Відео

At this time, Ying AI is free. I cannot say whether it will continue to be so. But it is not necessary to buy credits or similar at this time. You can also check Minimax / Hailuoai, which is also free for now: ua-cam.com/video/TRYJYvQu8NU/v-deo.html

As shown in the video you can use Edge browser's translate. It works fine. You didn't watch the video I assume? 1:18

Why would it be risky?

Yes, and funnily enough, they use the same type of background graphics and colors on their sites.

@@bpvideosyd indeed

I use both because kling expensive

Unfortunately, I have no idea. It works fine here

Click retrieve verification code with Google translate

Well, that's also my constant dilemma. No doubt Professional is generally better than Standard, but when it comes to fast motion and fast-moving subjects, Professional also blurs (as you can see with the woman running at 1:06 - virtually no difference anymore between the two versions). My video 'Girls with Guns' ua-cam.com/video/M8IGw7H1Hc4/v-deo.html is made with Standard mode only. My answer to the question will therefore be that Standard mode is definitely usable. Then give it a little extra sharpness in post-editing. Moreover, compared to Luma, Kling produces fewer useless or indifferent results. I'd say that Luma produces around 20-30% good results, with Kling around 60-70%.

@@bpvideosyd Thank you for your detailed and thoughtful reply. When I generate a full-body view in Standard mode, even when the subject is still, it becomes tremendously blurred. I had to manually perform a face swap after generation. This face blurring in full-body views does not occur in Professional mode. However, considering the cost of video generation, I would say that Standard credits are more tolerable compared to Professional mode, which is three times more expensive. Additionally, with Kling offering a crazy sale of about 70% off for new users this month, I would still recommend going for Kling.

@puja1985 You're welcome. Ehm now I don't know if you're talking about text-to-video or image-to-video? I never use text-to-video anymore, only image-to-video, and that's what I reply on. Image to video gives way better results.

Unfortunately, I didn't save my prompts for these. Was just playing around. And since they were made on Huggingface, I can't retrieve them again. Just ask me if you need help to achieve something specific or can't get generated what you want.

@AcidZero - just found one that made it over to Kling, it's: "full body of photo realistic Scandinavian woman aged 45 dressed in streetwear with baggy-pants and a low-cut top over a full big bosom"

@AcidZero - I found one more in Kling images. This one was for the face in last part of the video: "photo-realistic Scandinavian woman aged 45 with short fade-cut hair style, short hair on the sides, the hair is in streaks of brown and gray. Slim face with a wide mouth and high cheekbones. Gray (green) eyes and thin eyebrows. She has a nose ring and is dressed in streetwear with a low-cut top over a full bosom"

Thanks! I used the same prompt for both images and videos so it contains more info than just what is relevant to the image. Sometimes this is NOT a good idea because it can leave out things that are important. For example my last upload "KLING - standard vs. professional comparison" made with FLUX images taught me that by giving too much information about the characters face, I wouldn't get the full body image that I wanted. So be careful with too much information in the prompt that might "override" something else. Prompt was something like this (I did change it a few times tho): "Blond Scandinavian woman with large bosom and gray-blue eyes wearing only a black bikini and old style half-shell-helmet and knee-high leather boots with heels, rides an old custom built shopper "Harley-Davidson" motorcycle with flames coming out of the exhaust through Miami Strip Ocean Drive at night. Sporadic exhaust flames blow backwards. The old-style custom chopped "Harley-Davidson" motorcycle has a large V-engine and a long front fork and high handlebars. The front lights of the "Harley-Davidson" motorcycle are brightly lit, illuminating the road ahead and produces light flares. The motorcycle must follow the road ahead and follow the traffic and the wheels must turn. The woman is slim and athletic with full bosom and her skin is tanned and she has tattoos on her arms. Miami Ocean Drive at night has palm trees and lots of neon lights. The woman driving on the "Harley-Davidson" motorcycle must always be in ultra-sharp focus, so that her face appears sharp, while the background and surroundings can be slightly blurred. High quality, Ultra-high-definition like a blockbuster movie and use advanced camera angles and side view." Video is here: ua-cam.com/video/bX1Xoprousw/v-deo.html

@@bpvideosyd thank you so much

@@Steffen-hh2rf You're welcome

It is controlled by how hard you press the zoom button

Is the top handle required for this setup to work fine?

@@Luko007 A little extra weight is required at the rear to change the weight distribution so it can be balanced. The top handle helps with that, as well as a small weight block under the battery. I have already explained this in other comments.

I just bought a Weebill S and finally got my AX700 balanced on it, but I had to add a lot of back weight (adhesive wheel weights on the battery). May I ask the model of the remote you use?

Tak

Thanks

Thank you!

Thank you very much! It's a reupload transferred from my other previous channel.

Got an early access waitlist link from Tim at @TheoreticallyMedia and I've been on that waitlist for almost 2 months since early March.

@@bpvideosyd same. But still waiting. :(

Hi, it works fine here. Have been using it everyday for the last week incl. today. No problem. Maybe it's your browser? I had problems with Firefox so I'm using Edge for it.

@@bpvideosyd Thanks. I tried both Chrome and Firefox but had the same result. Tried a VPN too to change my IP in case they had blocked the UK for some reason. The only thing I can think is I'm on Win 7 so my browsers aren't quite up-to-date? They don't seem to have any tech support contact details, even if you pay for the service, as I did. Shame, since I was quite pleased with the results I got from the service last year and would use them again if I could. By, the way, great video!

@@bpvideosyd Thanks. I tried both Chrome and Firefox but had the same result. By, the way, great video!

Thanks! Did you watch my latest upload - it's also Lensgo made. Anyway, you should try a remote browser. VPN wont help if your browser is the problem. Just google "remote browser" and try it out.

Also, they do have contact mail, it's: contact @ lensgo . ai It's listed more times on their terms page lensgo . ai / terms

mudvayne? Don't know it. This is Suno