Court of Appeal - Civil Division - Court 75
Court of Appeal - Civil Division - Court 75
  • 297
  • 159 945
Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH & ors (appellants) v Sandoz AG & ors (respondents)
Thursday 16 May 2024
Before Lady Justice Nicola Davies
Lord Justice Arnold
Lady Justice Falk
This is an appeal against the Order of HHJ Hacon (sitting as a HCJ) dated 12 April 2024 that declared that the Patent is and has at all material times been invalid and ordered that it be revoked.
Rivaroxaban is the generic name of a pharmaceutical used for the prevention or treatment of thromboembolic disorders. It was developed by the Bayer group of which the defendant forms part.
The active ingredient of rivaroxaban is protected by product claims of a patent owned by Bayer. Consequently Bayer has had a monopoly of the rivaroxaban market, selling the product under its brand name Xarelto. That protection was extended by an SPC but expired on 1 April 2024. This provides an opportunity for those who wish to market generic rivaroxaban, not least the claimants and third parties in these proceedings, save that Bayer also owns European Patent (UK) No. 1 845 961 (“the Patent”).
The claimants allege that the Patent is invalid and that it constitutes an attempt by Bayer to evergreen its lucrative monopoly in the manufacture and marketing of rivaroxaban, in other words to extend the monopoly through unjustified means.
Bayer has counterclaimed, alleging a threat on the part of the claimants and the third parties to infringe the Patent by the marketing of rivaroxaban products.
Переглядів: 556

Відео

Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH & ors (appellants) v Sandoz AG & ors (respondents)Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH & ors (appellants) v Sandoz AG & ors (respondents)
Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH & ors (appellants) v Sandoz AG & ors (respondents)
Переглядів 6234 дні тому
Thursday 16 May 2024 Before Lady Justice Nicola Davies Lord Justice Arnold Lady Justice Falk This is an appeal against the Order of HHJ Hacon (sitting as a HCJ) dated 12 April 2024 that declared that the Patent is and has at all material times been invalid and ordered that it be revoked. Rivaroxaban is the generic name of a pharmaceutical used for the prevention or treatment of thromboembolic d...
Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks (app) v Emotional Perception AI Ltd (resp)Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks (app) v Emotional Perception AI Ltd (resp)
Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks (app) v Emotional Perception AI Ltd (resp)
Переглядів 3975 днів тому
Tuesday 14 (2:00pm) - Wednesday 15 May 2024 Before Lady Justice Nicola Davies Lord Justice Arnold Lord Justice Birss This is an appeal against the Order of Sir Anthony Mann (sitting as a High Court Judge) dated 19 December 2023 that allowed an appeal, set the decision aside and remitted to UKIPO for further prosecution. The judge granted permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal.
Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks (app) v Emotional Perception AI Ltd (resp)Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks (app) v Emotional Perception AI Ltd (resp)
Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks (app) v Emotional Perception AI Ltd (resp)
Переглядів 5055 днів тому
Tuesday 14 (2:00pm) - Wednesday 15 May 2024 Before Lady Justice Nicola Davies Lord Justice Arnold Lord Justice Birss This is an appeal against the Order of Sir Anthony Mann (sitting as a High Court Judge) dated 19 December 2023 that allowed an appeal, set the decision aside and remitted to UKIPO for further prosecution. The judge granted permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal.
Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks (app) v Emotional Perception AI Ltd (resp)Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks (app) v Emotional Perception AI Ltd (resp)
Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks (app) v Emotional Perception AI Ltd (resp)
Переглядів 5626 днів тому
Tuesday 14 (2:00pm) - Wednesday 15 May 2024 Before Lady Justice Nicola Davies Lord Justice Arnold Lord Justice Birss This is an appeal against the Order of Sir Anthony Mann (sitting as a High Court Judge) dated 19 December 2023 that allowed an appeal, set the decision aside and remitted to UKIPO for further prosecution. The judge granted permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal.
Zhang (appellant) v Eternity Sky Investments Ltd (respondent)Zhang (appellant) v Eternity Sky Investments Ltd (respondent)
Zhang (appellant) v Eternity Sky Investments Ltd (respondent)
Переглядів 11411 днів тому
Wednesday 8 - Thursday 9 May 2024 Before Lord Justice Males Lord Justice Dingemans Lady Justice Falk By an Appellant’s Notice, filed on 8 September 2023, the Appellant appeals the Judgment dated 21 July and Order, dated 28 July 2023 of Mr Justice Bright sitting in the Commercial Court in which he dismissed the Appellant’s Applications to set aside an enforcement order in respect of a Hong Kong ...
Zhang (appellant) v Eternity Sky Investments Ltd (respondent)Zhang (appellant) v Eternity Sky Investments Ltd (respondent)
Zhang (appellant) v Eternity Sky Investments Ltd (respondent)
Переглядів 13011 днів тому
Wednesday 8 - Thursday 9 May 2024 Before Lord Justice Males Lord Justice Dingemans Lady Justice Falk By an Appellant’s Notice, filed on 8 September 2023, the Appellant appeals the Judgment dated 21 July and Order, dated 28 July 2023 of Mr Justice Bright sitting in the Commercial Court in which he dismissed the Appellant’s Applications to set aside an enforcement order in respect of a Hong Kong ...
Zhang (appellant) v Eternity Sky Investments Ltd (respondent)Zhang (appellant) v Eternity Sky Investments Ltd (respondent)
Zhang (appellant) v Eternity Sky Investments Ltd (respondent)
Переглядів 10012 днів тому
Wednesday 8 - Thursday 9 May 2024 Before Lord Justice Males Lord Justice Dingemans Lady Justice Falk By an Appellant’s Notice, filed on 8 September 2023, the Appellant appeals the Judgment dated 21 July and Order, dated 28 July 2023 of Mr Justice Bright sitting in the Commercial Court in which he dismissed the Appellant’s Applications to set aside an enforcement order in respect of a Hong Kong ...
Zhang (appellant) v Eternity Sky Investments Ltd (respondent)Zhang (appellant) v Eternity Sky Investments Ltd (respondent)
Zhang (appellant) v Eternity Sky Investments Ltd (respondent)
Переглядів 20612 днів тому
Wednesday 8 - Thursday 9 May 2024 Before Lord Justice Males Lord Justice Dingemans Lady Justice Falk By an Appellant’s Notice, filed on 8 September 2023, the Appellant appeals the Judgment dated 21 July and Order, dated 28 July 2023 of Mr Justice Bright sitting in the Commercial Court in which he dismissed the Appellant’s Applications to set aside an enforcement order in respect of a Hong Kong ...
Campbell (claimant/appellant) v London Borough of Ealing (defendant/respondent)Campbell (claimant/appellant) v London Borough of Ealing (defendant/respondent)
Campbell (claimant/appellant) v London Borough of Ealing (defendant/respondent)
Переглядів 8819 днів тому
Wednesday 1 May 2024 Before Lord Justice Bean Lord Justice Males Lord Justice Dingemans By Appellant’s Notice filed on the 30 January 2023, this is an appeal against the order of Upper Tribunal Judge O’Connor, sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court, sitting in the Administrative Court The Appellant sought to judicially review the Respondent’s decision of 28 February 2022 to withdraw its fu...
Campbell (claimant/appellant) v London Borough of Ealing (defendant/respondent)Campbell (claimant/appellant) v London Borough of Ealing (defendant/respondent)
Campbell (claimant/appellant) v London Borough of Ealing (defendant/respondent)
Переглядів 11319 днів тому
Wednesday 1 May 2024 Before Lord Justice Bean Lord Justice Males Lord Justice Dingemans By Appellant’s Notice filed on the 30 January 2023, this is an appeal against the order of Upper Tribunal Judge O’Connor, sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court, sitting in the Administrative Court The Appellant sought to judicially review the Respondent’s decision of 28 February 2022 to withdraw its fu...
Re: C-L-R (children)Re: C-L-R (children)
Re: C-L-R (children)
Переглядів 18425 днів тому
Thursday 25 April 2024 Before Lady Justice King Lord Justice Moylan Lord Justice Green By an Appellant’s Notice filed at this Court on 4 March 2024, this is an appeal against the decision of HHJ Coppel, sitting in the Family Division of the High Court, dated 12 February 2024. The applicant Local Authority appeal the decision for the subject child to be placed in his father’s care pursuant to a ...
Re: C-L-R (children)Re: C-L-R (children)
Re: C-L-R (children)
Переглядів 33925 днів тому
Thursday 25 April 2024 Before Lady Justice King Lord Justice Moylan Lord Justice Green By an Appellant’s Notice filed at this Court on 4 March 2024, this is an appeal against the decision of HHJ Coppel, sitting in the Family Division of the High Court, dated 12 February 2024. The applicant Local Authority appeal the decision for the subject child to be placed in his father’s care pursuant to a ...
Re: T (a child)Re: T (a child)
Re: T (a child)
Переглядів 51727 днів тому
Tuesday 23 April 2024 Before Lady Justice King Lady Justice Nicola Davies Mr Justice Cobb By an Appellant’s Notice filed on 26 March 2024, this is an appeal by the Local Authority against the decision of HHJ Greensmith, sitting in the Family Court, dated 22 March 2024.
Kwik-Fit Group Limited and others v The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and CustomsKwik-Fit Group Limited and others v The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Kwik-Fit Group Limited and others v The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Переглядів 151Місяць тому
Wednesday 17 April 2024 Before Lady Justice Andrews Lady Justice Falk and Sir Launcelot Henderson The dispute concerns claims made under a share purchase agreement which the Defendant, Scottish Power, says were not properly notified within the time limits required and sought summary dismissal of the claims. The Judge dismissed a number of the claims known as the Warranty Claims and the Other Br...