die. I hope everyone finds the best way to live through it. _To think of it, just as you’ve come to realize you’re depleting yourself of the capacity to feel, so will the little monster._ *_Additional Affirmations (lol):_* ◘ “The act can’t chase happiness if it depletes it." ◙ "The act only chases happiness, forcing you to deplete it." ◘ "It already happened, as it never will satiate just a peek." ◙ "It forces you to physiologically deplete satisfaction, never satiating just a peek.” *Synopsis:* Forcing something that's already being depleted, is silly. In reality, the energy of/for accomplishing something is compensated by doing something else that develops the goal, which is accomplishing the sub-goal; it takes two to tango! Three? Five... sure that too. So, physiologically forcing an emotion in the hopes of feeling an emotion is plain stupid because you're compensating with something that's already being depleted, when in reality you could feel elation from committing to goals and subgoals. The compulsion isn’t a goal and sub-goal, no matter how you put it, it’s just chasing false happiness. Depleting yourself of the capacity to feel is all you’re doing. Though it took me over 15 years to realize this, and an online book within only 7 months after escaping, I want you to know that, at least, you're not silly enough to not realize this anymore. It will take time to get used to the mindsets I learned, and your own. _The little monster is putting itself through stress, and therefore dying, as you were putting yourself through the stress and therefore dying. You shouldn't have to force pleasure, you shouldn't have to watch those videos, don't feel like you need to look back at those images, either, because it's always going to be the same feeling (In the end, it is cold)._ Physiologically force yourself, deplete yourself. Force pleasure, and you won't make room for it.

Great vid, as someone on the other side of the scenario, trying to get people to change their diet and lifestyle has been rather difficult, I’ve never been able to tackle it in the correct way. I’m going to send this video to people to see if it has any effect, people need to know that the path to health improvement has been paved and known for years now, and doesn’t have to be a scrambled impossible road full of secrets and shortcuts. Only thing i would change/add is the volume, im not sure if you meant 12-15 sets a day or a week, but ideally it should be a week per muscle group, just off of my own experience and studies I’ve witnessed. Keep aiming to make thoughtful content, and I will aim to keep making thoughtful comments.

hey interesting video, what sources of information do you use in your video?

I bet you'd like George Harrison's solo work ⊂⁠(⁠・⁠﹏⁠・⁠⊂⁠)

I will listen for this the whole days . Thanks for spending time with us Braden

What about Turdonomics?

The camera is so annoying man. Please disable the centering feature, it looks disorienting!!

I want to make long form discussions soolo for now do you have any tips? Willl watch this in parts!

He mentions Price's Law: the square root of the number of people in a group will do roughly half of the work, meaning that a relatively small portion of the group contributes significantly more to the overall output compared to the rest. Pareto distributions, or the 80-20 rule: most of the effects (80 percent of total effects) are caused by a small number of factors (20 percent of total factors).

Is this a journal? A verbal journal?

congrats on completing this video work your opinion on tought is quite interesting and appreciated by the few interested by these topics Personally, i would say that you're very detail oriented and granular when it comes to ideas and subjects, probably also why everything seems way more complicated than if you only used your mental capacity on whatever is practical/most effective solution for a certain amount of effort that you're willing to put in (depending on how much you value that field of tought) I will say that almost all of your nuanced statements are correct enough that they have a reasonable justification for why you'd make them in the first place, not that they're all correct, but decent enough so far, fairly dramatic and overexagerated in many aspects (which isnt necessarily bad for conveying a message). i haven't watched your entire video today (i must sleep, only watched around half an hour) so i will leave more of my own opinions here tomorrow

Do ASMR

UA-cam recommendations is trying to tell me something

Bro thinks genetics isn't luck

Do u eat veg carbs or fruit? Or just animal products

1:4 like:view 🎉

Bro cooked with this one. (Pun intended)

Life itself is full of checks and balances

The next Luigi Mangione

I did some dumb stuff like that as a kid and I regret it. I wish I could go back and apologize.

My thinking is so clear now because I just watched all of this

Listen man I just wanna be a cute girl like damn bro damn

I liked your thoughts on recognizing your own limits on being a human. It matters way more what we do than what we say and believe.

2:46:32 baiting for whom’st’ve

29:50 free will is why. God does not control our actions. And if you believe in god, you believe in the devil. And the devil temps humans into committing evils, because the devil’s goal is to destroy god’s creation. Evil exists because sin exists. And Humans are sinful creatures. God forgave and continues to forgive our sins through the covenant of Grace, which was formed through the sacrifice of Jesus Christ. God does not allow evil to happen, humans allow evil to happen. This is just my addition. I haven’t listened to this fully. I’ll update/add my comment when as I listen ◡̈ So far an amazing discussion.

dont dont exist 😢

I was thinking about your OnlyFans and UA-cam videos, and it reminded me of another creator on OF (kingofthematt), who does something called Mental Mondays on his page. He uploads a 5-10 minute video, usually shirtless, in his underwear, or something similar, where he talks about mental health or shares what's on his mind that week. He's also straight and does OF in a nontraditional way. I thought that if you’re planning to continue with OF, something like that might make sense for your page. It could be a way to combine the important ideas you want to discuss with the type of content people expect on OF. Plus, if people are going to sexualize you on there, they might as well also hear what you have to say.

They see me rollin ☝️

Braden is the only person who can match my intellectual freak without a degree in philosophy

😡 jeez…..

Thank you for sharing this. What you shared is a healthy reminder for me and how to just...live in a world that scares me but not fully succumb to hopelessness. Made me feel like I can do something. Please know, for what it's worth, you've impacted this stranger's perspective for the better. Seriously, thank you for sharing this.

learning abt islam is answers sm of my questions

existence is only material and material has no intrinsic value, thats why i am a nihilist :/ there is no meaning

braden I am using your ideas for social engineering through urban planning and design can I get 4 and a half hours of thoughts on that

I think he likes malenia

9 fucking hours

Just try and be yourself not worry about things you can’t control take care of yourself if you get upset talk to someone take it easy

1 hour/9 of the way through, i’ll put this on as a podcast while doing chores today 🤔

Jesus doesn't hate shampoo I promise

keep the natural thumbnails ☀️

I think your video essays have potential. I think if you focused on the message or thesis you want to convey, and dropped some of the commentary on the commentary on the commentary of the things you say, which comes across as a rant. As a listener, I forget why we are talking about this. That over 50% of marriages end in divorce (41% for first marriages in the US) is not a stupid statistic. It's something there's evidence for. Maybe you mean that interpretations of statistics and extrapolations, can be invalid?

PS. Btw. Do you know Buñuel's "Un chien andalou?" (An Andalusian Dog. Backdrop is the Spanish Civil War. No picnic! ua-cam.com/video/W8yKT7H_KJ0/v-deo.htmlsi=DMBvnAcbn4uC6jkU

B. Am running late. Will not be the my first no-sleep night at the rodeo. SO just this, since the topic is "the relation between music and emotion." Apparently this song ain't known in Utah. I grew up with it in very rural NE Arizona. In this mangled but 100 sincere rendition by old codgers. The Kantian Sublime--the praxis of it. Not just the theory. I give you: youtu.be e/sVSCiNPSLxA?si=AkQTeVZK2MjKvgcz God forbid I get classified into the group that comes to you with a belated little toy fan in 113° AZ heat. Mark.

Can't believe I actually listened until the end. Pretty good argument overall, although I do disagree with many things. I particularly like your discussion about how marketing strips away the rational actor in each individual.